US 'welcomes' NSC statement saying no 'foreign conspiracy' to oust Imran

[INDIAPOSITIVE]

US State Department deputy spokesperson Jalina Porter has said that the United States welcomed the statement issued by Pakistan's National Security Committee (NSC) a day ago wherein it dismissed an impression of a "foreign conspiracy" to topple the Imran Khan-led government.
The senior US official made this statement during a press briefing in response to a question from a journalist.
"Today, the newly elected prime minster of Pakistan, Shehbaz Sharif, chaired the meeting of national security committee and senior military and civil officers attended that. And this meeting was to — about Imran Khan’s allegation of US government. So the press release we got, it states that the (inaudible) concludes that there has been no foreign conspiracy. How do you see this?" the journalist had asked.
"... We welcome this statement," Porter replied.
The NSC — which is chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and includes the army and ISI chief — had met on Friday and discussed the "telegram received from the Pakistan embassy in Washington".
According to the statement issued by the body, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US Asad Majeed, who was also in attendance, briefed the committee on the context and content of his telegram. "The NSC was again informed by the premier security agencies that they have found no evidence of any conspiracy," it had said, adding that the meeting concluded that "there has been no foreign conspiracy".
It had, however, also "reaffirmed the decisions of the last NSC meeting". In March, the committee had decided to issue a "strong demarche" to a country, that it did not name, over what it said was "blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan".
At a press briefing on Saturday, Porter dismissed the accusations leveled by Imran, saying "there’s absolutely no truth to those rumours, so we welcome this statement."
"And I would also like to underscore that the United States values our longstanding cooperation with Pakistan and has always viewed a strong, prosperous, and democratic Pakistan as critical to US interests," the senior official added.
Earlier, the US had also agreed with military spokesman Maj Gen Babar Iftikhar's statement in which he said that the NSC had in its first statement on the ‘cablegate’, unlike some political pronouncement by the PTI leaders, did not use the word “conspiracy”.
The Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director General (DG) had said that the military’s stance on the cable was formulated after a thorough investigation by an intelligence agency.

Cablegate​

The controversy surrounding the no-confidence motion against the former premier Imran Khan took a dramatic turn when the embattled PM brandished a letter at a rally on March 27 — days before his ouster, claiming it contained evidence of a "foreign conspiracy" hatched to topple his government.
Imran had kept a mum about the contents of the letter when he first unveiled it, however, he spilled the beans days later by naming the United States when the exit of the government appeared imminent.
Imran's allegation that the US spearheaded his exit from power was based on a cable received from Pakistan's Ambassador to the US, Asad Majeed, in which he had reported about a meeting with Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Affairs Donald Lu.
Majeed had reportedly said that Donald Lu warned that Imran Khan’s continuation in office, who was set to face a vote of no confidence, would have repercussions on bilateral relations. The US was said to be annoyed with Imran over his "independent foreign policy" and visit to Moscow.
The Pentagon and the State Department have rejected the accusations, saying there was no veracity to it.
The National Security Committee (NSC), which includes all services chiefs as well as the head of Pakistan's top intelligence agency, took up the matter on March 31 and decided to issue a "strong demarche" to a country that it did not name over what was termed “blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan”.
It had also termed the interference "unacceptable under any circumstances" and said the language used in the communique was undiplomatic.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1686421/us-welcomes-nsc-statement-saying-no-foreign-conspiracy-to-oust-imran

 

[ARMalik]

The US is supporting the Criminals of Pakistan. There are Criminals in the Military, there are Criminals in the government with PM being the biggest criminal, there are Criminal judges, and so on. USA has hijacked Pakistan, and 220 Million people are just slaves. I am never felt so ashamed of the Army and what this Army Chief has done this country and its people.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

"the language used in the communique was undiplomatic."

https://www.dawn.com/news/1686421/us-welcomes-nsc-statement-saying-no-foreign-conspiracy-to-oust-imran

Diplomacy can be war by other means. America responded to Imran's anti American rhetoric. Nothing undiplomatic about it.

Tools of Statecraft: Diplomacy and War - Foreign Policy Research Institute

By their very nature, diplomacy and military force are means to the ends of statecraft as well as channels by which governments press their agendas onto

www.fpri.org

"Diplomacy is often popularly thought of as the peaceful alternative to violence, but in fact, diplomacy serves to prepare as often as to avoid war. It is an important part of waging war, often makes the difference in who wins, and nearly always codifies wars’ results. Again, diplomacy is the verbal representation of compelling international realities, and military [or other] force is one of those realities."

 

[IceCold]

This only reaffirms IK's stance.

 

[crankthatskunk]

Well Done NSC.
Now all characters of the Conspiracy are cleared of wrong doing, they are rejoicing the judgement/finding by the "Kangroo Court" clearing themselves of any wrongdoings.

Classic, absolutely Classic.

Here is a clip of Legend Omar Sharif , a great Example of "Kanpain Tang rahi hain".
And how Conspiracies are hatched and why!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1514149753201872896

 

[WotTen]

Diplomacy can be war by other means. America responded to Imran's anti American rhetoric. Nothing undiplomatic about it.

Slave masters rarely take kindly to a slave seeking freedom.

Tools of Statecraft: Diplomacy and War - Foreign Policy Research Institute

By their very nature, diplomacy and military force are means to the ends of statecraft as well as channels by which governments press their agendas onto

www.fpri.org

"Diplomacy is often popularly thought of as the peaceful alternative to violence, but in fact, diplomacy serves to prepare as often as to avoid war. It is an important part of waging war, often makes the difference in who wins, and nearly always codifies wars’ results. Again, diplomacy is the verbal representation of compelling international realities, and military [or other] force is one of those realities."

"severe consequences"
"all will be forgiven"
are not exactly diplomatic statements. These are warnings from a slave master to his slaves.

 

[Dalit]

The US is supporting the Criminals of Pakistan. There are Criminals in the Military, there are Criminals in the government with PM being the biggest criminal, there are Criminal judges, and so on. USA has hijacked Pakistan, and 220 Million people are just slaves. I am never felt so ashamed of the Army and what this Army Chief has done this country and its people.

The amount of US congrats and statements with regards to Pakistan in the past few weeks has broken all record.

Diplomacy can be war by other means. America responded to Imran's anti American rhetoric. Nothing undiplomatic about it.

Tools of Statecraft: Diplomacy and War - Foreign Policy Research Institute

By their very nature, diplomacy and military force are means to the ends of statecraft as well as channels by which governments press their agendas onto

www.fpri.org

"Diplomacy is often popularly thought of as the peaceful alternative to violence, but in fact, diplomacy serves to prepare as often as to avoid war. It is an important part of waging war, often makes the difference in who wins, and nearly always codifies wars’ results. Again, diplomacy is the verbal representation of compelling international realities, and military [or other] force is one of those realities."

When did Imran Khan ever resort to anti-US rhetoric? Imran Khan has criticised US policies. He is not anti-US.

Slave masters rarely take kindly to a slave seeking freedom.



"severe consequences"
"all will be forgiven"
are not exactly diplomatic statements. These are warnings from a slave master to his slaves.

The Bajwa fans are fulfilling their job.

 

[Jazzbot]

The prime accused was heading the meeting that gave him the clean chit. It's nothing but a joke.

 

[Mugen]

That's like replacing the judges with the very people commiting the crime, and then these criminals pass judgment on their own crimes... how many will put themselves in jail?

 

[ARMalik]

I really don't get it -- WHAT THE HELL IS IK WAITING FOR?? WHY IS HE NOT GIVING OUT THE CALL?? IT IS NOW OR NEVER !!

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Slave masters rarely take kindly to a slave seeking freedom.



"severe consequences"
"all will be forgiven"
are not exactly diplomatic statements. These are warnings from a slave master to his slaves.

America is a superpower which sets the global agenda through multilateral organizations. There is no slave-master relationship. There are strong, weak, failed and rogue states.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog809

'The term “weak state” is a contentious one. It is generally used to define a state that is weak in its core functions of providing security to its citizens (security gap), providing basic services to its citizens (capacity gap), and having legitimacy among its people (legitimacy gap). Though used after the Cold War, the idea of weak states became salient post 2001, after the 9/11 attacks in the United States. Since, several governments and international organizations dominated by bureaucrats and experts from a handful of countries have involved themselves in the task of recognizing states that are weak or failing. From 1992 to today, over 40 quantitative indexes have been generated to measure state failure/fragility (Woodward 2008). The immediacy of recognizing and intervening in weak or failed states comes from the apparent, though undertested, link between state weakness and terrorism. Weak states have come to be considered a security threat because they are seen as more susceptible to organized crime, privatized violence, arms proliferation, the spread of infectious diseases, environmental degradation, and civil war. Within a globalized world, such states are considered a threat to all nations, having spillover effects, especially on stable states. Weak states have low or stagnant economic growth and weak governing institutions that are unable to implement policies or maintain autonomy due to corruption or conflict.'

 

[EvoluXon]

Well Done NSC.
Now all characters of the Conspiracy are cleared of wrong doing, they are rejoicing the judgement/finding by the "Kangroo Court" clearing themselves of any wrongdoings.

Classic, absolutely Classic.

Here is a clip of Legend Omar Sharif , a great Example of "Kanpain Tang rahi hain".
And how Conspiracies are hatched and why!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1514149753201872896

This show was released in 1999 in Nawaz Gunja era and for your information, Nawaz Gunja banned umer sharif from appearing on tv or shows due to this satirical political stage show ... . Mr Platelets ..

 

[WotTen]

America is a superpower which sets the global agenda through multilateral organizations. There is no slave-master relationship. There are strong, weak, failed and rogue states.

No amount of word salad or sugar coating will hide the fact that the US has been involved in at least 81 coups around the world. Other estimates put the number at around 200.

Putin is a simple man of action who lacks American finesse in achieving regime change. Resorting to brute force is a sign of incompetence.

Democratic countries like the US are infinitely more sophisticated and use more devious means. Usually. Although even the US sometimes resorts to violent solutions like assassinations and invasions.

 

[UKBengali]

Question to Pakistanis

How do you propose to reduce the power of the army to decide who is the leader of Pakistan?

From outside perspective, Pakistan will never develop economically as long as the army decides on the PM.

No country run by the military has ever been economically successful as the role of army is not to develop the country but to defend it.

 

[Mahmood-ur-Rehman]

US State Department deputy spokesperson Jalina Porter has said that the United States welcomed the statement issued by Pakistan's National Security Committee (NSC) a day ago wherein it dismissed an impression of a "foreign conspiracy" to topple the Imran Khan-led government.
The senior US official made this statement during a press briefing in response to a question from a journalist.
"Today, the newly elected prime minster of Pakistan, Shehbaz Sharif, chaired the meeting of national security committee and senior military and civil officers attended that. And this meeting was to — about Imran Khan’s allegation of US government. So the press release we got, it states that the (inaudible) concludes that there has been no foreign conspiracy. How do you see this?" the journalist had asked.
"... We welcome this statement," Porter replied.
The NSC — which is chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and includes the army and ISI chief — had met on Friday and discussed the "telegram received from the Pakistan embassy in Washington".
According to the statement issued by the body, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US Asad Majeed, who was also in attendance, briefed the committee on the context and content of his telegram. "The NSC was again informed by the premier security agencies that they have found no evidence of any conspiracy," it had said, adding that the meeting concluded that "there has been no foreign conspiracy".
It had, however, also "reaffirmed the decisions of the last NSC meeting". In March, the committee had decided to issue a "strong demarche" to a country, that it did not name, over what it said was "blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan".
At a press briefing on Saturday, Porter dismissed the accusations leveled by Imran, saying "there’s absolutely no truth to those rumours, so we welcome this statement."
"And I would also like to underscore that the United States values our longstanding cooperation with Pakistan and has always viewed a strong, prosperous, and democratic Pakistan as critical to US interests," the senior official added.
Earlier, the US had also agreed with military spokesman Maj Gen Babar Iftikhar's statement in which he said that the NSC had in its first statement on the ‘cablegate’, unlike some political pronouncement by the PTI leaders, did not use the word “conspiracy”.
The Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director General (DG) had said that the military’s stance on the cable was formulated after a thorough investigation by an intelligence agency.

Cablegate​

The controversy surrounding the no-confidence motion against the former premier Imran Khan took a dramatic turn when the embattled PM brandished a letter at a rally on March 27 — days before his ouster, claiming it contained evidence of a "foreign conspiracy" hatched to topple his government.
Imran had kept a mum about the contents of the letter when he first unveiled it, however, he spilled the beans days later by naming the United States when the exit of the government appeared imminent.
Imran's allegation that the US spearheaded his exit from power was based on a cable received from Pakistan's Ambassador to the US, Asad Majeed, in which he had reported about a meeting with Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Affairs Donald Lu.
Majeed had reportedly said that Donald Lu warned that Imran Khan’s continuation in office, who was set to face a vote of no confidence, would have repercussions on bilateral relations. The US was said to be annoyed with Imran over his "independent foreign policy" and visit to Moscow.
The Pentagon and the State Department have rejected the accusations, saying there was no veracity to it.
The National Security Committee (NSC), which includes all services chiefs as well as the head of Pakistan's top intelligence agency, took up the matter on March 31 and decided to issue a "strong demarche" to a country that it did not name over what was termed “blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan”.
It had also termed the interference "unacceptable under any circumstances" and said the language used in the communique was undiplomatic.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1686421/us-welcomes-nsc-statement-saying-no-foreign-conspiracy-to-oust-imran

When all the conspirators are in security council how they will declare it conspiracy. Our generals were without war contract for the last 4 years Now they got the contract from their masters the price will be paid by jawans JCOs Lt Cap Maj and maximum Colonels and the whole Nation and castles of generals will be bult in Belgium ,Australia ,London and America