US and South Korea Agree: US Needs to Take Command in War

[jkroo]

so what's your point

Take it easy.
An official procedure to take things from underdesk to desktop.

 

[walle990]

why is this even worthy of an article, its pretty well known the bangzi can't even react to north koreans without a nod from uncle sam.

 

[AgentOrange]

in hindsight if Truman and MacArthur knew how it would all turn out with the countless deaths by the PRC between the 50's to the 70's in China and how NK turned out nuking the PVA,NK, and even Beijing would of been the best move.

And the Soviets would have nuked you in return. And then maybe the Iraq invasion wouldn't have happened and a million Iraqi civilians would still be alive today. Pathetic troll attempt on your part and as usual, you fail.

 

[Jlaw]

U.S., South Korea Agree -- U.S. Needs To Take Command In War

U.S., South Korea Agree -- U.S. Needs To Take Command In War - Forbes


I dont know whether to post this here or in the Team USA thread.

Of course. you think the US will be lead by koea and japan?

 

[C130]

And the Soviets would have nuked you in return. And then maybe the Iraq invasion wouldn't have happened and a million Iraqi civilians would still be alive today. Pathetic troll attempt on your part and as usual, you fail.

after beating the nazi and the imperial Japan should of went on beat the USSR. Gen Patton and Truman knew USSR was the next enemy.

war is terrible civilians dies. no ones hands are clean

 

[AgentOrange]

after beating the nazi and the imperial Japan should of went on beat the USSR. Gen Patton and Truman knew USSR was the next enemy.

war is terrible civilians dies. no ones hands are clean

Brilliant analysis on your part. Force levels in Europe following the conclusion of WW2 was 3 to 1 in favor of the Soviets. It would have been a cake-walk for the United States right? Of course your grandparents were still in a mudhut on the Subcontinent at the time so it wouldn't have affected your family much...

 

[applesauce]

if MacArthur had gotten his way PRC would of be the second country to ever be nuked, and just how many Chinese that could of saved from "the Great Leap Forward" we'll never know.

are you proud of your backwards friend NK??? was it worth the PVA to die for them??

as for the U.S taking command when the war happens is the logical decision.

if MacArthur had his way, there woulda been a war with the soviets, resulting in ww3

and as far as whether it was worth it,

of course it was,

china showed that it could go into a conflict with the UN led by the US with success and thus became a recognized major military power which led directly to decisions by the US to be careful when dealing with chinese personnel in the vietnam war, and overt actions against the PRC.

it secured the korean border by keeping america from being able to establish military bases mere hours drive time from beijing, meaning in modern times, the chinese land border is secured allowing major naval expansions that we are seeing today.

we got the father of chinese rocketry through prisoner trade with the americans at the end of the korean war, which quite possibly advanced chinese rocket sciences by decades

and of course there are down sides, but as they say, hindsight is 20/20 korea was in a better situation than china back in those days, no one knew it would be the basket case that listens to no one today.

 

[C130]

Brilliant analysis on your part. Force levels in Europe following the conclusion of WW2 was 3 to 1 in favor of the Soviets. It would have been a cake-walk for the United States right? Of course your grandparents were still in India at the time so...

3 to 1 we would of roll stomped over the USSR easily and we wouldn't of needed the A-bomb either

 

[AgentOrange]

if MacArthur had his way, there woulda been a war with the soviets, resulting in ww3

and as far as whether it was worth it,

of course it was,

china showed that it could go into a conflict with the UN led by the US with success and thus became a recognized major military power which led directly to decisions by the US to be careful when dealing with chinese personnel in the vietnam war, and overt actions against the PRC.

it secured the korean border by keeping america from being able to establish military bases mere hours drive time from beijing, meaning in modern times, the chinese land border is secured allowing major naval expansions that we are seeing today.

we got the father of chinese rocketry through prisoner trade with the americans at the end of the korean war, which quite possibly advanced chinese rocket sciences by decades

and of course there are down sides, but as they say, hindsight is 20/20 korea was in a better situation than china back in those days, no one knew it would be the basket case that listens to no one today.

Indeed. In fact, in the 70s, North Korea was actually wealthier than the South. You can't go 50 odd years in the future and then postulate "what ifs" because there's always going to be a valid counter argument.

3 to 1 we would of roll stomped over the USSR easily and we wouldn't of needed the A-bomb either

It's obvious you're a prepubescent kid that plays too many video games. I'm done with you.

 

[C130]

Indeed. In fact, in the 70s, North Korea was actually wealthier than the South. You can't go 50 odd years in the future and then postulate "what ifs" because there's always going to be a valid counter argument.

hardly

it was all an illusion anyways

Indeed. In fact, in the 70s, North Korea was actually wealthier than the South. You can't go 50 odd years in the future and then postulate "what ifs" because there's always going to be a valid counter argument.



It's obvious you're a prepubescent kid that plays too many video games. I'm done with you.

sorry if you can't handle the fact the USSR was at the mercy of the U.S and the West.