What's new

US military in decline, threats from China ‘formidable,’ report says

Having a cake while eating it too is usually a losing game. :D
That didn't stop them from trying.....

The sad part is that after three pages, a simple concept @jhungary is explaining still can't be understood.
Well, consider they already had their thing in mind, they will never understood how war are actually fought.

In their mind, they produce everything, because well, they do, but then they wouldn't go back and think how or what leads to that circumstance, and that will basically be gone when there is a war.

ALMOST ALL WAR ARE FOUGHT OVER RESOURCES, the world has not change much since we fought over salt in roman time, we now fought for oil and gas or some other mineral, not cheap TV or cheap washing machine
 
The sad part is that after three pages, a simple concept

Worst poster on PDF hands down..

You have zero understanding of conventional wars and their concepts...

You are the guy saying wars can end in 1 day or hours. Absolutely unrealistic gibberish you were spewing

Edit: I mean @PakFactor... Sorry for saying this bro but you are utter trash in anything military related..

Not @jhungary and by the way @jhungary is legitimate
 
LOL. Commiebots do not understand. They just do as ordered. Only to be expected. :D



Let them. We will do what we know is right. :D
which is watch them go banana....... :lol:
 
Worst poster on PDF hands down..

You have zero understanding of conventional wars and their concepts...

You are the guy saying wars can end in 1 day or hours. Absolutely unrealistic gibberish you were spewing

Edit: I mean @PakFactor... Sorry for saying this bro but you are utter trash in anything military related..

Not @jhungary and by the way @jhungary is legitimate

When the hell did I say that? Again, take your simplistic Islamic ego elsewhere. You've not provided anything yourself to back up your point. Idiot.

LOL. Commiebots do not understand. They just do as ordered. Only to be expected. :D



Let them. We will do what we know is right. :D

On top, we have this moron named @Titanium100 who has a sore back side along with the commiebots bots.
 
When the hell did I say that? Again, take your simplistic Islamic ego elsewhere. You've not provided anything yourself to back up your point. Idiot.

You are completely trash when it comes to ground reality. You have strong bias and it hinders you from reality...

Israel wants Hamas and Hezbollah gone but forced to quo-exist with them for decades? Do you know why? It is due to a conventional ground reality no charity is given.. The strong take what is theirs badlands kind of co-existence.

You don't understand conventional realities and possibilities hence you have very deluded concept and extreme bias.. You may have embraced christianity or you are athiest which is perfectly fine and I have also seen you trying to flip the hadith...
 
Even if US is able to blockade some of Chinas mineral supplies such as Iron ore, copper and aluminum in war time, then China just wont going to produce all the commercial products for the West and the world to use, it will hurt the West too. China can still manufacture products for Chinese military and domestic uses using Chinas own mineral resources. Also, China can stop exporting precious metals and antibiotic raw material to US and the West that the Wests military weapons and health antibotic drugs are totally dependent on these Chinese monopolized exports. These bans of export of precious metals and antibiotic raw material are deadly that will cripple the Western military and health industry that means lives for quite some time.
Or China can import more from next door, Russia, Mongolia, Kazakstan, Afghanistan.... they are all resources rich countries

 
Again, that's plan B is for, if you don't play ball, US WILL Blockade you.
US cant even blockade Iran after Iran threw away the nuclear deal, so i think you're talking 100% rubbish.

Whenever there is tension with Iran, US will keep its aircraft carrier 800miles away- is that how you enforce a potential blockade?

US military HATES the idea or a blockade now, because it wont work - iran and China and Russia have very effective anti-ship weapons, so American soldiers will die, and the blockades wont do crap - that's why US hasnt attempted it against North Korea, China, Iran or Russia till today - toothless tiger just wasting our tax dollars telling us we are safe but meanwhile US military cant even win 1 expensive azz war.
 
US cant even blockade Iran after Iran threw away the nuclear deal, so i think you're talking 100% rubbish.

Whenever there is tension with Iran, US will keep its aircraft carrier 800miles away- is that how you enforce a potential blockade?

US military HATES the idea or a blockade now, because it wont work - iran and China and Russia have very effective anti-ship weapons, so American soldiers will die, and the blockades wont do crap - that's why US hasnt attempted it against North Korea, China, Iran or Russia till today - toothless tiger just wasting our tax dollars telling us we are safe but meanwhile US military cant even win 1 expensive azz war.
Yes, you are right, is it why Iran is world number 1 of sea trade route in the world, no wonder it has been that rich in trade lol.....

Jesus, sometimes I don't really know if people are pretend to be stupid or really that stupid. I mean, you can't make up stupid shit like this up LOL :lol: :lol:
 
US cant even blockade Iran after Iran threw away the nuclear deal, so i think you're talking 100% rubbish.

Whenever there is tension with Iran, US will keep its aircraft carrier 800miles away- is that how you enforce a potential blockade?

US military HATES the idea or a blockade now, because it wont work - iran and China and Russia have very effective anti-ship weapons, so American soldiers will die, and the blockades wont do crap - that's why US hasnt attempted it against North Korea, China, Iran or Russia till today - toothless tiger just wasting our tax dollars telling us we are safe but meanwhile US military cant even win 1 expensive azz war.
Actually, when one thinks about this issue, the US military is NOT the ideal model to follow.

The US military was designed, probably by accident, and operated as an expeditionary force, meaning we are constantly 'Visitors' and not 'Home'. Never mind 1812, no one really made it to CONUS and fought the US military. Then given the retreats from SE Asia, Iraq, and Afghanistan, the US military can arguably be considered as a failure, as in unable to support political goals.

Now, the best model to follow is the Parade Line Army (PLA). Most of the world's militaries are usually, if not always, use as an adjunct to internal police forces mainly because most of the world's countries are variations of dictatorships. China spends more on internal security than on the PLA. The PLA have more experience at putting down riots, civil arrests, interrogations, and investigations of political dissent, all the main skills at supporting the current political leadership.

In sum, if your military is not expeditionary in design, DO NOT follow the US model but take after the PLA version. :enjoy:
 
Actually, when one thinks about this issue, the US military is NOT the ideal model to follow.

The US military was designed, probably by accident, and operated as an expeditionary force, meaning we are constantly 'Visitors' and not 'Home'. Never mind 1812, no one really made it to CONUS and fought the US military. Then given the retreats from SE Asia, Iraq, and Afghanistan, the US military can arguably be considered as a failure, as in unable to support political goals.

Now, the best model to follow is the Parade Line Army (PLA). Most of the world's militaries are usually, if not always, use as an adjunct to internal police forces mainly because most of the world's countries are variations of dictatorships. China spends more on internal security than on the PLA. The PLA have more experience at putting down riots, civil arrests, interrogations, and investigations of political dissent, all the main skills at supporting the current political leadership.

In sum, if your military is not expeditionary in design, DO NOT follow the US model but take after the PLA version. :enjoy:
Just your BS, other than the 1989 incident, when was the PLA used to putting down unrests or any civil arrests ? The PLA fought major wars with US, India, Vietnam and clashed with Soviet Union, PLA has no experiences of fighting or war ? Yeah, the chicken away US army do have lots of war experiences like moping operations or chicken run away like in the Korean, Vietnam and Afghan wars.
 
I am neither, and the I understand the US system well too. It is imperfect, but it works better than anything else. Your kind may not like it, but eh, so what? :D
Far from perfect. If it's even minimally effective, US government would have, should have resolved the water quality in Flint, Michigan. It's been there for decades. Residents there have been forced to buy bottle water not for a day, a month, but for 'decades'. This is unseen, unheard of in any developed nations. How about Bush refusing to mobilize the military to help the Katrina victims in the first 48-72 hours? In these cases I cited and in many more cases, one thing is common -- the victims are minorities, especially blacks.
When the nation tuned in to hear Monica Lewinsky's testimony in the Congress, Bill Clinton ordered missile strikes on a Kenya pharmaceutical plant, claiming it produces biochemical weapon. Kenya refuted and the UN, including American and many inspectors from US allies, checked and found it simply produced cheap AIDS drugs for Africa. Clinton bombed the plant to benefit the big pharma co's that were charging arms and legs for their AIDS drugs. Remember the 90's when AIDS scare and drugs were sky high? Clinton successfully made all live-broadcast of Lewinsky's testimony into live reports of the bombings. Such was the Anglo Saxon evils.

But you're blind because you've been patted on the head and called a 'good dog'. God bless your parents.
 
Far from perfect. If it's even minimally effective, US government would have, should have resolved the water quality in Flint, Michigan. It's been there for decades. Residents there have been forced to buy bottle water not for a day, a month, but for 'decades'. This is unseen, unheard of in any developed nations. How about Bush refusing to mobilize the military to help the Katrina victims in the first 48-72 hours? In these cases I cited and in many more cases, one thing is common -- the victims are minorities, especially blacks.
When the nation tuned in to hear Monica Lewinsky's testimony in the Congress, Bill Clinton ordered missile strikes on a Kenya pharmaceutical plant, claiming it produces biochemical weapon. Kenya refuted and the UN, including American and many inspectors from US allies, checked and found it simply produced cheap AIDS drugs for Africa. Clinton bombed the plant to benefit the big pharma co's that were charging arms and legs for their AIDS drugs. Remember the 90's when AIDS scare and drugs were sky high? Clinton successfully made all live-broadcast of Lewinsky's testimony into live reports of the bombings. Such was the Anglo Saxon evils.

But you're blind because you've been patted on the head and called a 'good dog'. God bless your parents.

All that ranting, and even you could not give any other example of a system that works better than this one. :D

This is what I said: "It is imperfect, but it works better than anything else".
 
Back
Top Bottom