VCheng
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2010
- Messages
- 48,460
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
The Taliban were refusing to hand over AQ - what do you propose should have been done?
The US won the conventional war in the beginning (not really a surprise) - they lost/drew the longer term COIN campaign.
Of course one could argue that the COIN campaign was always going to end through a political solution (as VCheng pointed out), and creating the conditions for a political solution required all parties to arrive at a military stalemate, which is where the US & Taliban are at currently.
One could also argue that the US goal in Afghanistan was to prevent the use of Afghanistan by terrorist groups, which, given what we know about the talks so far, is a condition the Taliban are willing to accept. So therefore, while it has cost a lot of blood and treasure, the US might be able to end its involvement in Afghanistan with the accomplishment of the goal stated above.
Now, could that goal have been realised without the invasion of Afghanistan? I don’t know. The Taliban were, IIRC, amenable to a trial of AQ locally and I believe in a mutually agreed upon third country. Perhaps those options should have been fully explored before the use of military force.
USA does not care about winning or losing wars. It cares only about serving its national interests, whatever it takes. That is all.