What's new

US Politics

Trump throws Republicans under the bus, by making a deal with Democrats.

When the Democrats propose a three-month extension to the debt ceiling, Speaker Paul Ryan called the proposal “ridiculous” and “disgraceful”, the Republicans and Trump’s Treasury Secretary wanted an 18 month extension. But Trump, the so-called great negotiator accepted Democrats proposal without hardly negotiating.

The Republicans wanted 18 month, so they did not have to deal with the debt ceiling until after the 2018 midterm elections (34 Senate and all 435 House seats will be on the ballot on November 6, 2018) on the other hand, Democrats strategy was to keep the pressure on the Republicans before 2018 primaries, so they can create a rift between Republican incumbents and primary challengers.

Good job Democrats!

summers_14.jpg


‘Trump betrays everyone’: The president has a long record as an unpredictable ally

By Ashley Parker and Philip Rucker September 9

President Trump prepared for the pivotal meeting with congressional leaders by huddling with his senior team — his chief of staff, his legislative director and the heads of Treasury and the Office of Management and Budget — to game out various scenarios on how to fund the government, raise the debt ceiling and provide Hurricane Harvey relief.

But one option they never considered was the one the president ultimately chose: cutting a deal with Democratic lawmakers, to the shock and ire of his own party.

In agreeing to tie Harvey aid to a three-month extension of the debt ceiling and government funding, Trump burned the people who are ostensibly his allies. The president was an unpredictable — and, some would say, untrustworthy — negotiating partner with not only congressional Republicans but also with his Cabinet members and top aides. Trump saw a deal that he thought was good for him — and he seized it.

The move should come as no surprise to students of Trump’s long history of broken alliances and agreements. In business, his personal life, his campaign and now his presidency, Trump has sprung surprises on his allies with gusto. His dealings are frequently defined by freewheeling spontaneity, impulsive decisions and a desire to keep everyone guessing — especially those who assume they can control him.

He also repeatedly demonstrates that, while he demands absolutely loyalty from others, he is ultimately loyal to no one but himself.

“It makes all of their normalizing and ‘Trumpsplaining’ look silly and hollow,” said Rick Wilson, a Republican strategist sharply critical of Trump, referring to his party’s congressional leaders. “Trump betrays everyone: wives, business associates, contractors, bankers and now, the leaders of the House and Senate in his own party. They can’t explain this away as [a] 15-dimensional Trump chess game. It’s a dishonest person behaving according to his long-established pattern.”

But what many Republicans saw as betrayal was, in the view of some Trump advisers, an exciting return to his campaign promise of being a populist dealmaker able to cut through the mores of Washington to get things done.

In that Wednesday morning Oval Office meeting, Trump was impressed with the energy and vigor of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) relative to the more subdued Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.). Far from fretting over the prospect of alienating McConnell and Ryan or members of his administration, he relished the opportunity for a bipartisan agreement and the praise he anticipated it would bring, according to people close to the president.

On Thursday morning, he called Pelosi and Schumer to crow about coverage of the deal — “The press has been incredible,” he told Pelosi, according to someone familiar with the call — and point out that it had been especially positive for the Democratic leaders. Read more
 
.
Beauty with brains, it seems Miss Texas Margana Wood has more commonsense and decency than our President. :usflag:

During the question and asked portion of the Miss America pageant , she was asked about Pres Trump’s disgraceful and apologetic response to white supremacist violence in Charlottesville last month.

She said:

“I think that the white supremacist issue, it was very obvious, that it was a terrorist attack. And I think that President Donald Trump should’ve made a statement earlier addressing the fact, and in making sure all Americans feel safe in this country. That is the number one issue right now.”





How California could jolt the 2020 presidential race

The nation's largest state is poised to upend the primary election schedule.

By DAVID SIDERS and GABRIEL DEBENEDETTI 09/10/2017

LOS ANGELES — California is pushing forward with a plan to change the state’s primary date from June to March, a move that could scramble the 2020 presidential nominating contest and swing the early weight of the campaign to the West.

If adopted by the legislature this week — as is widely expected — and signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown, the early primary would allocate California’s massive haul of delegates just after the nation’s first contests in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina.


The earlier primary could benefit at least two potential presidential contenders from California — U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti — while jeopardizing the prospects of other candidates who will struggle to raise enough early money to compete in expensive media markets in the nation’s most populous state. Read more
http://www.politico.com/staff/gabriel-debenedetti
 
.
How Donald Trump Lied to Conceal His Moscow Business Partner

Perhaps this was his greatest deception of the 2016 campaign.


DAVID CORNSEP. 12, 2017

Donald Trump has told many lies and falsehoods. He’s lied about the Russia scandal. He’s lied about his ties to organized crime. Perhaps he’s lied so much that freshly excavated prevarications don’t register greatly. Yet recent news reports revealing that Trump was pursuing a huge development deal in Moscow in late 2015 and early 2016 show that during the campaign Trump committed a tremendous act of deception.

This mammoth duplicity was encompassed in a small fib. On December 2, 2015, during an interview with an Associated Press reporter, Trump was asked about his relationship with a fellow named Felix Sater. Trump, who was then the front-runner in the GOP presidential nomination contest, replied, “Felix Sater, boy, I have to even think about it. I’m not that familiar with him.” He referred questions to his Trump Organization. One of his lawyers, Alan Garten, subsequently told the AP that Sater once prospected for real estate deals for the Trump Organization and that the arrangement lasted for six months in 2010.

What neither Trump nor Garten said was that—at that very moment—Trump was in the middle of the deal to build a Trump Tower in the Russian capital and that Sater had put together the venture. As he was running for president, Trump was hiding this project from the American public, and he was insisting he barely knew the man at the center of it. This was serious deceit.


Trump’s claim that he was unfamiliar with Sater was regarded at the time as absurd by journalists who have followed Trump’s career; it appeared the candidate was attempting to distance himself from a one-time felon. Sater had a substantial criminal record. In the early 1990s, when he was in his mid-20s, Sater went to jail for about a year after he smashed a broken margarita glass into the face of a man during a barroom altercation. After that, he became part of a mid-1990s stock swindle tied to the Mafia and Russian organized crime. To escape going back to jail, he pleaded guilty to racketeering and became a cooperating witness for the FBI.

While an informant for the bureau, Sater hooked up with a real estate development firm in New York City called Bayrock, and in the 2000s he cooked up various projects with Trump. Many fizzled out and ended up in lawsuits. But at least one was built: the Trump SoHo hotel and condominium project. (That deal also prompted a lawsuit in which buyers of units there claimed to have been defrauded by Trump, his adult children, and others. Trump and his co-defendants settled the case, agreeing to refund 90 percent of $3 million in deposits but admitting no wrongdoing.) Throughout this stretch, Sater, who was born in what is now Russia and who boasted connections there, worked with Trump to try to land a tower project in Moscow, which had long been a dream for Trump.

In 2007, the New York Times revealed Sater’s past as a criminal and reported that Trump was in business with a man who had been accused of “conspiring with the Mafia to launder money and defraud investors.” Trump told the Times he knew nothing of Sater’s dark past. Though Sater departed Bayrock after the Times’ article, Trump’s organization brought him on board three years later, and Sater was wheeling and dealing, seeking projects for Trump and handing out Trump Organization business cards describing him as a “senior advisor to Donald Trump.”

In subsequent years, Trump issued conflicting statements about his relationship with Sater. In a 2011 deposition, Trump acknowledged that he used to speak to Sater “for a period of time.” Yet in a 2013 deposition, Trump said, “If he were sitting in the room right now, I really wouldn’t know what he looked like.” Trump had plenty of reason to distance himself from his felonious onetime business partner. Sater wasn’t simply controversial; he posed a serious risk for Trump. If Trump had been aware of Sater’s felonious and fraudulent past before the Times story came out, such knowledge could taint business deals the Trump Organization made involving Bayrock and possibly create a legal liability.

So it was no surprise when Trump in late November 2015 acted as if he had never met Sater. But now it’s obvious that his dishonest response to the question about Sater was far more significant.

Around September 2015, Sater approached Michael Cohen—a lawyer for Trump and an executive vice president at the Trump Organization—with a proposal for the construction of a luxury hotel, office, and residential condominium building in the Russian capital that would be called Trump Tower Moscow. In a recently released statement, Cohen noted that the project called for a Russian company named I.C. Expert Investment Company to develop the building, and Trump would license his name to the venture. Cohen said he “primarily communicated” with the Russian firm through Sater. Cohen recalled, “Sater claimed to have appropriate relationships within the business community in Russia in order to obtain the real estate, financing, government permits, and other items necessary for such a development…Sater acted as a deal broker and would have been compensated by the licensee if the proposal had been successful. I have known Mr. Sater for several decades and I routinely handled communications with him regarding the proposal.”

This was Sater’s deal. According to a source familiar with this aspect of the Trump-Russia investigation, Trump was fully aware that Sater had brokered the agreement. And around late October 2015, Trump himself signed a letter of intent with I.C. Expert Investment to proceed with the project.

The arrangement would have put $4 million in upfront fees in Trump’s pocket. Trump’s company solicited building designs from different architects and engaged in discussions regarding potential financing for the proposal. (I.C. Expert Investment projects were sometimes financed by Russian banks under US economic sanctions. Last month, Sater told the New York Times that he lined up financial support from VTB Bank, an institution partially owned by the Kremlin and now under US sanctions.)

Sater considered this endeavor related—perhaps crucial—to Trump’s presidential campaign. In October, when he forwarded Cohen the letter of intent for Trump to sign, he wrote, “Lets make this happen and build a Trump Moscow. And possibly fix relations between the countries by showing everyone that commerce & business are much better and more practical than politics. That should be Putins message as well, and we will help him agree on that message. Help world peace and make a lot of money, I would say thats a great lifetime goal for us to go after.” A few weeks later, Sater emailed Cohen: “I arranged for Ivanka to sit at Putins private chair at his desk and office in the Kremlin. I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected…Our boy can become president of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get all of Putins team to buy in on this, I will manage this process.” In mid-January, Cohen, at Sater’s suggestion, sent a letter to Vladimir Putin’s office to ask for help in obtaining permission for the construction from the Russian government.

Ponder all this for a moment. At the time Trump was running for president, he was endeavoring to pull off a major deal in Moscow that required government permission. That is, if Putin didn’t favor this project, it wouldn’t happen. Trump’s right-hand legal man even asked Putin’s office to help them. And through all this, Trump was making positive statements about Putin. One example: In mid-December 2015, Trump said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe that Putin was a better leader than Barack Obama, and when Joe Scarborough asserted that Putin “kills journalists that don’t agree with him,” Trump scoffed at him and said, “He’s running his country and at least he’s a leader, unlike what we have in this country…I think our country does plenty of killing also.”

Trump was defending a repressive leader—but one with whom he was trying to do business in private. Throughout the 2016 election, people wondered why Trump consistently made oddly positive remarks about Putin. Part of the answer is clear: You cannot develop major construction projects in Moscow if you criticize Putin.

Back to Sater. As Trump was in the thick of it with this Sater-brokered project, he gave the impression he hardly had any idea who Sater was. It is hard to see Trump’s answer as anything other than a deceptive reply designed to hide the fact that he was attempting to land a Putin-sanctioned deal in Russia (that would earn him several million dollars) at the same time he was pitching himself as the best possible president of the United States. The truthful answer would have been: “Sure, I know Felix Sater, and right now I am working with him to develop a major hotel-residential-retail project in Moscow that can only move forward with the permission of the Russian government.” How would such a reply have played in the campaign?

The Sater project, like Trump’s previous efforts to develop a Trump Tower in Moscow, eventually fell apart. Cohen says he decided to abandon the idea “for business reasons” in late January 2016. But Sater remained in the Trump orbit. In early 2017, he and Cohen worked on a Russia-friendly peace plan for Ukraine and tried to get the Trump White House to adopt it.

Trump pulled off a con during the presidential campaign. He insisted he cared only about US interests—while he was privately negotiating a deal in Moscow that could only happen with the assent of Putin’s government. In and of itself, this should be a major scandal. Yet Trump got away with it. And to do so, he had to lie about his relationship with Sater. This was not the first instance in which he had misrepresented his connection to Sater. But it was the most important one. Link




download1111.png



Daily Beast: Russia used Facebook to organize and promote anti-immigrant rallies in U.S.

By Gabe Ortiz
Tuesday Sep 12, 2017

”Facebook was the indispensable messenger” for Russia in their hacking of our democracy this past November, media columnist Margaret Sullivan wrote last week,“even more obvious now after Wednesday’s news that Facebook sold ads during the campaign to a Russian ‘troll farm,’ targeting American voters with ‘divisive social and political messages’ that fit right in with Donald Trump’s campaign strategy.”

But now, the Daily Beast reports there’s also evidence that Russia went beyond spreading fake news and used Facebook’s event management tool to “remotely organize and promote political protests in the U.S.,” including an anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim rally in Idaho in August 2016. This is “the first indication that the Kremlin’s attempts to shape America’s political discourse moved beyond fake news and led unwitting Americans into specific real-life action”:

Much of the Russian Facebook propaganda campaign has since been deleted. But bits and pieces remain visible in search engine caches, including a 2016 notice on Facebook Events—the site’s event management and invitation tool—announcing an August 27 rally in a rural Idaho town known to welcome refugees.

“Due to the town of Twin Falls, Idaho, becoming a center of refugee resettlement, which led to the huge upsurge of violence towards American citizens, it is crucial to draw society's attention to this problem,” the event notice began. The three hour protest was titled “Citizens before refugees”, and would be held at the City Council Chambers beginning at 11:00 am. The notice provided the street address and ended with a fiery exhortation.

“We must stop taking in Muslim refugees! We demand open and thorough investigation of all the cases regarding Muslim refugees! All government officials, who are covering up for these criminals, should be fired!”

The event was “hosted” by “SecuredBorders,” a putative U.S. anti-immigration community that was outed in March as a Russian front.

Event turnout bombed just like it did at Trump’s inauguration, but as Fortune notes,“the action taken by Secured Borders clearly amounts to an incitement to real-world political action by American citizens during the election campaign.” One former FBI agent told the Daily Beast that “this is the next step. The objective of influence is to create behavior change. The simplest behavior is to have someone disseminate propaganda that Russia created and seeded. The second part of behavior influence is when you can get people to physically do something.” Link
 
.
But Trump has become Saudi Arabia’s friend now, didn’t you see him dancing on their tunes.:D

I must admit, that was fun to watch. :lol: Saudis rolled out the red carpet. It must've been a cultural shock for the likes of Melania, Ivanca and the rest getting exposed to such Arabic culture. And credit the Saudis for making it a very traditional reception and not making any attempt to westernize the gathering. Even down the the way they served tea and pastry, pure Saudi/Arab style.

img_1058.jpg
 
.
Excellent job, recently Congress unanimously passed a resolution that condemns White Nationalists, White Supremacist, KKK, neo-Nazis and other hate groups for domestic terrorist attack on August 11/12 in Charlottesville, Virginia. Since the bill was passed unanimously, Trump had no choice but to sign the bill, in a way, Trump was forced to sign the bill without putting his apologetic spins for the racist scums.

What an irony, Congress had to force the President to categorically condemn the racist scums. :rolleyes:

racisttoon01.jpg


S.J.Res.49 - A joint resolution condemning the violence and domestic terrorist attack that took place during events between August 11 and August 12, 2017, in Charlottesville, Virginia, recognizing the first responders who lost their lives while monitoring the events, offering deepest condolences to the families and friends of those individuals who were killed and deepest sympathies and support to those individuals who were injured by the violence, expressing support for the Charlottesville community, rejecting White nationalists, White supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups, and urging the President and the President's Cabinet to use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups.115th Congress (2017-2018) Read more

I must admit, that was fun to watch. :lol: Saudis rolled out the red carpet. It must've been a cultural shock for the likes of Melania, Ivanca and the rest getting exposed to such Arabic culture. And credit the Saudis for making it a very traditional reception and not making any attempt to westernize the gathering. Even down the the way they served tea and pastry, pure Saudi/Arab style.

img_1058.jpg
I agree, but here’s a funny thing, during the campaign, Trump and his supporters on this thread used to repeatedly criticize Hillary for accepting money from Saudi Arabia, “the largest sponsors of terrorist” for her charity. After becoming president, Trump picked, not Canada, Britain, Germany, but Saudi Arabia as his first foreign destination, and accepted 83 gifts from the kingdom.

Trump also criticize Pres Obama for Bowing front of the Saudi king, but then, of course, he did the same, watch the video and have fun.


President Trump Bows as he accepts Gold Medal in Saudi Arabia:D

And here an exchange between me and Trump supporters:

Whatta bunch of ballonie. We all know who Omar Mateen's father was rooting for, and lets not forget that Hillary received more than $100,000,000 in donations from Saudi Arabia and other Arab states, the largest sponsors of terrorist organizations like ISIS, Al-Qaeda and Al-Nusra.

Look, we like it or not, but all the countries that you mentioned are considered United States allies in the Middle East, and there is a very good possibility that they will be our friends under president Trump.

Now I should be the last person to defend Saudi Arabia, but the fact is, Saudi government does not "sponsor" or fund ISIS, Al-Qaeda and Al-Nusra, but yes, Saudi citizens do.

@T-72, you think Trump is anti-Saudi Arabia, actually, he's more anti-Iranian
 
.
Trump also criticize Pres Obama for Bowing front of the Saudi king, but then, of course, he did the same, watch the video and have fun.

One of the many, many hypocritical and shameless gum flaps from this guy, lol. And truly shameless! He couldn't care less if you called him out on any of them. As a matter of fact, he'll defend them with another outrageous, hypocritical lie right to all our faces. :lol:

Which brings us to the wire-tapping; apparently he wasn't completely off with that one, in light of what's come out today with the FBI surveillance that was revealed about Paul Manafort. Although it's not exactly wire-tapping Trump himself, it's pretty close. More importantly, it's another bombshell with regards to this mafiosi crew just as we've become immune to all this stuff now. We need a block-busting, slamajamamama to be even mildly moved nowadays. Maybe something like financial records making their way to the Washington Post that show he owed Russia $2.1 billion and sent them an email promising them America in return payment or something along those lines. That might do it. :D
 
.
One of the many, many hypocritical and shameless gum flaps from this guy, lol. And truly shameless! He couldn't care less if you called him out on any of them. As a matter of fact, he'll defend them with another outrageous, hypocritical lie right to all our faces. :lol:

Which brings us to the wire-tapping; apparently he wasn't completely off with that one, in light of what's come out today with the FBI surveillance that was revealed about Paul Manafort. Although it's not exactly wire-tapping Trump himself, it's pretty close. More importantly, it's another bombshell with regards to this mafiosi crew just as we've become immune to all this stuff now. We need a block-busting, slamajamamama to be even mildly moved nowadays. Maybe something like financial records making their way to the Washington Post that show he owed Russia $2.1 billion and sent them an email promising them America in return payment or something along those lines. That might do it. :D

I think that the information Mueller obtained through a search warrant of Facebook is also huge. It means he convinced a federal judge that a crime had taken place by the use of Facebook.
 
.
Manafort offered to give Russian billionaire ‘private briefings’ on 2016 campaign


Less than two weeks before Donald Trump accepted the Republican presidential nomination, his campaign chairman offered to provide briefings on the race to a Russian billionaire closely aligned with the Kremlin, according to people familiar with the discussions.

Paul Manafort made the offer in an email to an overseas intermediary, asking that a message be sent to Oleg Deripaska, an aluminum magnate with whom Manafort had done business in the past, these people said.

“If he needs private briefings we can accommodate,” Manafort wrote in the July 7, 2016, email, portions of which were read to The Washington Post along with other Manafort correspondence from that time.

The emails are among tens of thousands of documents that have been turned over to congressional investigators and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team as they probe whether Trump associates coordinated with Russia as part of Moscow’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. election.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...d975285475e_story.html?utm_term=.d1d2c582901c

The noose is tightening around Manafort's neck.
 
.
Manafort offered to give Russian billionaire ‘private briefings’ on 2016 campaignPaul Manafort made the offer in an email to an overseas intermediary, asking that a message be sent to Oleg Deripaska, an aluminum magnate with whom Manafort had done business in the past, these people said.

The noose is tightening around Manafort's neck.

lol, you know, what is wrong with these peoples' level of intelligence using emails to send these messages back and forth? That's worst than using your cell phone! Aside from the inappropriate actions, the level of stupidity is dumbfounding.

I thought John Kelly's reaction at Trump's UN speech was priceless! This was probably when Trump called Kim Jong Un "Rocket Man." He probably went off-script on that one, drawing Kelly's reaction.

The poor guy's thinking "WTH is it gonna take to control this guy's gum flap! Jesus, he can't help himself!" :lol:

 
.
You know, despite Colin Kaepernick choosing not the stand and instead kneeling during the national anthem in protest and solidarity to BLM, and the controversy it's unleashed in the NFL and social media along with the backlash it's caused him has turned out to be an unwanted baggage causing hesitation for other teams to consider signing him.

161208-admiral-speech-kaepernick-embed.jpg


It's still his right and no matter how "un-American" or disrespectful it might be, taking it on is a slippery slope especially for the president of the United States.

Being pretty good friends with many NFL owners might even complicate this whole battle Trump has started in an obvious attempt to cling on to his base. Is this another lame attempt at that or is this also an entitlement to the President who should also be able to express his opinion on the matter? As much as Kaepernick should be able to protest in this manner, I guess Trump can flap his gums just as much.






Problem is, it's now empowered Kaepernick and might not be something the powerful and influential NFL owners -- whom for the most part are good friends of Trump -- necessarily would've wanted to see coming from the POTUS lol.

N.F.L. Owners Support Kneeling Players in Protest of Trump Comments

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/24/sports/nfl-trump-anthem-protests.html?mcubz=0
 
.
Trump and the Republicans failed again. :cheers:

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAznAAAAJGVkMjAzMDgwLWY4NDYtNDE4Yy1hZTc0LTczNWQyMzIzNjNjYQ.jpg
E5B7792B-9DCB-4FF0-8324-3C6FE7932C3C.jpg

Senate won’t vote on last-ditch Obamacare repeal bill

Republicans made the decision after it was clear their latest plan would fail.


By SEUNG MIN KIM, JENNIFER HABERKORN and BURGESS EVERETT
09/26/2017 10:20 AM EDT

The Senate will not vote on Republicans' latest bill to repeal Obamacare this week, putting an end, for now, to the GOP's seven-year campaign promise to dismantle the health care law.

The decision was reached at a party lunch Tuesday after it became clear the plan would fail, GOP senators said. Three Senate Republicans had already said they would vote against the measure, and the GOP could only afford two defections. Link



One of the many, many hypocritical and shameless gum flaps from this guy, lol. And truly shameless! He couldn't care less if you called him out on any of them. As a matter of fact, he'll defend them with another outrageous, hypocritical lie right to all our faces. :lol:
I totally agree, but we should not give up or ignore his outrageous lies and bogus claims, because the moment we start ignoring his abnormal behavior, is the moment his abnormal behavior starts to become normal. And that’s exactly what he and his supporters want, remember, alternate facts. :D


Which brings us to the wire-tapping; apparently he wasn't completely off with that one, in light of what's come out today with the FBI surveillance that was revealed about Paul Manafort. Although it's not exactly wire-tapping Trump himself, it's pretty close.
I respect your views, but I have a little different take on it, let’s not forget, he’s the President of United State (the sole superpower) and the leader of the Western world, let’s not give him a pass so easily, we must judge him from the high standard we come to expect from our Presidents.

Let’s look at what Trump was alleging in his four tweets:





Trump’s allegation that Obama had ordered wiretap on him, note, he uses the term “my phones”. We both agree was a lie. Pres Obama had no power to order wiretap on an American citizen, to get a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) warrant, Intelligence official would need to convince federal judges that Manafort was working as an agent of a foreign power and only the Court can order wiretap.

He also mentions “Nixon/Watergate”, this is a clear reference to Richard Nixon’s attempt to bug the Democratic party headquarters. Again, I’m sure you’ll agree with me that is complete fabrication.

He also claimed without any evidence that “Nothing found”. Meanwhile, there are reports that Manafort can soon be indicted, so maybe they did find something.

Now, his allegation that “my wires tapped in Trump Tower”, is not true either, though we still do not know for sure if Trump Tower was targeted, but there are reports, Manafort did have an apartment at Trump Tower. So maybe, Manafort’s, not Trumps, phone was tapped in Trump Tower. Trump’s claim is still far-fetched.

Now, the important points are that to this day, Pres Trump has offered no evidence to support his far-fetched allegation. On the other hand, earlier this month Justice Department said in a court filing that it had zero evidence to support Trump’s claims. The motion came in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by a group for government transparency, American Oversight. Link


More importantly, it's another bombshell with regards to this mafiosi crew just as we've become immune to all this stuff now. We need a block-busting, slamajamamama to be even mildly moved nowadays. Maybe something like financial records making their way to the Washington Post that show he owed Russia $2.1 billion and sent them an email promising them America in return payment or something along those lines. That might do it. :D
I agree with you, it’s very hard to follow all the news that keeps on pouring. I don’t believe in witch hunt, as an American citizen, all I want is the truth.
 
.
9 ways Trump’s tax plan is a gift to the rich, including himself

By Heather Long September 28

President Trump and congressional Republicans keep saying their tax plan doesn't help the rich. But that's not true.

The nine-page outline released Wednesday is full of goodies that will make millionaires and billionaires happy. Republicans say it's a starting point, but it would have to be turned on its head to be anything other than a windfall for the wealthy. In fact, in nine pages, The Washington Post counts at least nine ways the wealthy benefit, including Trump himself. Here's our list:

1) A straight-up tax cut for the rich. The top tax rate in the United States is 39.6 percent. Trump and GOP leaders propose lowering that to 35 percent. It's also worth noting the 39.6 percent tax rate applies only to income above $418,400 for singles and $470,700 for married couples. The outline doesn't specify what income level the new 35 percent rate would kick in at. It's possible the rich will get an every bigger tax cut if the final plan raises that threshold.

2) The estate tax goes bye-bye. Trump likes to call the estate tax the “death tax.” At the moment, Americans who pass money, homes or other assets on to heirs when they die pay a 40 percent tax. But here's the important part Trump leaves out: The only people who have to pay this tax are those passing on more than $5.49 million. (And a married couple can inherit nearly $11 million without paying the tax.)

Trump frequently claims the estate tax hurts farmers and small-business owners. But as The Post's Fact Checker team points out, only 5,500 estates will pay any estate tax at all in 2017 (out of about 3 million estates). And of those 5,500 hit with the tax, only 80 (yes, you read that right) are farms or small businesses.

3) Hedge funds and lawyers get a special tax break. The plan calls for the tax rate on “pass-through entities” to fall from 39.6 percent to 25 percent. Republicans claim this is a tax break for small-business owners because “pass-through entities” is an umbrella term that covers the ways most people set up businesses: sole proprietorships, partnerships and S corporations. But the reality is, most small-business owners (more than 85 percent) already pay a tax rate of 25 percent or less, according to the Brookings Institution.

Only 3 percent pay a rate greater than 30 percent. That 3 percent includes doctors, lawyers, hedge fund managers and other really well-off people. Instead of paying a 35 percent income tax, these rich business owners would be able to pass off their income as business income and pay only a 25 percent tax rate. (The tax outline released Wednesday “contemplates” that Congress “will adopt measures to prevent” this kind of tax dodging. But there's no guarantee that will happen).

4) The AMT is over. Republicans want to kill the alternative minimum tax, a measure put in place in 1969 to ensure the wealthy aren't using a bunch of loopholes and credits to lower their tax bills to paltry sums. The AMT starts to phase in for people with earnings of about $130,000, but the vast majority of people subject to the AMT earn over $500,000, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

Trump himself would benefit from repealing the AMT. As The Post's Fact Checker team notes, Trump's leaked tax return from 2005 shows that the AMT increased his tax bill from about $5.3 million to $36.5 million. In 2005 alone, he potentially could have saved $31 million.

5) The wealthy get to keep deducting mortgage interest. Only about 1 in 4 taxpayers claims the mortgage interest deduction, the Brookings Institution says. “Upper-income households primarily benefit from the subsidy,” wrote Brookings scholar Bruce Katz in a report last year. In fact, the wealthy can deduct interest payments on mortgages worth up to $1 million. There have been many calls over the years to lower that threshold, but the Trump tax plan is keeping it in place.

The GOP is doing this even though the tax cuts would add to the United States' debt, since it doesn't raise enough revenue to offset all the money lost from the new tax breaks. The outline also calls for the charitable deduction to stay, another deduction used heavily by the top 1 percent.

6) Stockholders are going to be very happy. Trump is calling for a super-low tax rate on the money big businesses such as Apple and Microsoft bring back to the United States from overseas, a process known as “repatriation.” Trump argues companies will use all this money coming home to build new U.S. factories. But the last time the United States did this, in the early 2000s, it ended up being a big win for people who own stocks. Companies simply took most of the money and gave it to shareholders in the form of dividends and share buybacks.

Guess what? Just about everyone (outside the White House) predicts the same thing will happen again. Corporations are even admitting it.

7) The favorite tax break of hedge fund billionaires is still safe. There's no mention in the tax-overhaul rubric of “carried interest.” Those two words make most people's eyes glaze over, but they are a well-known tax-dodging trick for millionaires and billionaires on Wall Street. Hedge fund and private-equity managers earn most of their money from their investments doing well. But instead of paying income taxes on all that money at a rate of 39.6 percent, the managers are able to claim it as “carried interest” so they can pay tax at the low capital gains rate of 20 percent.

Trump called this totally unfair on the campaign trail. During the primaries, he said he would eliminate this loophole because hedge fund managers were “getting away with murder.” But that change didn't end up in the GOP plan.

8) Capital gains taxes stay low. The nine-page document also says nothing about capital gains, the tax rate people pay when they finally sell a stock or asset after holding on to it for many years. At the moment, the wealthiest Americans pay a 20 percent capital gains rate. Trump and Republican leaders aren't proposing any changes to that, even though it is a popular way for millionaires to lower their tax bill.

9) The Obamacare investment tax goes away. The Affordable Care Act put in place a 3.8 percent surcharge on investment income (known formally as the Net Investment Income Tax). It applies only to individuals earning more than $200,000 a year and married couples earning more than $250,000. There's no mention of this tax in the outline released this week, but Republicans clearly want to get rid of it. Repealing it was part of the GOP health-care bills that failed to pass Congress in recent weeks. One way or another, Republicans are likely to roll back this tax. Read more
 
.
Now, one must wonder, what’s wrong with the Republicans, they elected Roy Moore in an Alabama GOP Senate primary election, and guess what, even Trump thought the man was nuts, Trump was supporting his opponent Luther Strange.

Roy Moore is a dangerous extremist unfit to be a Senator, no surprise, he was supported by Steve Bannon, Sarah Palin and right-wing British scumbag Nigel Farage.

Poor Trump was so embarrassed after Luther Strange lost the election that he deleted all the tweets endorsing him and was quick to congratulate Roy Moore.
:lol:

27-deleted-tweets.nocrop.w710.h2147483647.2x.png



roy-moore.jpg

Roy Moore with a tiny gun. lol

Here is a small sample of Roy Moore beliefs:

God's wrath is felt on Earth

Moore has suggested that the 11 September 2001 attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were a sign of God's divine anger. (America’s enemies think the same way) "Sounds a little bit like the Pentagon" he remarked after reading a Bible passage about "the great slaughter when the towers will fall".

Obama might not be US-born

Trump's predecessor was disqualified to be president, Moore claimed as far back as 2008. The so-called "birther" theory, alleging that Obama was born in Kenya, was heavily promoted by Donald Trump until very late in his campaign.


'Red and yellows' don't get along

He appeared to use pejorative racial terms for Asians and Native Americans at a rally this month."We have blacks and whites fighting, reds and yellows fighting, Democrats and Republicans fighting, men and women fighting. What's going to unite us? What's going to bring us back together? A president? A Congress? No. It's going to be God."


Islam is a 'false religion'

It is also a threat to US laws, Moore claims. Over the summer he falsely allegedthat Sharia law was already being enforced in parts of the states of Illinois and Indiana, offering no evidence.


Homosexuality should be illegal

He has likened it to bestiality, and called it "abhorrent, immoral, detestable, a crime against nature, and a violation of the laws of nature and of nature's God upon which this nation and our laws are predicated".


A Ten Commandments sculpture is worth fighting for

He was dismissed from the Alabama Supreme Court after he refused a federal order to remove a massive stone statue of the Ten Commandments from inside his courthouse.


The law comes from God

"God is the only source of our law, liberty and government," he said from the debate stage last week. Link
 
. .
Trump has been criticized for his weak response to the hurricane in Puerto Rico, well, Trump has an excuse, according to him:

This is an island surrounded by water. Big water. Ocean water.:lol:

So there you have it folks, it’s not that majority of them are nonwhites, or vote for the Democrats, it’s the water, big water, ocean water, that’s preventing him from helping them. :rolleyes:




More allegations of Russian hacking has been proven false yet again. Just one of dozens of fake claims debunked about Russia/Trump.

https://theintercept.com/2017/09/28...ry-falls-apart-is-skepticism-permissible-yet/


It's comical how none of the liberal hacks on here bother to post this news or retract their prior statements. Liberals are known to be stubborn liars after all.
First, you need to take a chill pill, there is no need to make sweeping statements.

It is still a developing story, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is still standing by their story, so at present we really don’t know what the heck is going on.

Now, you’re quick to criticize the liberal media for reporting the story, but maybe you didn’t notice, that the source of the story was Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Secretary of the Department, Elaine Duke is a Trump nominee, in other words, DHS is under the Trump Administration. So, if you are so impatient, and want to criticize someone, then criticize the Trump Administration not the media.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom