What's new

U.S. Leaves Its Last Afghan Base, Effectively Ending Operations

khansaheeb

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
17,009
Reaction score
-8
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom

U.S. Leaves Its Last Afghan Base, Effectively Ending Operations
With little fanfare, Bagram Air Base — once the military’s nerve center — was handed over to the Afghans, after nearly 20 years of waging war from the hub.



merlin_165170694_eee66bee-505a-4321-b1bd-a754fe3108ea-articleLarge.jpg


An American soldier in 2019 at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
Thomas Gibbons-Neff
By Thomas Gibbons-Neff
July 2, 2021
KABUL, Afghanistan — American troops and their Western allies have departed the U.S. military base that coordinated the sprawling war in Afghanistan, officials said on Friday, effectively ending major U.S. military operations in the country after nearly two decades.
For generations of American service members, the military hub, Bagram Air Base, was a gateway to and from a war that cut across constant changes on the battlefield and in presidential administrations. But the final withdrawal overnight on Thursday occurred with little fanfare and no public ceremony, and in an atmosphere of grave concern over the Afghan security forces’ ability to hold off Taliban advances across the country.
The American exit was completed quickly enough that some looters managed to get into the base before being arrested, Afghan officials said.

The quiet leave-taking from the base weeks before the planned withdrawal of American troops in mid July, and months ahead of President’s Biden announced Sept. 11 departure, highlights Washington’s efforts to signal two different messages: one to the U.S. public that its longest foreign war is ending, and another to the Afghan government that the United States is not abandoning the country in the middle of a Taliban offensive, and would retain some ability to conduct airstrikes if need be.
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story


“We are on track, exactly where we expected to be,” Mr. Biden told reporters at the White House on Friday.
The fear that Kabul could fall to the Taliban relatively soon haunted the administration’s debate over the decision to pull out of the country. But Mr. Biden suggested that even though the United States still retained the ability to conduct airstrikes if things went bad, no reversal of the withdrawal was on the table.

  • Dig deeper into the moment.
Special offer: Subscribe for $1 a week.

“We have worked out an over-the-horizon capacity,” he said, talking about air assets based in other places, “but the Afghans are going to have to do it themselves with the air force they have.”
Bagram was operating at full capacity until the end on Thursday. Fighter jets, cargo planes and surveillance aircraft relied on the twin runways until it was no longer feasible to keep them in the country.
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story


Now, air support for the Afghan forces and overhead surveillance will be flown in from outside the country, from bases in Qatar or the United Arab Emirates, or from an aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea. A contingent of 650 troops will remain to protect the American Embassy in Kabul, the capital. How long that type of support will continue is unclear, but the Pentagon has until Sept. 11 — when the American military mission is supposed to formally conclude — to decide.
U.S. WITHDRAWAL

As the U.S. leaves and the Afghan forces crumble, an air of unreality grips the capital.
The departure comes at a perilous time for Afghanistan.
Some U.S. intelligence estimates predict that the Afghan government could fall to its rivals, the Taliban, in from six months to two years after the Americans complete their withdrawal. The Taliban are inching closer to Kabul after having taken about a quarter of the country’s districts in the past two months.

Hundreds of members of the Afghan security forces have surrendered in recent weeks, while their counterattacks have taken back little territory from the Taliban. And as the Afghan forces fracture, regional militias have appeared with renewed prominence, in an echo of the country’s path toward civil war in the 1990s.

“Civil war is certainly a path that can be visualized,” the top American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Austin S. Miller, told reporters on Tuesday.
Early Friday morning, looters entered the base, grabbing gas canisters and some laptops, said Darwaish Raufi, a district administrator for Bagram, adding that some were arrested by the police.

Mr. Raufi said the Americans had failed to coordinate their departure with the Afghan forces, leaving a gap in security at the base. But Col. Sonny Leggett, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan, said the transfer of the base had been “closely coordinated.”





Don’t Play With Your Kids. Seriously.

Continue reading the main story




merlin_190234812_5f5e5e63-2e70-46da-b433-4aec56fc229d-articleLarge.jpg

Image
An Afghan soldier standing guard on Friday at the gate of the Bagram Air Base.Credit...Mohammad Ismail/Reuters
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story


Though the past 40 years of conflict in Afghanistan could be seen as civil war, a return to the fractious era of warlords and armed fiefs has long been feared.
With a line of snow-capped mountains as its backdrop, the Bagram airfield was built in the 1950s by the Soviet Union. It became a vital military hub during the Soviets’ 10-year occupation of Afghanistan. After the Soviets withdrew in 1989, the Taliban and what was known as the Northern Alliance fought for the base, sometimes with their trenches at either end.

When it invaded Afghanistan in 2001, after the Qaeda terrorist attacks in America, the United States inherited rubble at the Bagram site. In January 2002, when the first American service member killed by enemy fire, Sgt. First Class Nathan R. Chapman, was sent home, there were no American flags to drape on his coffin, so a flag patch from someone’s uniform had to suffice.
Today’s Best Reader Comments
    • The Trump organization is charged with running a 15-year employee tax scheme: “So all the people who don’t think this is a big deal: let’s all try the same thing and see if we get away with it as they did for decades.” Deirdre, New Jersey.
    • The U.S. leaves its last Afghan base, effectively ending operations: “Regardless of what you think should have happened, I want to extend my thanks to all of our troops and their families for their endless sacrifice over 20 years.” Character Counts, U.S.A.
    • Is Biden declaring ‘independence from the virus’ too soon?: “If Joe Biden wants to declare victory, he needs to have a serious national discussion about reality.” Corrie, Alabama.
By 2011, at the height of the American war, the air base had ballooned into a small city, with two runways, tens of thousands of occupants, shops and a U.S. military prison that became notorious. The thunder of jets and other aircraft, armed with hundreds of pounds of munitions that were dropped across the country, sometimes killing civilians, became a constant soundtrack for local residents throughout the conflict.

The base was also more violently attacked over the years, often by Taliban rockets and mortars, but sometimes by other means. In one of the worst strikes, in November 2016, a suicide bomber sneaked onto Bagram Air Base, hidden among a group of workers. The blast killed four Americans and wounded more than a dozen others.

Other foreign forces that helped guard the base as part of the U.S.-led coalition, like those from Georgia and the Czech Republic, saw their own casualties during their deployments.
In 2014, as the United States concluded its first official drawdown after the surge of troops in the years before — which brought the number of American and other international forces into the country to well over 100,000 — Bagram began to shrink.
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story


Local contractors were fired, troops left and the surrounding town of the same name went into a downward economic spiral. Many residents had been reliant on the base for employment, and others had sorted through the camp’s refuse for goods that could be sold or shipped to Kabul.
On Friday, Zabihullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman, called the departure from Bagram a “positive step.”

THE WAR IN PHOTOS
These images show the long arc of the war, through the eyes of our photographers.
With Bagram gone, what is left of the American forces in the country remain in Kabul. After General Miller leaves in the next several days, his authorities to carry out airstrikes against Al Qaeda and the Islamic State, and, in very limited circumstances, against the Taliban, will be assumed by Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., the head of the military’s Central Command.

Rear Adm. Peter G. Vasely, a former member of SEAL Team 6, will be in charge of the security mission at the United States Embassy in Kabul, and will report to General McKenzie. Admiral Vasely, who is already in Kabul for the transition, will command the American troops that will be largely based at the embassy and remain there indefinitely.
Through September, General McKenzie will also be authorized to keep about 300 additional troops in Afghanistan, if needed for security, Pentagon officials said.
Reporting was contributed by Fatima Faizi from Kabul, and Eric Schmitt and David E. Sanger from Washington.
 
.
well isis from syria have been shifted to afghani'ville. so i bet isis that fled syria will start sprouting up very very soon.
 
.
well isis from syria have been shifted to afghani'ville. so i bet isis that fled syria will start sprouting up very very soon.
I doubt it very much , if $2T and the greatest army couldn't defeat the Taliban then what chance will ISIS have? What will happen is that in desperation the Afghan alliance will unleash death squads and put the atrocities down to ISIS. But is is too late and the rout of the NA is in full speed. Within a month Kabul will again be under Taliban control either directly or indirectly. Ideally the NA would cede power peacefully and hand over the war criminals to the Taliban.
 
. .
I doubt it very much , if $2T and the greatest army couldn't defeat the Taliban then what chance will ISIS have? What will happen is that in desperation the Afghan alliance will unleash death squads and put the atrocities down to ISIS. But is is too late and the rout of the NA is in full speed. Within a month Kabul will again be under Taliban control either directly or indirectly. Ideally the NA would cede power peacefully and hand over the war criminals to the Taliban.
few years ago iran, PK, CN and RU held a meeting in which they highlighted the threat to the region from isis. secondly the isis that were being forced out of syria and iraq had to go somewhere.

the foreshadowing is that they will popup in afghanistan. There are stern warning from the security agencies for a reason.

weather what will happen to them eventually like victory and defeat is the aftermath. but everyone is observing the withdrawl because, of the expectation of civil war and the apperance of isis. infact the former president of afghanistan mentioned that isis had access to helicopters.

but lets see what will transpire.
 
. . .
Private contractors will still be there.
Afghanistan: All foreign troops must leave by deadline - Taliban
Published5 hours ago
Share
Related Topics

media caption'US forces remaining would violate Doha agreement' - Taliban
Any foreign troops left in Afghanistan after Nato's September withdrawal deadline will be at risk as occupiers, the Taliban has told the BBC.
It comes amid reports that 1,000 mainly US troops could remain on the ground to protect diplomatic missions and Kabul's international airport.
Nato's 20-year military mission in the country has all but ended.
But violence in the country continues to rise, with the Taliban taking more territory.
As Afghan forces prepare to take charge of security alone, concern is growing for the future of Kabul.
Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen said seizing Kabul militarily was "not Taliban policy".

But speaking to the BBC from the militant group's office in Qatar, he said no foreign forces - including military contractors - should remain in the city after the withdrawal was complete.
"If they leave behind their forces against the Doha agreement then in that case it will be the decision of our leadership how we proceed," Mr Shaheen told the BBC.
"We would react and the final decision is with our leadership," he said.
Diplomats, NGOs and other foreign civilians would not be targeted by the Taliban, he insisted, and no ongoing protection force for them was needed.
"We are against the foreign military forces, not diplomats, NGOs and workers and NGOs functioning and embassies functioning - that is something our people need. We will not pose any threat to them," he said.
Mr Shaheen described last week's withdrawal from Bagram Airfield - once the largest US military base in Afghanistan - as a "historic moment".

Under a deal with the Taliban, the US and its Nato allies agreed to withdraw all troops in return for a commitment by the militants not to allow al-Qaeda or any other extremist group to operate in the areas they control.
President Joe Biden set a deadline of 11 September - the 20-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the US - for American troops to fully withdraw, but reports suggest the pullout may be complete within days.
An Afghan MP speaking on behalf of the Afghan government said the withdrawal was being carried out irresponsibly.
The MP, Razwan Murad, told the BBC that the government was ready for talks and a ceasefire and the Taliban should now prove that they were committed to peace.
Armed men declare they will support the Afghan army near Kabul
IMAGE COPYRIGHTREUTERS
image captionSome armed men have pledged to support the Afghan army in defending Kabul against the Taliban
Mr Shaheen denied that the militant group had played any part in the recent uptick in violence.
He insisted that many districts had fallen to the Taliban through mediation after Afghan soldiers refused to fight.

On Sunday, the Taliban captured another area in southern Kandahar province. The militants say they now control about a quarter of the country's nearly 400 districts.
The Taliban spokesman described the current government as "moribund" and referred to the country as the "Islamic emirate" - an indication that the group envisaged a theocratic basis for governing the country and were unlikely to agree to Afghan government demands for elections.
Mr Shaheen said elections had so far not been raised in negotiations between the Taliban and the Afghan government.

media captionFrom May 2021: Top US commander General Scott Miller reflects on Nato forces' time in Afghanistan ahead of its departure
US-led forces ousted the Taliban from power in Afghanistan in October 2001. The group had been harbouring Osama Bin Laden and other al-Qaeda figures linked to the 9/11 attacks in the US.
President Biden has said the American pull-out is justified as US forces have made sure Afghanistan cannot again become a base for foreign jihadists to plot against the West.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, meanwhile, insists that the country's security forces are fully capable of keeping insurgents at bay, but many believe the withdrawal risks casting the country back into the grip of the Taliban.
Related Topics
 
.
well isis from syria have been shifted to afghani'ville. so i bet isis that fled syria will start sprouting up very very soon.

Isis is dead meat... Talibs will crush them... The Kabul government will try to salvage their imported Isis proxies... But it's futile.
 
.
Afghanistan: All foreign troops must leave by deadline - Taliban
Published5 hours ago
Share
Related Topics

media caption'US forces remaining would violate Doha agreement' - Taliban
Any foreign troops left in Afghanistan after Nato's September withdrawal deadline will be at risk as occupiers, the Taliban has told the BBC.
It comes amid reports that 1,000 mainly US troops could remain on the ground to protect diplomatic missions and Kabul's international airport.
Nato's 20-year military mission in the country has all but ended.
But violence in the country continues to rise, with the Taliban taking more territory.
As Afghan forces prepare to take charge of security alone, concern is growing for the future of Kabul.
Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen said seizing Kabul militarily was "not Taliban policy".

But speaking to the BBC from the militant group's office in Qatar, he said no foreign forces - including military contractors - should remain in the city after the withdrawal was complete.
"If they leave behind their forces against the Doha agreement then in that case it will be the decision of our leadership how we proceed," Mr Shaheen told the BBC.
"We would react and the final decision is with our leadership," he said.
Diplomats, NGOs and other foreign civilians would not be targeted by the Taliban, he insisted, and no ongoing protection force for them was needed.
"We are against the foreign military forces, not diplomats, NGOs and workers and NGOs functioning and embassies functioning - that is something our people need. We will not pose any threat to them," he said.
Mr Shaheen described last week's withdrawal from Bagram Airfield - once the largest US military base in Afghanistan - as a "historic moment".

Under a deal with the Taliban, the US and its Nato allies agreed to withdraw all troops in return for a commitment by the militants not to allow al-Qaeda or any other extremist group to operate in the areas they control.
President Joe Biden set a deadline of 11 September - the 20-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the US - for American troops to fully withdraw, but reports suggest the pullout may be complete within days.
An Afghan MP speaking on behalf of the Afghan government said the withdrawal was being carried out irresponsibly.
The MP, Razwan Murad, told the BBC that the government was ready for talks and a ceasefire and the Taliban should now prove that they were committed to peace.
Armed men declare they will support the Afghan army near Kabul
IMAGE COPYRIGHTREUTERS
image captionSome armed men have pledged to support the Afghan army in defending Kabul against the Taliban
Mr Shaheen denied that the militant group had played any part in the recent uptick in violence.
He insisted that many districts had fallen to the Taliban through mediation after Afghan soldiers refused to fight.

On Sunday, the Taliban captured another area in southern Kandahar province. The militants say they now control about a quarter of the country's nearly 400 districts.
The Taliban spokesman described the current government as "moribund" and referred to the country as the "Islamic emirate" - an indication that the group envisaged a theocratic basis for governing the country and were unlikely to agree to Afghan government demands for elections.
Mr Shaheen said elections had so far not been raised in negotiations between the Taliban and the Afghan government.

media captionFrom May 2021: Top US commander General Scott Miller reflects on Nato forces' time in Afghanistan ahead of its departure
US-led forces ousted the Taliban from power in Afghanistan in October 2001. The group had been harbouring Osama Bin Laden and other al-Qaeda figures linked to the 9/11 attacks in the US.
President Biden has said the American pull-out is justified as US forces have made sure Afghanistan cannot again become a base for foreign jihadists to plot against the West.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, meanwhile, insists that the country's security forces are fully capable of keeping insurgents at bay, but many believe the withdrawal risks casting the country back into the grip of the Taliban.
Related Topics

So interesting so many twists and turns lmao.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom