What's new

US Bio-warfare Laboratories In West Africa Are The Origins Of The Ebola Epidemic.

Loool Blaming the U.S even for Ebola Virus? lool:disagree: Some people will blame anything out there on the U.S/west.

However, me myself i was surprised/shock to hear the U.S was sending troops/elite soldiers instead of medical personel to west Africa to fight Ebola. WTH?:o::crazy: To be honest i dont really what they are trying to play there(though i dont believe it has anything to do with bio weapons from the U.S to Africa or whatever.lol). Maybe they just made use of this situation for some political motives, i cant say for sure, But its indeed weird that the U.S and even our government is sending soldiers/troops/military equipments instead of medics like other countries did(Cuba, China, Russia, etc).:disagree:

Of all the mentioned country who have sent personnel, i admire Cuba the most. Cuba is the country that has sent the most medical personel than any other country on earth including 'BIG' powers like U.S, CHINA, RUSSIA, U.K , FRANCE,GERMANY etc. This small country of only 11 million people, who isnst even affected at all by Ebola, still sent the largest contigent by far of any country. Even the U.S Secreatry of state had to praise Cuba actions (something which shocked many people, since they couldn't believe the U.S could ever say something good about 'evil' Cuba). No wonder when i visited many countries in Africa, the people there admire and love Cuba, i didnt understand this until i studied/red about Cuba roles in helping Africa free itself from colonialism, foremost of which was cuba sending thousands of its soldiers to help Angola gain independence from Portugal and fight off Apartheid south Africa supported ironically by the U.S and even my country.:disagree: And Cuba never asked anything in return, unlike other powers(read Russia, U.S etc) who always do things for interests(well like most/all countries do to be honest).lol

Kudos to Cuba, hope the U.S lift sanctions soon on them. keep it up Amigos Cuba

Ebola was specifically created to justify increasing military presence in Africa.
That's why it's a US-created biowarfare virus.

Depending on the units sent we could be looking at some seriously medically trained troops. The para-rescue service members can perform any operation short of brain or open-heart surgery, tracking and reducing Ebola outbreaks should't be too much more difficult that jumping into a hot-zone, stabilizing and exacting wounded while incoming fire is incoming. Also soldiers are better prepared for the stresses, something even some doctors have been having problems with. Soldiers will not turn tail and run when fellow soldiers or doctors start to die. They are well disciplined.

:rofl:
 
.
The oyibo/White devils worship the disease. From what I have heard, a secret Nazi sex cult is involved in the disease and is attempting to wipe out the original humans of the planets (i.e. Dark-skinned humans). Da White man/Cracka is trying to put da black man down 'cause da black man ain't a White puppet.
ae3.png
 
. .
Depending on the units sent we could be looking at some seriously medically trained troops. The para-rescue service members can perform any operation short of brain or open-heart surgery, tracking and reducing Ebola outbreaks should't be too much more difficult that jumping into a hot-zone, stabilizing and exacting wounded while incoming fire is incoming. Also soldiers are better prepared for the stresses, something even some doctors have been having problems with. Soldiers will not turn tail and run when fellow soldiers or doctors start to die. They are well disciplined.

LOOL yes bro. we are fighting terrorist EBOLA.:guns::ph34r:

Please dont make a joke of this bro.:rolleyes1:

U.S made Ebola :rofl::rofl:
1408149564478.jpg


:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

That made my day bro.
 
.
Ebola's problem, and the reason if hasn't been fully weaponized (apart from treaties) was its lack of virulence. While terrifying, Ebola doesn't spread easily from person to person (despite what the media uproar would suggest). More virulent bacteria and viruses have been more successful. Botulism, Anthrax, Smallpox, each is easier to spread than Ebola and when weaponized are just as lethal.
It can be made more virulent by genetic engineering. I just finished teaching a course on "Bio-Terrorism". What sets apart Ebola from the other bio-agents you have mentioned is the resulting psychological effect on those who get exposed or see/care of exposed individuals.
 
.
LOOL yes bro. we are fighting terrorist EBOLA.:guns::ph34r:

Please dont make a joke of this bro.:rolleyes1:

I'm not making a joke. The US military contains some very well trained doctors, some belong to US special forces such as the Para-rescue service. Does the British military not have doctors? The PJs are some of the best battlefield doctors in the US military, their skills can and do translate to non-battlefield conditions as well. If you think this is a joke, and I understand Beidou2020 does but he's a moron, I suggest some more research.

To add a bit more specifics, the US military, you know the terrorist hunters, have a CBRN school at Fort Leonard Wood which trains US soldiers and doctors in how to reponse to biological disasters. Those trained formerly were under the command of the SBCCOM, which was split into small units in 2003. The current unit responsible for biological outbreak disaster management is the Guardian Brigade; PM NBC. The other agencies that resulted from the split of the SBCCOM are the RDECOM and CMA. In the USAD, specialty code ADSC 3E9X1 is given to people specifically trained in biological disaster response, the Marines use the military occupational specialties designation of USMC CBIRF and the US navy requires all personal to under go CBRNE training on an annual basis. Joke all you want, our military, the terrorist hunters as you would call them, have units that can respond to such instances and have responded to outbreaks before. Instances such as the 2001 Anthrax incident

@mike2000

(not trying to bother you, just want your response)

It can be made more virulent by genetic engineering. I just finished teaching a course on "Bio-Terrorism".

It can but it was never as virulent as it needed to be. Smallpox was already virulent and with lethality enhancements was made more dangerous. Botulism too. Ebola is virulent only in certain situations such as contact with matter infected with Ebola, even when weaponized. Smallpox, Anthrax and Botulism were better candidates as they could be contracted with greater efficiency and from a wider range of conditions such as airborne or infected matter. I'm not disputing the weaponization of Ebola, it happened in the US and USSR, it just wasn't as good as its competitor and that's why it wasn't pursued with as much vigor.

It can be made more virulent by genetic engineering. I just finished teaching a course on "Bio-Terrorism". What sets apart Ebola from the other bio-agents you have mentioned is the resulting psychological effect on those who get exposed or see/care of exposed individuals.

On the point of psychological effect, Smallpox is equally scary for people to see. Pustules on the skin, think zits but covering your whole body, and oozing blood and puss which further spreads the infection. Seeing people vomit blood on the streets as they are dying is terrifying (as happens with Ebola), but I would rank both symptoms very close together, even though vomiting isn't naturally recognized (I'm sure you've seen people vomit and your first inclination was not an Ebola outbreak) as an Ebola infection while body-wide pustules are a clear indication of a Smallpox (or its more benign cousin Cowpox) infection. Also as Smallpox spreads faster.People would know of an infection more quickly and that would induce panic faster. It also would invite a quicker response to an attack, but weaponized viruses are designed to resist response methods. The effects of Botulism are less severe for people to see as dropping eyelids and weak muscles aren't the most noticeable of signs.
 
Last edited:
.
I don't think we are hearing the complete story about this outbreak.

I for the life of me don't understand we these soldiers are being sent to Liberia , a hot zone. I doubt Liberian life is worth that much, it sounds cold but it is true.
 
.
I don't think we are hearing the complete story about this outbreak.

I for the life of me don't understand we these soldiers are being sent to Liberia , a hot zone. I doubt Liberian life is worth that much, it sounds cold but it is true.

Ebola is just the US-created 'problem'.
The regime and media give the exaggerated 'reaction'.
The 'solution' is more US military presence.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION.

Works everytime for the US regime and its terrorist organisations.
 
.
Ebola is just the US-created 'problem'.
The regime and media give the exaggerated 'reaction'.
The 'solution' is more US military presence.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION.

Works everytime for the US regime and its terrorist organisations.

if the U.S is so all powerful and made Ebola why didn't we make Ebola airborne and it only effects a certain ethnic group like the Han
maybe we'll do that for Ebola-2 :rofl::rofl:
 
.
if the U.S is so all powerful and made Ebola why didn't we make Ebola airborne and it only effects a certain ethnic group like the Han
maybe we'll do that for Ebola-2 :rofl::rofl:

This is Africa-specific.

The US wants to use its military power to dominate Africa again to counter Chinese influence. This Ebola hoax is all about giving an excuse to increase US troops and US control over Africa.

It's how fascists behave.
 
.
This is Africa-specific.

The US wants to use its military power to dominate Africa again to counter Chinese influence. This Ebola hoax is all about giving an excuse to increase US troops and US control over Africa.

It's how fascists behave.

yeah man we made Ebola so we can send in over a few hundred soldiers to weaken the Chinese influence
that's pretty funny
 
.
yeah man we made Ebola so we can send in over a few hundred soldiers to weaken the Chinese influence
that's pretty funny

I respect your fortitude. Arguing with some of these nuts would put me in a mental institution quite quickly. Respect my friend. And if we, the US, really wanted to reduce or diminish China's influence in Africa, for Beidou's sake I will mention China is helping with the Ebola response too (alongside the US, who is somehow acting against China's influence:what:), why would we not strike at the Chinese mainland? Problems at home make concerns overseas less of a priority.
 
.
This is Africa-specific.

The US wants to use its military power to dominate Africa again to counter Chinese influence. This Ebola hoax is all about giving an excuse to increase US troops and US control over Africa.

It's how fascists behave.
America is manipulating the world's mainstream media to hide its biowarfare campaign and military invasion in Africa.

Like this drug was created overnight or something.....I think it has been in R&D for a long time.

China just sent 10,000 doses of its new Ebola-blocking drug to Africa.

"✓ On a side note, there are an estimated 10,000 Chinese nationals living and working in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea, the Ebola-infected African countries. According to reports I've read, none of those Chinese seem to have have caught the disease.

✓ On another side note, the vaccine was created by the China’s Academy of Military Medical Science, which has been working on such antidotes since the US started using biological warfare in North Korea beginning in 1951. Who knew? Isn't that a war crime?

✓ In addition, China has sent over a thousand doctors and health care workers to the afflicted countries. China told a World Bank crisis meeting in Washington last week its Ebola effort was already worth $200m altogether and would grow further."
 
Last edited:
.
I respect your fortitude. Arguing with some of these nuts would put me in a mental institution quite quickly. Respect my friend. And if we, the US, really wanted to reduce or diminish China's influence in Africa, for Beidou's sake I will mention China is helping with the Ebola response too (alongside the US, who is somehow acting against China's influence:what:), why would we not strike at the Chinese mainland? Problems at home make concerns overseas less of a priority.

these Chinese here are obviously trolls and I doubt they are really Chinese in the first place.

Ebola didn't even show up til 1975/6 and like most unknown diseases come from Africa from deep within the jungle, but U.S made it to fight China and take over Africa.

4 decade plan now just coming together
 
.
these Chinese are here are obviously trolls and I doubt they are really Chinese in the first place.

I hope so. I've had faith that the stereotype that Asian, and Chinese in particular, are magnitudes more intelligence than US bumpkin Americans was actually true. Sadly, based on the quality of many Chinese posters, not all as some provide good quality discussions, my faith has been shaken.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom