What's new

U.S. designates Chinese media outlets as government entities

TruthSeeker

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
6,390
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
U.S. designates 5 major Chinese media outlets as government entities
By Anna Fifield, Carol Morello and Emily Rauhala
Feb. 18, 2020 at 4:38 p.m. EST

BEIJING — The State Department on Tuesday designated five Chinese media outlets as official government entities under the Foreign Missions Act, meaning they will treated as though they are diplomatic outposts of the Chinese government and subject to the same constraints.

The move is the latest in a series of U.S. efforts to tackle China’s influence in the United States. It will be sure to anger Beijing, which generally views U.S. government’s actions — from the trade war and the accusations against Huawei to criticism of its human rights record — as an effort to thwart China’s global rise.

The media outlets are the official Xinhua News Agency; China Global Television Network, known as CGTN, the international arm of state broadcaster CCTV; China Radio International; the China Daily newspaper; and Hai Tian Development, a U.S. company linked to the People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China.

The 1982 Foreign Missions Act covers matters like license plates for embassy vehicles and diplomatic immunity, but it also governs how foreign governments operate in the United States.

Practically speaking, Tuesday’s decision was likely more symbolic than punitive.

The five Chinese news outlets will be required to provide a list of their current staff, including names, ages and addresses, and to update it when there are any changes. They also must get State Department approval to purchase or lease any real estate, though that requirement does not apply to individual employees who buy or rent housing.

That information will be shared with other government agencies, including intelligence units, said a senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity under State Department rules for briefing reporters.

American officials have become increasingly concerned in recent years that Chinese authorities are using journalists to do government work in the United States, noting that a number of Chinese journalists enter the country on official passports, which are issued by governments to do official business.

But the designation does not carry any journalistic restrictions that would limit where reporters employed by the five outlets can report, including attending State Department briefings or news conferences.

Two State Department officials declined to discuss internal considerations on whether Beijing will retaliate against foreign reporters working in China.

“We’re painfully aware of the very tough operating environment that U.S. and other foreign journalists operate under in China … It’s already the case that freedom of the press is under severe siege in the People’s Republic of China,” one State Department official said.

The five organizations are all part of a huge propaganda apparatus that transmits the Communist Party’s views to China and the world. Democracy advocates have warned about China’s increasingly aggressive attempts to shape the global narrative about its actions at home and abroad.

But the U.S. has struggled to find a way to respond forcefully while protecting free speech.

“Because we are an open, transparent society our tool set is limited as to what we can actually do,” said Bonnie Glaser, director of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In 2018, the Department of Justice Ordered Xinhua and CGTN to register under the Foreign Agents Registration act as part of an effort to combat influence operations.

What the United States has done so far, she said, “doesn’t stop them from sending out the messages they are sending,” Glaser said.

But it does flag the issue for the general public.

“It is alerting people to pay attention to the fact that the message that these organizations give out is one that the Chinese Communist Party wants them to hear, not what we consider real, objective journalism,” Glaser added.

Under leader Xi Jinping, the Communist Party has dramatically stepped up pervasive censorship and state control inside China and extended efforts to reach readers and viewers elsewhere.

“China is trying to promote itself as an international model,” said Sarah Cook, senior research analyst for China at Freedom House and the author of a report, “Beijing’s Global Megaphone,” released in January.

“Beijing has a large toolbox for influencing media around the world and its tactics have been evolving, especially since 2017,” Cook said.

In the United States, these media organizations have Chinese reporters dispatched to provide news about the U.S. to a Chinese audience, like foreign correspondents. But they also have stepped up efforts to reach the American market.

When Xi toured state media outlets in 2016, he told them to “speak for the Party” and “tell China’s story to the world.”

Xi has said repeatedly that “telling stories is the best form of international dissemination” when it comes to telegraphing China’s messages to the world, notes David Bandurski of China Media Project.

By inclusion in cable packages, CGTN America, which is based in Washington, has been able to reach an estimated 30 million households in the United States.

The China Daily, its English-language paper, is available on newsstands in places such as New York and congressional offices in Washington. China Daily has also adopted a practice it calls “borrowing the boat to reach the sea” to place its content in advertorial “China Watch” supplements in newspapers, including The Washington Post, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.

Xinhua produces copy that is highly favorable to the Chinese government, by disseminating the official view on events like the Hong Kong protests or the detention camps for Muslims in Xinjiang, or stories that are sharply critical of adversaries, with the United States being public enemy number one.

During the Soviet era, Russian news organizations like Tass and Pravda also were designated foreign missions. Several years ago, the Vietnam News Agency got the designation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...2b3ece-5210-11ea-80ce-37a8d4266c09_story.html
 
.
US is King of double standard. Nothing new.
 
. .
American officials have become increasingly concerned in recent years that Chinese authorities are using journalists to do government work in the United States, noting that a number of Chinese journalists enter the country on official passports, which are issued by governments to do official business.

So who issues US passports in US or one buys them from the eBay lol. Does BBC, CNN doesn't propagate Brit or US point of view. China can ban their outlets all together for 5 years and see how US is going to cry for freedom of press.
 
.
Since these news agencies are now considered diplomatic outposts and foreign missions, are the journalists going to get diplomatic immunity?
 
.
So who issues US passports in US or one buys them from the eBay lol. Does BBC, CNN doesn't propagate Brit or US point of view. China can ban their outlets all together for 5 years and see how US is going to cry for freedom of press.

You misunderstood the word "Official"

Chinese "official" passport is not the same as Chinese passport. Official Passport only granted to Chinese Government Official, not every Chinese can get. The normal Chinese passport were for everyday Chinese. Official Passport were blue and issued by Ministry of Foreign Affair of PRC while normal Passport were Red and issued by Ministry of Public Safety.

PRC_passport_(Service).png

People's_Republic_of_China_Biometric_passport.jpg


Each country have different passport for different people, US would have their own diplomatic passport and normal passport. Funny enough, the colour scheme are exact opposit to the Chinese one. The Official US passport were red/maroon and the normal one is deep blue

417px-United_States_passport_-_official_-_biometric.png


Us-passport.jpg


And no, CNN personnel was not granted an "Official" US Passport.

Since these news agencies are now considered diplomatic outposts and foreign missions, are the journalists going to get diplomatic immunity?

No, and No.

The first no is that these News Outlet were not part of foreign mission, they are designated them a part of official government service, however, since CCTV et el were based in China (Not the satellite office but the HQ of CCTV) So they are neither diplomatic nor foreign agency in the US. And that would affect the location of CCTV satellite office in the US and its employee. (Explained below)

The second no is that Not all Chinese official enjoy diplomatic immunity, under Vienna Convention (the one that govern Diplomatic Relationship, most people mistaken it as Geneva Convention...), only people who are act in diplomatic role were granted diplomatic immunity. That goes to people who carry out official diplomatic duty, and reporting news were not one of them.

Putting one organisation in the official government entity list would mean severe restriction on what these organisation can do within the US. First of all, all of them, say, CCTV personnel would now need to register with US State Department as per foreign mission act. They also limited on the location those organisation can have their office within the US. Most rent/lease will not be granted. Which mean you cannot rent a commercial building to act as an office for say CCTV America. They may need to move their operation within Chinese Embassy or Consulate in US. Also all vehicle they drove would need to be properly registered with the State Department, so they will know where you are, where you go all the time.
 
.
U.S. designates 5 major Chinese media outlets as government entities
By Anna Fifield, Carol Morello and Emily Rauhala
Feb. 18, 2020 at 4:38 p.m. EST

BEIJING — The State Department on Tuesday designated five Chinese media outlets as official government entities under the Foreign Missions Act, meaning they will treated as though they are diplomatic outposts of the Chinese government and subject to the same constraints.

The move is the latest in a series of U.S. efforts to tackle China’s influence in the United States. It will be sure to anger Beijing, which generally views U.S. government’s actions — from the trade war and the accusations against Huawei to criticism of its human rights record — as an effort to thwart China’s global rise.

The media outlets are the official Xinhua News Agency; China Global Television Network, known as CGTN, the international arm of state broadcaster CCTV; China Radio International; the China Daily newspaper; and Hai Tian Development, a U.S. company linked to the People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China.

The 1982 Foreign Missions Act covers matters like license plates for embassy vehicles and diplomatic immunity, but it also governs how foreign governments operate in the United States.

Practically speaking, Tuesday’s decision was likely more symbolic than punitive.

The five Chinese news outlets will be required to provide a list of their current staff, including names, ages and addresses, and to update it when there are any changes. They also must get State Department approval to purchase or lease any real estate, though that requirement does not apply to individual employees who buy or rent housing.

That information will be shared with other government agencies, including intelligence units, said a senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity under State Department rules for briefing reporters.

American officials have become increasingly concerned in recent years that Chinese authorities are using journalists to do government work in the United States, noting that a number of Chinese journalists enter the country on official passports, which are issued by governments to do official business.

But the designation does not carry any journalistic restrictions that would limit where reporters employed by the five outlets can report, including attending State Department briefings or news conferences.

Two State Department officials declined to discuss internal considerations on whether Beijing will retaliate against foreign reporters working in China.

“We’re painfully aware of the very tough operating environment that U.S. and other foreign journalists operate under in China … It’s already the case that freedom of the press is under severe siege in the People’s Republic of China,” one State Department official said.

The five organizations are all part of a huge propaganda apparatus that transmits the Communist Party’s views to China and the world. Democracy advocates have warned about China’s increasingly aggressive attempts to shape the global narrative about its actions at home and abroad.

But the U.S. has struggled to find a way to respond forcefully while protecting free speech.

“Because we are an open, transparent society our tool set is limited as to what we can actually do,” said Bonnie Glaser, director of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In 2018, the Department of Justice Ordered Xinhua and CGTN to register under the Foreign Agents Registration act as part of an effort to combat influence operations.

What the United States has done so far, she said, “doesn’t stop them from sending out the messages they are sending,” Glaser said.

But it does flag the issue for the general public.

“It is alerting people to pay attention to the fact that the message that these organizations give out is one that the Chinese Communist Party wants them to hear, not what we consider real, objective journalism,” Glaser added.

Under leader Xi Jinping, the Communist Party has dramatically stepped up pervasive censorship and state control inside China and extended efforts to reach readers and viewers elsewhere.

“China is trying to promote itself as an international model,” said Sarah Cook, senior research analyst for China at Freedom House and the author of a report, “Beijing’s Global Megaphone,” released in January.

“Beijing has a large toolbox for influencing media around the world and its tactics have been evolving, especially since 2017,” Cook said.

In the United States, these media organizations have Chinese reporters dispatched to provide news about the U.S. to a Chinese audience, like foreign correspondents. But they also have stepped up efforts to reach the American market.

When Xi toured state media outlets in 2016, he told them to “speak for the Party” and “tell China’s story to the world.”

Xi has said repeatedly that “telling stories is the best form of international dissemination” when it comes to telegraphing China’s messages to the world, notes David Bandurski of China Media Project.

By inclusion in cable packages, CGTN America, which is based in Washington, has been able to reach an estimated 30 million households in the United States.

The China Daily, its English-language paper, is available on newsstands in places such as New York and congressional offices in Washington. China Daily has also adopted a practice it calls “borrowing the boat to reach the sea” to place its content in advertorial “China Watch” supplements in newspapers, including The Washington Post, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.

Xinhua produces copy that is highly favorable to the Chinese government, by disseminating the official view on events like the Hong Kong protests or the detention camps for Muslims in Xinjiang, or stories that are sharply critical of adversaries, with the United States being public enemy number one.

During the Soviet era, Russian news organizations like Tass and Pravda also were designated foreign missions. Several years ago, the Vietnam News Agency got the designation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...2b3ece-5210-11ea-80ce-37a8d4266c09_story.html


chinese are not in business of democracy .
 
.
But aren't the Chinese medias government entities tho? I mean CCTV is obviously the propaganda arm of the Communist Party anyway. Why is this a surprise ...
 
.
But aren't the Chinese medias government entities tho? I mean CCTV is obviously the propaganda arm of the Communist Party anyway. Why is this a surprise ...

State own and being operate as an government organisation are different in term of Vienna Convention.

If they are state own then they are still treated as private venture, but if they operate as an official government branch, then there are rules governed and follow as per Vienna Convention.

Basically, US government have no reach over private matter, however, in a G2G level, they can put restriction on them, things like limit the location of their office or monitor their movement. Both of which would have been a violation of the Constitution of US if they are treated as a private entity. However, if they are foreign government employee, that would be a whole new ball game.
 
.
Well to me the news agency that really fit government entity is BBC.
 
.
Well to me the news agency that really fit government entity is BBC.

BBC is a state own TV station, but by no mean they are an "Government Agency"

Each country have their own state own broadcasting company. US have ABC , Canada have CBC, UK have BBC, Australia have BBC and SBS. That is not the same as "Government Entity"

In term of Operational Direction and Operation Budget, State Own business only need majority of ownership from the government (usually more than 51% but can be less than 51% but more than other owner) and State own business are only partially/principally funded by the Government. In this case, State Own TV Station can still get their revenue from selling Advertisement and Product Placing or even Private Equity Funding and Donation. Government can have a say (as a majority owner) but usually require the approval form the board of directors.

Government owned (or government controlled entity) is a separate concept but most people do not separate between SOE and GOE. Which the government MUST BE ABSOLUTE owner (More than 51%, so their decision cannot be challenged) All funding are from the government and all operation are determined by the government. Government owned entity usually provide basic infrastructure to its citizens, such as Postal Service (USPS), Transportation (NSW Transport) or Hospital. And the operation is "On Behalf" of the government.

TV station seldom government own by the way, there are government owned media service, but usually they are internal media service, but not public access television.
 
.
Coronavirus: China expels Wall Street Journal journalists for article it deemed racist

China has ordered three foreign journalists of the Wall Street Journal to leave the country over an opinion piece it said was "racist".

The article published on 3 February criticised the country's response to the deadly coronavirus outbreak.

The Chinese foreign ministry said it had asked the newspaper to apologise several times but it had declined.

The newspaper said the journalists - who had not written the opinion piece - were given five days to leave China.

The article called the authorities' initial response "secretive and self-serving" and said global confidence in China had been "shaken".

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said the article was "racist" and "denigrated" China's efforts to combat the outbreak that has killed more than 2,000 people in the country.

"The Chinese people do not welcome media that publish racist statements and maliciously attacks China," Mr Geng said, without naming the journalists being expelled.

The Wall Street Journal identified the reporters as two US citizens - Josh Chin, who is the deputy bureau chief, and Chao Deng - as well as Australian citizen Philip Wen. The newspaper has not yet commented.

It is the first time in more than two decades that journalists holding valid credentials have been ordered to leave China, the BBC's John Sudworth in Beijing reports.

The Foreign Correspondents Club of China called the decision "an extreme and obvious attempt by the Chinese authorities to intimidate foreign news organizations".

The measure comes a day after the US said it would begin treating five Chinese state-run media outlets that operate in the country in the same way as foreign embassies, requiring them to register their employees and properties with the US government.

The decision affects the Xinhua News Agency, China Global, Television Network and China Daily Distribution Corp.

_105894347_grey_line-nc.png

Last year, the government declined to renew the credentials - necessary for the work of foreign journalists in the country - of another Wall Street Journal reporter.

The journalist, a Singaporean national, had co-written a story that authorities in Australia were looking into activities of one of China's President Xi Jinping's cousins suspected of involvement in organised crime and money laundering.

And in 2018, the Beijing bureau chief for BuzzFeed News Megha Rajagopalan was unable to renew her visa after reporting on the detention of Muslim minority Uighurs and others in China's Xinjiang region.

Meanwhile, two Chinese citizen journalists who disappeared last week after covering the coronavirus in Wuhan, the epicentre of the outbreak in Hubei province, remain missing.

Fang Bin and Chen Qiushi had been sharing videos and pictures online from inside the quarantined city.
 
.
Same thing was done with RT and Sputnik in 2017 wont be suprised if TRT and Turkish related state owned press gets same treatment,anyways RFEL and VOA in foreign countries should be classified as American propaganda outlets then
 
.
Same thing was done with RT and Sputnik in 2017 wont be suprised if TRT and Turkish related state owned press gets same treatment,anyways RFEL and VOA in foreign countries should be classified as American propaganda outlets then

Every media outlet is a propaganda machine, if you can find any outlet that is truly neutral, I am willing to give you 200 bucks.

You cannot report a story being neutral, that is because the readers are always bias. Because being bias is not just favour one side, but also un-favour one side as well. So by that definition, no readers are inheritably neutral, because you have to be in either one of those case
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom