What's new

US military news, discussions and history

Navy’s $2.7B Unfunded List to Congress Topped By Electronic Warfare Upgrades, Destroyer Modernization and Aircraft Buys

Upgrading the electronic warfare capabilities ships and aircraft, modernizing destroyers and adding almost $2 billion in new aircraft topped the Navy’s list of wants in its unfunded priorities wish list to Congress.

In a concise letter to Congress, the Navy ‘s Fiscal Year 2016 unfunded priorities list (UPL) asked for $200 million in airborne and surface electronic warfare modernization, $60 million in destroyer modernization and $2.2 billion in new aircraft, according to the Pentagon’s submission to Congress obtained by USNI News.

“Navy had to accept reduction in naval warfare systems’ modernization, aircraft procurement and air and missile defense capabilities to meet fiscal constraints,” read the attached letter from Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert to legislators.
“Further, adversary naval warfare modernization and our tactical aircraft readiness has evolved since our budget submission — they are more challenging.”

The contents of the UPL was first reported by Defense News on Tuesday.

Greenert identified three warfare areas in which the service was “taking significant chances” that could use additional money:

  • Improving sensors for air-to-air and anti-cruise missile fight
  • Increase striker fighter, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and logistics aircraft capacity.
  • Improve undersea warfare sensors and fire control systems
Number one in terms of priority for the service are 170 Air-to-air Radio Frequency Kill Chain Kits that “defeats enemy jamming at longer ranges” and if funded would cover all of the Boeing F/A-18 E/F Super Hornets and EA-18G Growlers by 2020 for $170 million, according to the submission.

The Navy also included an unfunded request for $60 million to fully upgrade a Flight IIA Arleigh Burke guided missile destroyer (DDG-51) to include a more modern suite of computers and the ability to handle ballistic missile and anti-air warfare threats simultaneously. The funds would buy a combat system ship set in FY 2016 for installation in 2018.

Screen-Shot-2015-03-31-at-7.58.07-AM.png


The Navy passed on fully upgrading five of its more modern DDGs in the Future Year Defense Plan (FYDP) for a savings of about $500 over the five-year period, USNI News reported in early March.

The largest line items in terms of cost were $1.15 billion for 12 additional Super Hornets and $1.04 billion for eight Lockheed Martin F-35C Lighting II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF).

The 12 additional Super Hornets would reduce some of the pressure on legacy F/A-18 A-D Hornets — set to already undergo a service life extension program (SLEP) — and be built with the internal wiring to be easily converted into the electronic attack Growlers, Greenert wrote.

The eight JSFs would buy back part of a 16 fighter reduction over the FYDP as part of the FY 2016 budget submission.

“Procuring eight additional aircraft in FY 2016 will mitigate transition risk to the F-35C [initial operating capability] in 2018, while also assuring the transition timeline of the next two JSF squadrons,” according to the submission.

The Navy also asked for eight towed sonar arrays for Virginia-class submarines, two Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) Block II shipsets, a Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and two C-40A cargo planes.

This year’s list is much more modest and less granular than the FY 2015 submission —more than $10 billion — and focused on a high-end air-to-air warfare capabilities.



*Come on Congress, let's get this done!!!

:yay::yay::yay:

:usflag:
 
. . . .
:lol: Women like explosions too:victory:. Being active duty does help though.

Not a whole lot of action in my line of work though:angry:

View attachment 209935

I like psychology though, so I really want to understand why some women are interested in military :cool:

Yup, some of our military personnel are women, there are also present in special force. Quite understandable since we are fighting insurgency and some time we need women for intelligence gathering. 8-)

As a woman member in PDF you will be regarded as special and interesting in here :partay:
 
. .
:laughcry:

@Armstrong s reminded me of that:p:. I just tell people I'm getting married (pushed back the date because my husband's overseas) and they back off. No one, no one wants to annoy a Viking.

:taz:

I see your originally from Sweden. How long have you been in the States?
 
.
I see your originally from Sweden. How long have you been in the States?

:lol:

Well, actually my flags aren't right. Kai, also known as @SvenSvensonov - or my husband, created the account with his real flags (after he locked himself out of his), since his current profile lists two US flags due to him living in the US and holding an allegiance to the US military. However, I'm from Russia - so the Swedish flag should be Russian instead, but moved to the US when I was 18. So 8 1/2 years in the US for me.

Got to say, what I heard about the US and US citizens while in Russia was soooooo wrong:angry:. Anyone who dislikes the US, and disliking its government is understandable, should visit, it's a wonderful place.
 
Last edited:
. .
I thought I was cordial and appropriate throughout ! :undecided:

You are, you are just teasing you, I actually appreciate your friendly/playfulness. It's a welcome distraction at work. Long hours, boring days, I need some laughter and smiles every once in a while.

:enjoy:

US Nuclear-tipped Cruise Missiles

AGM-129 - now retired

AGM-129_ACM_-_ID_DF-SD-04-03208.JPEG


Agm-129_acm.jpg


The AGM-129A advanced cruise missile is a stealth, nuclear-capable cruise missile used exclusively by U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortress strategic bombers.

The AGM-129A is a subsonic, turbofan-powered, air-launched cruise missile. It is harder to detect, and has greater range and accuracy than the AGM-86 air-launched cruise missile. The ACM achieves maximum range through its highly efficient engine, aerodynamics and fuel loading. B-52H bombers can carry up to six AGM-129A missiles on each of two external pylons for a total of 12 per aircraft. When the threat is deep and heavily defended, the AGM-129 delivers the proven effectiveness of a cruise missile enhanced by stealth technology. Launched in quantities against enemy targets, the ACM's difficulty to detect, flight characteristics and range result in high probability that enemy targets will be eliminated.

The AGM-129A's external shape is optimized for low observables characteristics and includes forward swept wings and control surfaces, a flush air intake and a flat exhaust. These, combined with radar-absorbing material and several other features, result in a missile that is virtually impossible to detect on radar.

The AGM-129A offers improved flexibility in target selection over other cruise missiles. Missiles are guided using a combination of inertial navigation and terrain contour matching enhanced with highly accurate speed updates provided by a laser Doppler velocimeter. These, combined with small size, low-altitude flight capability and a highly efficient fuel control system, give the United States a lethal deterrent capability well into the 21st century.

In 1982 the Air Force began studies for a new cruise missile with stealth characteristics after it became clear that the AGM-86B would soon be too easy to detect by future air defense systems. In 1983 General Dynamics was awarded a contract to develop the new AGM-129A ACM. The first test missile flew in 1985; the first missiles were delivered to the Air Force in mid-1990.

Plans called for an initial production of approximately 1,500 missiles. The end of the Cold War and subsequent budget cuts led the Air Force to cease production after 460 missiles, with the final delivery in 1993. Several corporate changes during production resulted in Raytheon Missile Systems as the final production firm.





AGM-28 - also retired

agm-28b.jpg


Boeing_B-52F_takeoff_with_AGM-28_Hound_Dog_missiles.jpg


The Hound Dog, originally designated B-77, was redesignated GAM-77 and then became the AGM-28. North American Aviation designed the missile so that two could be carried on specially modified B-52s, one beneath each wing. The navigation systems of the B-52 and the GAM-77 were integrated so that the B-52 navigator could cross-check data with the automated system in the Hound Dogs.

Named after a hit song by Elvis Presley, the AGM-28 Hound Dogs were air-launched supersonic missiles designed to destroy heavily defended ground targets. The Hound Dog missile program began on March 15, 1956, when the U.S. Air Force issued a requirement for an air-to-surface missile to be carried on the B-52 bomber. North American won the contract on Oct. 16, 1958, and delivered the first production model to Gen. Thomas S. Power, commander in chief of the Strategic Air Command (SAC), on Dec. 21, 1959, in a ceremony at North American's Downey, Calif., plant.

The first launch of the missile from a B-52 took place in April 1959. By the end of 1959, the Air Force had approved 29 B-52 squadrons to be equipped with Hound Dog missiles.

No AGM-28s were ever used in combat, but on a typical mission, an AGM-28 would be launched at an altitude of 45,000 feet (13,700 meters), climb to more than 56,000 feet (17,068 meters), cruise to the target area and then dive to the target. The missile allowed standoff launches hundreds of miles from the target, reducing risk to the launch aircraft.

In 1960, the SAC developed a method for using the missiles’ jet engines to provide extra power for the B-52 carrier in flight or during takeoff. The missiles could then be refueled in flight from the bomber's fuel tanks.

The AGM-28B, incorporating an improved guidance system and with greater range, first flew in May 1961. Before production ended in 1963, almost 700 AGM-28s were built. The last AGM-28s were removed from service in 1975 and scrapped three years later.

 
.
:lol:

Well, actually my flags aren't right. Kai, also known as @SvenSvensonov - or my husband, created the account with his reals flags, since his current profile lists two US flags due to him living in the US and holding an allegiance to the US military, however, I'm from Russia - so the Swedish flag should be Russian instead, but moved to the US when I was 18. So 8 1/2 years in the US for me.

Got to say, what I heard about the US and US citizens while in Russia was soooooo wrong:angry:. Anyone who dislikes the US, and disliking its government is understandable, should visit, it's a wonderful place.

Well, we're happy to have you here! It's a shame the US is presented in such a bad light in Russia. I hope one day we can become true allies.
 
.
I will try to keep posting updates every 2 days
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navy Fixes Carrier Catapult to Launch Jets with External Fuel Tanks

Navy Fixes Carrier Catapult to Launch Jets with External Fuel Tanks | Defense Tech

The Navy plans to fix the software on its new carrier-based electromagnetic catapult system so that it can launching F/A-18s and Growlers carrying additional external fuel tanks under the wings, service officials said.

The changes will be finished on the Navy’s Electro Magnetic Aircraft Launch System, or EMALS, in time for operational testing aboard the Navy’s first Ford-class carrier — the USS Gerald R. Ford — in 2017, said Navy Cmdr. Thurraya Kent.

In April 2014, the Navy discovered an issue during testing at its facility in Lakehurst, N.J., that prevents the system from launching F/A-18 Super Hornets and EA-18 Growlers that are configured with external wing tanks, service officials said.

“The Navy understands the issue and will address it with a software modification well before any planned operational launch and recovery of aircraft. The fix will only involve a software change and will be completed well before any planned operational launch and recovery of aircraft,” she said.

The external fuel tanks, positioned beneath the wings on the E/A-18G Growler electronic jamming aircraft and F/A-18s, add additional stress to the aircraft when launched by EMALS, an issue which could wind up shortening the operational life of the aircraft.

The software updates are anticipated to begin by March of next year.

“No additional hardware or hardware changes to equipment already installed onboard CVN 78 are required, and there are no modifications required for any of the aircraft affected,” Kent explained.

EMALS is a next-generation carrier-deck launch systems engineered to replace existing steam catapults and go on the services’ new Ford-class carriers.

The first EMALS system has been under construction for several years aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford, or CVN 78, the first in class of the new carriers expected to deliver to the Navy next year.

The USS Ford has been heavily criticized by lawmakers and government watchdog groups for cost overruns and delays with the new technologies. The ship is on track to come in under its congressionally-mandated cost cap of $12.9 billion.

“Two of the four catapults are completely built. The other two are almost built,” said Rear Adm. Thomas Moore, Program Executive Officer, Carriers.

The system is part of a new series of carrier-based technologies designed to significantly increase the sortie rate and engineer a tailorable catapult that can achieve the desired amount of power for a an aircraft’s dimensions and weight – all while reducing wear and tear on airframes.

“EMALS gives the Navy the flexibility to make adjustments based on aircraft weight and configuration to accommodate a wider range of aircraft, including lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles that cannot be launched with a steam catapult,” Kent said. “EMALS can be adjusted more optimally and rapidly than a steam catapult could accommodate, providing the Navy with the ability to increase sortie generation rate for our entire inventory of combat aircraft.”

Additional laboratory testing of the software glitches will be performed this year before control algorithms and fine-tuning can take place, Kent added.

“This will be followed by dead load launches, comparative steam catapult launches and aircraft launches at Lakehurst next fiscal year,” she said.

The fixes are designed to build upon how EMALS is engineered to adjust power and thrust depending upon the weight of the aircraft. As a result, Navy officials say the system can be adjusted to accommodate the aircraft loaded with extra fuel tanks under the wings.

“EMALS will allow us to do the fine-tuning as necessary,” Kent said. “The resolution of this issue is straight-forward because the Navy will leverage this inherent capability of the system to tune the catapult forces for these wing tank configurations. There is no impact to ongoing shipboard installation or shipboard testing and this will not delay any CVN 78 milestones,” Kent said.

On the USS Ford, the below-deck EMALS equipment has been installed. This consists of a series of transformers and rectifiers designed to convert and store electrical power through a series of motor generators before brining power to the launch motors on the catapults, Moore explained.

“By having this electrical pulse come down, you are pulling the aircraft down to the catapult to launch it. You can dial in the precise weight of the aircraft. As you accelerate the aircraft down the catapult, you can accelerate it to the precise speed it needs to launch,” Moore said.

Unlike steam catapults which use pressurized steam, a launch valve and a piston to catapult aircraft, EMALS uses a precisely determined amount of electrical energy. As a result, EMALS is designed to more smoothly launch aircraft while reducing stress and wear and tear on the airframes themselves, he added.

“By the time the aircraft gets to the catapult it is at the right speed. Minimizing stress on the airframe, over time, reduces maintenance,” Moore added.

On the ship, EMALS will be engineered such that any of the ship’s four catapults will be able to draw power from any one of three energy storage groups on the ship, he said.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Navy funds construction of new destroyer (DDG-121)
HII gets Navy funding for new destroyer build - UPI.com

PASCAGOULA, Miss., March 31 (UPI) -- The U.S. Navy has funded construction by Huntington Ingalls Industries of an Arleigh Burke-class (DDG 51) Aegis guided missile destroyer.
The DDG 121 is the third of five DDG 51 destroyers the company was awarded in June 2013. The funding -- $604.3 million -- comes under a contract modification.

"The DDG 51 program has been the backbone of Ingalls Shipbuilding for the past three decades," said DDG 51 Program Manager George Nungesser. "We now have a hot production line in the shipyard where we can maintain our highly skilled shipbuilding crews in the same working areas for each ship. This will allow increased learning and provide the most efficient way to reduce cost and schedule while building quality ships for the United States Navy."

Ingalls said the five-ship contract it had received allows for more efficiency in construction through bulk buying of materials and by moving its workforce from ship to ship.

A total of 28 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers have been delivered to the Navy by Ingalls. Four destroyers are under construction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HII launches US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, John Finn (DDG 113)

HII launches US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, John Finn (DDG 113) - Naval Technology

The US Navy's newest Arleigh Burke-class (DDG 51) Aegis guided missile destroyer, John Finn (DDG 113), has been launched at Huntington Ingalls Industries' (HII) shipyard.

John Finn, which was keel laid in November 2013, is the 63rd DDG 51 destroyer, and the first of the DDG 51 Flight IIA restart ships.

US Navy DDG 51-class programme manager captain Mark Vandroff said: "This is the first DDG 51-class ship to launch in almost four years, and we're both proud and excited with the progress the programme is making.

"I look forward to John Finn joining the fleet and the other ships of her class to continue in the legacy of success that is the Arleigh Burke destroyer."

HII will continue outfitting the destroyer in preparation for the ship's scheduled delivery to the navy in the third quarter of 2016.

The DDG 113, which will be equipped with the Aegis combat system and the SPY-1D multi-function phased array radar, is set to undergo it's Aegis system light off later this year.

The destroyer's christening ceremony, where it will be named after a Medal of Honor recipient, is scheduled to take place on 2 May.

The Arleigh Burke-class destroyers provide anti-submarine, anti-air and anti-surface capabilities for the navy, while also supporting carrier battle, surface action, amphibious and replenishment groups.

Ralph Johnson (DDG 114), Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) and Delbert D. Black (DDG 119) destroyers are currently under construction at Ingalls Shipbuilding, which has delivered 28 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers to the navy so far.
 
. . .
I will try to keep posting updates every 2 days

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HII launches US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, John Finn (DDG 113)

HII launches US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, John Finn (DDG 113) - Naval Technology

The US Navy's newest Arleigh Burke-class (DDG 51) Aegis guided missile destroyer, John Finn (DDG 113), has been launched at Huntington Ingalls Industries' (HII) shipyard.

John Finn, which was keel laid in November 2013, is the 63rd DDG 51 destroyer, and the first of the DDG 51 Flight IIA restart ships.

US Navy DDG 51-class programme manager captain Mark Vandroff said: "This is the first DDG 51-class ship to launch in almost four years, and we're both proud and excited with the progress the programme is making.

"I look forward to John Finn joining the fleet and the other ships of her class to continue in the legacy of success that is the Arleigh Burke destroyer."

HII will continue outfitting the destroyer in preparation for the ship's scheduled delivery to the navy in the third quarter of 2016.

The DDG 113, which will be equipped with the Aegis combat system and the SPY-1D multi-function phased array radar, is set to undergo it's Aegis system light off later this year.

The destroyer's christening ceremony, where it will be named after a Medal of Honor recipient, is scheduled to take place on 2 May.

The Arleigh Burke-class destroyers provide anti-submarine, anti-air and anti-surface capabilities for the navy, while also supporting carrier battle, surface action, amphibious and replenishment groups.

Ralph Johnson (DDG 114), Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) and Delbert D. Black (DDG 119) destroyers are currently under construction at Ingalls Shipbuilding, which has delivered 28 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers to the navy so far.

 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom