What's new

UK spy agencies urge China rethink once Covid-19 crisis is over

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
Britain’s intelligence community believes the UK needs to reassess its relationship with China after the coronavirus crisis subsides and consider if tighter controls are needed over high-tech and other strategic industries.

They reckon China will become more assertive in defending its one-party model as having successfully tackled the pandemic and that Boris Johnson and other ministers will have to take a “realistic view” and consider how the UK responds.



Issues being aired are whether the UK wants to restrict takeovers of key companies in high-tech areas such as digital communications and artificial intelligence, and whether it should reduce Chinese students’ access to research at universities and elsewhere.

But MI6, the foreign intelligence service, and MI5, its domestic equivalent, still believe it was correct to allow Huawei access to Britain’s 5G network, capped at 35% – a decision made by Johnson in January – although the new emphasis on China may make that decision increasingly hard to defend as Conservative rebels press for a rethink.

A Whitehall source said the UK needs to ensure diversity of supply “in 6G and 7G” and, more broadly, to protect “the crown jewels” of technology, research and innovation.

MI6 is also understood to have told ministers that China was significantly under-reporting the number of coronavirus cases and deaths in January and February, echoing similar briefings given by the CIA to the White House.

Intelligence agencies have been urging a greater emphasis on Chinese activity for months, and the announcement of Ken McCallum as the new director general of MI5 at the end of last month was accompanied by a promise that the organisation would focus more clearly on Beijing.

Late last month, Michael Gove, chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, accused China of playing down the initial threat posed by Covid-19. “It was also the case that some of the reporting from China was not clear about the scale, the nature, the infectiousness of this,” he said.


Other ministers who are known to be China-sceptics include Priti Patel, the home secretary, Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, and Jacob Rees-Mogg, leader of the house.

Concern about China, however, remains tempered by the UK’s deep trade relationship with Bejing, a point reinforced when Gove was forced to soften his criticism earlier this month after the arrival of badly-needed Chinese ventilators in the UK.

“Today 300 new ventilators arrived from China. I would like to thank the Chinese government for their support and securing that capacity,” the senior minister said.

Under David Cameron and George Osborne, the government pursued a policy of actively courting Chinese investment in areas such as nuclear power and telecoms. When Theresa May took over as prime minister, she ordered a review of the China General Nuclear Power Group’s investment in the new Hinckley Point nuclear plant, but it was allowed to proceed.


Charles Parton, a former China diplomat, and a senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said that “a rethink of UK-China relations has been needed for a long time” because Beijing sees itself as in long-term competition with the west.

But the foreign policy specialist also argued that the agencies’ job was “not to make policy but provide information, and added: “When they have strayed in the past, the results have not always been edifying”. Despite their concern about high-tech, it was not clear that spy agencies were technological experts, Parton said.

The future relationship with China is one of many issues due to be tackled by the integrated review of foreign policy and defence announced in February. It had been due to report in the autumn but is widely expected to be delayed given the current crisis.



A group of Conservative backbenchers, many of whom were prominent Brexiters, have begun to form a bloc of China-sceptics. Thirty-eight of the party’s MPs voted against allowing Huawei into supplying 5G technology last month, cutting the government’s majority in a Commons vote to 24.

Fifteen Tory MPs, led by Bob Seely, and including former ministers Iain Duncan Smith and David Davis, wrote to Johnson over the weekend asking that the UK “rethink our wider relationship with China” after the pandemic has eased. “We ... have failed to take a strategic view of Britain’s long-term economic, technical and security needs,” they said.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ge-china-rethink-once-covid-19-crisis-is-over
 
China, under the leadership of the CCP, cannot be trusted in any way. Of course many will want and need to do business with China in the near-term, but all should work on back-up and alternate plans for everything they buy from China. If a non-Chinese company wants to do business in the Chinese domestic market, it should do so via a fire-walled subsidiary.
 
Britain’s intelligence community believes the UK needs to reassess its relationship with China after the coronavirus crisis subsides and consider if tighter controls are needed over high-tech and other strategic industries.

They reckon China will become more assertive in defending its one-party model as having successfully tackled the pandemic and that Boris Johnson and other ministers will have to take a “realistic view” and consider how the UK responds.



Issues being aired are whether the UK wants to restrict takeovers of key companies in high-tech areas such as digital communications and artificial intelligence, and whether it should reduce Chinese students’ access to research at universities and elsewhere.

But MI6, the foreign intelligence service, and MI5, its domestic equivalent, still believe it was correct to allow Huawei access to Britain’s 5G network, capped at 35% – a decision made by Johnson in January – although the new emphasis on China may make that decision increasingly hard to defend as Conservative rebels press for a rethink.

A Whitehall source said the UK needs to ensure diversity of supply “in 6G and 7G” and, more broadly, to protect “the crown jewels” of technology, research and innovation.

MI6 is also understood to have told ministers that China was significantly under-reporting the number of coronavirus cases and deaths in January and February, echoing similar briefings given by the CIA to the White House.

Intelligence agencies have been urging a greater emphasis on Chinese activity for months, and the announcement of Ken McCallum as the new director general of MI5 at the end of last month was accompanied by a promise that the organisation would focus more clearly on Beijing.

Late last month, Michael Gove, chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, accused China of playing down the initial threat posed by Covid-19. “It was also the case that some of the reporting from China was not clear about the scale, the nature, the infectiousness of this,” he said.


Other ministers who are known to be China-sceptics include Priti Patel, the home secretary, Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, and Jacob Rees-Mogg, leader of the house.

Concern about China, however, remains tempered by the UK’s deep trade relationship with Bejing, a point reinforced when Gove was forced to soften his criticism earlier this month after the arrival of badly-needed Chinese ventilators in the UK.

“Today 300 new ventilators arrived from China. I would like to thank the Chinese government for their support and securing that capacity,” the senior minister said.

Under David Cameron and George Osborne, the government pursued a policy of actively courting Chinese investment in areas such as nuclear power and telecoms. When Theresa May took over as prime minister, she ordered a review of the China General Nuclear Power Group’s investment in the new Hinckley Point nuclear plant, but it was allowed to proceed.


Charles Parton, a former China diplomat, and a senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said that “a rethink of UK-China relations has been needed for a long time” because Beijing sees itself as in long-term competition with the west.

But the foreign policy specialist also argued that the agencies’ job was “not to make policy but provide information, and added: “When they have strayed in the past, the results have not always been edifying”. Despite their concern about high-tech, it was not clear that spy agencies were technological experts, Parton said.

The future relationship with China is one of many issues due to be tackled by the integrated review of foreign policy and defence announced in February. It had been due to report in the autumn but is widely expected to be delayed given the current crisis.



A group of Conservative backbenchers, many of whom were prominent Brexiters, have begun to form a bloc of China-sceptics. Thirty-eight of the party’s MPs voted against allowing Huawei into supplying 5G technology last month, cutting the government’s majority in a Commons vote to 24.

Fifteen Tory MPs, led by Bob Seely, and including former ministers Iain Duncan Smith and David Davis, wrote to Johnson over the weekend asking that the UK “rethink our wider relationship with China” after the pandemic has eased. “We ... have failed to take a strategic view of Britain’s long-term economic, technical and security needs,” they said.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ge-china-rethink-once-covid-19-crisis-is-over
Another fake articles.. British need to rethink their alliance with US.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/10/coro...nct-strains-spread-across-world-12536852/amp/

Great brother of UK are responsible for spreading virus worldwide and indirectly causing many death in UK. This epidemic is caused by Americans and this report surprisingly is done by UK Cambridge.

Researchers found that the closest type of coronavirus to the one discovered in bats – type A, the original human virus genome – was present in Wuhan, but was not the city’s predominant virus type.

Mutated versions of A were seen in Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and a large number of A-type viruses were found in patients from the US and Australia
.

Wuhan’s major virus type was B and was prevalent in patients from across east Asia, however it didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations
.
 
Britain’s intelligence community believes the UK needs to reassess its relationship with China after the coronavirus crisis subsides and consider if tighter controls are needed over high-tech and other strategic industries.

They reckon China will become more assertive in defending its one-party model as having successfully tackled the pandemic and that Boris Johnson and other ministers will have to take a “realistic view” and consider how the UK responds.



Issues being aired are whether the UK wants to restrict takeovers of key companies in high-tech areas such as digital communications and artificial intelligence, and whether it should reduce Chinese students’ access to research at universities and elsewhere.

But MI6, the foreign intelligence service, and MI5, its domestic equivalent, still believe it was correct to allow Huawei access to Britain’s 5G network, capped at 35% – a decision made by Johnson in January – although the new emphasis on China may make that decision increasingly hard to defend as Conservative rebels press for a rethink.

A Whitehall source said the UK needs to ensure diversity of supply “in 6G and 7G” and, more broadly, to protect “the crown jewels” of technology, research and innovation.

MI6 is also understood to have told ministers that China was significantly under-reporting the number of coronavirus cases and deaths in January and February, echoing similar briefings given by the CIA to the White House.

Intelligence agencies have been urging a greater emphasis on Chinese activity for months, and the announcement of Ken McCallum as the new director general of MI5 at the end of last month was accompanied by a promise that the organisation would focus more clearly on Beijing.

Late last month, Michael Gove, chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, accused China of playing down the initial threat posed by Covid-19. “It was also the case that some of the reporting from China was not clear about the scale, the nature, the infectiousness of this,” he said.


Other ministers who are known to be China-sceptics include Priti Patel, the home secretary, Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, and Jacob Rees-Mogg, leader of the house.

Concern about China, however, remains tempered by the UK’s deep trade relationship with Bejing, a point reinforced when Gove was forced to soften his criticism earlier this month after the arrival of badly-needed Chinese ventilators in the UK.

“Today 300 new ventilators arrived from China. I would like to thank the Chinese government for their support and securing that capacity,” the senior minister said.

Under David Cameron and George Osborne, the government pursued a policy of actively courting Chinese investment in areas such as nuclear power and telecoms. When Theresa May took over as prime minister, she ordered a review of the China General Nuclear Power Group’s investment in the new Hinckley Point nuclear plant, but it was allowed to proceed.


Charles Parton, a former China diplomat, and a senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said that “a rethink of UK-China relations has been needed for a long time” because Beijing sees itself as in long-term competition with the west.

But the foreign policy specialist also argued that the agencies’ job was “not to make policy but provide information, and added: “When they have strayed in the past, the results have not always been edifying”. Despite their concern about high-tech, it was not clear that spy agencies were technological experts, Parton said.

The future relationship with China is one of many issues due to be tackled by the integrated review of foreign policy and defence announced in February. It had been due to report in the autumn but is widely expected to be delayed given the current crisis.



A group of Conservative backbenchers, many of whom were prominent Brexiters, have begun to form a bloc of China-sceptics. Thirty-eight of the party’s MPs voted against allowing Huawei into supplying 5G technology last month, cutting the government’s majority in a Commons vote to 24.

Fifteen Tory MPs, led by Bob Seely, and including former ministers Iain Duncan Smith and David Davis, wrote to Johnson over the weekend asking that the UK “rethink our wider relationship with China” after the pandemic has eased. “We ... have failed to take a strategic view of Britain’s long-term economic, technical and security needs,” they said.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ge-china-rethink-once-covid-19-crisis-is-over
Oh my god, I thought UK will reevaluate Brix. It will be unwise if UK break ties with both EU and China in the same time. There are 3 major market in the world, which are China, EU and US.
Good luck.
 
I guess Huawei will be banned from the UK after this.
 
Not sure Britain can afford to rethink anything at the moment but everyone is already rethinking their relationship with China.
 
Britain’s intelligence community believes the UK needs to reassess its relationship with China after the coronavirus crisis subsides and consider if tighter controls are needed over high-tech and other strategic industries.

They reckon China will become more assertive in defending its one-party model as having successfully tackled the pandemic and that Boris Johnson and other ministers will have to take a “realistic view” and consider how the UK responds.



Issues being aired are whether the UK wants to restrict takeovers of key companies in high-tech areas such as digital communications and artificial intelligence, and whether it should reduce Chinese students’ access to research at universities and elsewhere.

But MI6, the foreign intelligence service, and MI5, its domestic equivalent, still believe it was correct to allow Huawei access to Britain’s 5G network, capped at 35% – a decision made by Johnson in January – although the new emphasis on China may make that decision increasingly hard to defend as Conservative rebels press for a rethink.

A Whitehall source said the UK needs to ensure diversity of supply “in 6G and 7G” and, more broadly, to protect “the crown jewels” of technology, research and innovation.

MI6 is also understood to have told ministers that China was significantly under-reporting the number of coronavirus cases and deaths in January and February, echoing similar briefings given by the CIA to the White House.

Intelligence agencies have been urging a greater emphasis on Chinese activity for months, and the announcement of Ken McCallum as the new director general of MI5 at the end of last month was accompanied by a promise that the organisation would focus more clearly on Beijing.

Late last month, Michael Gove, chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, accused China of playing down the initial threat posed by Covid-19. “It was also the case that some of the reporting from China was not clear about the scale, the nature, the infectiousness of this,” he said.


Other ministers who are known to be China-sceptics include Priti Patel, the home secretary, Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, and Jacob Rees-Mogg, leader of the house.

Concern about China, however, remains tempered by the UK’s deep trade relationship with Bejing, a point reinforced when Gove was forced to soften his criticism earlier this month after the arrival of badly-needed Chinese ventilators in the UK.

“Today 300 new ventilators arrived from China. I would like to thank the Chinese government for their support and securing that capacity,” the senior minister said.

Under David Cameron and George Osborne, the government pursued a policy of actively courting Chinese investment in areas such as nuclear power and telecoms. When Theresa May took over as prime minister, she ordered a review of the China General Nuclear Power Group’s investment in the new Hinckley Point nuclear plant, but it was allowed to proceed.


Charles Parton, a former China diplomat, and a senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said that “a rethink of UK-China relations has been needed for a long time” because Beijing sees itself as in long-term competition with the west.

But the foreign policy specialist also argued that the agencies’ job was “not to make policy but provide information, and added: “When they have strayed in the past, the results have not always been edifying”. Despite their concern about high-tech, it was not clear that spy agencies were technological experts, Parton said.

The future relationship with China is one of many issues due to be tackled by the integrated review of foreign policy and defence announced in February. It had been due to report in the autumn but is widely expected to be delayed given the current crisis.



A group of Conservative backbenchers, many of whom were prominent Brexiters, have begun to form a bloc of China-sceptics. Thirty-eight of the party’s MPs voted against allowing Huawei into supplying 5G technology last month, cutting the government’s majority in a Commons vote to 24.

Fifteen Tory MPs, led by Bob Seely, and including former ministers Iain Duncan Smith and David Davis, wrote to Johnson over the weekend asking that the UK “rethink our wider relationship with China” after the pandemic has eased. “We ... have failed to take a strategic view of Britain’s long-term economic, technical and security needs,” they said.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ge-china-rethink-once-covid-19-crisis-is-over
True, CN govt always hide any news abt deadly virus until they cant hide anymore, so any countries making tie bussiness wt CN will be in the great risk of falling into another pademic starting again from CN:cool:
 
I doubt so. Why ban Huawei and stick with a useless ally who cause nothing more disaster?

Because the UK is also dominated by the same financier class as the US and public opinion will turn very harshly against China after this.

Count yourself lucky if only Huawei is banned.

Don't be surprised if Chinese students will be barred from studying in US, UK and Australian universities after this.
 
Because the UK is also dominated by the same financier class as the US and public opinion will turn very harshly against China after this.

Count yourself lucky if only Huawei is banned.

Don't be surprised if Chinese students will be barred from studying in US, UK and Australian universities after this.
LOL. I think you overestimate the US power. British are very pragmatic people, they will go with the wind. Whoever can give them economic benefits , they are more than happy to rope in.. Since US is such pain in the back, maybe its better to stick with Chinese afterall..

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/soc...ina-unlimited-amount-military-radar-equipment
 
LOL. I think you overestimate the US power. British are very pragmatic people, they will go with the wind. Whoever can give them economic benefits , they are more than happy to rope in.. Since US is such pain in the back, maybe its better to stick with Chinese afterall..

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/soc...ina-unlimited-amount-military-radar-equipment

I don't think so. The British deep state is closely tied to the American one. Expect repercussions after this. Do not think there won't be a major reckoning. You have no idea how much hatred there is of China at this moment in the Anglosphere.
 
I don't think so. The British deep state is closely tied to the American one. Expect repercussions after this. Do not think there won't be a major reckoning. You have no idea how much hatred there is of China at this moment in the Anglosphere.
You idea of hatre is gather only from the very bottom level of UK. I believe the upper level of British parliiament , end of the day, are rational and looking into the real interest of UK. If not , how do this report of Cambridge ever allowed to be release in the first place? You will be very surprised at the practical of British. There is no forever brotherhood but benefit only.

British end of the day, are looking at beneifts that helps them preserve their power as long as possible. They are not going to die for American or be the cannon-fodder for US.
 
You idea of hatre is gather only from the very bottom level of UK. I believe the upper level of British parliiament , end of the day, are rational and looking into the real interest of UK. If not , how do this report of Cambridge ever allowed to be release in the first place? You will be very surprised at the practical of British. There is no forever brotherhood but benefit only.

I think you are mistaken. China will face significant barriers after this in many areas in which they had free access to the Anglosphere, I can guarantee you that much.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom