What's new

U.S. Prepared to Strike Iran Before Approval Was Abruptly Withdrawn.

K Shehzad

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
D9jo_cMW4AAzL7T.jpg

(WASHINGTON) — A U.S. official said the military made preparations Thursday night for limited strikes on Iran in retaliation for the downing of a U.S. surveillance drone, but approval was abruptly withdrawn before the attacks were launched.

The official, who was not authorized to discuss the operation publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said the targets would have included radars and missile batteries.

The New York Times reported that President Donald Trump had approved the strikes, but then called them off. The newspaper cited anonymous senior administration officials.

The White House on Thursday night declined requests for information about whether Trump changed his mind.

According to the official who spoke to the AP, the strikes were recommended by the Pentagon and were among the options presented to senior administration officials. It was unclear how far the preparations had gone, but no shots were fired or missiles launched.

The military operation was called off around 7:30 p.m. Washington time, after Trump had spent most of Thursday discussing Iran strategy with top national security advisers and congressional leaders.

Asked earlier in the day about a U.S. response to the attack, he said, “You’ll soon find out.”

Trump declared that “Iran made a very big mistake” by shooting down the U.S. drone over the Strait of Hormuz. But he also suggested that shooting down the drone was a foolish error rather than an intentional escalation of the tensions that have led to rising fears of open military conflict.

“I find it hard to believe it was intentional, if you want to know the truth,” Trump said at the White House. “I think that it could have been somebody who was loose and stupid that did it.”

On Capitol Hill, leaders urged caution to avoid escalation, and some lawmakers insisted the White House must consult with Congress before taking any actions.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton have advocated hardline policies against Iran, but Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House intelligence committee, said “the president certainly was listening” when congressional leaders at the meeting urged him to be cautious and not escalate the already tense situation.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said no specific options for a U.S. response were presented at the more than hour-long meeting. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, “The administration is engaged in what I would call measured responses.” And late Thursday, House Republicans on the Foreign Affairs, intelligence and Armed Services committees issued a statement using the same word, saying, “There must be a measured response to these actions.”

The downing of the huge, unmanned aircraft , which Iran portrayed as a deliberate defense of its territory rather than a mistake, was a stark reminder of the risk of military conflict between U.S. and Iranian forces as the Trump administration combines a “maximum pressure” campaign of economic sanctions with a buildup of American forces in the region.

On Thursday, Iran called the sanctions “economic terrorism,” insisted the drone had invaded its airspace and said it was taking its case to the United Nations in an effort to prove the U.S. was lying about the aircraft being over international waters. It accused the U.S. of “a very dangerous and provocative act.”

The drone — which has a wingspan wider than a Boeing 737 — entered Iranian airspace “despite repeated radio warnings” and was shot down by Iran, acting under the U.N. Charter which allows self-defense action “if an armed attack occurs,” Iran’s U.N. Ambassador Majid Takht Ravanchi said in a letter to the U.N. secretary-general.

Late Thursday, the Federal Aviation Administration barred American-registered aircraft from flying over parts of the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.

Trump, who has said he wants to avoid war and negotiate with Iran over its nuclear ambitions, appeared to play down the significance of the shootdown.

He cast it as “a new wrinkle … a new fly in the ointment.” Yet he also said “this country will not stand for it, that I can tell you.”

Shortly before Trump spoke, Air Force Lt. Gen. Joseph Guastella, commander of U.S. Central Command air forces in the region, took a more pointed view of the shootdown in an area where Trump has blamed Iran for attacking shipping vessels.



U.S. Gen. Guastella disputed that contention, telling reporters that the aircraft was 34 kilometers (21 miles) from the nearest Iranian territory and flying at high altitude when struck by a surface-to-air missile. The U.S. military has not commented on the mission of the remotely piloted aircraft that can fly higher than 10 miles in altitude and stay in the air for over 24 hours at a time.

One U.S. official said there was a second American aircraft in the area that was able to get video and imagery of the drone when it was shot down.

Congressional leaders came to the White House for an hour-long briefing in the Situation Room late Thursday with top national security officials, including Pompeo, Bolton, CIA Director Gina Haspel, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford, acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan and Army Secretary Mark Esper, whom Trump has said he’ll nominate as Pentagon chief.


Democratic leaders in particular urged the president to work with U.S. allies and stressed the need for caution to avoid any unintended escalation.

Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York said he told Trump that conflicts have a way of escalating and “we’re worried that he and the administration may bumble into a war.”
 
Trump: ‘Hard To Believe’ Iran Drone Downing ‘Intentional’

Yes babe, it's hard to believe, that's why your drones have to stay away from Iranian borders.

P.S.
Trump fans were mocking Obama for giving Iran their top asset RQ170, now I wonder how they will feel after their tough president also gave Iran another top asset drone.
I predict a 50% rise of psychologists' incomes in U.S!
 
More propaganda.

What a joke is this. They issued the order then pulled it “last minute”.

Clever way of establishing deterrence without actually doing anything.

Those fighter jets wouldn’t have made it back home as S-300 covers the entire PG. The ships if the PG would be subject to a salvo of missiles that no ship could survive.

Obviously this would be a declaration of war.

1 drone does not equal the right to take out “handful” of radar sites causing potential casualties. Iran would be forced to respond or lose face. If this fantasy strike happened it would be war.
 
D9jo_cMW4AAzL7T.jpg

(WASHINGTON) — A U.S. official said the military made preparations Thursday night for limited strikes on Iran in retaliation for the downing of a U.S. surveillance drone, but approval was abruptly withdrawn before the attacks were launched.

The official, who was not authorized to discuss the operation publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said the targets would have included radars and missile batteries.

The New York Times reported that President Donald Trump had approved the strikes, but then called them off. The newspaper cited anonymous senior administration officials.

The White House on Thursday night declined requests for information about whether Trump changed his mind.

According to the official who spoke to the AP, the strikes were recommended by the Pentagon and were among the options presented to senior administration officials. It was unclear how far the preparations had gone, but no shots were fired or missiles launched.

The military operation was called off around 7:30 p.m. Washington time, after Trump had spent most of Thursday discussing Iran strategy with top national security advisers and congressional leaders.

Asked earlier in the day about a U.S. response to the attack, he said, “You’ll soon find out.”

Trump declared that “Iran made a very big mistake” by shooting down the U.S. drone over the Strait of Hormuz. But he also suggested that shooting down the drone was a foolish error rather than an intentional escalation of the tensions that have led to rising fears of open military conflict.

“I find it hard to believe it was intentional, if you want to know the truth,” Trump said at the White House. “I think that it could have been somebody who was loose and stupid that did it.”

On Capitol Hill, leaders urged caution to avoid escalation, and some lawmakers insisted the White House must consult with Congress before taking any actions.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton have advocated hardline policies against Iran, but Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House intelligence committee, said “the president certainly was listening” when congressional leaders at the meeting urged him to be cautious and not escalate the already tense situation.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said no specific options for a U.S. response were presented at the more than hour-long meeting. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, “The administration is engaged in what I would call measured responses.” And late Thursday, House Republicans on the Foreign Affairs, intelligence and Armed Services committees issued a statement using the same word, saying, “There must be a measured response to these actions.”

The downing of the huge, unmanned aircraft , which Iran portrayed as a deliberate defense of its territory rather than a mistake, was a stark reminder of the risk of military conflict between U.S. and Iranian forces as the Trump administration combines a “maximum pressure” campaign of economic sanctions with a buildup of American forces in the region.

On Thursday, Iran called the sanctions “economic terrorism,” insisted the drone had invaded its airspace and said it was taking its case to the United Nations in an effort to prove the U.S. was lying about the aircraft being over international waters. It accused the U.S. of “a very dangerous and provocative act.”

The drone — which has a wingspan wider than a Boeing 737 — entered Iranian airspace “despite repeated radio warnings” and was shot down by Iran, acting under the U.N. Charter which allows self-defense action “if an armed attack occurs,” Iran’s U.N. Ambassador Majid Takht Ravanchi said in a letter to the U.N. secretary-general.

Late Thursday, the Federal Aviation Administration barred American-registered aircraft from flying over parts of the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.

Trump, who has said he wants to avoid war and negotiate with Iran over its nuclear ambitions, appeared to play down the significance of the shootdown.

He cast it as “a new wrinkle … a new fly in the ointment.” Yet he also said “this country will not stand for it, that I can tell you.”

Shortly before Trump spoke, Air Force Lt. Gen. Joseph Guastella, commander of U.S. Central Command air forces in the region, took a more pointed view of the shootdown in an area where Trump has blamed Iran for attacking shipping vessels.



U.S. Gen. Guastella disputed that contention, telling reporters that the aircraft was 34 kilometers (21 miles) from the nearest Iranian territory and flying at high altitude when struck by a surface-to-air missile. The U.S. military has not commented on the mission of the remotely piloted aircraft that can fly higher than 10 miles in altitude and stay in the air for over 24 hours at a time.

One U.S. official said there was a second American aircraft in the area that was able to get video and imagery of the drone when it was shot down.

Congressional leaders came to the White House for an hour-long briefing in the Situation Room late Thursday with top national security officials, including Pompeo, Bolton, CIA Director Gina Haspel, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford, acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan and Army Secretary Mark Esper, whom Trump has said he’ll nominate as Pentagon chief.


Democratic leaders in particular urged the president to work with U.S. allies and stressed the need for caution to avoid any unintended escalation.

Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York said he told Trump that conflicts have a way of escalating and “we’re worried that he and the administration may bumble into a war.”
They are planning and telling the plan to whole world.. what joke these Americans become in recent years..Iran studied US war mythology in Syria iraq and Afghanistan even in Libya...so I believe Iranian are more ready to defend themselves and attack back. Pakistan should ready for next number if it happens...even if they attack on Iran , Iran will attack back to USA rallies likes of Israel UAE and Saudis..this is where problem can be start if Saudis get attacks Pakistan's involvement will starts.. this is dangerous. Iran has many targets near his approach..US army in Qatar in UAe then Afghanistan...and big naval assets near Oman sea..this war will bring lots of bloodshed.. I hope these Americans let live other countries peaceful and stop blackmailing other countries..peace is need for everyone..and for American war is business
 
I'm actually finding it funny how meek the US has become after this incident. They were talking such a big game, Iran shot down a drone, and then Trump started cowering saying it "probably wasn't intentional".
 
I never get Pakistan Indian nuclear threats at each other... Any nuke that lands on either side of the border is like shooting yourself in the foot.
 
I never get Pakistan Indian nuclear threats at each other... Any nuke that lands on either side of the border is like shooting yourself in the foot.

This is like if we are going to die you would also die with us you can't live in peace after defeating or killing us
 
similar pattern to RQ170 incident:

The officials considered various options for retrieving the wreckage of the RQ-170 drone.

Under one plan, a team would be sent to retrieve the aircraft. U.S. officials considered both sending in a team of American commandos based in Afghanistan as well as using allied agents inside Iran to hunt down the downed aircraft.

Another option would have had a team sneak in to blow up the remaining pieces of the drone. A third option would have been to destroy the wreckage with an airstrike.

However, the officials worried that any option for retrieving or destroying the drone would have risked discovery by Iran.

“No one warmed up to the option of recovering it or destroying it because of the potential it could become a larger incident,” the U.S. official said.

Romney: Obama’s Foreign Policy Is Based On Begging
 
Trump: ‘Hard To Believe’ Iran Drone Downing ‘Intentional’

Yes babe, it's hard to believe, that's why your drones have to stay away from Iranian borders.

P.S.
Trump fans were mocking Obama for giving Iran their top asset RQ170, now I wonder how they will feel after their tough president also gave Iran another top asset drone.
I predict a 50% rise of psychologists' incomes in U.S!

This shows the previous attacks were false flags. What is worse mining a tanker with civilians on board to explode... or downing some useless worthless drone.

This is the first time Iran reacted to Amerikan aggression and trump let the world know with that statement yesterday.
 
More propaganda.

What a joke is this. They issued the order then pulled it “last minute”.

Clever way of establishing deterrence without actually doing anything.

Those fighter jets wouldn’t have made it back home as S-300 covers the entire PG. The ships if the PG would be subject to a salvo of missiles that no ship could survive.

Obviously this would be a declaration of war.

1 drone does not equal the right to take out “handful” of radar sites causing potential casualties. Iran would be forced to respond or lose face. If this fantasy strike happened it would be war.
Or maybe those jets really did take off from Emirate and then they realized Iran AD has already locked on them! And thought. ... maybe it is not a good idea! Lol
 
To compare Iran for the past few weeks was like some poor kid cornered by bullies, being punched while the bullies tell the poor bullied kid to 'stop hitting yourself'. The kid has black eyes from the bullies, yet the bullies blamed the kid for punching himself. When the bullies go in for a new round of bullying, the kid punches back hard and makes the bullies run away. And the reaction of the bullies is 'hard to believe the kid's punches were intentional, he probably want to be punched some more.' Let's go back to bullying the poor kid, they think.
 
Last edited:
“A senior level administration source briefed on the plan says it would have escalated the situation quickly had it been carried out. Officials feared the attack could have caused hundreds of civilian casualties.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnew...trike-iran-reversed-sources/story?id=63853570



How would a plan to hit a “handful” of radar/Missile batteries sites result in “hundreds” of civilian casualties.

Like I said, something doesn’t add up here.

It’s not like Iran’s radar and AD sites that would likely be attacked (near the coast) are in dense city centers.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom