What's new

US Drones Trump China Theatrics

. .
Since 2001, the US Air Force has purchased dozens of the $100-million-a-copy Global Hawks and deployed them over Iraq, Afghanistan and other conflict zones. Together, the Air Force and Navy will possess more than 130 RQ-4s in 15 years’ time. Among Asian powers, Australia and Japan also plan to procure Global Hawks. Together, this international drone force could place most of the Pacific under constant observation, tracking the movement and disposition of Chinese forces—particularly warships—and feeding targeting data to allied ships, planes and submarines.

That ability to find and follow enemy warships is exactly what the PLAAF most craves, and which the US military and its allies most fear in China. The PLA’s relentless pursuit of ship-killing DF-21 ballistic missiles and associated reconnaissance satellites—and the United States’ breathless hand-wringing in reaction—best illustrates this dynamic. Ballistic missiles require careful targeting. Careful targeting calls for overlapping ground-, air- and space-based sensors. Large drone aircraft arguably represent the most important component of this surveillance network, and it’s in large drone aircraft that China is weakest and the United States and its allies strongest.

Building on a century of aerospace innovation, and with tens of billions of dollars in developmental funding over at least two decades, plus the urgency instilled by several ongoing wars, the US military has become by far the world leader in unmanned aircraft. Today, the Pentagon possesses some 3000 UAVs, ranging in size from the hand-thrown Raven to the Cessna-size Predator and Reaper (both built by General Atomics), and the much larger Global Hawk
 
. .
The roughly 200-strong Predator and Reaper fleet is armed with missiles and bombs in addition to carrying a wide range of sensors; the similarly scaled but less numerous RQ-170 from Lockheed Martin has radar-evading characteristics and might be equipped with ‘electronic attack’ emitters, enabling it to insert computer viruses into enemy networks. In-development drones include Boeing’s Phantom Eye—an even bigger, farther-flying improvement over the Global Hawk—plus no fewer than three fast, armed, unmanned planes intended to replace manned fighter-bombers.



The command-and-control signals for UAVs operate on similar principles. If China is having problems receiving imagery from its drones, it’s probably having trouble controlling them, as well. The problem is compounded over long distances, as over-the-horizon UAV operations typically rely on space-based signal relays requiring extensive satellite infrastructure.

For this and other military uses, the Pentagon maintains hundreds of satellites. The PLA, by contrast, possesses just a dozen or so strictly-military spacecraft and several dozen others with mixed civilian and military applications. And while China has recently matched the United States in terms of the sheer number of space launches, its satellites are shorter-lived, so it would need to greatly exceed the US launch rate in order to cut the gap between Chinese and US space infrastructure. The space gap translates into an enduring UAV gap.
 
. . .
and that makes this better... how? cause we all know japan and china are best friends right?
That was in response to the 'white racist' charge that was edited out by the admin staff. If your pal actually done basic research he would not have made a fool out of himself by calling anything critical of China as because of 'racism'.
 
.
The roughly 200-strong Predator and Reaper fleet is armed with missiles and bombs in addition to carrying a wide range of sensors; the similarly scaled but less numerous RQ-170 from Lockheed Martin has radar-evading characteristics and might be equipped with ‘electronic attack’ emitters, enabling it to insert computer viruses into enemy networks. In-development drones include Boeing’s Phantom Eye—an even bigger, farther-flying improvement over the Global Hawk—plus no fewer than three fast, armed, unmanned planes intended to replace manned fighter-bombers.



The command-and-control signals for UAVs operate on similar principles. If China is having problems receiving imagery from its drones, it’s probably having trouble controlling them, as well. The problem is compounded over long distances, as over-the-horizon UAV operations typically rely on space-based signal relays requiring extensive satellite infrastructure.

For this and other military uses, the Pentagon maintains hundreds of satellites. The PLA, by contrast, possesses just a dozen or so strictly-military spacecraft and several dozen others with mixed civilian and military applications. And while China has recently matched the United States in terms of the sheer number of space launches, its satellites are shorter-lived, so it would need to greatly exceed the US launch rate in order to cut the gap between Chinese and US space infrastructure. The space gap translates into an enduring UAV gap.
sorry to break your bubble, but injecting code into military grade encrypted networks aren't happening.

and uavs aren't going to rule the air.
 
. .
sorry to break your bubble, but injecting code into military grade encrypted networks aren't happening.

and uavs aren't going to rule the air.

Are you a defence expert making this opinion? what is the basis for making such a claim?
 
.
Are you a defence expert making this opinion? what is the basis for making such a claim?

no but i work with network security.

sure, it can inject data into wireless networks. a $20 wireless card can too. but the chance of breaking any modern encryption is pretty much nill.
 
.
Are you a defence expert making this opinion? what is the basis for making such a claim?

He is not but he is much smarter than the so called defence expert who wrote this article. Current non-stealthy subsonic propeller driven UAVs like the reaper will get swatted out of the sky if it trys to attack even 4th gen fighters. Trying to make it sound like they have a chance against the J-20 is completely moronic. Understood?
 
.
The reaper perhaps but this article refers to the new wave of US UAV tech like the RQ-4 Global Hawk which is on a diffrent scale :

For increased survivability the mission is planned for threat avoidance using available theatre assets such as AWACS, combat air patrol and JSTARS. The aircraft flies high at a loiter altitude 65,000ft which minimises exposure to surface-to-air missiles. The aircraft's modular self-defence system includes an AN/ALR 89 radar warning receiver, an on-board jamming system and an ALE 50 towed decoy system.
 
.
no but i work with network security.

sure, it can inject data into wireless networks. a $20 wireless card can too. but the chance of breaking any modern encryption is pretty much nill.

If anyone could do it, the US military could.

That said, they havn't given any indication they could.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom