Ukraine Resists Russia Alone: A Tale Of The West's Broken Promises

[IceCold]

They also talk about Savarkar in glowing terms, they talk of Hindutva, they talk of only Indic religion followers being genuine citizens of our country, they refuse to acknowledge that millions of Indians, including the Dalit, eat beef, and have set up laws against cow-slaughter, while smiling weakly at the enormous beef exports that happen, under the guise of buffalo meat. They are scared of Hindu girls marrying Muslim boys and have even coined a term for it; they are scared of conversions, and they attack churches, mosques and those they consider missionaries. They make a mess of our constitution, including in apparently neutralising Art. 370, which is rank bad in law, and detain people for three years without forming charge-sheets on false accusations.

So do you take them seriously or as anything but utterly irredeemable bigots? Why should you pick out one point from their rambling and make a song and dance about it?

How India manages its internal matters and how it imposes or tries to impose its agenda on another country are two different things. While we don't care whether a Hindu man can marry a Muslim girl or vice versa, we do care when a country size of India openly talks of promoting terrorism inside another country and breaking it away.

Guess what happened before Searchlight?

It does not matter at this stage what happened before or after. The determining factor in all of that was India that supported Mukhti and later waged a war that resulted in Pakistan losing its territory not the other way round. Whether or not India can repeat this is the topic of discussion here. My initial point is that Pakistan has sufficient conventional deterrence to make certain India cannot as demonstrated on this day in 2019. If you have a different perspective to counter my argument, I am all ears.

All I can say is, Wow.

Your posts were better in the past. Much better.

I don't know what upset you in the above post but push come to shove is a common phrase.

 

[Turingsage]

NATO has been saying for MONTHS that it cannot use any of its troops to fight In Ukraine. So that's hardly news .
The population of Ukraine are learning to to resist this invasion.

 

[Basel]

So, let me get this straight.

No matter what, India gets flattened.

It depends on breach of nuclear threshold of Pakistani security content.

 

[Joe Shearer]

It depends on breach of nuclear threshold of Pakistani security content.

Actually, my question was about the possibility - only the possibility - that India, at that moment, had nothing to do with Pakistan's woes. The answer I got was plain and simple. ALL Pakistan's woes can be attributed to India, so India gets flattened.

I think I'd better get my air-raid shelter ready. And stock up with survival food.

 

[Basel]

Actually, my question was about the possibility - only the possibility - that India, at that moment, had nothing to do with Pakistan's woes. The answer I got was plain and simple. ALL Pakistan's woes can be attributed to India, so India gets flattened.

I think I'd better get my air-raid shelter ready. And stock up with survival food.

It means India is planning an attack on Pakistan and you wanted to know, to what extent Pakistan can go to defend itself.

 

[Joe Shearer]

It means India is planning an attack on Pakistan and you wanted to know, to what extent Pakistan can go to defend itself.

It means nothing of the kind, as you'd realise if you looked around and remembered who we are.