What's new

US must 'get used to China's rise'

Mao1949

BANNED
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
244
Reaction score
1
Country
China
Location
China
Washington's engagement in territorial issues 'complicates problems'

Chinese and Western observers seemed to reach a consensus on Wednesday over President Xi Jinping's proposal to establish a new framework for security cooperation in Asia, and he also sent a veiled warning to Washington.

"To beef up a military alliance targeting a third party is not conducive to regional common security," Xi said without mentioning the United States when delivering a keynote speech at a regional security forum in Shanghai on Wednesday.

Provocation and escalation of tensions for selfish interests should be opposed, he told participants at the fourth Summit of the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia, including representatives from Japan, the Philippines and Vietnam.

Instead, Beijing is urging Washington to get used to China's rise and take a proper role in the region, which is the world's economic engine but is also prone to security threats.

"Someone who tries to blow out another's oil lamp will set his beard on fire," the president said, quoting a Kazakh proverb, drawing the attention of Kazakh reporters who were watching the live feed of the speech in the media center.

Xi's remarks came amid recent escalating tension in the South China Sea as some Asian countries, especially those having territorial rows with China, have sought to reaffirm their security ties with Washington.

Pang Zhongying, a professor of international affairs at Renmin University of China, said: "It is time to tell the US it is not justified in interfering in Asia's affairs, which have nothing to do with the country."

Washington's engagement in Asia's territorial issues, for example, has complicated the problems and emboldened its allies, he said.

During an Asian tour last month, US President Barack Obama sought to reassure Washington's traditional allies like Tokyo and Manila about its long-promised strategic pivot toward the Asia-Pacific, widely regarded as an attempt to counter China.

Ruan Zongze, vice-president of the China Institute of International Studies, said the alliance, a product of the Cold War, deepened divisions in Asia while weakening regional willingness for economic cooperation.

"Many countries tend to give up diplomatic efforts as they believe they can just rely on such an alliance to bolster their illegal claims over territory and sea," Ruan said.

Xi spoke against a zero-sum, Cold War concept of security, saying "no country should attempt to dominate regional security affairs or infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of other countries".

Security problems in Asia should eventually be solved by Asians themselves, he said, reiterating China's stance to resolve disputes peacefully and to oppose the arbitrary use of force or threats.

Jia Xiudong, a senior researcher on international affairs at the China Institute of International Studies, said, "A US role in Asia is not unthinkable for China, and its constructive role is very welcome in some multilateral problems."

"But it's a pity that what Washington is doing now is far from being constructive," Jia added.

Pang said the US has to accept the fact that China is developing in an age of global transformation, but China is not building another alliance to target any third party.
 
Now Xi want to control which countries Asian countries should make friend to ?

Deng-Xiaoping_1_1.jpg
 
Now Xi want to control which countries Asian countries should make friend to ?

Deng-Xiaoping_1_1.jpg

This is taichi, soft against hard :D There are many China historical leader who bowed to their opponent. But at the end, they were the ultimate winner. The example was Liu Bang and Han Xin. So I don't think that my fellow Chinese members here will feel bad with this :) Plus bowing is a courtesy, Even Japanese bows. It just a culture. i think it just difference culture between Vietnam and China, so my Vietnamese Friend doesn't know about this.

But I recommend Tai Chi and Aikido to Vietnamese friends. Sometime, Hard against Hard is not the good answer. Something that too hard need to be answered with softer strategem. If you don't like the term of Tai Chi, then I can say, use Aikido to win your case against China :D
 
Last edited:
This is taichi, soft against hard :D There are many China historical leader who bowed to their opponent. But at the end, they were the ultimate winner. The example was Liu Bang and Han Xin. So I don't think that my fellow Chinese members here will feel bad with this :) Plus bowing is a courtesy, Even Japanese bows. It just a culture. i think it just difference culture between Vietnam and China, so my Vietnamese Friend doesn't know about this.

But I recommend Tai Chi and Aikido to Vietnamese friends. Sometime, Hard against Hard is not the good answer. Something that too hard need to be answered with softer strategem. If you don't like the term of Tai Chi, then I can say, use Aikido to win your case against China :D

you misunderstand my posting, I had not comment on Deng style, but stated, China could make friend to anyone, so do we !!!
 
You could argue it was US which helped manufacture China's rise.
 
hahaha the things China says to other nations are funny. "Hey I'm growing faster than you so you need to bend over."
 
hahaha the things China says to other nations are funny. "Hey I'm growing faster than you so you need to bend over."

That's pretty much how nations worked throughout history. One country is growing faster and becomes stronger than its neighbors and the neighbors have to either find a way to catch up or accept it and bend over. That's really how every empire, superpower came about.
 
That's pretty much how nations worked throughout history. One country is growing faster and becomes stronger than its neighbors and the neighbors have to either find a way to catch up or accept it and bend over. That's really how every empire, superpower came about.

will USA invade Canada or Mexico? No
 
will USA invade Canada or Mexico? No
No problem with 'rise', but China shouldn't expect anybody to 'get used to China's bullying'. :)

Yeah, I am sure war of 1812 means nothing to you. Fun fact, Texas used to belong Mexico and US won it in a war with Mexico. In fact, I actually have US, Canada and Mexico in mind in my original statement. When US was found in 1776, it was a fraction of its current size and over the next 200 year fought a number of wars with its neighbors over territory, but eventually Canada and Mexico could not keep up with US' growth and have to bend over.

The thing is, for the vast majority of human history Vietnam has bent over before the dominant regional power,I honestly don't see why it would be different today.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom