Twitter suspends Pakistani Foreign office spokesperson M Faisal's private account

[VCheng]

The pattern of denialism continues, Syed Cheng.

Again, there are no objectionable tweets. The account is public (DrMFaisal). Even you despite ample time have been able to produce a single objectionable tweet. Ergo, we can safely conclude tthat Twitter's Indian regional office acted out of bias when it suspended Dr. Faisal's account.

Your desire to force prejudgments without a sound basis is evident, but I will continue to maintain that without knowing the content of the complaint or the tweets that initiated it, nothing can be concluded.

 

[Khanate]

Your desire to force prejudgments without a sound basis is evident, but I will continue to maintain that without knowing the content of the complaint or the tweets that initiated it, nothing can be concluded.

The fact that you are willing to "maintain" something without any evidence, or even claims, itself speak of the denial you are in. Sad.

nothing can be concluded.

The proof is in the pudding and it is very biased.

 

[VCheng]

The fact that you are willing to "maintain" something without any evidence, or even claims, itself speak of the denial you are in. Sad.

That, unlike you, I am willing to keep an open mind precisely because there is no evidence to arrive at any robust conclusion speaks for itself.

The proof is in the pudding and it is very biased.

So where is the complaint? Where are the tweets that caused the complaint?

 

[Khanate]

That, unlike you, I am willing to keep an open mind precisely because there is no evidence to arrive at any robust conclusion speaks for itself.

Keeping an open mind based on what evidence? The deep denial continues.

So where is the complaint? Where are the tweets that caused the complaint?

Excatly, there are no objectionable tweets hence the suspension by Twitter's Indian regional office is biased.

​

 

[VCheng]

Keeping an open mind based on what evidence?

Keeping an open mind is the correct thing to do given the LACK of evidence:

Excatly, there are no objectionable tweets hence the suspension by Twitter's Indian regional office is biased.

How can anyone say that without knowing the complaint and the tweets that caused it?

 

[Khanate]

Keeping an open mind is the correct thing to do given the LACK of evidence:

More denials. Poor Syed Cheng.

We have direct evidence from the sources privy to the development. Ergo, this is factual evidence.

"...India raised the issue to the Twitter management that eventually led to the suspension of his personal Twitter handle late Tuesday," it said.

Indian Source: Twitter restores Pakistan's foreign office spokesman's handle after suspending it over complaints from India


The account was suspended on an official complaint lodged by the Indian government over apprehensions that Dr Faisal was keeping social media users updated regarding Indian atrocities in occupied Kashmir and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing on RAW agent Kulbhushan Jadhav.

Sources privy to the development told The Express Tribune that the micro-blogging website’s regional office in India had acted on an official complaint lodged on Tuesday.

Pakistani Source: After 19-hour suspension over ‘India complaint’, FO spokesperson’s Twitter account restored​

How can anyone say that without knowing the complaint and the tweets that caused it?

Precisely, there are no objectionable tweets. You are free to look for them.

 

[VCheng]

Precisely, there are no objectionable tweets. You are free to look for them.

Could it be because they were deleted?

 

[Verve]

More denials. Poor Syed Cheng.

We have direct evidence from the sources privy to the development. Ergo, this is factual evidence.

"...India raised the issue to the Twitter management that eventually led to the suspension of his personal Twitter handle late Tuesday," it said.

Indian Source: Twitter restores Pakistan's foreign office spokesman's handle after suspending it over complaints from India


The account was suspended on an official complaint lodged by the Indian government over apprehensions that Dr Faisal was keeping social media users updated regarding Indian atrocities in occupied Kashmir and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing on RAW agent Kulbhushan Jadhav.

Sources privy to the development told The Express Tribune that the micro-blogging website’s regional office in India had acted on an official complaint lodged on Tuesday.

Pakistani Source: After 19-hour suspension over ‘India complaint’, FO spokesperson’s Twitter account restored​

Precisely, there are no objectionable tweets. You are free to look for them.

What Cheng Indian refuses to acknowledge is that no Twitter rule was broken, which is what he was barking about when the news broke.

Now he has changed tact to 'objectionable ' and conveniently brushed aside his earlier mantra of Twitter rules being broken.

 

[VCheng]

Now he has changed tact to 'objectionable ' and conveniently brushed aside his earlier mantra of Twitter rules being broken.

Without knowing the complaint, or the tweets that caused it, nothing can be concluded.

 

[Verve]

We saw this typical behaviour by Indians at ICJ as well. Cheng Indian has been trained well and paid well.

 

[VCheng]

We saw this typical behaviour by Indians at ICJ as well. Cheng Indian has been trained well and paid well.

The fact that you are resorting to personal attacks and misrepresentations rather than replying to the argument shows that you have already lost, and that is clear to all.

 

[Verve]

These 'all' must be all of the Indian Hindu brothers of yours!

 

[Khanate]

Could it be because they were deleted?

For the 4th time, if you are making a claim than the onus of evidence is on you. Please share the evidence because so far you have failed to do so.

The fact that you are resorting to personal attacks and misrepresentations rather than replying to the argument shows that you have already lost, and that is clear to all.

Siege mentality.

An argument is won or lost on the basis of evidence so far you haven't produced anything other than denials.

Without knowing the complaint, or the tweets that caused it, nothing can be concluded.

Denials, as you agreed upon earlier, does not solve the issue of Twitter's implict/explict bias.

And as stated earlier, we have direct evidence from the sources privy to the development so, yes, this is factual evidence.

"...India raised the issue to the Twitter management that eventually led to the suspension of his personal Twitter handle late Tuesday," it said.

Indian Source: Twitter restores Pakistan's foreign office spokesman's handle after suspending it over complaints from India


The account was suspended on an official complaint lodged by the Indian government over apprehensions that Dr Faisal was keeping social media users updated regarding Indian atrocities in occupied Kashmir and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing on RAW agent Kulbhushan Jadhav.

Sources privy to the development told The Express Tribune that the micro-blogging website’s regional office in India had acted on an official complaint lodged on Tuesday.

Pakistani Source: After 19-hour suspension over ‘India complaint’, FO spokesperson’s Twitter account restored​

What Cheng Indian refuses to acknowledge is that no Twitter rule was broken, which is what he was barking about when the news broke.

Now he has changed tact to 'objectionable ' and conveniently brushed aside his earlier mantra of Twitter rules being broken.

Syed Cheng's attempts to dilute the truth not only lacks evidence but creativity.

 

[VCheng]

For the 4th time, if you are making a claim than the onus of evidence is on you. Please share the evidence because so far you have failed to do so.

I am not making any claims. I am merely noting other possibilities that your rush to judgement is intentionally ignoring to be misleading, that is all. As I have maintained consistently, nothing can be concluded without knowing the complaint and the tweets that caused it to be filed.

You do not know, just as i do not, as to what really happened. Your speculation is just that - speculation - just the same as mine.

An argument is won or lost on the basis of evidence so far you haven't produced anything other than denials.

What denial? Please read the above with comprehension, again till you get what you have failed to see until now. Perhaps the bewildered incomprehensibility displayed by you is intentional.

==================================

No wonder such mindless zealobots continue to lose their voices in the international social media.

 

[Khanate]

I am not making any claims. I am merely noting other possibilities

Noted.

Now given that you are not making this claim or have any evidence to support this possibility, it is safely discarded.

You do not know, just as i do not, as to what really happened. Your speculation is just that - speculation - just the same as mine.

I don't need to speculate when I have direct evidence from the sources privy to the development.

What denial? Please read the above with comprehension, again till you get what you have failed to see until now. Perhaps the bewildered incomprehensibility displayed by you is intentional.

Many words and still no evidence.

This is what you are consistently in denial of:

"...India raised the issue to the Twitter management that eventually led to the suspension of his personal Twitter handle late Tuesday," it said.

Indian Source: Twitter restores Pakistan's foreign office spokesman's handle after suspending it over complaints from India


The account was suspended on an official complaint lodged by the Indian government over apprehensions that Dr Faisal was keeping social media users updated regarding Indian atrocities in occupied Kashmir and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing on RAW agent Kulbhushan Jadhav.

Sources privy to the development told The Express Tribune that the micro-blogging website’s regional office in India had acted on an official complaint lodged on Tuesday.

Pakistani Source: After 19-hour suspension over ‘India complaint’, FO spokesperson’s Twitter account restored​

No wonder such mindless zealobots continue to lose their voices in the international social media.

The fact that you are resorting to personal attacks and misrepresentations rather than replying to the argument shows that you have already lost, and that is clear to all. --Syed Ali Cheng
​

Too easy.