What's new

U.S. Air Force sends B-1B bombers to Saudi Arabia amid U.S. military buildup in the kingdom

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
Air Force Sends B-1B Bombers To Saudi Arabia Amid U.S. Military Buildup In The Kingdom

JOSEPH TREVITHICK

OCTOBER 25, 2019

The U.S. Air Force has deployed an unspecified number of B-1B Bone bombers to Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia, which appears to be the first time the service has deployed these aircraft or any other heavy bombers to that country. This comes two weeks after the Pentagon announced plans to establish a full Air Expeditionary Wing at this base as part of a buildup in Saudi Arabia following unprecedented cruise missile and suicide drone attacks, linked to Iran, on two major oil-related sites in the Kingdom last month. Air Force F-22 Raptor stealth fighters and U.S. Army Patriot missile batteries have already arrived at Prince Sultan as part of this broader plan.

U.S. Air Forces Central Command Tweeted a brief video of one B-1B landing at Prince Sultan Air Base, or PSAB, on Oct. 25, 2019, but did not say how many of the bombers were headed to the Saudi base or for how long. The social media post also said that the bombers had flown directly from Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota, indicating that the aircraft are from that base's 28th Bomb Wing. A seperate video from Air Force Global Strike Command showed at least four B-1Bs leaving Ellsworth for the deployment.

"The B-1B is a long-range strategic bomber able to strike any adversary at any location on the globe," the Tweet said. "This demonstrates PSAB’s ability to conduct combat ops."



In addition to appearing to be the first time the Air Force has sent bombers to Saudi Arabia, this deployment also marks the return of the Bones to the region for the first time since March, when the service withdrew a separate contingent of the bombers from Al Udeid Air Force Base in Qatar.

At that time, this meant there were no Air Force bombers of any kind forward-deployed to the Middle East at all for the first time in years. The Air Force also revealed that the B-1 fleet had been seriously overworked and had become dangerously overextended with the protracted deployments to the region.

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-cms-content-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1572028805089-5745804.jpg

A B-1B from the 28th Bomb Wing takes off from Ellsworth Air Force Base in September 2019.

In August 2019, then-head of U.S. Strategic Command, revealed that just six of 62 B-1Bs, or around 10 percent of the fleet, were fully mission capable. The United States had sent bombers back to Al Udeid in May, but in the form of four B-52s, in response to intelligence related to potential threats to American interests in the region from Iran or its proxies. The arrival of the Bones at PSAB would indicate that the readiness rates for those aircraft have improved at least to some degree.

As with the B-52s, the B-1Bs represent a standing threat to Iran, or any other regional opponents, offering the ability to launch stand-off cruise missile strikes from multiple vectors. Bones flying from Al Udeid notably demonstrated this capability when they took part in U.S.-led missile strikes against chemical weapons infrastructure in Syria in 2018 using AGM-158A Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSM).

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-cms-content-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1572027878615-jassm.jpg

AGM-158A Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles loaded in a B-1 ahead of strikes in Syria in 2018.

From PSAB, these bombers could also conduct patrols in and around the Persian Gulf, including to keep tabs on Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' maritime movements that may present risks to American or other friendly naval vessels or commercial shipping. B-1s regularly conduct similar overwater missions from Key West targeting drug smugglers in the Caribbean Sea. In July 2019, pictures also emerged of Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles performing maritime patrols, armed with precision-guided bombs and cluster munitions, optimal loadouts for engaging swarms of the kinds of small boats that the IRGC operates.

Of course, there is no reason the B-1Bs couldn't perform these same missions from Al Udeid, which is their usual base in the region. This would suggest that a major objective of the deployment is to underscore the United States' specific commitment to Saudi Arabia or is a product of concerns about the potential vulnerability of other bases in the region to attacks should an larger conflict break out in the region. PSAB is some 200 miles inland from the Persian Gulf, much farther from that body of water than Al Udeid, but it is still well within range of Iran's ballistic missile arsenal.

The deployment is also in line with plans the Pentagon announced earlier this month to establish a full Air Expeditionary Wing (AEW) in Saudi Arabia, which will likely be headquartered at PSAB, if it isn't already, something The War Zone highlighted the significance of at the time. This was a clear signal that the Air Force expected to set up a more robust and long-term presence in the Kingdom that could also oversee additional units surging into the region to respond to future crises.

This was part of a larger U.S. military deployment that came in the aftermath of cruise missile and suicide drone attacks on Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq oil processing facility and the Khurais oil field in September 2019. Saudi Arabia said that Iran was undeniably involved, but has not blamed the regime in Tehran directly. The United States has accused the Iranian government of carrying out the attacks from its own soil.

Curiously, the most recent official announcement about American forces heading to the region on Oct. 11, 2019, did not mention bombers at all. It did say that there would be two Air Force fighter squadrons heading to the Kingdom. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper's recent visit to Saudi Arabia confirmed that F-22 Raptor stealth fighters from the 192nd Fighter Wing, Virginia Air National Guard, had already deployed to the country, as had Army Patriot surface-to-air missile batteries.

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-cms-content-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1572028534776-f-22.jpg

Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, in the blue shirt, stands with airmen in front of an F-22 Raptor at Prince Sultan Air Base earlier in October.

Tensions between the United States and Iran have been ebbing and flowing for most of the year, with the United States blaming the regime in Tehran for a number of hostile acts, including a string of attacks on commercial oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman. The IRGC did shoot down a U.S. Navy RQ-4A Global Hawk drone in June, which almost prompted U.S. military strikes in response. The IRGC has also seized a number of oil tankers in the strategic Strait of Hormuz in recent months.

The U.S. military had already begun increasing its presence in Saudi Arabia in light of these earlier regional security concerns, but announced the deployment of a significant number of additional personnel in the aftermath of the Abqaiq and Khurais attacks. In total, the United States expects to eventually have 3,000 personnel in the Kingdom.

The new deployment of the B-1s, even if it is relatively short, only underscores these broader plans to expand the Air Force's presence in Saudi Arabia in the near term. It sends a clear message to Iran, or any other American opponents in the region, that the United States is both willing and now increasingly able to send very capable strike assets to the Kingdom to respond to any threats, if necessary.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...abia-amid-u-s-military-buildup-in-the-kingdom
 
B-1B bomber is not good. Maintenance cost is high, load is low, not stealthy. It was designed for low-altitude penetration, it's suicidal nowadays when your enemy has AWACS. It can be detected from far distance even without AWACS.

B-52 is much better than B-1B for engagement from outside the range of AA defense anyway.
 
B-1B bomber is not good. Maintenance cost is high, load is low, not stealthy. It was designed for low-altitude penetration, it's suicidal nowadays when your enemy has AWACS. It can be detected from far distance even without AWACS.

B-52 is much better than B-1B for engagement from outside the range of AA defense anyway.
Exactly the opposite of what you have said. Its a great bomber with a pretty good payload and speed. Iran has no AWACS and its antiquated radar systems would be put out of commission in the first day or two along with its ageing air force, giving these bombers full reign in the air.
 
B-1B bomber is not good. Maintenance cost is high, load is low, not stealthy. It was designed for low-altitude penetration, it's suicidal nowadays when your enemy has AWACS. It can be detected from far distance even without AWACS.

B-52 is much better than B-1B for engagement from outside the range of AA defense anyway.

Load is low? a single B-1B Lancer can carry 24 LRASMs, which is enough to take out most navies.
 
i think after russia send their tu160 black jack and write off 20 billion usd loans of south Africa u.s has to show this in response
 
Load is low? a single B-1B Lancer can carry 24 LRASMs, which is enough to take out most navies.
six of 62 B-1Bs, or around 10 percent of the fleet, were fully mission capable

You did NOT read the news entirely.

B-1B sucks.
 
IK says he is mediating between KSA and Iran but on the other hand, they are sharpening knives and getting ready to get stuck in. What is this?
 
six of 62 B-1Bs, or around 10 percent of the fleet, were fully mission capable

You did NOT read the news entirely.

B-1B sucks.

Why do I get the feeling that if this bomber was of Chinese origin, you would be saying it was the best thing since sliced bread.
 
wow! what an amazing analysis. no wonder you are an analyst


https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...mbers-are-in-more-dire-shape-than-we-thought/

B-1 Lancer readiness is in the toilet, here’s why
https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...-lancer-readiness-is-in-the-toilet-heres-why/


viva_zhao just repeated what he read on the web, if it is propaganda to give false sense of security to the "enemy" i.e Arabs, Chinese, Pakistanis etc., you are undermining it


Has nothing to do with being an Analyst or otherwise.

Everyone here has just as much right to Have an observation As anyone else.

No more, no less
 
Why do I get the feeling that if this bomber was of Chinese origin, you would be saying it was the best thing since sliced bread.
Because those who can NOT see things base on facts and logic has ill mentality.

six of 62 B-1Bs, or around 10 percent of the fleet, were fully mission capable. You did NOT read the news entirely.

The B-1B bomber should be canceled during Carter administration. It's not canceled because president Reagan get elected who promised to proceed during his campaign.

When Reagan took the office, he realized that there is a secret project called B2. The B2 is lack of fund because of B-1 bomber.

But Reagan has no choice but to continue. Otherwise B1 should be canceled. Thus B2 only produced 20. It's a mistake.

B1 penetration can not compare with B2 at all. B1 is problematic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockwell_B-1_Lancer#New_problems_and_cancellation

On 30 June 1977, Carter announced that the B-1A would be canceled in favor of ICBMs, SLBMs, and a fleet of modernized B-52s armed with ALCMs.[38] Carter called it "one of the most difficult decisions that I've made since I've been in office." No mention of the stealth work was made public with the program being top secret, but today it is known that in early 1978 he authorized the Advanced Technology Bomber (ATB) project, which eventually led to the B-2 Spirit.[51]

During the 1980 presidential campaign, Ronald Reagan campaigned heavily on the platform that Carter was weak on defense, citing the cancellation of the B-1 program as an example, a theme he continued using into the 1980s.[58] During this time Carter's defense secretary, Harold Brown, announced the stealth bomber project, apparently implying that this was the reason for the B-1 cancellation.[59]
 
Exactly the opposite of what you have said. Its a great bomber with a pretty good payload and speed. Iran has no AWACS and its antiquated radar systems would be put out of commission in the first day or two along with its ageing air force, giving these bombers full reign in the air.

what happens when a F-14 locks on it ??? it will not have any escort as all of them are either destroyed by ballistic missiles on there home base or well within our air defense range. and yes we do not have AWACS but we have countless fully mobile long range radars with 3000 KM range and mobile Air defense systems

D9uA3OtWsAEwqSZ.jpg


572906e0841b6856ad3d89e4927ca295520530fe.jpg


15-Khordad-TEL.jpg


DrVnXLMX0AAu3jh.jpg


DraCEBPUUAA-v8F.jpg


D-EasAdWkAE0kvA.jpg


190822-iran-missile-mc-1004_1506b25046ebeea87d0521368a4619dc.fit-760w.JPG


1398052618360162518140084.jpg


rxXTglWkwMsB.jpg


70181763_383826612504203_1337399591173471445_n.jpg


Could be the same radars that failed to protect Iranian assets in Syria. You know the ones that initially allowed the Iranian military to drive from Iran to Palestine.
or could be the ones that took down the most advance drone in the world
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom