Instead of posting a link to a book that nobody knows you should cite technical specs comparing the cannons. Aka effective firing range. Otherwise people would begin to question your knowledge on military matters.
Did you even read the link I just show you earlier about Russian APFSDS?
You are wasting other people's time.
Now you are asking me to waste my time. You're in a military forum go to the armored warfare section & post a new thread about it.
You are a funny little boy. Instead of posting technical specs to prove your point, first you shout out loud I shall shut up and now second ask me to open a thread in another section, then I should read this and that. Last, you assume VN will get mango.
If you don't know how to read/compare spec just say so. "Mango" is not a fruit. Its a code name for the Russian 3BM42 round. Vietnam will most likely have this round because its what the indian have. http://*********************/forum/threads/3bm42-mango-license-production.78729/
Says the guy that think he can single handedly take the entire indonesian army with a spoon.
The 125mm far reaching canon of T90 can destroy both Abraham and Leopard before they can come close to fire their shells. Worse, the 120mm cannon can hardly defeat T90 armor hence the Germans now develop a new generation tank with 130mm cannon.
At this point you are just trolling now. American 120mm would pierce any armored vehicle in existence thanks to its DU round & so does Leopard with its more modern DM53-63 round. T-90 having a better armor is debatable because its considered by the west to be a medium tank. Only the front side has armor, the sides & the back are completely vulnerable.
Having a bigger turret means longer traversing time. The germans already have such experience with such calibre. I wonder how the russian manage to solve the low rotating speed problem.
