What's new

Vietnam Defence Forum

interesting and the best picture till now, especially with the sticker "comcom" on the turret. ha ha ha.

but if comparing to other pictures of T90MS, it is not exactly as it should be.
Please remember that this is the ERA "clamshell" on the T-72B3 and not T-90A/MS.

I mentioned the rumors about T-72 modernization and newly purchasing for a reason :D
 
.
The tank in the picture is a T-72B3, interesting.......

Its a T-72B3, the space between the amor plates is what gives you the clue.
Please remember that this is the ERA "clamshell" on the T-72B3 and not T-90A/MS.

I mentioned the rumors about T-72 modernization and newly purchasing for a reason :D
ah ok...I see it, there are clear gaps between the armor plates.
do the "rumours" mention any number of tanks the army wants to acquire? :partay:


1-1470797415833-46-0-434-760-crop-1470797473763.jpg
 
. .
the Army recently tested a Vietnam made fumes spewing vehicle for camouflage: KH-01.
the equipment is mounted on a Izuzu truck :D


upload_2016-8-11_10-8-9.png



upload_2016-8-11_10-13-51.png




upload_2016-8-11_10-6-45.png



upload_2016-8-11_10-3-16.png



upload_2016-8-11_10-10-20.png



upload_2016-8-11_10-13-9.png






what is it good for?
we can darken the sky, taking the view away from other potential onlookers, or...when we are arming the EXTRA :D


viet-nam-sanh-ngang-nga-trong-nguy-trang-khoi_101423626.jpg
 
.
You know the Vietnam People's Army, there's no such thing as publicized numbers 8-)8-)

*cough* at least a brigade of T-90MS *cough*

*cough* that means 93 T-90MS tanks since there are 3 battalions with 31 tanks each in a brigade *cough*.
 
. . .
* cough* I said "at least", not "exactly" *cough*


Well, you could potentially triple the number of T-90MS.
Ok

1 brigade T90 and 3 brigades T72. I think that is ok and sufficient for now to defend the northern front, in combat formation with T54/55 panzer divisions.
 
.
a look at Orbiter 2. a drone, usually flying at altitude of 2,000 ft, that guides XETRA missile to target. a larger version of the drone, Orbiter 3, is under consideration for acquisition.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/vietnam-ups-interest-in-unmanned-orbiter-3-409675/

Orbiter 2
hai-quan-viet-nam-trinh-lang-sat-thu-chong-do-bo_282256996.jpg




Orbiter 3. Can fly higher, operating longer
getasset.aspx




a nice feature: a modified larger version of Orbiter can carry (Rafael) Spike antitank missile. The time has come for armed drones.
spike_launched.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Ok

1 brigade T90 and 3 brigades T72. I think that is ok and sufficient for now to defend the northern front, in combat formation with T54/55 panzer divisions.
Be more ambitious with the numbers, my friend :p::p:
 
.
Be more ambitious with the numbers, my friend :p::p:
Sure I'm ambitious. Have I told you of my dream from our Navy having a squadron of fleet and air defence destroyers? :D

I believe we are good at with 4 brigades of modern tanks. More are of course better if budget is available. But I think we would fare better with more submarines as Carlosa repeatedly says it.
 
.
Sure I'm ambitious. Have I told you of my dream from our Navy having a squadron of fleet and air defence destroyers? :D

I believe we are good at with 4 brigades of modern tanks. More are of course better if budget is available. But I think we would fare better with more submarines as Carlosa repeatedly says it.

Subs is what makes the difference, everything else is window dressing (talking only about the navy).
 
.
Subs is what makes the difference, everything else is window dressing (talking only about the navy).
Well, sub is a contributing factor, while surface assets play the key role in most major operations.

Besides, you can tell them you're there if you don't have surface vessels patrolling the area, especially when your subs are quiet af. :p::p:
 
.
South China Sea Ticking Time Bomb: Vietnam’s Mobile Rockets Risk Arms Race, War

22:51 11.08.2016


image.jpeg



The placement by Vietnam of rocket systems capable of striking China dramatically raises the stakes over the disputed waters and territories, all but forcing an act of escalation by Beijing.

On Wednesday, Reuters reported that Vietnam had "discreetly fortified several of its islands in the disputed South China Sea with new mobile rocket launchers capable of striking China’s runways and military installations across the vital trade route," citing an unnamed Western official.


The provocation by Vietnam comes in the wake of Xi Jinping’s refusal to adhere to a ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague, which found that Beijing’s territorial claims to disputed waters and islands in the South China Sea are without merit.

China argued that the decision was political, and lacked both substantive and procedural merit, most notably because the Hague does not have proper jurisdiction over the case — as the treaty requires both parties to a dispute to submit to arbitration before a legal judgment can be made.

Facing regional and Western pressure to abandon their claims to valuable waters through which some 40% of the world’s shipborne trade travels each day, and under which lies one of the world’s largest oil and natural gas deposits, Beijing has responded forcefully, telling its people to prepare for war.


Beijing has increased combat patrols to the South China Sea, in a show of military might intended to ward off counter-provocation and bring the dispute to a standoff.

Vietnam’s inflammatory posture, however, has raised the stakes, increasing the possibility of war between the two long-time allies, and potentially prompting China to declare an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), packing the Paracel and Spratly islands with additional military assets to prevent their seizure.

Beijing may engage in military escalation if it suspects that Hanoi is using the mobile rocket launchers to create an anti-access/area-denial capability (A2/AD). The Vietnamese military is one of a few global forces that could threaten China in a conventional war, as it possesses some of the world’s most advanced submarines, purchased from Moscow.

War between Vietnam and China is unlikely, however, as the two Communist countries have historically maintained a dialogue and could orchestrate a compromise. In the broader environment of Japan’s military buildup to oppose China, and the US sitting on Beijing’s backdoor, having deployed the THAAD anti-missile system in South Korea, the possibility of military action by China cannot be understated.


China has long argued that the Obama Administration’s "Pivot to Asia," with its publicly-stated goal of containing Beijing’s influence, is a ploy to encircle China to shift regional stability. Prior to this latest aggressive act by traditionally-friendly Vietnam, the Obama Administration rescinded military and economic sanctions placed by the US on Hanoi nearly 50 years earlier, and began selling weapons to Vietnam.

The geopolitical region has become less friendly for China, in the wake of the Hague ruling, and if Beijing is forced into an arms race, tensions in the South China Sea are unlikely to de-escalate in the near term.



Read more: http://sputniknews.com/asia/20160811/1044179890/china-beijing-vietnam-rocket-war.html#ixzz4H5R3mC89
 
.
Well, sub is a contributing factor, while surface assets play the key role in most major operations.

Besides, you can tell them you're there if you don't have surface vessels patrolling the area, especially when your subs are quiet af. :p::p:

I was talking in case of an actual conflict, actual war. Of course need to have surface ships, otherwise can have a situation like when PH lost Scarborough Shoal because they only had one ship that could only stay on station for so long.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom