What's new

US let Pakistan go nuclear: ex-CIA official

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
May 04, 2007
US let Pakistan go nuclear: ex-CIA official

WASHINGTON, May 3: The Reagan administration allowed Pakistan to continue its nuclear programme because it needed Islamabad’s support to fight the Russians in Afghanistan, says a former CIA official.

Richard Barlow was an analyst for the CIA, monitoring Pakistan’s nuclear programme during the Reagan era. In 1989, he moved over to the Pentagon, where he worked for then Secretary of Defence Richard Cheney.

In an interview to a Washington news site, Raw Story, Mr Barlow claims that he lost the job when he raised objections to his bosses about senior Pentagon officials allegedly lying to Congress concerning Pakistan’s emerging nuclear programme.

When Mr Barlow joined the CIA in 1985 as a counter-proliferation intelligence officer with particular expertise on Pakistan, he soon learned that US officials were aware of Pakistan’s efforts to establish a weapon-cable nuclear programme but chose to ignore them.

According to Mr Barlow, individuals at the State Department later actively facilitated procurement, tipping off targets of sealed arrest warrants in undercover operations and illegally approving export licenses for restricted goods.

In 1985 — following the arrest of a Pakistani agent in the US who attempted to procure specialised switches for nuclear detonators — Congress took steps to prevent Pakistan from developing nuclear weapons, passing bills that would cut off economic and military aid to Pakistan if it were found to be involved in nuclear activities.

“However, President Reagan wanted military and economic aid to continue flowing to Pakistan to ensure its ongoing support of his covert war against the Russians in Afghanistan,” Mr Barlow says.

In 1987, Mr Barlow engineered the arrest of some of Pakistanis in the US as part of an undercover operation. He says the arrests came with the full support and knowledge of the highest levels of the CIA and the Reagan administration.

The arrests sparked a firestorm. Proof of Pakistan’s proliferation activities would trigger the provisions of the so-called Solarz Amendment and put an end to Pakistani aid.

The amendment’s author, Subcommittee on Asian and Pacific Affairs Chairman Rep. Stephen Solarz (D-NY), called for a top-secret briefing by the CIA. Mr Barlow was sent to represent the agency.

Under orders from the CIA, he told the subcommittee that there were “scores” of illegal transactions that should have triggered the Solarz Amendment. He also claimed that the Pakistanis involved — including a retired general — were agents of the government of Pakistan.

While Mr Solarz and others in Congress favoured Mr Barlow, he claims that some senior officials of the Reagan administration tried to undercut his testimony. US officials running the covert Afghan war — the Directorate of Operations, the former National Intelligence Officer for Proliferation who had been responsible for briefing Congress and the State Department’s regional office — were particularly upset and tried to get him fired for engineering the arrests and spilling the beans, he says.

A US court, however, convicted the Pakistani nationals arrested for assisting their country’s nuclear programme and President Reagan triggered the Solarz Amendment for the first and only time.

Immediately afterward, President Reagan invoked a national security waiver provision in the law, nullifying the amendment.

Mr Barlow left the CIA and in early 1989, after George H. W. Bush became president, he joined the Pentagon’s Office of Non-Proliferation Policy.

http://www.dawn.com/2007/05/04/top4.htm
 
What a bunch of bull ****, if that was the case we wouldn't have been sanctioned in the first place, CIA didn't do jack the damn googling agency.
 
1980's dynamics in geo-politics were lot different, and Americans did show a blind eye to Pakistan Nuke program. But pakistani's would have achieved it anyways, even if they embargoed then there, maybe a bit more later. but still, no way they were going to sit tight when India exploded its first in 1974. We will eat grass, but we will get bomb..lol
 
1980's dynamics in geo-politics were lot different, and Americans did show a blind eye to Pakistan Nuke program. But pakistani's would have achieved it anyways, even if they embargoed then there, maybe a bit more later. but still, no way they were going to sit tight when India exploded its first in 1974. We will eat grass, but we will get bomb..lol

Son whom you talking about eating grass? India when 50% of its population was below poverty line?
 
The grass line by the Bhutto was a comment to Indians that we can not be oppressed or threatened. Bhutto did what he said. He made the nation to explode 5 nuclear weapons in return and not just India, but the whole world was shocked.

It was also a comment that dont underestimate us. We can do anything we want to.
 
Son whom you talking about eating grass? India when 50% of its population was below poverty line?

God you are seriously ignorent, That was a famous line by a Pakistani leader Bhutto. For god sakes, take off your 'I hate Indians' glasses.
 
God you are seriously ignorent, That was a famous line by a Pakistani leader Bhutto. For god sakes, take off your 'I hate Indians' glasses.

Shouldn't you take off "I hate Pakistani" glasses? Adu don't talk like a grown up, if you post garbage on other threads and ridicule others after they do.
 
Garbage? Where, dont tell me to endorse a bad product. Cant do that.

I have a glass though " I hate extremist idiotic holier than thou, ours is the best people".....
 
Ok.. cut the personal talk. Use the Buddy/Ignore List if you have to or take over to the personal messages. Not in threads please.
 
i agree with adu we would have reached it even if the americans would have let us or not. anyways most of our technology is chinese anyway so what could they have done.
 
Back
Top Bottom