What's new

US Soldiers Kill CHILDREN in Iraq With 30mm Apache

Status
Not open for further replies.
You mad bruh? :lol:

Desert storm didn't involve China, Korean war did.

Where was the all mighty US military? Why couldn't they crush the poorly equipped Chinese volunteer army?

US got embarrassed by a volunteer army with rifles :lol:
SOOOOOPER POWAAAAAA
Yeah...Because the PLA chickened out. There was a chance for China to prove the PLA superior to the US Army, based upon the Korean War, no ? But China sat out. The PLA guessed that Iraq would be defeated. Fair enough. But did the PLA guessed that Iraq could win with China's assist ? :lol:

Always avoiding the question, i know it's already embarrassing for you to continue bragging about decades of experience. You have already lost credibility old man, these decades of proven technologies you speak of are only used against weak countries. Against Russia and China, USA prefer not using them on us because it will have severe consequences :lol:
Because China was too chickenshit to step in. So what are we supposed to do ? :lol:
 
Yeah...Because the PLA chickened out. There was a chance for China to prove the PLA superior to the US Army, based upon the Korean War, no ? But China sat out. The PLA guessed that Iraq would be defeated. Fair enough. But did the PLA guessed that Iraq could win with China's assist ? :lol:


Because China was too chickenshit to step in. So what are we supposed to do ? :lol:

I don't remember Russia and China chickened out in the Georgia/Syria and DPRK cases. You have some memory problems old man? getting demented these days?
 
The low IQ here is in thinking that was an analogy. It was no analogy, but facts. The US never sold weapons to Iraq. China and Russia were the major arms suppliers to Saddam Hussein.

You see what are the facts here? The low IQ is here thinking the fact of selling or giving arms to (Iraq or Vietnam) and the fact of having military pact (or the absence of it) is directly related. Is your IQ still same as your fellow countrymen, I mean the country you emigrated from?
 
Always avoiding the question, i know it's already embarrassing for you to continue bragging about decades of experience. You have already lost credibility old man, these decades of proven technologies you speak of are only used against weak countries. Against Russia and China, USA prefer not using them on us because it will have severe consequences :lol:

The Chinese and Russian re-education of the US about international law at the time Obama and his regime was salivating against the fake Syrian chemical attack was another historical moment.

Was not the US also on the brink of bombing the DPRK into the stone age?

It seems the rogue superpower is now stopped even before it takes action.

I don't remember Russia and China chickened out in the Georgia/Syria and DPRK cases. You have some memory problems old man? getting demented these days?

Exactly.
 
You see what are the facts here? The low IQ is here thinking the fact of selling or giving arms to (Iraq or Vietnam) and the fact of having military pact (or the absence of it) is directly related. Is your IQ still same as your fellow countrymen, I mean the country you emigrated from?
:lol:

You walked right into it. Like a slapstick comedy.

If the association I laid for you is 'low IQ', then equally 'low IQ' is the argument that the existence of North Korea constitute a military victory for China and proved the superiority of the PLA in military affairs.

You -- who probably have never felt the recoil of a mere .22 caliber -- answer me this: How many of these PLA Korean War veterans are still around and actively contributes to PLA doctrines ?

You guys boasts about China inventing gunpowder ? That is hilarious since I have more experience with gunpowder than all of you -- combined. For the lot of you here, the closest you guys can get to the glory of that Chinese invention is fireworks, not firearms. And yet you guys have no problems making plenty of low IQ declarations that defied the laws of physics, common sense, and established military doctrines.

Look at your own PLA reforms and see how low IQ are you guys here. Those reforms got American signatures all over it, from the way PLA dress to how they hold their weapons to technology and finally to copying American military doctrines and policies. If the US military is so inferior based upon the supposedly 'defeat' in Korea, then why is your PLA taking after US ? How low IQ is that ?

See all those PLA troopers at the parade grounds ? The most combat experience they are going to get is stomping on ants.
 
RIP....
It happens in war, you kills few children too by mistake/wrong info or in search of big terrorist groups , but death rate of children in Iraq from U.S.A is not high.
U.S.A killed hundreds of thousand terrorist there too.
Unfortunately this is also truth THAT some cowards use children as a shelter. They can't fight with U.S.A so coward tactics.
 
LOL another brainwashed American apologist
U.S.A want Peace in the world. That's why they are doing it even from thousands miles away such agressive policy against terrorism.
This is only U.S.A which has good contribution for humanity. They created many things and whole world is getting benefit from it.
World should not show hypocrisy.
America is actually creator of 20th century for such developments, innovations , and such technology..
This World was never before as it is today. No such example of innovation and technology in the history of thousand of centuries.
 
Last edited:
U.S.A want Peace in the world. That's why they are doing it even from thousands miles away such agressive policy against terrorism.
This is only U.S.A which has good contribution for humanity.
They created many things and whole world is getting benefit from it.
World should not show hypocrisy.
America is actually creator of 20th century for such developments, innovations , and such technology..
This World was never before as it is today. No such example of innovation and technology in the history of thousand of centuries.

*FACEPALM*
 
*FACEPALM*
You should 'facepalm'. Your China used racialist tactics during the Cold War in trying to foment racial tensions among overseas Chinese living in other Asian countries.
 
Yes your IQ is pathetically low, well not a surprise given where you were from.

If the association I laid for you is 'low IQ'

Yes, the association (arms selling/giving vs military pact) you laid is a low IQ one, not if. Your association:

"But we gave you the opportunity to mess with US in Desert Storm. The Iraqi military was about 20% equipped with Chinese arms. What happened ? The most China did was gave an estimate of Iraq's defeat, maybe that was why China never came to Iraq's aid. The PLA knew it would get a butt kicking."

My reply:

"But we gave you the opportunity to mess with China in Sino-Vietnam War. The Viet military was about 20% equipped with US arms leftover. What happened ? The most US did was gave an estimate of Vietnam's defeat, maybe that was why US never came to Vietnam's aid. The US DoD knew it would get a butt kicking"

then equally 'low IQ' is the argument that the existence of North Korea constitute a military victory for China and proved the superiority of the PLA in military affairs.

Korean War history is readily available on the web isn't it? Alright let me spoon feed you:
  • North Korean forces invaded South Korea on 25 June 1950.
  • On 27 June, the Security Council adopted S/RES/83 : Complaint of aggression upon the Republic of Korea and decided the formation and dispatch of the UN Forces in Korea. As many as twenty-one countries of the United Nations eventually contributed to the defense of South Korea, with the United States providing 88% of the UN's military personnel.
  • After the first 2 months of the conflict, South Korean and UN forces were on the point of defeat, forced back to the Pusan Perimeter.
  • In September 1950, an amphibious UN counter-offensive was launched at Inchon, and cut off many of the North Korean attackers. Those that escaped envelopment and capture were rapidly forced back north all the way to the border with China at the Yalu River, or into the mountainous interior.
  • In October 1950, Chinese forces crossed the Yalu and entered the war. Chinese intervention triggered a retreat of UN forces which continued until mid-1951. After these dramatic reversals of fortune, which saw Seoul change hands 4 times, the last 2 years of conflict became a war of attrition, with the front line close to the 38th parallel.
  • The fighting ended on 27 July 1953, when the armistice was signed
It doesn't take much literacy to search, even IQ below 85 can do it, why can't you?

See all those PLA troopers at the parade grounds ? The most combat experience they are going to get is stomping on ants.

Shooting children is any better than stomping ants? Are you suggesting others should do that to your host country or home country? You have more than an IQ problem.
 
Last edited:
Just a honest question, have China or Russia picked a powerful country to fight. You threaten Vietnam and Philippines nad same Russia did to Chechnya and Ukraine. There is no difference at all.

We are claiming what we own with sovereignty rights in respect of the territorial disputes with the Philippines and Vietnam

Apart from the above listed wars that China engaged in with some of the powers in the world, we fought against the invasions of the imperial japanese facists gallantly and as a result other parts of the world like S Asia were spared from the barbaristic assaults of the japanese facists

How about the world's hegemony, the Dictatorship of the world, the united Sanctions of america after ww2: North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq. Afghanistan, invasion of Dominican Republic and Panama, Libya, Lebanon, Grenada, Honduras, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Somalia. Haiti, ...
Timeline of United States military operations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom