What's new

US to buy Russian helicopters for Afghan air force

nightcrawler

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
1,400
Reaction score
0
chopperski_1675641c.jpg

Defence Department officials have argued that purchasing the M-17s would accelerate the handover of control to Afghan forces.

Most Afghan pilots are in their 40s or older and have flown nothing else. Most of the 92 currently qualified pilots are products of the Soviet flying school.
Teaching them to use US helicopters such as the Chinook or Black Hawk would add as much as two years to making the Afghan National Army Air Corps self-reliant, according to the US military officials.

Considered an easy-to-maintain workhorse, the M-17 is comparatively simple to fly and is well suited to Afghanistan's high altitudes and desert landscapes.

The US has already spent $648 million on 31 civilian M-17s which it customised for military use in Afghanistan, primarily to transport troops and equipment.

But after Barack Obama's administration lifted the ban on Rosoboronexport, the Russian state arms exporter, it can now buy aircraft ready for military use direct from Russia, at a cost of $15 million to $18 million each, about half the price of a Chinook, the standard US transport helicopter.

Sen Richard Shelby of Alabama has led objections in Washington, arguing that the procurement of M-17s had lacked oversight.

"The results have led to massive waste, cost overruns, schedule delays, safety concerns, and major delivery problems," he said, calling on the administration to consider alternative helicopters for the Afghan mission.

The US military turned its attention to the Afghan air force in 2005, four years after the invasion. It then consisted of a few ageing M-17s, but there are now 19 working Mi-17s, with plans to further increase the fleet and establish a pilot training centre in the western province of Herat.
US to buy Russian helicopters for Afghan air force - Telegraph
 
.
chopperski_1675641c.jpg

Defence Department officials have argued that purchasing the M-17s would accelerate the handover of control to Afghan forces.





Most Afghan pilots are in their 40s or older and have flown nothing else. Most of the 92 currently qualified pilots are products of the Soviet flying school.
Teaching them to use US helicopters such as the Chinook or Black Hawk would add as much as two years to making the Afghan National Army Air Corps self-reliant, according to the US military officials.

Considered an easy-to-maintain workhorse, the M-17 is comparatively simple to fly and is well suited to Afghanistan's high altitudes and desert landscapes.

The US has already spent $648 million on 31 civilian M-17s which it customised for military use in Afghanistan, primarily to transport troops and equipment.

But after Barack Obama's administration lifted the ban on Rosoboronexport, the Russian state arms exporter, it can now buy aircraft ready for military use direct from Russia, at a cost of $15 million to $18 million each, about half the price of a Chinook, the standard US transport helicopter.

Sen Richard Shelby of Alabama has led objections in Washington, arguing that the procurement of M-17s had lacked oversight.

"The results have led to massive waste, cost overruns, schedule delays, safety concerns, and major delivery problems," he said, calling on the administration to consider alternative helicopters for the Afghan mission.

The US military turned its attention to the Afghan air force in 2005, four years after the invasion. It then consisted of a few ageing M-17s, but there are now 19 working Mi-17s, with plans to further increase the fleet and establish a pilot training centre in the western province of Herat.
US to buy Russian helicopters for Afghan air force - Telegraph



Why buy Russian helicopters when the Us can give them Chinooks and Apache's
 
.
Why buy Russian helicopters when the Us can give them Chinooks and Apache's

Because they don't want to spend the money to train the 92 already experienced pilots how to fly American helicopters since they only know how to fly Russia ones. It will take them over 2 years to learn and they need the pilots now.
 
.
Because they don't want to spend the money to train the 92 already experienced pilots how to fly American helicopters since they only know how to fly Russia ones. It will take them over 2 years to learn and they need the pilots now.
Also Russian helos are cheaper
 
. .
Because they don't want to spend the money to train the 92 already experienced pilots how to fly American helicopters since they only know how to fly Russia ones. It will take them over 2 years to learn and they need the pilots now.

Ohhh okay , I didnt knew that
 
.
Because they don't want to spend the money to train the 92 already experienced pilots how to fly American helicopters since they only know how to fly Russia ones. It will take them over 2 years to learn and they need the pilots now.
Not only pilots, but what IF the aircrafts fell into the wrong hands? The possibility of that happening is quite high, so best give them something Russian.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom