What's new

US reconnaissance plane intercepted by PLA jet over Yellow Sea

A "dangerous interception " is what us deserved, What do you expect from china while your reconnaissance aircraft flying close to china border,especially close to beijing? A cup of beer?
How about professional pilots ? Got any ?

What should us do while china aircraft close to Washington?
This is a stupid and ignorant question. The question intends to provoke an emotional response from Americans but always end up making the questioner look stupid.

It is stupid and ignorant in the sense that the questioner is ignorant of the fact that the Soviets and today's Russians routinely fly close to US border. Our pilots fly in a disciplined manner and politely escort the intruder. As long as he does not violate US airspace, nothing will happen.
 
.
A "dangerous interception " is what us deserved, What do you expect from china while your reconnaissance aircraft flying close to china border,especially close to beijing? A cup of beer? What should us do while china aircraft close to Washington?

It is international airspace. An EC-135 is unarmed. I don't see why China has anything to fear that warrent dangerously conducted intercepts at 80 nmi off shore.

By comparison, look at recent actual 12nmi zone incursions by Russian aircraft
23 Jul 2015

Russian Nuclear Bear Bombers Fly 40 Miles off California Coast

On July 4, Two Russian Tu-95 Bear Bombers, which can carry nuclear warheads, flew within 40 miles of the Northern California Coast around the time Russia’s President Putin and America’s President Obama conducted a private telephone call that the Kremlin referred to as an effort to “find solutions” to international issues.
F-15 fighters were scrambled to intercept the bombers, which are capable of launching six KH-555 Air Launched Cruise Missiles with nuclear or conventional warheads at a speed of 1,000 miles per hour and a range of around 1,500 miles. The incursion “incident” was the closest buzz of the West Coast of California since the Cold War.
As the interceptors roared into contact just north of San Francisco, one of the Russian crew members made a statement in what was described by military sources as a threatening tone on an emergency channel: “Good morning American pilots, we are here to greet you on your Fourth of July Independence Day.”
The Colorado based U.S. Northern Command, which guards North American airspace, regularly intercepted TU-95 Bear Bombers that would penetrate the restricted 12 to 24 nautical mile U.S. Contiguous Zone to provocatively skirt the banned U.S. 12-mile Air Defense Identification Zone by scrambling warplanes from Elmendorf Air Force Base near Anchorage.
But other than a few “incidents” in 2008, there had been virtually no provocative actions by Russian bombers until the spring of 2014, when the U.S. began an effort to rally its allies to put sanctions on Russia over the dispute in the Ukraine.
Breitbart News reported that on May 5, 2014, Air Force General Herbert J. Carlisle disclosed at a Washington DC think tank meeting there had been a number of Russian long-range single-aircraft patrols off the California Coast and a circumnavigation of the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam. A month later, four Russian bombers flew within 50 miles of the California Coast.
But in a much more serious incident in September 2014, the Northern Command scrambled multiple pairs of F-15s and F-22 Raptor fighters from Elmendorf to intercept what appeared to be a Russian attack squadron. The six-plane group included two long-range Bear Bombers, two refueling tankers and two Mikoyan Mig-31 fighters. The formation aggressively penetrated the U.S. Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) off the Alaskan coast, according to the Washington Times.
A pair of Tu-95 Bear H bombers was also reported on April 22 of this year to have flown into the US AIDZ off of Alaska’s coast. But U.S. military officials downplayed the Russian fly-by as just the beginning of their long-range aviation spring training cycle, and commented that American fighter jets were not dispatched to make interceptions.
The Russian intrusion on the Fourth of July off of California would be the first provocation of its kind in U.S. or Canadian ADIZs this year. Some military analysist see the bomber flights as mere saber-rattling by Moscow, which has recently raised international tensions with a steady stream of anti-U.S. rhetoric.
But a new National Institute study entitled “Foreign Nuclear Developments: A Gathering Storm” warns that, “While many in the West believe that the end of the Cold War has meant the end of a confrontational and adversarial relationship with Russia, recent events suggest this hoped-for outcome is more the result of wishful thinking than of a sober and realistic assessment of the current geostrategic environment.”
The National Institute suggests that Russia’s across-the-board buildup of nuclear forces and revised first-strike-doctrine are increasing the danger of a nuclear war.
Russian Nuke Carrying Bear Bombers Fly within 40 Miles of California Coast
 
.
You do have to announced your flight and flightpath in advance so as not to cause trouble for civilian air traffic. Which over the north sea etc is quite heavy. Don't know exactly how that is over Yellow Sea.

The Russian sometimes deliberately fly into certain areas with known thick civilian traffic while not filing or keeping a flightpath. That is intentionally disruptive. Hence the occasional hoopla
Thank you for explaining RC-135 disruptive flying path which deserve interception by Chinese JH-7.
 
.
Thank you for explaining RC-135 disruptive flying path which deserve interception by Chinese JH-7.
Actually I said nothing of the sort about this particular RC-135. Also, if you read properly, I also inquired whether the area in which the intercept took place has a lot of commercial traffic. Kindly never ever put any words in my mouth.

Please note the US Defense Department officials said Wednesday that a Chinese fighter jet performed an unsafe maneuver last week while close to a United States 'spy plane' (actually the RC-135 is part of a family of large reconnaissance or 'listening' aircraft). They (DoD) are in no way complaining about an intercept. They have problems with unsafe manouvres of the jet(s) conducting the intercept (i.e. unprofessional and hence dangerous behaviour)

The episode began when the Chinese warplane flew close underneath a Navy P-8 Poseidon. It then moved parallel to the naval plane, with the wingtips of the two aircraft separated by less than 30 feet (10m or so). As a final maneuver, the Chinese fighter jet executed a barrel roll, apparently to show off its weapons payload to the American pilot. During this, the RC-135 flew straight and level. Military officials take such intercepts seriously, particularly given that a Chinese fighter jet collided with a United States Navy spy plane in April 2001 in the skies above Hainan Island. The Chinese pilot was killed, and the American plane was forced to make an emergency landing on Hainan.

Thank you for completely ignoring the post about Russian incursions into the 12 nmi zone off Alaska with combat aircraft, which puts the recent incident with the RC-135 and JHF-7 in proper perspective..

Incidentally, JH-7 is a fighter-bomber, not typically used as interceptor. Perhaps that may have something to do with the incident too.

Flight plans are documents filed by a pilot or flight dispatcher with the local Civil Aviation Authority (e.g. FAA in the USA) prior to departure which indicate the plane's planned route or flight path.
Flight plan format is specified in the ICAO Doc 4444. They generally include basic information such as departure and arrival points, estimated time en route, alternate airports in case of bad weather, type of flight (whether instrument flight rules [IFR] or visual flight rules [VFR]), the pilot's information, number of people on board and information about the aircraft itself.
In most countries, flight plans are required for flights under IFR, but may be optional for flying VFR unless crossing international borders. Flight plans are highly recommended, especially when flying over inhospitable areas, such as water, as they provide a way of alerting rescuers if the flight is overdue.
In the United States and Canada, when an aircraft is crossing the Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), either an IFR or a special type of VFR flight plan called a DVFR (Defense VFR) flight plan must be filed.
For IFR flights, flight plans are used by air traffic control to initiate tracking and routing services. For VFR flights, their only purpose is to provide needed information should search and rescue operations be required, or for use by air traffic control when flying in a "Special Flight Rules Area".
Flight plan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In United States aviation, a special flight rules area (SFRA) is a region in which the normal regulations of flight do not apply in whole or in part, especially regulations concerning airspace classification, altitude, course, and speed restrictions, and the like.
Special flight rules area - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See also Flight planning
Flight planning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


world-air-routes-map.gif
 
Last edited:
.
Overall, Nato said it had intercepted Russian aircraft more than 100 times so far this year [2014] - three times more than it did last year [2013].
"Scrambles and intercepts are standard procedure when an unknown aircraft approaches Nato airspace," the statement said.
However, it said, such flights pose a potential risk to civilian aviation because the Russian military often does not file flight plans or use on-board transponders.
"This means civilian air traffic control cannot detect these aircraft nor ensure there is no interference with civilian air traffic," the statement said.
Nato reports rise in Russia military flights over Europe - BBC News
 
Last edited:
.
A "dangerous interception " is what us deserved, What do you expect from china while your reconnaissance aircraft flying close to china border,especially close to beijing? A cup of beer? What should us do while china aircraft close to Washington?

what nonsense is this? go loo at where 80 miles east of shandug peninsula is. They were close to S.Korea than China. Obviously an amateurish attempt at snooping near S.Korea and suddenly realized there was a US plane nearby and decided to make a show of it.
 
.
The flight distance from Weihai, China to Incheon, South Korea is: 252 miles / 406 km

staticmap


qingdao_map.png
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom