What's new

U.S. illegal Weaponry causes Birth Defects in Falluja, Guardian Says

sherdil76

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
386
Reaction score
0
By Alan Purkiss - Bloomberg online Dec 31, 2010

An abnormally high incidence of birth defects in Falluja, Iraq, way have been caused by weaponry used when U.S. forces assaulted the city six years ago, the Guardian reported, citing a study it’s reviewed.

The study, to be published next week in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, was conducted by Dr. Samira Abdul Ghani, a pediatrician at Falluja general hospital, the newspaper said.

It covered 55 families with seriously deformed new-born babies between May and August; in May, of the 547 babies born, 15 percent had chronic deformities, the Guardian said. In the same period, 11 percent of babies were born at less than 30 weeks and 14 percent of fetuses spontaneously aborted, it added.

While the findings are likely to reinforce previous speculation that defects have been caused by depleted uranium ammunition, used in two battles in Falluja in 2004, the report acknowledges that many war residues may interfere with normal embryonic and fetal development, the Guardian said.

.... and yet they speak against chemical and biological weapons but can't see their own piles and Israel did the same to poor Gazans
 
Salaam.....:coffee:

ref:Research links rise in Falluja birth defects and cancers to US assault | World news | The Guardian


Research links rise in Falluja birth defects and cancers to US assault• Defects in newborns 11 times higher than normal
• 'War contaminants' from 2004 attack could be cause

US-marines-prepare-for-Fa-007.jpg

Share630 Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk, Thursday 30 December 2010 21.34 GMT Article history

White phosphorous smoke screens are fired by the US army as part of an early morning patrol in November 2004 on the outskirts of Falluja, Iraq, in preparation for an offensive against insurgents. Photograph: Scott Nelson/Getty Images

A study examining the causes of a dramatic spike in birth defects in the Iraqi city of Falluja has for the first time concluded that genetic damage could have been caused by weaponry used in US assaults that took place six years ago.

The research, which will be published next week, confirms earlier estimates revealed by the Guardian of a major, unexplained rise in cancers and chronic neural-tube, cardiac and skeletal defects in newborns. The authors found that malformations are close to 11 times higher than normal rates, and rose to unprecedented levels in the first half of this year – a period that had not been surveyed in earlier reports.

The findings, which will be published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, come prior to a much-anticipated World Health Organisation study of Falluja's genetic health. They follow two alarming earlier studies, one of which found a distortion in the sex ratio of newborns since the invasion of Iraq in 2003 – a 15% drop in births of boys.

"We suspect that the population is chronically exposed to an environmental agent," said one of the report's authors, environmental toxicologist Mozhgan Savabieasfahani. "We don't know what that environmental factor is, but we are doing more tests to find out."

The report identifies metals as potential contaminating agents afflicting the city – especially among pregnant mothers. "Metals are involved in regulating genome stability," it says. "As environmental effectors, metals are potentially good candidates to cause birth defects.

The findings are likely to prompt further speculation that the defects were caused by depleted uranium rounds, which were heavily used in two large battles in the city in April and November 2004. The rounds, which contain ionising radiation, are a core component of the armouries of numerous militaries and militias.

Their effects have long been called into question, with some scientists claiming they leave behind a toxic residue, caused when the round – either from an assault rifle or artillery piece – bursts through its target. However, no evidence has yet been established that proves this, and some researchers instead claim that depleted uranium has been demonstrably proven not to be a contaminant.

The report acknowledges that other battlefield residues may also be responsible for the defects. "Many known war contaminants have the potential to interfere with normal embryonic and foetal development," the report says. "The devastating effect of dioxins on the reproductive health of the Vietnamese people is well-known."

The latest Falluja study surveyed 55 families with seriously deformed newborns between May and August. It was conducted by Dr Samira Abdul Ghani, a paediatrician at Falluja general hospital. In May, 15% of the 547 babies born had serious birth defects. In the same period, 11% of babies were born at less than 30 weeks and 14% of foetuses spontaneously aborted.

The researchers believe that the figures understate what they describe as an epidemic of abnormalities, because a large number of babies in Falluja are born at home with parents reluctant to seek help from authorities.
One case documented in the report is of a mother and her daughter who after the 2004 battles both gave birth to babies with severe malformations. The second wife of one of the fathers also had a severely deformed baby in 2009.
"It is important to understand that under normal conditions, the chances of such occurrences is virtually zero," said Savabieasfahani.

Iraq's government has built a new hospital in Fallujah, but the city's obstetricians have complained that they are still overwhelmed by the sheer number of serious defects. The US military has long denied that it is responsible for any contaminant left behind in the city, or elsewhere in Iraq, as it continues its steady departure from the country it has occupied for almost eight years.

It has said that Iraqis who want to file a complaint are welcome to do so. Several families interviewed by the Guardian in November 2009 said they had filed complaints but had not received replies.

The World Health Organisation is due to begin its research sometime next year. However, there are fears that an extensive survey may not be possible in the still volatile city that still experiences assassinations and bombings most weeks.

"An epidemic of birth defects is unfolding in Fallujah, Iraq," said Savabieasfahani. "This is a serious public health crisis that needs global attention. We need independent and unbiased research into the possible causes of this epidemic.
We invite scientists and organisations to get in touch with us so that we may gain the strength to address this large global public health issue."

City's spike in deformity rates

Birth-defect rates in Falluja have become increasingly alarming over the past two years. In the first half of 2010, the number of monthly cases of serious abnormalities rose to unprecedented levels. In Falluja general hospital, 15% of the 547 babies born in May had a chronic deformity, such as a neural tune defect – which affects the brain and lower limbs – cardiac, or skeletal abnormalities, or cancers.

No other city in Iraq has anywhere near the same levels of reported abnormalities. Falluja sees at least 11 times as many major defects in newborns than world averages, the research has shown.
The latest report, which will be published next week in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, says Falluja has been infected by a chronic environmental contaminant. It focuses on depleted uranium, used in weaponry during two US assaults in 2004 as a possible cause of the contaminant. Scientific studies have so far established no link between the rounds, which contain ionising radiation to burst through armour and are commonly used on the battlefield.

The study focuses on metals as a potential conduit for the contaminant. It suggests a bodily accumulation of toxins is causing serious and potentially irreversible damage to the city's population base, and calls for an urgent examination of metals in Falluja as well as a comprehensive examination of the city's recent reproductive history.
:pdf:
 
this will pass by the wayside, the americans dont care.

but they did care about saddam and anything bad he did.


when people in power use such logic the world has no morality and principles, power rules.
 
this will pass by the wayside, the americans dont care.

but they did care about saddam and anything bad he did.


when people in power use such logic the world has no morality and principles, power rules.

No one cares really. Alot of iraqis supported saddam and they didn't stand up for themselfs to try to get rid of saddam so it's the price they have to pay.

The people of North Korea will be paying the same price shortly.

If you don't help yourself, it's your fault.
 
^^post reported.

Who are you to decide fate of other?

lol you reported my post? It isn't breaking any rules. Reporting a post because you don't agree with it is silly.
 
No one cares really. Alot of iraqis supported saddam and they didn't stand up for themselfs to try to get rid of saddam so it's the price they have to pay.

The people of North Korea will be paying the same price shortly.

If you don't help yourself, it's your fault.
You mean the west way or the high way..... How this policy makes you any better than taliban??
 
us should pay compensation for what they did in iraq.
 
You mean the west way or the high way..... How this policy makes you any better than taliban??

No. It's the peaceful way or the highway.

If the citizens are not going to stand up to their dangerous and violent government who is murdering other citizens of the country then they are as bad as the government and could be seen as supporters of their actions.

The coalition wouldn't have invaded iraq if the citizens of iraq had the guts to stand up and take down the government themselfs.

Read what i said carefully so you understand what i am saying. I am not going to repeat myself.
 
No. It's the peaceful way or the highway.

If the citizens are not going to stand up to their dangerous and violent government who is murdering other citizens of the country then they are as bad as the government and could be seen as supporters of their actions.

The coalition wouldn't have invaded iraq if the citizens of iraq had the guts to stand up and take down the government themselfs.

Read what i said carefully so you understand what i am saying. I am not going to repeat myself.
But who'll decide the peaceful thing.... News channels of the west???? Like they decided in Iraq war and WMDs..... And when they didn't find any WMDs they said this war is for Human rights and Iraqi Liberatin. And now people are paying price for that liberation. :lol:
 
But who'll decide the peaceful thing.... News channels of the west???? Like they decided in Iraq war and WMDs..... And when they didn't find any WMDs they said this war is for Human rights and Iraqi Liberatin. And now people are paying price for that liberation. :lol:

What? You obviously don't understand what i wrote lol.
 
Name me one terrorist in this world, who cause such crimes that future generation pay for the rest of there lives. I cant think of any but two namely........oh i might get banned, so i keep my mouth shut.
 
No one cares really. Alot of iraqis supported saddam and they didn't stand up for themselfs to try to get rid of saddam so it's the price they have to pay.


Saddam originally was supported by the US to fight against Iran. The crimes that Saddam committed against the Kurds were done in the late 1980s, and at that time the media did not report on it.


A lot of warhawks now are calling for war against Iran but many of them forget that to get rid of Saddam, the US supported many Shiite militant groups, because they were against Saddam's Baathist regime. Many of them were sympathetic to Iran.
 
Back
Top Bottom