What's new

US ambassador Nikki Haley says veto stands between UNSC membership and India

Shahzaz ud din

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
7,877
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
US ambassador Nikki Haley says veto stands between UNSC membership and India
By News Desk
Published: October 18, 2017
21SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1534331-httpffoaolcdncomfhssfstoragefmidasfbffaabdcdebcffrtrue-1508306448-618-640x480.jpeg

South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley waves as she arrives to address delegates during the second session of the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida, August 28, 2012 REUTERS/Mike Segar (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS ELECTIONS)

US ambassador the United Nations Nikki Haley said on Tuesday that the US was open to UN reforms to expand the permanent membership of the UN Security Council, but the key for India to attain it is to “not touch” the issue of veto power that current members are unwilling to share or give up.

Haley also was swift to point out that President Trump’s new South Asian policy was a “tougher approach” towards Pakistan. “We cannot tolerate its government (Pakistan’s) or any other government giving safe haven to terrorists,” she said, reiterating Trump’s call for India to do more in Afghanistan.

US diplomat Nikki Haley says her mother couldn’t be a judge in India because she was a woman

While speaking at a discussion hosted by the advocacy group India-US Friendship Council “is much more about the veto”, she said that the UN reforms “is much more about the veto”. The permanent five who have veto powers – US, UK, France, Russia and China – “none of them want to give that up”.

The “key to getting India on the Security Council would have to be not touch the veto”, Haley who is an Indian-American, added, in a rare public discussion of the American position on India’s claim to a permanent UNSC seat, which was first endorsed by former president Barack Obama in a visit to India in 2010. India has staked a claim to a permanent seat on a reformed UNSC with all the same powers but along with other members of the G-4 pressure group.

Germany, Japan and Brazil have backed deferred and phased rollout of the veto power after a transition period of 15 years. The Trump administration reiterated US support for India during Prime Minister Narendra Modi past June. Vice president Mike Pence chipped in with his support in a speech to a trade body the next day. And, now the US ambassador to UN, which was the first for her, according to India watchers.

However, India is disappointed by the slow pace of the movement on the issue at the UN, as conveyed by officials at the recent UNGA meetings, in the context of secretarial and bureaucratic reforms by its leadership. The US was not opposed to the reforms, Haley said in response to a question. Russia and China were.

US to mediate between Pakistan and India over Kashmir issue

While Russia has backed India’s claim, it has not shown particular enthusiasm about the reforms generally, not taking a position on any of the other claimants. China is the only permanent member not to back India but it has not backed any other country as well. Diplomats concede the two countries together did indeed not seem open to reforms.

On the issue of the veto, the US and UK don’t want to let go of it or share it, only France has said it was open to it. Russia remained ambivalent given its support only for India and China hasn’t even gotten past the first block to even begin to consider the question of sharing or giving up the veto.


Read more: india , Latest , News
 
. . .
None of the P5 are going to willingly dilute their own veto power. That's just common sense.

But common sense is apparently not very common here.

Next we'll have some of the local Indian members saying, "oh China can't stop India from getting an NSG seat or a UNSC seat!"
 
. .
No problem, 1st let us part of UN member then automatically we will get veto power sooner or later
 
.
None of the P5 are going to willingly dilute their own veto power. That's just common sense.

But common sense is apparently not very common here.

Next we'll have some of the local Indian members saying, "oh China can't stop India from getting an NSG seat or a UNSC seat!"

India will not get the veto power. Or even permanent membership. It's best that India expend its energy elsewhere...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom