What's new

Vietnam Defence Forum

Carlosa, have you posted Vietnam acquired Buk missiles? when Russia media such as Sputnik begins to report such a deal or a future deal or a possible deal then the rumor gets an interesting tough.


Đặc biệt, đích thân Đại sứ Nga tại Việt Nam, ông Konstantin Vasilievich Vnukov cũng đã nói về tương lai hệ thống Buk-М3 xuất hiện tại Việt Nam:

"Sự hợp tác trong lĩnh vực quân sự quốc phòng giữa Nga và Việt Nam đã phát triển trong hàng thập kỉ qua, và không bao giờ có những vấn đề trừng phạt hay cấm vận nào được đề ra cả.

Việc các bạn lựa chọn vũ khí nào là quyền quyết định của các bạn. Tôi vẫn thiên về một tương lai tươi sáng cho sự hiện diện của vũ khí Nga trên thị trường vũ khí Việt Nam".


ngatin-viet-nam-se-muabukm3_7151194.jpg


BUK_M3_OMMK.jpg

I don't remember what I had posted before, but even the SIPRI report used to have 6 batteries of Buk-M2.
 
Just an assertion? sure, so does your statement about your double degrees, EE and medicine. You could be some internet troll or loser with no girlfriend. LOL

It goes both ways. I don't care if you agree or don't. Not my problem. But good luck with your double degrees.

I'm glad you finally admit that you're just making assertions. See, being honest isn't so hard, is it?
 
I'm glad you finally admit that you're just making assertions. See, being honest isn't so hard, is it?
Chill bro. The Viets are harmless, I just hope they don't turn into an American pawn. They forgot how they were treated as slaves.
 
I don't remember what I had posted before, but even the SIPRI report used to have 6 batteries of Buk-M2.
If I recalled you mentioned a battery of Buk is deployed to protect Hanoi? Don't remember what type M2 or M3. Sputnik says Vietnam wants to acquire M3. That is one of the most advanced anti aircraft missiles today. More accurate more dangerous than S-300. The Russians praise "one shot one kill". Or money back. The bear sells weapons like the Germans selling cars.
 
Su-27 fighter squadron reportedly receives a modern search and acquisition radar N001VE-Pero. The radar can search targets at a distance of 190 km, acquire/lock 6 aerial and 4 ground targets at any given time.

@Silent Knight

tiem-kich-su27-viet-nam-sau-nang-cap-manh-hon-su30mk2_12122963.jpg



tiem-kich-su27-viet-nam-sau-nang-cap-manh-hon-su30mk2_121232.jpg



tiem-kich-su27-viet-nam-sau-nang-cap-manh-hon-su30mk2_12123467.jpg



tiem-kich-su27-viet-nam-sau-nang-cap-manh-hon-su30mk2_12124607.jpg




tiem-kich-su27-viet-nam-sau-nang-cap-manh-hon-su30mk2_12125976.jpg
 
If I recalled you mentioned a battery of Buk is deployed to protect Hanoi? Don't remember what type M2 or M3. Sputnik says Vietnam wants to acquire M3. That is one of the most advanced anti aircraft missiles today. More accurate more dangerous than S-300. The Russians praise "one shot one kill". Or money back. The bear sells weapons like the Germans selling cars.

No, that was a Spyder battery in Hanoi.
 
Su-27 fighter squadron reportedly receives a modern search and acquisition radar N001VE-Pero. The radar can search targets at a distance of 190 km, acquire/lock 6 aerial and 4 ground targets at any given time.

That's the latest version of the N001 radar. I have a feeling that the recently received MK2Vs also have that radar, it only makes sense.
 
I have tried to gain access to this forum from many location of Japan, but without success, always being redirected to a different address. My guess is no Japanese in this forum.
Sometimes i also can't access to PDF forum from China, it usually return me a error server page ... not like other Chinese members in foreign countries, sometimes i have the problem to visit the forum. I don't know where's the PDF server but it seems the network not good for Northeast Asia.
 
China Is Bitter at Russia Over Lack of Support in the South China Sea Dispute
M.K. Bhadrakumar reads the tea leaves
http://russia-insider.com/en/china-bitter-russia-over-lack-support-south-china-sea-dispute/ri15872
M.K. Bhadrakumar
(Indian Punchline)
10 hours ago |

Originally appeared at Indian Punchline

The scathing attack on Russian foreign policies in the Global Times newspaper on Sunday has no precedents. It goes way beyond the occasional sparring in a spirit of ‘glasnost’. Indeed, China-Russia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership of Coordination (as it is officially described) is not at all like what it appears. (Read my article in Asia TimesRussia-China entente – Lofty rhetoric, shifty discourse.)

The GT article marks a big departure from past Chinese criticism. A note of outright condemnation is appearing. The fundamentals of Russian foreign policies and diplomacy have been called into question.

There are pointed allegations that Russia undermines China’s core interests and seeks to extract “strategic room” out of China’s tensions with the US and Japan.

Russia is presented here as a mirror image of the US – harbouring hegemonic ambitions and imposing its own version of ‘colour revolutions’ in a drive to dominate Eurasia, Eurasian Economic Union and the SCO.

The article makes a hard-hitting reference to the tortuous history of the relations between the two countries to hark back to the vast Chinese territories that are still in Russian possession — if only to remind how gracious and stoical China has been.

Of course, from the Indian perspective, the article makes a stunning allegation that Russia eyes India as a counterweight to China in terms of a containment strategy:

  • Russia is also aiming at its own containment of China by using India, a key force in Russia’s eyes. Fostering another regional power to offset China’s growing influence is what both Russia and the US desire. India’s ambition to join the Nuclear Suppliers Group, which was foiled by some countries including China, was backed by both Russia and the US.
Evidently, at a time when tensions are rising in China-India relations, Russia’s pro-Indian leaning rankles in the Chinese mind. China cannot afford to overlook that it could be the honeypot of the Indian arms bazaar that largely attracts Russia. What explains this level of rancorous indignation?

To my mind, the principal reason could be that Beijing feels disillusioned with Moscow’s unhelpful stance apropos the Permanent Arbitration Tribunal’s recent award on the South China Sea.

We know that just hours before the award was announced at The Hague on July 12, Minister Plenipotentiary (holding ambassadorial rank) of the Chinese Embassy in Moscow Zhang Ziao had called on Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Igor Morgulov. The Russian readout merely said the two diplomats discussed “current bilateral and global issues”.

But it stands to reason that the Chinese diplomat conveyed Beijing’s expectations of Russian support apropos the forthcoming South China Sea award. However, for two full days, Moscow kept mum. Probably, the Chinese demarche went up all the way to the Kremlin for instructions.

At any rate, when the Russian reaction came, finally, it was not as a formal statement but instead in the Q&A following a press briefing on July 14 by Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakhavrova. The following excerpts are important:

  • Question: On July 12, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague rendered a judgment on the jurisdiction of certain islands in China’s economic zone. What do you think about the decision, and what is Russia’s attitude towards China’s policy in the South China Sea?

  • Maria Zakharova: We would like to note the following in connection with the July 12 ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague concerning the well-known lawsuit filed by the Philippines. It is our position that the states involved in territorial disputes in these seas should honour the principle of the non-use of force, and that they should continue to search for a diplomatic settlement based on international law, mainly the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. They should act in accordance with the spirit of ASEAN and PRC documents, specifically, the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea and the guidelines for following the declaration that were coordinated in 2011.

  • We support ASEAN and PRC efforts to draft a code of conduct in the South China Sea. I will remind you that Russia is not involved in territorial disputes in that region, and that it has no intention of getting involved. We consider it a matter of principle not to side with any party. We believe that the concerned parties should conduct negotiations in a format they define. We also believe attempts to interfere in a resolution of territorial issues in the South China Sea by external parties to be counter-productive. We support the role of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea in ensuring the rule of law during activities in the world’s oceans. Moreover, it is important that the provisions of this universal international treaty be applied consistently and in a way that will not jeopardise the integrity of the legal system stipulated by the convention.
Clearly, the remarks not only fell far short of an articulation of support for China, but rather clinically distanced Moscow from identifying with Beijing’s position. Furthermore, it underscored — not merely once but thrice — the centrality of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The China-Russia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership of Coordination failed to pass the litmus test here. If the “forever” partnership expected the two big powers to be supportive of each other’s core interests, when the time came for Moscow to stand up and be counted as China’s friend, it scooted. The Chinese bitterness shows.

Beijing understands the Russian game plan to willy-nilly ingratiate itself back into favor with the West. A possible rapprochement between the US and Russia, which the Kremlin is desperately seeking before President Barack Obama leaves office, creates uneasiness in the Chinese mind.

Meanwhile, Beijing’s comfort level on the South China Sea situation as such has significantly risen. The Chinese diplomacy has rather successfully weathered a potentially ugly situation stemming from the July 12 award. The summit meetings of the ASEM and ASEAN in successive weeks refrained from criticising China.

Most important, the US is tamping down tensions. National Security Advisor Susan Rice is currently in Beijing. Quite obviously, Obama hopes to collect some substantial takeaway from his meeting with President Xi Jinping in early September during the G20 summit in Hangzhou, China, which will be his last encounter with the Chinese leader.

Moscow may have badly miscalculated on the likely geopolitical fallout of the July 12 award. The GT article is a stark reminder to the Russian side that its need of China is greater than the other way around. The article is here.
 
I'm glad you finally admit that you're just making assertions. See, being honest isn't so hard, is it?

Nah, I just think you really aren't educated on the laws of nature, physical things and the art of communication and social dynamics. I don't need to provide proof. Nobody cares. Get it?

You're empty inside. Is that why your VIET GF is going to pay for you? I hope she dumps you soon because of how useless you are. She would be more happy sleeping with guys like me. Unlike you, lol. :smitten::azn:
You're clueless for a Double Majors. Don't forget TWO Degrees!! One in Electrical Engineering and MEDICINE! You are SO Brilliant! :omghaha:
You don't need hardcore facts to justify your ignorance. Your speech is evidence of that. Did you pass grade 12 and Photoshoped your way through University to get your double majors? You must be one PROUD Chinese!:omghaha:

This is being honest. Not the way you think what honesty is, boy. :closed:
 
Last edited:
@cnleio

Have you read the article Carlosa posted above? and the article of global times, the propaganda mouthpiece of Ccp?

What happens to your number one brother Russia?

Ha ha ha
 
@cnleio

Have you read the article Carlosa posted above? and the article of global times, the propaganda mouthpiece of Ccp?

What happens to your number one brother Russia?

Ha ha ha
U like it ? The purpose of such article just make u happy, my friend.
 
U like it ? The purpose of such article just make u happy, my friend.

Yes, China is Ultra Powerful. The world cannot beat it. China can fly into space and colonize Mars. We get it. Tell us more.
 
Back
Top Bottom