Chhatrapati
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2016
- Messages
- 11,579
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
By 2040 - 2050, countries will start counting 'not literacy' but higher education numbers.100% by 2040-2050.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By 2040 - 2050, countries will start counting 'not literacy' but higher education numbers.100% by 2040-2050.
India's data is from 2011 & Bangladesh's data is from 2016...
Bangladesh 2011 literacy from same source - 47.08
This is an interesting thread. But again we've spoiled it by unnecessarily dragging india into the discussion. Why r we so obsessed with india. Really sad.
As SJC said in his article, don't get blinded by anti India hysteria. If we wanna be respected as a nation, we have to respect others too.
India had 69.3% in 2011 and 86.14% literacy rate for 15-24 years old in 2011 . Any ways well done BD
dude from where are you doing these "observations" ? india's literacy for instance was 40% in 1981 and was 69.3 in 2011 . So ~30% increase in 3 decades . That's what the goal is really to increase 10% per decade and pulling off extra ordinary rise like BD is impossible for india . But we are steady
stop jumping around india is ahead of bangladesh . We must have added 5% points from 2011 to 2016 . Just that the next survey will be only in 2021 (?) . Till then you can enjoy comparing to India's 2011 literacy rateHow could Indian _not_ be more literate than Bangladesh??
They are world champions in spouting BS anyhow....
At the rate Bangladesh went up in literacy rate in the last 5 years, wouldn't it lead to more embarrassment for India in 2021 when Bangladesh gets a lot ahead? It's not like Bangladesh is currently stagnant irt 2011 and 2016 data.stop jumping around india is ahead of bangladesh . We must have added 5% points from 2011 to 2016 . Just that the next survey will be only in 2021 (?) . Till then you can enjoy comparing to India's 2011 literacy rate
How could Indian _not_ be more literate than Bangladesh??
world champions in spouting BS
At the rate Bangladesh went up in literacy rate in the last 5 years, wouldn't it lead to more embarrassment for India in 2021 when Bangladesh gets a lot ahead? It's not like Bangladesh is currently stagnant irt 2011 and 2016 data.
By 2021, BD will leave India in the dust. BD government almost doubled education expenditure from 4.3 billion in 2016 to almost 7.8 billion in the 2017-2018 budget
Regardless, It's not like literally doubling education spending won't have an effect.Aha, more projections.... The 2011 data for Bangladesh is UIS estimation & cannot be used for comparison (check the table in the link)
For one, hardly matters when comparing to India in such cases. We are much more efficient as we are almost 3 times denser country. Just look at the health expenditure, we spend less than 1/3rd as much per capita and yet our life expectancy is much higher then India.
Regardless, It's not like literally doubling education spending won't have an effect.
We are much more efficient as we are almost 3 times denser country.
It matters. And I don't think countries with lower literacy rates produces more highly educated citizens anyway. You build from ground up. Why give certain children an edge while completely neglect other children in the same country by not even caring about their literacy as long as there are more 'highly educated citizens'? Not a fan of a society where inequality in basic education is seen as acceptable if there are more people highly educated in numbers compared to other countries.Just achieving literacy rate for the sake of it is nothing. A person is deemed literate if he manages basic minimum criteria like writing his own name or reading a sentence and such. Its the higher education and the research that adds value to education. Let others decide how well BD's cope in that area.
2021 isn't immediate.And what makes you think that result would be immediate ?
It has nothing to do with density.
2021 isn't immediate
It matters. And I don't think countries with lower literacy rates produces more highly educated citizens anyway. You build from ground up. Why give certain children an edge while completely neglect other children in the same country by not even caring about their literacy as long as there are more 'highly educated citizens'? Not a fan of a society where inequality in basic education is seen as acceptable if there are more people highly educated in numbers compared to other countries.
Well, it will have effect later on then. I guess you need 5 years to a decade to get the result of investments in such sectors. Either way, BD will easily get ahead in the foreseeable long run.It's 3 years away.
You can do that in a country where literacy is at 99 to 100%. Countries like ours can and do have more schools near the number of what's needed than universities. Higher education output hardly tells the story of BIMARU states.I said it because it is easy to manipulate literacy rate given it doesn't take much to declare a person literate. And we all know how BBS is adept at that.
But the correct measure to identify a country's educational prowess is to look at its research output because its really hard to fake it. I'll allow you look into your country's research output over the past few years and tell me if the increased education budget is making any difference.
Well, it will have effect later on then. I guess you need 5 years to a decade to get the result of investments in such sectors. Either way, BD will easily get ahead in the foreseeable long run.
You can do that in a country where literacy is at 99 to 100%. Countries like ours can and do have more schools near the number of what's needed than universities. Higher education output hardly tells the story of BIMARU states.
We have national exams at 5th grade, 8th, 10th and 12th grade. Government has records of them. That's how they know how many percentage of people are literate. It's not a 'BBS' estimation data.
If anything positive or anything that shows us ahead is considered fake, then why are you here arguing? Everything is fake and India is a superpower. Move on if you have nothing to add to the discussion other than calling everything positive in every thread ''fake''.
If anything positive or anything that shows us ahead is considered fake, then why are you here arguing?
I can see why literacy rate jumped so high. As around 2011, the government added the free books up to 10th grade students (both Bangalis and books in different languages for minorities)