nightcrawler
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,400
- Reaction score
- 0
This thread mustn't be in WMD section rather in armour section
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thread mustn't be in WMD section rather in armour section
ahh, those SAMs,,,
i guess soon enough i would be telling friends that i had an Ft-2000 in dinner last night..
i guess i am giving a bit too much to these..
anyway thanks for pointing out, i have made the correction
regards!
They're talking about Baktarshikan as a capability rather than as a product. US-made TOWs are listed as well.
This is the reason for opening this thread as this varying "capability" of Baktar Shikan was not well known to many people.
We should get something like this (Tow ITVs kind) with either HJ-9 or the new HJ-10 ATGM, but should be having top attack capability.
how would you compare these Chinese ATGM with NAAG ATGM in technical perimeter .well i guess what we require is to further modify Maaz to carry missile in atleast a Quard Pack Assembly so that it do not have to be reloded after firing just one missile.
it would become something like
the most option that we will most probably see provided PA do chose to induct something like this will be:
this is the chines HJ-9 ATGM Launch Vehicle.
regards!
how would you compare these Chinese ATGM with NAAG ATGM in technical perimeter .
how would you compare these Chinese ATGM with NAAG ATGM in technical perimeter .
Imagine if you had an FT-2000 for dinner, next time an IAF plane violated our airspace, we would have to launch arsalanaslam to shot it down lol and would have lost an important contributor to the forum.