What's new

US Army chief apprised of Indian strategies

shree835

BANNED
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
3,005
Reaction score
-19
Country
India
Location
India
Days after the Cabinet approved a new mountain strike corps for China border, India shared its “strategic perspective” with a top US general who met the defence minister and Army chief here on Wednesday.

US Army chief General Raymond T Odierno met his counterpart General Bikram Singh at the latter’s office in the South Block, during which General Odierno was given a 20-minute presentation on “India’s strategic perspective”, which involved India’s security analysis of the Af-Pak region and China, reliable sources told Deccan Herald.

The US general on Thursday will travel to the northern command in Udhampur, where he is likely to receive yet another military assessment on the regional security scenario from its commander Lt Gen Sanjiv Chachra.



India’s strategic perspective revolves mainly around its western border (Pakistan), eastern border (China) and the sea lanes. Traditionally, India has been well prepared against Pakistan, but of late the focus has shifted towards China.

Incidentally, India’s senior-most military officer and Indian Air Force chief Air Chief Marshal N A K Browne had said on Tuesday, “The complementary strengths of India and the United States provide a solid foundation for developing mutually beneficial strategic responses in the 21st century.”

Browne is on an official tour in the US, where he has met top officials from the US air force and military establishment. He received the second C-17 Globemaster — a heavy-lift strategic aircraft that India is purchasing from Boeing in a government-to-government contract.

India purchased 10 C-17 carriers from the US in a $4.1-billion deal to become the aircraft’s largest operator outside the US.

“The C-17′s enhanced reach and versatility will support operations in an extremely challenging terrain that spans from the Himalayas in the north, where we have bases at an altitude of 11,000-13,000 ft, to the Indian Ocean region in the south,” said the IAF chief.


http://www.deccanherald.com/content/346930/us-army-chief-apprised-indian.html
 
Standard procedure of briefing strategic partners.

Ideally even Russia should also be briefed.
 
US army chief looks bad as*

l2013072448283.jpg


l2013072448284.jpg


Can anyone shed some light on the different styles of salute that we see in the first pic?
 
US army chief looks bad as*

l2013072448283.jpg


l2013072448284.jpg


Can anyone shed some light on the different styles of salute that we see in the first pic?

US style of salute and British type of salute (as adopted by the IA). Interestingly the IN and IAF have different salutes from the IA and each other- the IN's is much like this US style whilst the IAF's is sort of a hybrid between flat hand of the IA and the angled hand of the IN.

salutes-pix-2.jpg


@Roybot
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the chief staretgy being to generate enough poop to stink the other side into surrendering....worked in 1971 when Gen "Tiger" [read chicken] Niazi would not stand the stink and shat in his pants and surrendered giving honor guard to the bhindis...


CT_Why_you_mad.jpg
 
the chief staretgy being to generate enough poop to stink the other side into surrendering....worked in 1971 when Gen "Tiger" [read chicken] Niazi would not stand the stink and shat in his pants and surrendered giving honor guard to the bhindis...

Were you trying to say something profoundly and rationally intelligent??????? :azn:
 
US style of salute and British type of salute (as adopted by the IA). Interestingly the IN and IAF have different salutes from the IA and each other- the IN's is much like this US style whilst the IAF's is sort of a hybrid between flat hand of the IA and the angled hand of the IN.

salutes-pix-2.jpg


@Roybot

@Abingdonboy:
First of all the respective salutes of the three Indian Armed Forcesare simply inherited from the three respective British Armed Forces.

Then the differences between the salutes is even more than what you have written. For instance, the IA salute not only is 'open-palmed' but the trajectory of the hand movement from rest to completion is in a very wide sweeping arc.
While the IN salute incorporates a much constricted and closed direct movement from the side of the body to completion. Undoubtedly; this has to do with confining spaces on board ships.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Abingdonboy:
First of all the respective salutes of the three Indian Armed Forcesare simply inherited from the three respective British Armed Forces.

Then the differences between the salutes is even more than what you have written. For instance, the IA salute not only is 'open-palmed' but the trajectory of the hand movement from rest to completion is in a very wide sweeping arc.
While the IN salute incorporates a much constricted and closed direct movement from the side of the body to completion. Undoubtedly; this has to do with confining spaces on board ships.

Not seen here but the air force;s salute is almost near the temple rather than the forehead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
US army chief looks bad as*

l2013072448283.jpg


l2013072448284.jpg


Can anyone shed some light on the different styles of salute that we see in the first pic?

In the first pic he really look badass and that salute with one hand he can rip me in half. And just look on his left side hahahaah.
 
Back
Top Bottom