Like racism,riots,deportations,stripping tamils of citizenship and forcing buddhism by sri lankans into their throats. Yeah. These kind of stupidity start civil wars. Look at what is happening in Donbass by kiev junta.Very similiar pattern. But that does not mean I support LTTE or its war crimes against sri lanka. You guys should have tried peace and co-existence.
this is why i said you should know about subject matter before talk about it cos it makes you look like a total idiot.
racisms, riots are not limited to SL but is a subcontinental thing. This coming frm an indian is more hilarious. India is one of the last to point at riots in SL.
SL had few riots only one being the major in 83. That is normal for any multi cultrual third world country after colonialism. Take your india. India and pakistan partition resulted in deaths of milions, 1992 riots in Mumbai, Sikh riots in 1984, Gujrat riots in 2001-2 were more disastrous than the ones in SL.
I am not saying SL is perfect i am saying you are the last to point at SL.
To this day violence erupts in India in a larger scale unlike in SL. Take Muzzafernagar, Assam you have bloody racial riots. In TN there are many many caste riots. People are killed for being born in wrong caste.
And tell me where buddhism was forced on others? In SL anyone can choose any religion or even desist in practicing a religion. Just these days in parts of UPin India people are wreaking havoc just because a lady teacher has converted. In SL: conversion happen normally and people consider them to be private affairs.
If SL force buddhism on SL people then how come people of islam and Hinduism has increased their percentages?
Coming from india i guess you think every riots every conflict has roots in religion. In SL it is different. SInhala is a multi religious group, it is just majority are buddhist. In a single family you will have ppl of different religions.
The real reason or real roots for conflict in SL is not minority rights or oppression but rather histroy. which is why every debate on SL war ends with a debate on histoy in PDF itself.
Bark about things you know.
The only party that made conflict in SL bloodier was india. Anyone from india crying over dead bodies in SL is not only stupid but shameful
@[USER=144893]Saradiel[/user]
get over your obsession with Tamils ...
there's no basis for comparing Tamils with neo Nazi Sinhala Buddhists, who are facing UN war crime charges/probe , committed genocide and raped young captive Tamil women and are keeping 1 million people under military occupation
Tamils don't go around raping , looting or killing Sinhalas or publishing vulgar cartoons , and don't try and justify illegal occupation of Tamil Eelam, a victim of Sinhala Buddhist terorism ..
I have no obsession of tamils. who do you think tamils are to be obsessed with?
Sl is right in its own capacity to reject any external intervention that is coming disguised as HR activists. Especially the HR activits are supporters of a former barbaric terrorist organisation.
The LTTE you support hid behind women and children to save their sorry a$$es. Sinhala ppl need not loot, SLO gover sent money, food, health care, paid for jobs and even paid fore education for 30 years even for the ppl living under LTTE.
Be thankful to sinhalese we saved you. Otherwise under LTTE the tamils would have perished.
There is no tamil eelam to begin with even historically