US not to back dictators in future, says Clinton

[H2O3C4Nitrogen]

Oh another BS
WTF are they doing in Philippines and Honduras . Supporting Dictators in those reagions where there interests matter.

 

[Spring Onion]

Oh another BS
WTF are they doing in Philippines and Honduras . Supporting Dictators in those reagions where there interests matter.

no actually the hypocrat moroons can only see Pakistan and Cuba

 

[90210]

Mrs Clinton is hilarious as hell.​

She has become desperate, maybe she needs someone under her desk like hubby bill.

USA never ever supported Kings in KSA UAE QATAR KUWAIT EGYPT ............and the list goes on.

USA never supported Musharraf. May be he is regarded as a illegal alien when he is busy delivering his delusions.

USA never supported Coup detta of PPP through Benazir's assassination.

Maybe Mrs Clinton has started missing her medication.

PS: MRS Clinton you need to see your doc.

US not to back dictators in future​

.

 

[Kasrkin]

The rulers of Pakistan would be 'slightly' different in my opinion. There arent that many rulers (and I'm including the elite from both political and military) around who would actually allow drone attacks by US while at the same time having to convince their people that they are against such attacks on the sovereignity of their nation.

You're certainly right. But like you yourself pointed out, the present and preceding Pakistani leadership was faced with exceptional circumstances in terms of the tribal areas which are undoubtedly hosting international terrorists. Everything is relative. With an affair of this nature, we don't know if the US is doing it with the permission of Pakistan's government, or if they're doing so in disregard of our wishes. We just don't know the arrangement, we can't even be sure that we're not operationally involved. A few days ago I was speaking to a soldier back from a tour of the tribal areas, and he told me some very interesting things about them having chips which they can place on an enemy hideout and a Hellfire strike would follow in a couple of hours. Like I said, all unverifiable and conflicting. Given the uncertain nature of all the information we have, it would be premature to conclude things either way.

 

[Spring Onion]

Mrs Clinton is hilarious as hell.​

She has become desperate, maybe she needs someone under her desk like hubby bill.

USA never ever supported Kings in KSA UAE QATAR KUWAIT EGYPT ............and the list goes on.

USA never supported Musharraf. May be he is regarded as a illegal alien when he is busy delivering his delusions.

USA never supported Coup detta of PPP through Benazir's assassination.

Maybe Mrs Clinton has started missing her medication.

PS: MRS Clinton you need to see your doc.

US not to back dictators in future​

.

In other words the old lady admits that US had been backing dictorships in the past and if so then it means all the crying by US for democracy were no more than BS.

 

[dbc]

I'm afraid you misunderstood me sir. Your post was already dumb and incoherent, you just made it dumber. I've never argued that the 'great devil' is unjust in 'exploiting' us. None of that is relevant to the line of my contentions. If you have some relevant thoughts to my posts, then please do post, but not because of any 'other urges'. Thanks.

Kasrkin, when you became moderator I told you with power comes responsibility. I don't care if hot headed teenagers insult my country but when a responsible "super moderator" does it I take it seriously.

 

[NukeLord]

Kasrkin, when you became moderator I told you with power comes responsibility. I don't care if hot headed teenagers insult my country but when a responsible "super moderator" does it I take it seriously.

United States Bill of Rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Patriot]

Jesus Christ..you guys are too sensitive.If America was bashed like Pakistan is bashed all over the American Military forums then i think you would have a heart attack...

 

[gambit]

In other words the old lady admits that US had been backing dictorships in the past and if so then it means all the crying by US for democracy were no more than BS.

No BS about it. What make a country functionally democratic is internal, not external. If the US had to deal with any dictator, it is because that is all we have to deal with. Stalin was not such a nice character yet we 'backed' Stalin in WW II.

 

[Spring Onion]

No BS about it. What make a country functionally democratic is internal, not external. If the US had to deal with any dictator, it is because that is all we have to deal with. Stalin was not such a nice character yet we 'backed' Stalin in WW II.

By supporting and protecting a dictator for your own interests only prolonged the dictatorship. You can not deny that you had played the bigger role in that.

 

[Zee-Gen]

How we can trust US statements like this……………we have to understand that in future whatever is in interest of Pakistan definitely will contradict US’s interests in this region. Pakistan and US cannot be friend on the basis of common interests…………as I am not seeing any common interest in the future..........like friendly relations with china as china is becoming a rival of US for superpower tag……..Pakistan-Iran gas pipeline through which china and Central Asian countries will be connected in future……...Chine’s trade through Gwadar Port, which will enhance its economy by reaching gulf and Europe………..Pakistan’s trade route via Iran and Turkey to Europe, which will definitely not help Pakistan but also China to boost its economy…….Pakistan can become a gateway between Gulf, Europe, Central Asia, China and Russia …….and many more things……….all these developments in future will provide opportunities to China and Russia to hoist their economies and also will give them access to oil reserves of Gulf.

US knows all this and that is a reason why all this 9/11 drama was engendered to provide a logical motive for its presence in Afghanistan and sabotage all these activities in future…………so, whenever US feels……..dictator will come and as long as dictator will behave according to US needs, US will help…….!!!!

 

[gambit]

By supporting and protecting a dictator for your own interests only prolonged the dictatorship. You can not deny that you had played the bigger role in that.

Mutual interests. You cannot so cavalierly dismiss the role of the people. Saddam Hussein came to power, not by CIA connivance as erroneously believed, but thru Syrian socialist assistance. The Iranians overthrew the Shah, someone the US supported, and now they are living under a dictator of their own creation. The US have nothing to do with it. Qadoofus in Libya received nothing from US and we have to deal with him.

 

[Kasrkin]

Kasrkin, when you became moderator I told you with power comes responsibility. I don't care if hot headed teenagers insult my country but when a responsible "super moderator" does it I take it seriously.

I didn't insult anyones country. Please think about the tone and context of my words before you fling accusations. If you're referring to the term 'Great Devil' then please remind yourself that I posted them in quotation and with sarcasm as that is how many anti-Americanists refer to it. Its apparent you missed the whole God damn point of what I said, its my fault no doubt. But please on your part try to reread posts when there is ambiguity before lashing out.

 

[ambidex]

Every single post in this thread is Nauseating and inconclusive. Wow.. i never know people have oversensitive digital ego here in PDF.

Before presenting your arguments can someone please tell me what was the need for H. Clinton to make such comments(Pakistan specific)?

I think the answer will help to proceed ahead.
Regards.

whenever you will open the doors of your awareness life will impvove itself.

 

[Spring Onion]

Mutual interests. You cannot so cavalierly dismiss the role of the people. Saddam Hussein came to power, not by CIA connivance as erroneously believed, but thru Syrian socialist assistance. The Iranians overthrew the Shah, someone the US supported, and now they are living under a dictator of their own creation. The US have nothing to do with it. Qadoofus in Libya received nothing from US and we have to deal with him.

Oh how easily you picked up only few cases and left over the other ones where you were supporing the dictators directly.

I think there was someone called Zia or Musharraf if i am not forgetting these names and there is someone ine egypt too