What's new

Vietnam Defence Forum

Actually, L-188 Electra (The P-3 Hull) were also out of production 40 years ago. If Vietnam gone for P-3, the only way Vietnam can get them is 2nd hand. If you want brand new, you need P-8........

My mistake there :v Still, i consider the superior number of P-3 is a advantage. P-8 is not really a choice since we cant get our hand on it with the recent relation with US. Aiming for P-3 of countries that about to get the P-8 is more realostic

You admit that your goverment is being cheap on your foot troopers by sticking with inferior more expensive to produce round while chinese are going for 5.8mm with bullpups also converting and making new their AKs that chamber 5.8mm.

300 meters is simply not good enough when a Chinese foot trooper will able to engage your comrades at 500-600 meters effectively with precision and penetration power to penetrate a helmet due to its more focused kinetic energy.

Screw machine gunners... They are considerably less more and far machine guns than assault rifles... And it uses the same round as Galil ACE?

How does it save costs? It does not in the long run. Screw reducing costs by half in terms of cost of ammunition used in training and war...

You quite funny you know that. You just focus on 1 aspect and screw the rest of the problem. You even know what wil happen to the Army logistic and training if we are going to change now ? Even if we change now what can be certain that we can get them at sufficient level ? If a war broke out right in the middle of the re-arming process, what can we do ? Inferior and more expensive ? Where do you even get our Army ammunition supply cost stastics from ? You are going to give us a lot of big IF. And again with plenty of IF you present your own calculated solution. The army problems go beyond just a single round. Focus on 1 aspect is as easy as eating candy bar, but real world stuff deal way more than that. You can solve them all, sure speak up. You just take 1 aspect out then complaint and just turn over every single problemd, risks and uncertainty come after that for us to solve ..........Well even primary kids in VN can do that :v

Go around and see some stuff, shall we ? :)

13247880_942680335854927_6509090297683425485_o.jpg
 
McCain Pushing for More U.S. Naval Engagement with Vietnam
By: Sam LaGrone
May 24, 2016 5:12 PM



Lt. (jg) Travis Harlow, training officer aboard the guided-missile destroyer USS Chung-Hoon (DDG-93), explains his job responsibilities to senior leaders from the Vietnam People’s Navy in 2013. US Navy Photo


The chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee is pushing for more interaction between the U.S. and Vietnamese navies, according to a copy of a May 20 letter to Vietnamese Secretary General Nguyen Phu Trong obtained by USNI News.

In the letter, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) told Trong he was “committed to helping build the maritime capacity of the Vietnamese Coast Guard and Navy” and pushed to expand the sharing of maritime domain information with all South China Sea nations as part of the Maritime Security Initiative, unveiled by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter last month and pushed by McCain.

As part of the more than $425 million in MSI funds, the Pentagon committed to $1.8 million to assess Vietnam’s current set of capabilities and chart future needs for the Vietnamese Coast Guard and the Vietnam People’s Navy.

Ultimately the chief concern of both Hanoi and Washington is the rising naval power of China. Beijing has not only embarked on an intensive warship construction campaign but also built the quasi-military China Coast Guard into a force of more than 200 mostly former People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) vessels.

McCain also called for an increased bilateral cooperation between the VPN and the U.S. Navy by increasing port visits, inviting the Vietnam People’s Navy to future Rim of the Pacific international exercises off of Hawaii and more officer exchanges.



Members of the Vietnam People’s Navy depart the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain (DDG-56) in 2014. US Navy Photo


Over the last several years, the U.S. and the VPN have conducted limited Naval Engagement Activities (NEA) with mostly onshore training and brief at-sea periods, and the U.S. is looking to step up the engagement.

USNI News understands U.S. officials have offered Hanoi a plan for a regular series of bilateral naval exercises in which a U.S. ship would conduct a two-day port visit to Da Nang, two days of at-sea exercises and three days of in-port visits at Cam Ranh Bay.

The 2-2-3 plan has yet to be adopted by the Vietnamese. But the so-called ‘McCain Initiative’ – as it is known by U.S. officials in the region – would be the next step in improving cooperation between the navies. USNI News understands the first visit could happen later this year.

The letter to Trang, who McCain met with in Washington last year, came a week ahead of President Barack Obama’s state visit to Vietnam and his Monday announcement of the official lifting the U.S. arms embargo.

While the goal is increased military-to-military cooperation, McCain and Obama both also encouraged Vietnam to also improve its human rights record.

“As we continue to enhance our security partnership, the United States expects Vietnam to continue its progress on human rights and respect for civil society, including its respect for advocates of religious freedom, press freedom, and labor rights who seek to use peaceful means to build a strong and prosperous Vietnam,” McCain wrote.





MENU



© 2012-2016 U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE

g.gif
 
By:www.defensenews.com
Vietnam May Request F-16s, P-3 Orions From US
TAIPEI, Taiwan — With the lifting of the US arms embargo to Vietnam, a US defense industry source indicates Hanoi is seeking to improve its air defense and maritime security capabilities with the procurement of F-16 fighter aircraft from the US Pentagon’s excess defense articles (EDA) program and refurbished P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft, armed with torpedoes.

The source also said Vietnam could seek US-made UAVs for maritime intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) missions.

Torpedoes were banned under the embargo, but now the Vietnamese want the same P-3 program the US sold to Taiwan, the source said. On the F-16 EDA, they want the same deal the Obama administration gave Indonesia.

Defense News has also acquired an unclassified defense industry briefing prepared by the US Pacific Command. According to the report, “Socialist Republic of Vietnam — Country Security Cooperation Plan,” the US Embassy in Hanoi “possesses a robust security cooperating program operating in accordance with US policy goals and interests to promote integration and access focused on key areas within the Vietnamese security architecture.”....................Read more

635997718278910778-US-Pacific-Command.jpg
 
Interview with Russian Ambassador to Vietnam Konstantin Vnukov on the situation between the two countries Russia and Vietnam, economy, tourism, investment, security and stability in the South China Sea and Asia Pacfic.


vnukov_BAYZ.jpg




Now that Russia has ratified the free trade agreement between Vietnam and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), what are Moscow’s expectations?

The priority for us now is for a speedy ratification of the agreement by all member countries, and for its entry into force. We hope that this will happen before the end of 2016, i.e. before other preferential trade agreements important for Vietnam, primarily with the European Union, as well as on the Trans-Pacific partnership (TPP) come into effect.


Is there a conflict of interest between Vietnam’s FTA with the EAEU and its entry to the TPP?

I think that a comprehensive answer to this question was given by Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev after his talks with the Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyễn Xuân Phúc on May 16 in Moscow. In his opinion, these partnerships are still evolving and it’s very important for us that both the FTA with the EAEU and the TPP are consistent with the rules of the World Trade Organization and contribute to strengthening the international trade regime.


Are there any specific industries that will help Russia and Vietnam meet their $10 billion annual trade target?

For starters, there is the auto industry. In March 2016 customs tariffs for the supply of cars from Russia to Vietnam were lowered. Together with this, Vietnam created favorable conditions for the creation of car assembly facilities with the participation of Russian companies such as Kamaz, Gaz and Vaz.

This month, at a meeting with the mayor of Hanoi, we discussed the details of a deal to supply Hanoi with 300 Gaz city buses that are, as noted by the head of the Vietnamese capital, “of a quality superior to Korean counterparts.”


Besides oil production, where are the lucrative opportunities for Russian investors in Vietnam?

Small and medium businesses can play a large role in increasing trade and investment cooperation with Vietnam.

There is already some progress in this area. Medipal Onko, a pharmaceutical company that is willing to export medicines to Vietnam, including cancer drugs, has opened a representative office in the country.

This year the administration of Ho Chi Minh City purchased video conferencing equipment manufactured by Spirit, a Russian company.

In late March, Tolyatti-based Sagama launched an automobile tire recycling plant near Hanoi.


And what is happening in the oil sector?

Three Russian companies have been working in Vietnam for years: Zarubezhneft, Rosneft and Gazprom. They not only produce oil and gas, but also search for new forms of cooperation.

For example, Russia’s Gazprom Neft is looking to buy a stake in Vietnam's only refinery Zung Kuat, which is in need of capacity expansion and modernization. While the deal, as far as I know, has been postponed, the company plans to return to this issue after a public offering.

Another example is a joint project between Gazprom and PetroVietnam that involves the switching of municipal vehicles in Ho Chi Minh City to a new type of fuel that meets the highest modern environmental standards. Now, as far as I know, they are in the final stages of creating a joint venture.

Given the active work of PetroVietnam’s subsidiaries in the oil and gas fields of Russia, our cooperation with Vietnam in the energy sector, as emphasized by Dmitry Medvedev, “is unprecedented.” Medvedev noted how Russia and Vietnam have even exchanged oil fields.


Despite the longstanding relationship between the two countries, why are there so few Russian investments in Vietnam?

According to Vietnamese statistics, the accumulated Russian investments now amount to $2.1 billion and are present in 113 projects. Overall, it's not that small. Our investments in Vietnam are more than Germany’s and Italy’s combined. But it's not just about numbers. Statistics, as you know, are not always reliable.

Russia seeks to expand its investment presence in Vietnam, not only in quantitative but also qualitative terms. I am sure that we have all the possibilities.

During visit to Russia the new Prime Minister of Vietnam Nguyễn Xuân Phúc signed an agreement on creating a Russian-Vietnamese investment platform amounting to $500 million. Half of this will be injected by the Russian Direct Investment Fund and half by the Vietnam's State Investment Fund.

The platform intends to invest in companies and projects that strengthen bilateral trade and the development of medium and large Vietnamese enterprises in Russia.


What is the scope for Vietnamese investments in Russia?

Vietnam has a number of strong competitive advantages, especially in the field of agriculture and manufacturing. In Russia, these industries are now being actively developed and are open to foreign investment. I think that Vietnamese businessmen should pay close attention to them.

However, some steps have already been taken. One of the pioneers here was Vietnamese agricultural holding TH True Milk, which has already begun to establish dairy production in the Moscow and Kaluga Regions, and the total amount of declared investments is about $2.5 billion.

I can also advise businessmen from Vietnam to pay attention to Russian regions. There they can find land at a more reasonable price, and the production costs are lower than in Moscow. The main factor to look for is the commitment shown by the leadership in the regions in attracting foreign investors. Suffice to say that over the last year, the governors of St. Petersburg, Primorye, Moscow and Kaluga regions visited Vietnam. Many delegations from other Russian regions also visited the country.


Is there any indication that after the closing of Egypt and Turkey for Russian tourists, part of the tourist traffic shifted to Vietnam?

The number of Russian tourists here is growing significantly. For all of 2015, the number was 340,000. In January-April of this year it has already reached 144,000, which is 16 percent higher than during the same period last year.

It is difficult to say whether Vietnam can be seen as a full replacement for Turkish and Egyptian resorts. ‘All inclusive’ beach tours – the most sought after by Russians – are virtually absent in local hotels. And flights to Vietnam are longer and more expensive.

At the same time, Vietnam has a number of important benefits, including a visa-free regime for up to 15 days, lack of serious security problems and, of course, an always positive attitude of local residents towards Russians.

I want to note that, by cooperating with Vietnam in the field of tourism, we seek to establish the flow of tourists not only from Russia to Vietnam, but in the opposite direction as well. As you know, now our government pays great attention to the development of domestic and inbound tourism, and attracting foreign visitors to Russia.

This should be facilitated by the ‘Visit Russia’ tourist offices, one of which was recently opened in Hanoi. Its goal is to acquaint the people of Vietnam and other countries in the region with the tourism potential of our country. I am convinced that this undertaking has good prospects, given how quickly in Vietnam and other Southeast Asian countries, a growing middle class is willing to spend money on travel. People in this part of the world have an interest in Russia, almost from childhood.


What joint steps can Russia and Vietnam take to ensure security and stability in the region?

Russia and Vietnam are traditional partners for cooperation in the field of defense and security. Suffice it to say that at least two-thirds of weapons and military equipment of the Vietnam People's Army is produced in our country, and many experts were and are now undergoing training in Soviet and Russian universities.

Moreover, talking about our military-technical cooperation, we think not only about past but also about present and future. As we all know, the main topic for our military exports in recent years has been the upgrading of the Vietnamese Air Force and the creation of a submarine fleet.

We are interested in maintaining security and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, which occupies an increasingly important place in world politics and economics.

Here we have very specific economic interests, including mining projects, oil and gas and nuclear energy. Leading Russian companies are involved in these areas.

As for the situation in the South China Sea, I can only repeat Russia’s position that has been repeatedly expressed by the Russian leadership. Our country is interested in the settlement of disputes exclusively by peaceful means on the basis of equal dialogue between the parties involved and taking into account the universally recognized norms and principles of international law, including the relevant UN Convention of 1982. At the same time, we oppose the unnecessary politicization of the issues and the interference of third countries, the purpose of which, we think, is often to not resolve the existing differences, but pushing their own opportunistic geopolitical interests.


Are there any difficulties in the Russia-Vietnam relationship? How serious is the problem with illegal Vietnamese migrants?

Relations between Russia and Vietnam, in my opinion, can be called exemplary. This is a very rare occasion when states have neither long-standing historical problems nor significant contradictions in the present. This is due, of course, not only to the legacy of a glorious past, but also to the great attention we now pay to the development of bilateral relations.

In the last fifteen years, exchanges of visits at the highest levels have been as intense as they were in the Soviet era. These meetings are not just symbolic. They allow very fast and efficient means to discuss all the complex issues and “push” bilateral matters ahead.

As for the temporary difficulties in the relationship, yes, we admit there are some, it’s normal.

Illegal migration has recently become an increasingly acute problem for our society and sometimes citizens of Vietnam are mentioned in this context. According to various estimates, there are between 25,000 and 100,000 Vietnamese people in Russia. Some of them have already become a part of the Russian society, making a significant contribution to the development of the economy, culture and education educations sector of the country. Others come to study or work in the country.

The most problematic is the category of labor migrants. Among them there are those who stay in Russia longer than the period of their visa, thus violating our laws. This, incidentally, is not a purely Russian story. There are illegal Vietnamese immigrants in a number of other countries including Japan, Taiwan and South Korea.

We know that Vietnam attaches great importance to the protection of the rights of its compatriots abroad and makes all the necessary efforts to solve the existing problems in the spirit of our comprehensive strategic partnership. Relevant agencies of the two countries have started an intensive dialogue in the framework of specially established working groups on migration and temporary employment. I am sure that the results of this work will be able to create reliable mechanisms of control over migration flows from Vietnam to Russia and to ensure employment activities are within legal parameters.
 
Aerial Defence

while we are waiting for S-400, an unit of S-300 surface to air missile rolling into position, with advanced 96L6E acquisition radar that usually comes with S-400 missile defence system. can follow max. 100 targets within 300 km.


s-300pmu1-viet-nam-co-them-22mat-than22-bat-thap-76n6-sieu-khung1-bb-baaacWTA17.jpg




ly-do-viet-nam-chon-radar-96l6e-cho-he-thong-s300pmu1_2112158.jpg



ly-do-viet-nam-chon-radar-96l6e-cho-he-thong-s300pmu1_2112845.jpg


ly-do-viet-nam-chon-radar-96l6e-cho-he-thong-s300pmu1_2112141.jpg


ly-do-viet-nam-chon-radar-96l6e-cho-he-thong-s300pmu1_211242.jpg



baotrungquoc4-93b0b.jpg



ly-do-viet-nam-chon-radar-96l6e-cho-he-thong-s300pmu1_2113986.jpg


tai-sao-viet-nam-lua-chon-radar-96l6e-cua-s400-cho-s300pmu1.jpg
 
Last edited:
My mistake there :v Still, i consider the superior number of P-3 is a advantage. P-8 is not really a choice since we cant get our hand on it with the recent relation with US. Aiming for P-3 of countries that about to get the P-8 is more realostic



You quite funny you know that. You just focus on 1 aspect and screw the rest of the problem. You even know what wil happen to the Army logistic and training if we are going to change now ? Even if we change now what can be certain that we can get them at sufficient level ? If a war broke out right in the middle of the re-arming process, what can we do ? Inferior and more expensive ? Where do you even get our Army ammunition supply cost stastics from ? You are going to give us a lot of big IF. And again with plenty of IF you present your own calculated solution. The army problems go beyond just a single round. Focus on 1 aspect is as easy as eating candy bar, but real world stuff deal way more than that. You can solve them all, sure speak up. You just take 1 aspect out then complaint and just turn over every single problemd, risks and uncertainty come after that for us to solve ..........Well even primary kids in VN can do that :v

Go around and see some stuff, shall we ? :)

13247880_942680335854927_6509090297683425485_o.jpg

You may want some AP-3 or EP-3 second hand. US, Australia and Japan are all selling their EP-3, AP-3 stock and replacing them with P-8, I think Lockheed can still perform upgrade that could extend their service life for at least 11,000 hours (That's what they done to SK P-3C aircraft)
 
P8? Vietnam is even lacking in their basic MPA
 
P8? Vietnam is even lacking in their basic MPA

Nobody in Vietnam is thinking about getting the P-8. Its way expensive for Vietnam to begin with, the plane still has a number of issues that need to be resolved and anyway, US would not sell such an advance plane to Vietnam. It will either be the P-3 or the C-130 MPA version.

Vietnam already has the basic MPA, the CASA C-212-400 with the MSS 6000 maritime surveillance system and the DHC-6 400 series Twin Otter with the ELM-2022A radar capable of simultaneously scanning and tracking up to 256 targets at sea. Those MPA planes are small, but pack very nice avionics for maritime patrol.
 
Second (and fourth in general) 'Gepard' frigate for VN officially launched today.
z.jpg

sister ships.
1800092.jpg
 
Last edited:
I look forward to watching that episode. I really like Anthony Bourdain in general. The one problem is, I almost always get hungry while watching his show.

I like the way he samples the cuisine from various different countries.
yeah bro thanks to Anthony, more Viet foods such as this "bun cha" become polular to foreigners, and not only "pho" :D

do you know according to a statistic (2014) there are over 8,900 Viet restos in the United States and the number grows and grows? I won´t wonder if we have now 10,000 restos alone in the US. same big number in other rest of the world. foods are more than foods. in Vietnam culture, they have a deep meaning. a way of life. how we see the world. heaven and earth.

http://www.voanews.com/content/vietnam-cuisine-more-popular-united-states/3338500.html

cooking "pho"

7A9928E1-A79D-4260-ADC5-8215B04CD449_w640_s.jpg


A3CAD8D9-EBFE-4FE6-ABA4-144ED3AC826D_w640_s.jpg



A97EB4C2-22C5-48CB-A24F-5EEA56714D6A_w640_s.jpg
 
yeah bro thanks to Anthony, more Viet foods such as this "bun cha" become polular to foreigners, and not only "pho" :D

do you know according to a statistic (2014) there are over 8,900 Viet restos in the United States and the number grows and grows? I won´t wonder if we have now 10,000 restos alone in the US. same big number in other rest of the world. foods are more than foods. in Vietnam culture, they have a deep meaning. a way of life. how we see the world. heaven and earth.

http://www.voanews.com/content/vietnam-cuisine-more-popular-united-states/3338500.html

cooking "pho"

7A9928E1-A79D-4260-ADC5-8215B04CD449_w640_s.jpg


A3CAD8D9-EBFE-4FE6-ABA4-144ED3AC826D_w640_s.jpg



A97EB4C2-22C5-48CB-A24F-5EEA56714D6A_w640_s.jpg

Nguy Vu talk show? He sings well too.
 
Aiming for P-3 of countries that about to get the P-8 is more realistic

This is a small list of nations. Most P-3 users that could get the P-8 don't have a need for a longer-ranged and more expensive platform. Australia and United States are nations currently replacing their P-3s with P-8s, and the UK is replacing their MPA with it as well.

One country that operates the P-3 and is seeking to replace them with the P-8 is my homeland, Norway who has a massive coastline (larger then the US', and 7th only to Russia and Canada and Island nations like Australia and Greenland) and host of islands that need to be patrolled and policed:

1280px-Norway_in_the_World_(+Antarctica_claims).svg.png


These aircraft are modified to operate in colder climates, but they've been deployed to East Africa too, so they're adept at handling the more tropical climates Vietnam has.

tk333BL9C7708.jpg


20111029th_189.jpg


20111029th_292.jpg


20111029th_464b.jpg


20111029th_415.jpg


20111029th_281.jpg


These are modernized P-3Ns that will become available in the coming years.

I believe it's more realistic to approach the US, rather then ex-P-3 users, as they've more to offer. Still, these aircraft, six total, are going to be on the market and it never hurts to explore your options.
 
Last edited:
ha ha ha ...cheap or not cheap is not only the question you need to consider here. The other factor you should have in mind too is destruction power. A salvo of great caliber bullets on enemy soldiers make more fun, creating more impression on them than one of smaller caliber. Hiding behind vests and helmets won't help much.

That is what Americans thought over 50 years ago... They though they should stick with big caliber rifles for infantry and small caliber machineguns for fighters.

Like everything in life you need to make compromise.
That is not a compromise, a compromise would be to choose a 7.62x54 which is in between 5.56x45 and 12.7x99...

Even North Korea is ahead of Vietnam which is replacing their AK-47 based rifles with AK-74 based rifles.

Negev machine gun uses the same 7.62 caliber.
I feel sorry for your armed forces machine gunners as they will have to allocate more brainpower to adjusting their aim in accordance to wind and distance... If they had a 7.62x54 machine gun then they would only need to do that for 2000 meters...

How about the Croatian Army?
How about inform yourself you slob? AK-47 did its job during Independence War, first replacement was to be an indigineous rifle that chambered 7.62x54 NATO during arms embargo which ended in 1998 in which indigineous rifle was rejected and goverment instead prefered FN FAL, but military budget cuts prevented replacement to a meaningful level.

Later on, special forces, airborne paratrooper unit, counter terrorist unit and SWAT converted to 5.56x45 while another rifle from another company was being developed.

That second indigineous rifle is now primary assault rifle of Croatian Arked Forces, first version of second indigineous was rejected while second version was accepted which is a bullpup 5.56x45mm VHS-2 which is contender to replace primary assault rifle of French Arked Forces which is FAMAS and is in final evaluvation with decision to be made at soonest in June this year, also there are rumors that it could also be primary assault rifle of Indian Armed Forces.

Croatia is primary user, Iraq bought a lot of VHS-2's as does Iraqi-Kurdistan which also.receives and buys VHS-2 rifles.

Why does the Army of Finland use the same caliber as Vietnam?

You are cherry and straw picking at the same time, Finland? Are you serious? Yes, they have a rifle that is based on AK-47 and you believe that Finland's military prefere's? They don't, they were in process in converting to 5.56x45 which was postponed due to financial issues since the military is underfunded while Vietnam''s in comparison isn't. If Fins top military brass knew percentage of GDP Vietnam allocated for military then they would eat themselves up from jealousy.

@Aqsuperman

And you continue with speculations and assumptions, bravo.

Please pretend and assume I didn't consider what you are claiming I didn't consider and you kept spouting all the stuff that I already know for years you with child sized brain.

Go on, continue with speculation and assumption which is only thing you know to do when it involves me like you're chinese.
 
Did you guy think Vietnam never compare 7.62 x 39 and 5.56x45?


As you may know, at this moment,

Vietnam regular troops, who are well trained using 7.62mm based rifles.
Vietnam local militia, who is poorer trained using 5.56mm M-16

Vietnam uses both size,
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom