Sin Pateh
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2011
- Messages
- 299
- Reaction score
- 0
To read most major news sources, youd think today hadnt been a holiday. Xinhua ignored it, the China Daily ignored it; who was going to report on the joyous celebrations on Tibetans on this, the first glorious anniversary of Serf Liberation Day?
As usual, the hard-hitting journalists at the Peoples Daily go where others fear to tread. Among the exciting stories you can read in the special section theyve built on their website to celebrate the holiday (under the headline Latest News):
Or, you could read this article: American experience fails to help them understand Tibet.
It actually starts off a lot less crazy than you might expect. Via Steven Wong, director of the U.S.-Japan-China Relations Research Center, the article points out that Americans have little knowledge of Chinas history and the feudal serfdom of Tibet before Tibet was liberated. Which, lets face it, is pretty damn true. Most Americans dont know anything about Tibet except that the Dalai Lama comes from there and that they should be free. (Full disclosure: I have, in the past, expressed the opinion that Tibet should not be free and that most Americans dont know what theyre talking about).
Thats more or less where the article heads South, though: As long as religion, culture or language protection is mentioned, many Americans will compare the U.S. Indian reservations with Chinas Tibet.
Ah, yes. I see where this is going:
what the U.S. did to the Indians in history was so unfair and cruel that even Americans cannot forgive themselves anymore. The misery of the Native Americans started when the English colonists stepped onto the American continent, and spread all over after the American War of Independence. During the Westward Movement caused by the industrial revolution, millions of Indians were cruelly slaughtered, and the Indian race and their religion and language almost all became extinct. Though the number is not large, some U.S. filmmakers have focused their attention on this dark period of human rights. For example, the movie Dances with Wolves, which won many Academy Awards in 1990, and the TV series Into the West created by Steven Spielberg, both reflect this period of history. Especially in Into the West, many historical facts which made people extremely sad and angry were represented, such as the genocidal policy, the Grattan Massacre, the Chief Sitting Bull Incident and the Americans breaking the treaties between them and the Indians, such as the Treaty of Fort Laramie. Currently, the population of the American Indians, who were the native people of the American continent, is only about 2 million, and they have only 225,000 square kilometers of land. Now, they are living in the scattered reservations with poor social conditions.
Yes, yes, this is all stuff weve heard before. Come on, Peoples Daily. Take us to Crazytown!
In 2008, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper apologized to the nations native people for a sad chapter in our history. So, we assumed that the U.S. would also deeply rethink and repent their own misdeeds and vowed to prevent them from taking place again. In the face of the cruel misdeeds, anyone who abides by basic moral principles cannot feel at ease, let alone Americans who regard themselves as the chosen people of God. We respect the Christian culture in the U.S. and thus understand the prejudices some Americans have against China on the Tibet issue. But, after confessing to God, can Americans restore their self-confidence and believe that they are superior to others and that others deserve their suffering? Can Gods love become a premise of cultural hegemony?
[...]
If the U.S. has really learned from the past, it should not regard itself as the guide in human history and hold that others should repeat its own mistakes. Instead, it should show more respect for different cultures and unfamiliar countries.
Uh, what? First of all, I dont think Ive ever heard anyone say that Americans are the chosen people of God. After all, Americans arent really a people, were a collection of immigrants. As far as I understand it, the chosen people of God refers to the Jews. But beyond that, why does the USs Christian culture mean that Americans would side with Tibetans, who are, after all, not even a little bit Christian? And isnt the point of Americans protesting about Tibet that they dont want others to suffer? Americans arent saying others should repeat their own mistakes, they protest in Tibet because they dont want others to repeat their own mistakes.
So, OK, Peoples Daily, youve taken us to Crazytown. Can we swing by Outrightliesburg on the way home?
Todays China is a confident and open nation which allows tourists from all parts of the world to tour Tibet. Any tourist can witness the difference between Tibet and the Indian reservations in the U.S. So, the prejudice from some Americans resulting from their sense of superiority is a misunderstanding of Chinas intention.
Yes, tourists from all parts of the world may tour Tibet. Assuming, of course, that they apply to travel there via a travel agency, hire a government-approved guide at around 1000RMB/day (last I checked), and dont venture outside of Lhasa or a few other designated tourist spots. Yup, nothing says confident and open quite like requiring a government-vetted tour guide at all times and forbidding foreigners to travel on their own.
Who is this stuff for?Anyway, everyone knows the Peoples Daily is crap, so tearing apart an article of theirs is, admittedly, a bit of a soft target. My question is: who is this stuff actually for? Who do they think they are fooling? I have said it before, and I will say it again: China could really stand to hire some decent Western PR folks. Someone who can tell them that articles like this and stunts like Serf Liberation Day in general are never going to be convincing to the Western public (even if the Western public did read the Peoples Daily).
The thing is, the Chinese government does have some legitimate things to say about the situation in Tibet. Obviously, the reality isnt nearly as black-and-white as they make it out to be, but theres a case for Tibet-as-China to be made using actual, real facts. Why fake it?
Why is China afraid to admit wrongs?By my estimation, the biggest reason the Chinese government wont enter into an actual discussion of the Tibet issue is that it knows to convince the West, it would have to admit that some mistakes had been made, and wrongs perhaps even atrocities committed. But in all honesty, I think a bit more transparency could buy the Chinese government some much needed credibility abroad and also bolster support at home. Chinese people know that the government makes mistakes, and while theyre used to the government claiming the contrary, wouldnt it be something like a breath of fresh air to hear them say: You know what, we have done bad things in Tibet in the past, and the situation right now certainly isnt ideal, but we think Tibet remaining under Chinas control is the best thing for Tibet and its people and heres why
Still, dont hold your breath waiting for the Chinese government to admit its mistakes in Tibet or make actual effort to convince anyone outside its borders. As Captain Mal Reynolds once said, Thats a long wait for a train [that] dont come.
C. Custer
As usual, the hard-hitting journalists at the Peoples Daily go where others fear to tread. Among the exciting stories you can read in the special section theyve built on their website to celebrate the holiday (under the headline Latest News):
Or, you could read this article: American experience fails to help them understand Tibet.
It actually starts off a lot less crazy than you might expect. Via Steven Wong, director of the U.S.-Japan-China Relations Research Center, the article points out that Americans have little knowledge of Chinas history and the feudal serfdom of Tibet before Tibet was liberated. Which, lets face it, is pretty damn true. Most Americans dont know anything about Tibet except that the Dalai Lama comes from there and that they should be free. (Full disclosure: I have, in the past, expressed the opinion that Tibet should not be free and that most Americans dont know what theyre talking about).
Thats more or less where the article heads South, though: As long as religion, culture or language protection is mentioned, many Americans will compare the U.S. Indian reservations with Chinas Tibet.
Ah, yes. I see where this is going:
what the U.S. did to the Indians in history was so unfair and cruel that even Americans cannot forgive themselves anymore. The misery of the Native Americans started when the English colonists stepped onto the American continent, and spread all over after the American War of Independence. During the Westward Movement caused by the industrial revolution, millions of Indians were cruelly slaughtered, and the Indian race and their religion and language almost all became extinct. Though the number is not large, some U.S. filmmakers have focused their attention on this dark period of human rights. For example, the movie Dances with Wolves, which won many Academy Awards in 1990, and the TV series Into the West created by Steven Spielberg, both reflect this period of history. Especially in Into the West, many historical facts which made people extremely sad and angry were represented, such as the genocidal policy, the Grattan Massacre, the Chief Sitting Bull Incident and the Americans breaking the treaties between them and the Indians, such as the Treaty of Fort Laramie. Currently, the population of the American Indians, who were the native people of the American continent, is only about 2 million, and they have only 225,000 square kilometers of land. Now, they are living in the scattered reservations with poor social conditions.
Yes, yes, this is all stuff weve heard before. Come on, Peoples Daily. Take us to Crazytown!
In 2008, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper apologized to the nations native people for a sad chapter in our history. So, we assumed that the U.S. would also deeply rethink and repent their own misdeeds and vowed to prevent them from taking place again. In the face of the cruel misdeeds, anyone who abides by basic moral principles cannot feel at ease, let alone Americans who regard themselves as the chosen people of God. We respect the Christian culture in the U.S. and thus understand the prejudices some Americans have against China on the Tibet issue. But, after confessing to God, can Americans restore their self-confidence and believe that they are superior to others and that others deserve their suffering? Can Gods love become a premise of cultural hegemony?
[...]
If the U.S. has really learned from the past, it should not regard itself as the guide in human history and hold that others should repeat its own mistakes. Instead, it should show more respect for different cultures and unfamiliar countries.
Uh, what? First of all, I dont think Ive ever heard anyone say that Americans are the chosen people of God. After all, Americans arent really a people, were a collection of immigrants. As far as I understand it, the chosen people of God refers to the Jews. But beyond that, why does the USs Christian culture mean that Americans would side with Tibetans, who are, after all, not even a little bit Christian? And isnt the point of Americans protesting about Tibet that they dont want others to suffer? Americans arent saying others should repeat their own mistakes, they protest in Tibet because they dont want others to repeat their own mistakes.
So, OK, Peoples Daily, youve taken us to Crazytown. Can we swing by Outrightliesburg on the way home?
Todays China is a confident and open nation which allows tourists from all parts of the world to tour Tibet. Any tourist can witness the difference between Tibet and the Indian reservations in the U.S. So, the prejudice from some Americans resulting from their sense of superiority is a misunderstanding of Chinas intention.
Yes, tourists from all parts of the world may tour Tibet. Assuming, of course, that they apply to travel there via a travel agency, hire a government-approved guide at around 1000RMB/day (last I checked), and dont venture outside of Lhasa or a few other designated tourist spots. Yup, nothing says confident and open quite like requiring a government-vetted tour guide at all times and forbidding foreigners to travel on their own.
Who is this stuff for?Anyway, everyone knows the Peoples Daily is crap, so tearing apart an article of theirs is, admittedly, a bit of a soft target. My question is: who is this stuff actually for? Who do they think they are fooling? I have said it before, and I will say it again: China could really stand to hire some decent Western PR folks. Someone who can tell them that articles like this and stunts like Serf Liberation Day in general are never going to be convincing to the Western public (even if the Western public did read the Peoples Daily).
The thing is, the Chinese government does have some legitimate things to say about the situation in Tibet. Obviously, the reality isnt nearly as black-and-white as they make it out to be, but theres a case for Tibet-as-China to be made using actual, real facts. Why fake it?
Why is China afraid to admit wrongs?By my estimation, the biggest reason the Chinese government wont enter into an actual discussion of the Tibet issue is that it knows to convince the West, it would have to admit that some mistakes had been made, and wrongs perhaps even atrocities committed. But in all honesty, I think a bit more transparency could buy the Chinese government some much needed credibility abroad and also bolster support at home. Chinese people know that the government makes mistakes, and while theyre used to the government claiming the contrary, wouldnt it be something like a breath of fresh air to hear them say: You know what, we have done bad things in Tibet in the past, and the situation right now certainly isnt ideal, but we think Tibet remaining under Chinas control is the best thing for Tibet and its people and heres why
Still, dont hold your breath waiting for the Chinese government to admit its mistakes in Tibet or make actual effort to convince anyone outside its borders. As Captain Mal Reynolds once said, Thats a long wait for a train [that] dont come.
C. Custer