What's new

US sparring directly with Al-Qaeda fans online

UmarJustice

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
WASHINGTON - The United States is deliberately sparring with Al-Qaeda supporters and militants online aiming to shoot down extremist messages and win over hearts and minds, a US official said Wednesday.
Seeking out the virtual spaces where "Al-Qaeda and its supporters lurk" is part of America's strategy to combat violent extremism, Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Tara Sonenshine told students at the University of Maryland. "We robustly engage with them in chat forums in Arabic, Somali, Punjabi and Urdu," she explained.
"By targeting the hardliners, we are really trying to reach the middle grounders, the fence sitters, the sympathizers and passive supporters."
Last year, staff at the new Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, which reports directly to Sonenshine, wrote some 7,000 posts on different online forums.
"When we counter unfounded rumors, propaganda and conspiracy theories with facts, truth and reasonable argument, we can better define what we stand for. And we have a greater chance of changing more minds," Sonenshine said.
"We cannot afford to stand on the sidelines and let cynical voices distort and misreport our policies, values, and interests," she added.
"We have to enter that communications space - where so many young people are getting their information - and contest extremist and other negative rhetoric with facts and counter-assertions."
She admitted it was hard to assess whether such virtual online battles were helping to win the war against extremists, quipping that "terrorists are not exactly willing to participate in surveys."
But she said it was considered "a gain" when Al-Qaeda complained about the center's activities in their online forums or when a Saudi citizen called on his government to set up such a center.
Pressing the case for such continued public diplomacy, Sonenshine argued: "What is the cost of not confronting negative messaging?"
"Are we really going to leave it to our adversaries to define America, and recruit the disenfranchised and the impressionable to their cause?" she asked.

US sparring directly with Al-Qaeda fans online
 
Which one? Pro or counter? :D

Obviously pro.
In fact the are so pro that they make other Americans look like a bunch o' traitors. :P

And there a handful of sympathizers too, but it's OK. Only contributes to the forum's diversity.
 
Obviously pro.
In fact the are so pro that they make other Americans look like a bunch o' traitors. :P

And there a handful of sympathizers too, but it's OK. Only contributes to the forum's diversity.

Meanwhile, in another thread:

[............. A well-informed friend once told me that spooks even watch the number of likes/retweets on your Facebook and Twitter comments and the nationalities of those that do so. Thus, if there are more Indians liking your comments, you are immediately seen as an enemy of the state. Such recipe stinks of low IQ and EQ as it reflects a lack of understanding of how the internet has made the world fairly transparent. ............

I wonder how that approach applies to a forum such as this one? Interesting ...............
 
...
I wonder how that approach applies to a forum such as this one? Interesting ...............


You should see the Onion News "report" on CIA using facebook. It's hillarious.

Seriously though, the CIA seldom peaks directly. These things are often outsourced to marketing research companies. Those guys a bit more discreet.
 
You should see the Onion News "report" on CIA using facebook. It's hillarious.

Seriously though, the CIA seldom peaks directly. These things are often outsourced to marketing research companies. Those guys a bit more discreet.

Its more like that. In Information Wars, the 'smoke and mirrors' are very important.
 
Its more like that. In Information Wars, the 'smoke and mirrors' are very important.


Smoke and mirrors remind me of that cheapo, Chris Angel btw :P

But this American strategy is going to be difficult. They use reasoning while the other camp is already brainwashed. Americans talk of liberty while the others have no experience of this concept. Americans question things that these sympathizers believe because some bearded guy said so (and they never dare to verify facts btw).

I just hope they don't pull a Bush and mention Crusades in their debates :lol:
 
Smoke and mirrors remind me of that cheapo, Chris Angel btw :P

But this American strategy is going to be difficult. They use reasoning while the other camp is already brainwashed. Americans talk of liberty while the others have no experience of this concept. Americans question things that these sympathizers believe because some bearded guy said so (and they never dare to verify facts btw).

I just hope they don't pull a Bush and mention Crusades in their debates :lol:
I will...

In the defense of my country, I see it as a FRACKING CRUSADE...!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom