There is no such thing as absolute right to freedom. But then you know that. Your just fencing with me. Let it be so.
Fencing you?O my dear friend Kaptaan,You are misunderstanding me.As a former freedomist and ex-atheist i am just trying to understand the logic of my opponent party that consists of same belief i have left the day pilkhana happened,the day i vowed i am going to rape the shit out of freedom in such a way that freedom itself will be begging it does not want to be free anymore.
BTW lets not get into those,just chill.
So we were in freedom.
You know i have been trying to develop an algorithm lately that is going to give me decision based on trained data set about how an state should run consisting of some fixed parameters.
But in process of doing that i have face some serious trouble.
I tried to derive a mathematical expression for freedom,for democracy and for a fixed parameter let's say state intelligence.
I have seen whenever i try to execute these three function together,the basic variables of these three functions always contradict with each other and the output is error.It is so weird.
Can you please help me out in this regards?you have said
There is no such thing as absolute right to freedom. But then you know that. Your just fencing with me. Let it be so.
But then who is defining that function?you?
If yes then what is the exact definition of freedom?what is it's structure?Does it have any fixed structure?
If no then who has defined it?Do you think you should have the right to define any variable in that definition?