"US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years ?"
Bahhh.....
People around the world could be easily tricked into this so called "wikileak" plot. I realised that it's a plot the second time after my initial excitment at the 1st day when I heard about the name.
1. USA has a quite effective worldwide CIA operating network. If this Swede was really to release sth that would remotely damage the US national interests, he would have been kidnapped secretly by CIA operatives, and likely be waterboarded in Gitmo as we speak, long before we as common men heard about this name, surely before his website got operational. The fact that it wasn't case tells a lot about the nature of the "Wikileak" contents.
2. Look at motives to be clearer on what's on here: so far of all the "wikileaks" I've seen, none of them, NONE remotely has hurt the US interests. What a "coinstance"! Some chitchat about Clinton, etc. was nothing compared with "secret info"on other countries ( most of them are US competitors / "enermies") which in retrospect has serves the US interests instead - what a "coinstance", again?
3. Having said that, I don't doubt that most of the leaks are real cables from diplomats. The thing is that diplomats, by definition, mean double-talking by manipulating their limited info and mostly hersays.
Most importantly, these
very selected "leaks", I suspect, have actually been hand-picked by the US ( mainly CIA , Pentagan and the State Dept.) to reinforce the US national interests by stirring up troubles of, and among, its competitors / enermies:
---China CCP , utter corrupted ( yeah, we all knew it)
---CPC propaganda chief led Google attack and worldwide cyber attack ( serves US interests)
---newly elected Iraqi PM is a Bad Bad guy , so is elected Afgan president ( because they don't serve the US interests as expected )
---Russia is a mafia state , Putin is the head of Mafia( serves US interests)
---Berlusconi is a Bad Bad guy ( because US doesn't like his pipeline deal with Russia)
---Sarkozy is an emperor without clothes ( US doesn't like his getting too close to China)
--- CHina "to bandon NK" ( Washington version of "Art of War" is in full swing...
)
--- Pakistan supports int'l terrorism ( need to say more?)
--- "we should be ready to use force" by OZ foreign minister Kevin Rudd , a well known Sinophile actually and one of the most pro-China Western politicians despite his "rat-******" blunder. ( US has never liked Rudd's soft stance on China from the moment he was elected as the PM; And the US is increasingly becoming discomfort with the fact that AUS and China are getting closer economically; thus any conflict /suspicion between the two would serve US interests. I bet that Jewish elites-controlled US neocons would be 100x more provocative compared to Rudd, but where are thier remarks in the "leak"? )
---
The next "Wikileak", I guess, would be demonising Frau Merkel, saying that she is a gay and a anti-Turks racist ( US doesn't like Germany's firm stance on supporting China's Yuan in the last G20) ; And sth on Japan too , in order to stir up nationalists of both China and Japan...
... so on so forth,
all having 1 common result :
They all "by chance" benefit the US national interests !!!
The method deployed here is Anglo-American's classic favourate: Divide & Rule
"Wikileak" ? All above "leaks" sound like a standard tactical manuscript straight out of the US State Department. Meanwhile Clinton must be laughing her socks off in her restroom after pretending to be angry in front of the media .
Wake up guys and smell the coffee!