What's new

Unveiling the true size of china's 2022 military budget

China-Military-Budget-Graphic.png


Source: Setting the Record Straight on Beijing’s Actual Military Spending | American Enterprise Institute - AEI

Setting the Record Straight on Beijing’s Actual Military Spending​

By Mackenzie Eaglen
August 08, 2023

Popularly floating around the internet is some version of this flawed figure about the United States’ military spending versus the rest of the world. They all tell a similar story that the United States’ defense budget dwarfs the next ten nations combined, even when including our rivals like China and Russia.
Despite our supposed massive budgetary edge, the Defense Department has reported that China has become the “pacing challenge” and “…has already achieved parity with—or even exceeded—the United States in several military modernization areas.” Why are Pentagon leaders so worried if we’re apparently outspending Beijing by a factor of 4-to-1?
As it turns out, China’s real military budget is a whole lot bigger than it looks. A few months ago, Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) took to the Senate floor to reveal that in classified settings, “They [intelligence officials] came out and said the real Chinese budget, in terms of military, is probably close to about $700 billion dollars.”
When we account for this new $700 billion figure, the Pentagon’s assessment starts to make a little more sense.

What accounts for this half-trillion-dollar gap? Due to the sensitive nature, it’s hard to know for sure, but there are a variety of compounding factors we can calculate confidently.
Firstly, it’s flawed to take self-reported military budgets at face value, especially from a Communist Party from which there is so little transparency into China’s budget processes. Official reports are extraordinarily narrow in detail, dividing spending across the three simple categories of personnel, training and maintenance, and equipment. When compared to the thousands of pages of public Pentagon budget documentation, it’s clear that the American military budget is far easier to openly corroborate.
Furthermore the lines of funding are blurred by China’s obfuscation of its total military spending through military-civil fusion, where Beijing’s investments in dual-purpose enterprises blur the lines between what is classified as military versus civilian hardware (with the point being that many civilian items can easily be used for military purposes). These investments are focused in shipbuilding, information technology, and the aerospace industry, all areas where China is rapidly modernizing its military capability.
This is all to say nothing of China’s hard power investments counted off the “defense budget” books. Some of China’s regional muscle, namely the China Coast Guard and People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia, are funded entirely separately from the rest of the Chinese military, despite directly supporting China’s military goals.
The comparison is further flawed by blankly accepting a one-to-one conversion between Chinese yuan to US dollars. Research has shown that the US-China military gap narrows even further when purchasing power parity (PPP) is properly considered. For example, China can afford to pay its soldiers roughly sixteen times less than the salary of their American counterparts. Where Beijing saves on compensation, it can make up for in ships, planes, missiles and other armaments. The evidence is clear – while China churns out new warships, we’re struggling to keep shipyards open.
Of course, none of this shows up in a chart which takes the Chinese Communist Party word at face value. While America’s defense spending is the largest nominal military budget in the world, a simple glance at the topline doesn’t tell the whole story—not even close.
China’s military budget has been increasing consistently for the past 28 consecutive years. According to public data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, in the last decade alone, China’s military budget increased annually by an average of 9 percent. Meanwhile, the Pentagon’s budget, having been saddled by budget cuts, spending caps, and unstable funding for key programs, has fluctuated up and down. Our military budget continues to shrink as a percentage of national GDP, with projected spending in Fiscal Year 2025 likely taking the budget under 3 percent of GDP for the first time in over 20 years. In 2022, military spending accounted for only 10 percent of the federal budget – the lowest since WWII.
This has all culminated in a US defense budget which has failed to have any real growth under record inflation. Our troops are expected to do the same or more with less, and as the years have dragged on, the cracks are starting to show, leading to a shrinking and increasingly hollow force which is declining in capability.
With all these trends considered, it’s no wonder Pentagon leaders are worried. Reversing these trends will require real growth in America’s military budget. If we want to correct these trends and adequately deter an increasingly belligerent China, we’ll first need to make up for lost time and fully fund the military.
 
.
In term of PPP, China military budget is small as what it seems.
(The price of building warship is way cheaper in China (exclude the quality issue) compare with USA)

And China doesn't need to spend money to maintain thousands of military bases worldwide, as well as cost for worldwide military operational, it's concentrated in China only.

Finally, combine with the post above (the way how USA calculate their military budget), China military budget is perhaps way bigger.


But overall, USA military budget is not small either.

USA has allies.

Combination between USA and allies, it's also not as small as it seems too.
 
.
View attachment 945030

Source: Setting the Record Straight on Beijing’s Actual Military Spending | American Enterprise Institute - AEI

Setting the Record Straight on Beijing’s Actual Military Spending​

By Mackenzie Eaglen
August 08, 2023

Popularly floating around the internet is some version of this flawed figure about the United States’ military spending versus the rest of the world. They all tell a similar story that the United States’ defense budget dwarfs the next ten nations combined, even when including our rivals like China and Russia.
Despite our supposed massive budgetary edge, the Defense Department has reported that China has become the “pacing challenge” and “…has already achieved parity with—or even exceeded—the United States in several military modernization areas.” Why are Pentagon leaders so worried if we’re apparently outspending Beijing by a factor of 4-to-1?
As it turns out, China’s real military budget is a whole lot bigger than it looks. A few months ago, Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) took to the Senate floor to reveal that in classified settings, “They [intelligence officials] came out and said the real Chinese budget, in terms of military, is probably close to about $700 billion dollars.”
When we account for this new $700 billion figure, the Pentagon’s assessment starts to make a little more sense.

What accounts for this half-trillion-dollar gap? Due to the sensitive nature, it’s hard to know for sure, but there are a variety of compounding factors we can calculate confidently.
Firstly, it’s flawed to take self-reported military budgets at face value, especially from a Communist Party from which there is so little transparency into China’s budget processes. Official reports are extraordinarily narrow in detail, dividing spending across the three simple categories of personnel, training and maintenance, and equipment. When compared to the thousands of pages of public Pentagon budget documentation, it’s clear that the American military budget is far easier to openly corroborate.
Furthermore the lines of funding are blurred by China’s obfuscation of its total military spending through military-civil fusion, where Beijing’s investments in dual-purpose enterprises blur the lines between what is classified as military versus civilian hardware (with the point being that many civilian items can easily be used for military purposes). These investments are focused in shipbuilding, information technology, and the aerospace industry, all areas where China is rapidly modernizing its military capability.
This is all to say nothing of China’s hard power investments counted off the “defense budget” books. Some of China’s regional muscle, namely the China Coast Guard and People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia, are funded entirely separately from the rest of the Chinese military, despite directly supporting China’s military goals.
The comparison is further flawed by blankly accepting a one-to-one conversion between Chinese yuan to US dollars. Research has shown that the US-China military gap narrows even further when purchasing power parity (PPP) is properly considered. For example, China can afford to pay its soldiers roughly sixteen times less than the salary of their American counterparts. Where Beijing saves on compensation, it can make up for in ships, planes, missiles and other armaments. The evidence is clear – while China churns out new warships, we’re struggling to keep shipyards open.
Of course, none of this shows up in a chart which takes the Chinese Communist Party word at face value. While America’s defense spending is the largest nominal military budget in the world, a simple glance at the topline doesn’t tell the whole story—not even close.
China’s military budget has been increasing consistently for the past 28 consecutive years. According to public data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, in the last decade alone, China’s military budget increased annually by an average of 9 percent. Meanwhile, the Pentagon’s budget, having been saddled by budget cuts, spending caps, and unstable funding for key programs, has fluctuated up and down. Our military budget continues to shrink as a percentage of national GDP, with projected spending in Fiscal Year 2025 likely taking the budget under 3 percent of GDP for the first time in over 20 years. In 2022, military spending accounted for only 10 percent of the federal budget – the lowest since WWII.
This has all culminated in a US defense budget which has failed to have any real growth under record inflation. Our troops are expected to do the same or more with less, and as the years have dragged on, the cracks are starting to show, leading to a shrinking and increasingly hollow force which is declining in capability.
With all these trends considered, it’s no wonder Pentagon leaders are worried. Reversing these trends will require real growth in America’s military budget. If we want to correct these trends and adequately deter an increasingly belligerent China, we’ll first need to make up for lost time and fully fund the military.


Just like the expenses from US nuclear arsenals are under the Department of Energy, and the Veteran Affair is separate from DoD. The figure is flawed when citing the US defense budget in the comparison.
 
.
In term of PPP, China military budget is small as what it seems.
(The price of building warship is way cheaper in China (exclude the quality issue) compare with USA)

And China doesn't need to spend money to maintain thousands of military bases worldwide, as well as cost for worldwide military operational, it's concentrated in China only.

Finally, combine with the post above (the way how USA calculate their military budget), China military budget is perhaps way bigger.


But overall, USA military budget is not small either.

USA has allies.

Combination between USA and allies, it's also not as small as it seems too.

This is true, but also another fact author mentioned which is very important - inflation. US defence spending declining by 3% after accounting for inflation.

Why the budget deal is good news for defense — with one key exception - Breaking Defense

The 2024 cap would amount to a 3 percent cut to national defense programs after accounting for inflation and the pay raise. This cut would be compounded in 2025 with another 9 percent cut under the caps, again after accounting for a similar pay raise and inflation projection.

Buying Power Is the Invisible Shortfall of the 2024 Defense Budget Request | American Enterprise Institute - AEI

But the U.S. military will start the next fiscal year $90 billion in the hole—behind where the defense budget was just three years ago.

FY24-Buying-Power-math.png
 
.
To calculate the size of China's economy, they use GDP.

To calculate China's military spending, they use PPP.
 
.
China makes aircraft carrier at about 30% of US cost. So in terms of equipment output China will be on par.

China indeed spends less but China is far more efficient per dollar.


1691717604790.png
 
.
The most suprising fact is Saudi - ranked 5 @ $75bn and yet it doesnt have a functioning army or airforce.
 
.
If we use "aircraft carrier index" to normalized China and US GDP, then China GDP will be 2x USA.

USA will not want to admit it.

It will be a great loss of prestige.
 
.
If we use "aircraft carrier index" to normalized China and US GDP, then China GDP will be 2x USA.

USA will not want to admit it.

It will be a great loss of prestige.

The U.S. Burke 3 cost $3.5 billion.

China's type055 cost 6 billion CNY ($840 million).
 
.
Base on "Aircraft carrier index", average PRC standard of living will be in reality 50% of USA. The life expectancy of infant mortality rate already indicates both economy are not that far behind.

1691719841640.png



1691719922844.png


The U.S. Burke 3 cost $3.5 billion.

China's type055 cost 6 billion CNY ($840 million).

The actually difference could be even greater.

Type 055 is 1 generation more advance that Burke. Fujian carrier is kind of on par with CVN Ford but Ford is full of operation issues,
 
.
hard to compare to USA miitary budget.

USA industrial military complex corruption is something normal and accepted. Without steal through corruption they likely can do the same with half budget.

By the other side, military innovations are expensive, you can invest a lot for nothing, it's a lot cheaper copy from others.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom