What's new

Twitter’s ban on Trump strips US of ‘moral high ground’ in criticizing others on freedom of speech: observers

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
Social media's permanent silencing of US President Donald Trump again exposed the country's double standards, and stripped Washington's "moral high ground" in lecturing other nations about "freedom of speech," Chinese observers said, adding that the recent development on the presidential transition, including the storming of Capitol hill, has taught the US a lesson: freedom of speech has boundaries.

Using the excuse of a potential risk of further incitement of violence, social media platforms, Twitter announced the permanent suspension of Trump's accounts.

Google also followed suit. Shortly after Twitter announced on Friday to suspend Trump's account, Google shared that they were removing Parler, a conservative social media app, from their Play Store immediately, saying they were suspending the app until the developers committed to a moderation and enforcement policy that could handle objectionable content on the platform.

It is not only the accounts of Trump that have been suspended. Twitter also removed the accounts of Michael Flynn, Trump's former national security adviser who has received a presidential pardon; and pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell, for breaching policies that ban users from engaging in "coordinated activity" that results in online and real-world harm.

In a press statement released on Friday evening, Trump responded to his suspensions by saying "Twitter has gone further and further in banning free speech."

The incident has fully exposed the US' double standards when it spares no efforts to criticize other nations' "violations of free speech," whilst taking the drastic move to the restrict the speech of its own president, Li Haidong, professor at the Institute of International Relations, China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times on Saturday.

He said such blatant double standards stripped the US of its "moral high-ground" when it intends to bellow about other nations' "violations of freedom of speech."

China has long been devoted to regulating harmful content, such as violence, pornography and personal attacks on its internet. Yet such a move has fallen into the US muzzle of attacking China for "restricting freedom of speech."

"Maybe it is only until today, the US has learned the lesson that freedom of speech is not without limits. No government can have an unregulated internet," Shen Yi from the School of International Relations and Public Affairs of Fudan University, told the Global Times.

Yet he said the US has a long way to go regarding internet regulation. "We regulated the internet to provide a healthy online environment for the public; but US platforms started an internet purge because those platforms are tilting toward certain political parties, and some speeches are not in accordance with the political interests they upheld."

Li noted that after the incident, the US should not treat itself as special and perfect, differentiating itself from every country in the world. “It has fallen to a laughing stock for the world to see.”

The suspension of Trump and his followers' account also stirred waves of mocking on the Chinese internet. The hashtag "Twitter announced permanent suspension of Trump's account" has generated over 400 million views as of press time.

"We really have witnessed history; witnessed the true colors of the US political system and its double standards," said one Sina Weibo user.

 
.
It's a private corporation, it has the right to ban whomever it wants.

Freedom of speech protects you from government, not private organizations.

Unlike in China, where the Chinese government has a hand in all major chinese companies, the US doesn't operate like that. In the US' case, private corporations often fight tooth and nail against government interference.
 
.
Well, he can come and do live broadcasts or start his own networks or something other, completely different from China where you will disappear from real life not just some online messaging network.
 
.
Well, he can come and do live broadcasts or start his own networks or something other, completely different from China where you will disappear from real life not just some online messaging network.
It's a private corporation, it has the right to ban whomever it wants.

Freedom of speech protects you from government, not private organizations.

Unlike in China, where the Chinese government has a hand in all major chinese companies, the US doesn't operate like that. In the US' case, private corporations often fight tooth and nail against government interference.
Different and yet all the same. Can Trump really create him own network? Who are we fooling here? 12 year olds? LOL:lol:
 
.
Different and yet all the same. Can Trump really create him own network? Who are we fooling here? 12 year olds? LOL:lol:
He can actually, he has enough delusional supporters, that chances are at least some of them are programmers, web designers, network administrators...etc. he can gather enough talent to build his own network, and he has enough followers who'll use the service to make it somewhat successful.

I doubt he'll do it though.
 
. .
Social media needs to separate the political content from the other stuff. Like a filter that you can turn on and off.
 
.
Democracy or terrorism? Location matters


853ae7d8cb8e41c19048b7166e69b79e.jpeg


 
.
Trump may become more dangerous to the American political system as an outcast than as the president. We may be facing an escalating insurgency in the coming decade, especially as the Democrats continue to push more extreme and divisive ideologies while corporate America continues to dominate and reap more benefits to the detriment of the working class in the years to come.
 
. .
It's a private corporation, it has the right to ban whomever it wants.

Freedom of speech protects you from government, not private organizations.

Unlike in China, where the Chinese government has a hand in all major chinese companies, the US doesn't operate like that. In the US' case, private corporations often fight tooth and nail against government interference.

Keep this in mind, medias are complicated background no matter it private or public. Obviously the ones ban Trump are not controlled by Trump's Party. ( Sorry, I don't remember which party he belongs to, though there are two.)
 
.
The Chinese have freedom of speech. They will never ban Xi's speech.
 
.
Social media needs to separate the political content from the other stuff. Like a filter that you can turn on and off.

That will never happen because the left WANTS to expose everyone to their propaganda while pushing out alternative views. Propaganda doesn't work if much of the population can avoid it with a single click or swipe. The goal is to create a misinformed population, not an uninformed population.
 
.
It's a private corporation, it has the right to ban whomever it wants.

Freedom of speech protects you from government, not private organizations.

Unlike in China, where the Chinese government has a hand in all major chinese companies, the US doesn't operate like that. In the US' case, private corporations often fight tooth and nail against government interference.

LOL Are you this denial bot?

 
.
It's a private corporation, it has the right to ban whomever it wants.

Freedom of speech protects you from government, not private organizations.

Unlike in China, where the Chinese government has a hand in all major chinese companies, the US doesn't operate like that. In the US' case, private corporations often fight tooth and nail against government interference.
Lol.. selective agreement. Obviously twitter is under federal command to ban trump under their order. What load of BS private organisation...

Did twitter ban the HKer protestor who incited violence? No...

You lost all credibility. Obviously one sided protecting american tyranny.
The Chinese have freedom of speech. They will never ban Xi's speech.
As if US ,India or Pakistan has? All countries exercise media controls. Be a real man to at least admit it instead of being a lowlife trying to brag your righteous.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom