Syrian Lion
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 7,264
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
The 193-nation U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved the first treaty on the global arms trade, which seeks to regulate the $70 billion business in conventional arms and keep weapons out of the hands of human rights abusers.
The National Rifle Association (NRA), a powerful U.S. pro-gun lobbying group that has opposed the treaty from the start, said it was a sad day for the United States, which joined the vast majority of U.N. member states by voting for the pact.
Iran, Syria and North Korea cast the sole votes against the treaty. The same three states last week prevented a treaty-drafting conference at U.N. headquarters from reaching the required consensus to adopt the pact.
The official U.N. tally showed 154 votes in favor, three against 23 abstentions, though diplomats and U.N. officials said the actual vote was 155-3-22. They said Angola was recorded as having abstained, though it had attempted to vote yes.
Iran, which is under a U.N. arms embargo over its nuclear program, is eager to ensure its arms imports and exports are not curtailed, while Syria's government is embroiled in a two-year civil war and relies on arms from Russia and Iran, envoys said.
North Korea is also under a U.N. arms embargo due to its nuclear weapons and missile programs.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed the vote, saying the treaty "will help to keep warlords, pirates, terrorists, criminals and their like from acquiring deadly arms."
The treaty will be open for signature on June 3 and will enter into force 90 days after the 50th signatory ratifies it. Mexican U.N. Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba told reporters it normally takes two to three years for a treaty to come into force, but said he hoped it would happen sooner in this case.
Major arms producers China and Russia joined Cuba, Bolivia, Nicaragua and other countries in abstaining. Although a significant number of countries abstained, putting the treaty to a General Assembly vote was the only way its supporters could get it adopted after the treaty conference collapsed last week.
NRA: 'A SAD, YET TELLING, DAY'
Many of the countries that abstained, among them India, complained the treaty favored exporting over importing states. Russia said Moscow would take a hard look at the treaty before deciding whether to sign it.
Several delegates told Reuters the treaty's effectiveness would be limited if major arms exporters refused to sign it.
The United States, the world's No. 1 arms exporter, voted in favor of the treaty despite fierce opposition from the NRA, whose lobbying wing - the NRA Institute for Legislative Action - issued a statement condemning the U.N. vote.
"This treaty disregards the Second Amendment to our Constitution and threatens individual firearm ownership," said Chris Cox, head of the NRA-ILA. "It is a sad, yet telling, day when the president of the United States and his administration refuse to defend America's Constitution on the world stage."
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement the U.N. adopted "a strong, effective and implementable Arms Trade Treaty that can strengthen global security while protecting the sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade."
"Nothing in this treaty could ever infringe on the rights of American citizens under our domestic law or the Constitution, including the Second Amendment," he added, referring to the U.S. Constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to bear arms.
The NRA has vowed to fight to prevent the treaty's ratification by the U.S. Senate when it reaches Washington.
Syrian U.N. Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari repeated that his government opposes the arms trade treaty because it does not ban the sale of weapons to non-state actors and "terrorists" like those it says are active in Syria. The civil war there has claimed at least 70,000 lives, according to U.N. estimates.
Syria routinely refers to rebels trying to oust President Bashar al-Assad as "terrorists" backed by foreign governments.
The treaty does not ban transfers to armed groups, but says all arms transfers should be subjected to rigorous risk and human rights assessments first.
British Prime Minister David Cameron hailed the vote as a "landmark agreement that will save lives and ease the immense human suffering caused by armed conflict around the world."
SCRUTINY ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Mexico issued a statement on behalf of 98 U.N. member states saying, "an effective implementation of this treaty will make a real difference for the people of the world."
U.N. member states began meeting on March 18 in a final push to end years of discussions and hammer out a binding international treaty to end the lack of regulation over cross-border conventional arms sales.
Arms control activists and rights groups have said a treaty was needed to halt the uncontrolled flow of arms and ammunition that they say fuels wars, atrocities and rights abuses.
The Arms Trade Treaty aims to set standards for all cross-border transfers of conventional weapons. It would also create binding requirements for states to review all cross-border arms contracts to ensure that arms will not be used in human rights abuses, terrorism or violations of humanitarian law.
"The agreement of the Arms Trade Treaty sends a clear message to arms dealers who supply warlords and dictators that their time is up," said Anna Macdonald of the global development group Oxfam.
The main reason the arms trade talks took place at all is that the United States, the world's biggest arms trader, reversed U.S. policy on the issue after President Barack Obama was first elected and decided in 2009 to support a treaty.
U.N. overwhelmingly approves global arms trade treaty | Reuters
________________________________________________________________________________
Syria's permanent Envoy to the UN Bashar al-Jaafari said that Syria supports the global approach towards building an international community free of using force, prevailed by principles of the UN charter based on justice, equality and peace.
"As the rest of the member countries, Syria has worked for reaching a good treaty, not for getting a treaty which won't be applicable or to be used as a means for pressure in the future we need a good treaty, not to be used for a political exploitation by a number of countries against others," al-Jaafari said in a speech at a UN General Assembly session for voting on Arms' Trade Treaty.
"Syria cant be the obstructing side to reach a treaty.. but those who rejected to listen to the concerns of a vast part of the member countries are the ones who obstructed reaching a balanced and fair treaty," al-Jaafari said.
He added that the Syrians are more concerned than any other side in the need for reaching a good, applicable treaty which paves the way for a new era of dealing with illegal trafficking in arms instead of the prevailing immoral chaos state in this regard which shadows the international peace and security.
Al-Jaafari regretted that the efforts exerted by Syria and other delegations to reach a consensus on a balanced text were in vain as some countries "insisted on covering the interests of some sides at the expense of vast variety of states."
"The Syrian delegation finds itself forced, after using up all ways of dialogue and persuasion, to vote against the draft resolution and the text of the treaty as mentioned in the document 580 AL/67 A," al-Jaafari said.
He added that the treaty ignored a proposal by a number of countries, among them Syria, to include an article that refers to the foreign occupation and the peoples' right which live under occupation of self-determination, and as you know the Israeli occupation still occupies Arab territories in the Syrian Golan, Palestine and Lebanon.
"The text doesn't include a frank paragraph on the categorically ban of supplying weapons to the armed terrorist groups and members. " al-Jaafari said.
He added that that ignoring this dangerous issue which my country is suffering from due to providing the armed terrorist groups with arms by some countries is completely unacceptable by Syria as it is considered a flagrant violation of the international principles and charters with the aim of liquidating any hope of a political and peaceful solution to the crisis in Syria, based on the UN Security Council resolutions No. 2042 and 2043.
154 voted for the resolution, 3 countries were against; they are Syria, Iran and Democratic Korea, while 23 states abstained.
Syrian Arab news agency - SANA - Syria : Syria news ::
The National Rifle Association (NRA), a powerful U.S. pro-gun lobbying group that has opposed the treaty from the start, said it was a sad day for the United States, which joined the vast majority of U.N. member states by voting for the pact.
Iran, Syria and North Korea cast the sole votes against the treaty. The same three states last week prevented a treaty-drafting conference at U.N. headquarters from reaching the required consensus to adopt the pact.
The official U.N. tally showed 154 votes in favor, three against 23 abstentions, though diplomats and U.N. officials said the actual vote was 155-3-22. They said Angola was recorded as having abstained, though it had attempted to vote yes.
Iran, which is under a U.N. arms embargo over its nuclear program, is eager to ensure its arms imports and exports are not curtailed, while Syria's government is embroiled in a two-year civil war and relies on arms from Russia and Iran, envoys said.
North Korea is also under a U.N. arms embargo due to its nuclear weapons and missile programs.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed the vote, saying the treaty "will help to keep warlords, pirates, terrorists, criminals and their like from acquiring deadly arms."
The treaty will be open for signature on June 3 and will enter into force 90 days after the 50th signatory ratifies it. Mexican U.N. Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba told reporters it normally takes two to three years for a treaty to come into force, but said he hoped it would happen sooner in this case.
Major arms producers China and Russia joined Cuba, Bolivia, Nicaragua and other countries in abstaining. Although a significant number of countries abstained, putting the treaty to a General Assembly vote was the only way its supporters could get it adopted after the treaty conference collapsed last week.
NRA: 'A SAD, YET TELLING, DAY'
Many of the countries that abstained, among them India, complained the treaty favored exporting over importing states. Russia said Moscow would take a hard look at the treaty before deciding whether to sign it.
Several delegates told Reuters the treaty's effectiveness would be limited if major arms exporters refused to sign it.
The United States, the world's No. 1 arms exporter, voted in favor of the treaty despite fierce opposition from the NRA, whose lobbying wing - the NRA Institute for Legislative Action - issued a statement condemning the U.N. vote.
"This treaty disregards the Second Amendment to our Constitution and threatens individual firearm ownership," said Chris Cox, head of the NRA-ILA. "It is a sad, yet telling, day when the president of the United States and his administration refuse to defend America's Constitution on the world stage."
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement the U.N. adopted "a strong, effective and implementable Arms Trade Treaty that can strengthen global security while protecting the sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade."
"Nothing in this treaty could ever infringe on the rights of American citizens under our domestic law or the Constitution, including the Second Amendment," he added, referring to the U.S. Constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to bear arms.
The NRA has vowed to fight to prevent the treaty's ratification by the U.S. Senate when it reaches Washington.
Syrian U.N. Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari repeated that his government opposes the arms trade treaty because it does not ban the sale of weapons to non-state actors and "terrorists" like those it says are active in Syria. The civil war there has claimed at least 70,000 lives, according to U.N. estimates.
Syria routinely refers to rebels trying to oust President Bashar al-Assad as "terrorists" backed by foreign governments.
The treaty does not ban transfers to armed groups, but says all arms transfers should be subjected to rigorous risk and human rights assessments first.
British Prime Minister David Cameron hailed the vote as a "landmark agreement that will save lives and ease the immense human suffering caused by armed conflict around the world."
SCRUTINY ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Mexico issued a statement on behalf of 98 U.N. member states saying, "an effective implementation of this treaty will make a real difference for the people of the world."
U.N. member states began meeting on March 18 in a final push to end years of discussions and hammer out a binding international treaty to end the lack of regulation over cross-border conventional arms sales.
Arms control activists and rights groups have said a treaty was needed to halt the uncontrolled flow of arms and ammunition that they say fuels wars, atrocities and rights abuses.
The Arms Trade Treaty aims to set standards for all cross-border transfers of conventional weapons. It would also create binding requirements for states to review all cross-border arms contracts to ensure that arms will not be used in human rights abuses, terrorism or violations of humanitarian law.
"The agreement of the Arms Trade Treaty sends a clear message to arms dealers who supply warlords and dictators that their time is up," said Anna Macdonald of the global development group Oxfam.
The main reason the arms trade talks took place at all is that the United States, the world's biggest arms trader, reversed U.S. policy on the issue after President Barack Obama was first elected and decided in 2009 to support a treaty.
U.N. overwhelmingly approves global arms trade treaty | Reuters
________________________________________________________________________________
Al-Jaafari..Arms' Treaty Draft Resolution didn't Include Ban on Supplying Weapons to Terrorist Groups
Syria's permanent Envoy to the UN Bashar al-Jaafari said that Syria supports the global approach towards building an international community free of using force, prevailed by principles of the UN charter based on justice, equality and peace.
"As the rest of the member countries, Syria has worked for reaching a good treaty, not for getting a treaty which won't be applicable or to be used as a means for pressure in the future we need a good treaty, not to be used for a political exploitation by a number of countries against others," al-Jaafari said in a speech at a UN General Assembly session for voting on Arms' Trade Treaty.
"Syria cant be the obstructing side to reach a treaty.. but those who rejected to listen to the concerns of a vast part of the member countries are the ones who obstructed reaching a balanced and fair treaty," al-Jaafari said.
He added that the Syrians are more concerned than any other side in the need for reaching a good, applicable treaty which paves the way for a new era of dealing with illegal trafficking in arms instead of the prevailing immoral chaos state in this regard which shadows the international peace and security.
Al-Jaafari regretted that the efforts exerted by Syria and other delegations to reach a consensus on a balanced text were in vain as some countries "insisted on covering the interests of some sides at the expense of vast variety of states."
"The Syrian delegation finds itself forced, after using up all ways of dialogue and persuasion, to vote against the draft resolution and the text of the treaty as mentioned in the document 580 AL/67 A," al-Jaafari said.
He added that the treaty ignored a proposal by a number of countries, among them Syria, to include an article that refers to the foreign occupation and the peoples' right which live under occupation of self-determination, and as you know the Israeli occupation still occupies Arab territories in the Syrian Golan, Palestine and Lebanon.
"The text doesn't include a frank paragraph on the categorically ban of supplying weapons to the armed terrorist groups and members. " al-Jaafari said.
He added that that ignoring this dangerous issue which my country is suffering from due to providing the armed terrorist groups with arms by some countries is completely unacceptable by Syria as it is considered a flagrant violation of the international principles and charters with the aim of liquidating any hope of a political and peaceful solution to the crisis in Syria, based on the UN Security Council resolutions No. 2042 and 2043.
154 voted for the resolution, 3 countries were against; they are Syria, Iran and Democratic Korea, while 23 states abstained.
Syrian Arab news agency - SANA - Syria : Syria news ::
