Dark Warrior
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2012
- Messages
- 289
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is just talk. The ENTIRE Indian nuclear arsenal is only about 1 megaton in total.
Whereas even ONE single Chinese nuke is already 3-4 megatons by itself.
It is just talk. The ENTIRE Indian nuclear arsenal is only about 1 megaton in total.
Whereas even ONE single Chinese nuclear warhead, is already 3-4 megatons by itself.
Also, we could NUKE Burma, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and many other countries day and night without any fear of retaliation.
And remember you have to cater for Pakistan too at the same time because our calculations take into account intervention of China and Pakistan simultaneously with no backing for India from any quarter.
Really? Interesting thought there from you. Any logic to that?
Pakistan alone has a larger and faster growing nuclear arsenal than India does.
And even worse for India, in the scenario of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan... India will have to hold at least 50% of it's nukes back as an additional deterrent. Otherwise the PLA could simply roll down the Himalayas into a now defenceless India.
Pakistan on the other hand can simply fire all of their nukes at India without having to worry about witholding any at all.
It doesn't help that the India-Pakistan border has the highest risk of nuclear war on the planet. As the Economist said, it is the "most dangerous border in the world."
Pakistan alone has a larger and faster growing nuclear arsenal than India does.
And even worse for India, in the scenario of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan... India will have to hold at least 50% of it's nukes back, as an additional deterrent. Otherwise the PLA could simply roll down the Himalayas into a defenceless India.
Pakistan on the other hand can simply fire all of their nukes at India without having to worry about witholding any at all.
It doesn't help that the India-Pakistan border has the highest risk of nuclear war on the planet. As the Economist said, it is the "most dangerous border in the world."
Pakistan alone has a larger and faster growing nuclear arsenal than India does.
And even worse for India, in the scenario of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan... India will have to hold at least 50% of it's nukes back, as an additional deterrent. Otherwise the PLA could simply roll down the Himalayas into a defenceless India.
Pakistan on the other hand can simply fire all of their nukes at India without having to worry about witholding any at all.
It doesn't help that the India-Pakistan border has the highest risk of nuclear war on the planet. As the Economist said, it is the "most dangerous border in the world."
Pakistan alone has a larger and faster growing nuclear arsenal than India does.
And even worse for India, in the scenario of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan... India will have to hold at least 50% of it's nukes back, as an additional deterrent. Otherwise the PLA could simply roll down the Himalayas into a defenceless India.
Pakistan on the other hand can simply fire all of their nukes at India without having to worry about witholding any at all.
Dont worry the way you guys are going in Tibet we shall have Sino-Indian border being that now.It doesn't help that the India-Pakistan border has the highest risk of nuclear war on the planet. As the Economist said, it is the "most dangerous border in the world."
And do you really think the world will enjoy having India ROLLED over.
As for the logic, these countries simply do not have nukes and hence, we do not have to worry of their Nuclear Retaliation.
I thought Obama just sent a letter to MMS to start bombing Shanghai. The same old TOI. MUHAHAHAH
Wrong ..5% nukes will destroy entire Pakistan...
Wrong ..5% nukes will destroy entire Pakistan...