What's new

US missile defense test fails: Pentagon

JohnyD

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
3,689
Reaction score
-15
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
US missile defense test fails: Pentagon

WASHINGTON: America's missile defense system failed on Friday in a test over the Pacific, with an interceptor failing to hit an incoming ballistic missile, the Pentagon said.

The miss represented yet another setback for the costly ground-based interceptors, which have not had a successful test result since 2008.

The test's objective was to have an interceptor, launched from Vandenberg air base in California, knock out a long-range ballistic missile fired from a US military test site at Kwajalein atoll in the Marshall Islands.

But "an intercept was not achieved," US Missile Defense Agency spokesman Richard Lehner said in a brief statement.

"Program officials will conduct an extensive review to determine the cause or causes of any anomalies which may have prevented a successful intercept," it said.

The anti-missile weapon has run into repeated technical problems, with tests delayed after two failures in 2010.

The United States has 30 of the ground-based interceptors in Alaska and California, at a cost of about $34 billion. They are supposed to counter the potential threat posed by North Korea, which has tried to develop long-range ballistic missiles.

The Pentagon wants to deploy an additional 14 ground-based interceptors to bases in Alaska, at a cost of about $1 billion, also in response to what Washington deems a growing threat from North Korea.

Some lawmakers also are pushing to open a new missile defense site on the country's East Coast, in case Iran or other adversaries obtain long-range missiles.

Critics of the missile defense program are sure to seize on the test result as further proof that the system faces insurmountable technical hurdles.

US missile defense test fails: Pentagon - The Times of India
 
.
US missile defense test fails: Pentagon

WASHINGTON: America's missile defense system failed on Friday in a test over the Pacific, with an interceptor failing to hit an incoming ballistic missile, the Pentagon said.

The miss represented yet another setback for the costly ground-based interceptors, which have not had a successful test result since 2008.

The test's objective was to have an interceptor, launched from Vandenberg air base in California, knock out a long-range ballistic missile fired from a US military test site at Kwajalein atoll in the Marshall Islands.

But "an intercept was not achieved," US Missile Defense Agency spokesman Richard Lehner said in a brief statement.

"Program officials will conduct an extensive review to determine the cause or causes of any anomalies which may have prevented a successful intercept," it said.

The anti-missile weapon has run into repeated technical problems, with tests delayed after two failures in 2010.

The United States has 30 of the ground-based interceptors in Alaska and California, at a cost of about $34 billion. They are supposed to counter the potential threat posed by North Korea, which has tried to develop long-range ballistic missiles.

The Pentagon wants to deploy an additional 14 ground-based interceptors to bases in Alaska, at a cost of about $1 billion, also in response to what Washington deems a growing threat from North Korea.

Some lawmakers also are pushing to open a new missile defense site on the country's East Coast, in case Iran or other adversaries obtain long-range missiles.

Critics of the missile defense program are sure to seize on the test result as further proof that the system faces insurmountable technical hurdles.

US missile defense test fails: Pentagon - The Times of India

Mid course interception is too difficult to achieve. US should place laser shooting satellite in geosynchronous orbit over NK and shoot down its missiles at boost phase. @gambit how likely is that with today's technology?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Mid course interception is too difficult to achieve. US should place laser shooting satellite in geosynchronous orbit over NK and shoot down its missiles at boost phase. @gambit how likely is that with today's technology?

that might be seen as the weaponization of space which is against the international legal agreement and then it wil be followed by countires like Russia and China, leaving enough space for othes like India to test its ASAT.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Nothing serious - fails are part of every research and tests.
 
. .
Was this really required ,,, ??:closed:

every country missiles test failed once upon a time . but you never ever heard missile test failed in pakistan . bcz all pakistani missiles already tested in china .
 
.
Why don't US take Help from INDIANS as they have BEST ABM system in this world made by D,RDO ?

US is looking for larger range ABM system which is stil in the development phase in India....may be India can expect a formal request from the US in future when can offer the US to protect its land just by deploying our ABM systems in our land only..you know ABM system with Super Range....this way we can protect our customers/allies and our technology..Happpy?
 
.
Why don't US take Help from INDIANS as they have BEST ABM system in this world made by D,RDO ?

Stop this, India do not even have this kind of systems planned. India is still trying to develop THAAD.

Taunting is not necessary in this forum. We should just present the facts. And no Indians claim to plan to develop this kind of system.
 
.
every country missiles test failed once upon a time . but you never ever heard missile test failed in pakistan . bcz all pakistani missiles already tested in china .

Just because you are incompetent that doesn't mean others are too. Go brain fartt somewhere else if you don't have anything constructive to add as this thread is not about india/pakistan.
 
.
that might be seen as the weaponization of space which is against the international legal agreement and then it wil be followed by countires like Russia and China, leaving enough space for othes like India to test its ASAT.

India don't have ASAT, it's still a pipe dream and it will remain that way.

US is looking for larger range ABM system which is stil in the development phase in India....may be India can expect a formal request from the US in future when can offer the US to protect its land just by deploying our ABM systems in our land only..you know ABM system with Super Range....this way we can protect our customers/allies and our technology..Happpy?

US could just go to Russia since the Indian systems are all Russian imports.
 
.
India don't have ASAT, it's still a pipe dream and it will remain that way.
We dont have it readily buts it in pipeline and not a pipe-dream ...we are just waiting for the right time to test it!

US could just go to Russia since the Indian systems are all Russian imports.

Well, they wont get it directly from Russia so they might come to India....the way you use Russian copied stuff and then even export it to countries like Pakistan!
 
.
Stop this, India do not even have this kind of systems planned. India is still trying to develop THAAD.

Taunting is not necessary in this forum. We should just present the facts. And no Indians claim to plan to develop this kind of system.

Sorry my dear who ever you are..... You can't compete with INDIA... ask any one here...
 
.
India don't have ASAT, it's still a pipe dream and it will remain that way.

he did not say india has one he said india gets a reason to make one. its not a question of capability just a matter of intent.the same reason ur generals claimed that indians down played the range of agni v..besides we dont need a specialized wepon for that a modified agni v can be used for it.After Agni-V launch, DRDO?s new target is anti-satellite weapons - Times Of India

lets stay on the topic bro
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom