Update of FATF Meeting: Outcomes FATF Plenary, 21-23 February 2018

[Imran Khan]

indian media you can sit here

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

​

Iran/Saudia - Pakistan - Russia/Qatar -- China - Turkey
(OIL) --------(FOOD)----(GAS/OIL)------ TECH - TECH/TRADE

1 to 1 Bilateral agreement with Central Asian Nations

CENTRAL ASIA
SCO DREAMS


Fast Track Russian/Chinese financial alternative model​

 

[Devil Soul]

 

[Shiroyama]

https://twitter.com/x/status/967069532304134144

 

[Shiroyama]

WSJ is the highest circulated newspaper in USA.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

@egodoc222 and @Tom M

You clowns, I couldn't reply to you on other thread as it was made inactive.

Now carry on with your verbal diarrhoea here about how great Indian diplomacy is. LOL. Forget about India, yahan tu tumharay baap Amreeka ki bhi MC hogaee. Indian establishment and RAW need to find a hakeem , a soothsayer, they are constantly suffering and prematurely ejaculating on their billion plus nation, making absolute chutiya of the masses and embarrassing them.

This is another NSG in making. Rude awakening to America and her allies that old world order is well and truly buried. Those among them who are in denial, will keep on having egg on their face.

 

[Max]

I'm not sure about the consensus...I think it is majority and not consensus.

no it need consensus. otherwise how China, Saudi, Turks and GCC(6 states 1 or 6 votes) were able to stop the first attempt? somewhere i read 3 votes are needed to stop the resolutions out of 35.

 

[hussain0216]

There are 3 running threads already clown

 

[BHarwana]

There are no vetoes in FATF

Please don't argue I know how it works I have studied the whole structure for past 5 days.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Iran - Pakistan - Russia - China - Turkey
(OIL) (FOOD) (GAS/OIL) - TECH - TECH/TRADE

CENTRAL ASIA
SCO DREAMS​

 

[Devil Soul]

Also nothing is mentioned with regards to 3 month given to Pakistan in all press releases.....

 

[war&peace]

no it need consensus. otherwise how China, Saudi, Turks and GCC(6 states 1 or 6 votes) were able to stop the first attempt? somewhere i read 3 votes are needed to stop the resolutions out of 35.

Good. I will appreciate if you could provide the source.

Please don't argue I know how it works I have studied the whole structure for past 5 days.

Such statements of arrogance have no value. If what you claim is true, provide the source / link for it.

 

[Max]

Good. I will appreciate if you could provide the source.

it was bharati propaganda which was saying Chinese and Saudis backed off and we were left with Turkey (1 vote_) it was a lie but you can still find it online.

 

[BHarwana]

Such statements of arrogance have no value. If what you claim is true, provide the source / link for it.

Here is my link USA UK France and Germany wanted Pakistan on the list and moved the resolution in the report Pakistan is not there how? Now you give me link and read other thread that I have posted for last 3 days giving all info.

 

[war&peace]

Here is my link USA UK France and Germany wanted Pakistan on the list and moved the resolution in the report Pakistan is not there how? Now you give me link and read other thread that I have posted for last 3 days giving all info.

That's not an evidence for veto..