What's new

Turn of the razakars

Banana

BANNED
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
783
Reaction score
-2
A year after the Awami League Government set up the war crimes tribunal to try those who had directly participated or collaborated in the genocide that preceded Bangladesh’s liberation in 1971, a notorious razakar has been charged with several offences ranging from murder to rape. Between May and November 1971, when the people of erstwhile East Pakistan were engaged in the war of independence from Pakistan, Delwar Hossain Sayedee had thrown in his lot with the Pakistani Army to crush the Bengali rebellion. As a member of the Razakar Bahini and the laughably named ‘Peace Committee’, Sayedee tortured, murdered and raped Bengalis; he led mobs of razakars which looted shops and homes and set entire villages ablaze. He routinely outed Bengali nationalists, freedom fighters and Hindu families to the Pakistani soldiers who then went on to torture, murder and rape their prisoners. The bodies of the victims were dumped in rivers that crisscross Bangladesh. Take, for instance, the incidents of May 4, 1971, for which Sayedee has been charged by the tribunal. On that fateful day, Sayedee led Pakistani soldiers to a secret meeting of freedom fighters, at least 20 of whom were shot dead on the spot. He next led the Pakistanis to a Hindu neighbourhood in Pirojpur Sadar where they looted homes and set them on fire after killing 13 people. Sayedee and his fellow razakars regularly organised such raids on Hindu areas which the Tribunal has rightly deemed as acts of ethnic cleansing and thereby a crime against humanity.

The history of Bangladesh’s 1971 Liberation War is littered with such examples of horrific crimes against Bengalis, especially women and intellectuals. The mass graves that were discovered after the fall of Dhaka, the innumerable shocking tales about young girls being raped and killed, the mass murder of teachers and students were not only an indictment of the brutal Pakistani soldiers but also their local collaborators like Sayedee and other Jamaatis. The razakars should have been tried and punished immediately after the liberation of Bangladesh but that never happened because of a tragic sequence of events that began with the assassination of Mujibur Rahman. Sheikh Hasina has kept her promise of bringing the guilty men of 1971 to book so that they are made to pay for their crimes. Earlier, she dealt with the killers of Mujibur Rahman who had till now escaped punishment by sending them to the gallows. This time, it is the turn of the razakars and the Jamaatis.

Turn of the razakars
 
. . .
images
 
. . .
. .
Which is why justice is being served. The Supreme doesn't be biased against one religion and be brutal against another. That's what makes that Power beyond human, something you will not realize.

why do you always want to show Bangladeshis as Anti Hindu??

10% of Bangladeshis are Hindus. We dont hate them for being Hindu.

Dont forget, Muslim Muktis fought against a muslim force to save hindu people!

Saydee was innocent, dint commit any crime!

He was not politically active by then.

He is targeted just because He is the backbone of Jamat....

If he was a killer and rapist, how come he survived after 1971 in Bangladesh??

after 1971 he used to preach , thousand of people used to attend his programs....

He joined Jamat after 1980.

jamat wasnt anti Awamileague then.

Not BNP, Awamileague was the first to form Coalition with Jamat..... time for history check!

Whenever Hasina went to Chittagong , she used to meet Saydee....

Now Jamat Joined BNP around 2000.

And suddenly this man after 30 years of independence turned into Razakar!!!

Funny!!
 
.
This is entirely an internal matter of Bangladesh. Let them be the judge of what is good for their country.
 
.
why do you always want to show Bangladeshis as Anti Hindu??

10% of Bangladeshis are Hindus. We dont hate them for being Hindu.

It used to be 35% of them and 5% of our Buddhists. CHT was 98% Buddhist pre-1947. No one is saying Bangladesh as a whole is anti-Buddhist/anti-Hindu. It is just that those who are against them are not controlled.

Dont forget, Muslim Muktis fought against a muslim force to save hindu people!


Wrong. Mukti Bahini was a pan-Bangla fighting force who were secular and not-religion themed to fight against Pakistani troops. During the Pakistani atrocities, all Bangaldeshis regardless of religion, were being massacred for not being Urdu speaking and protesting the authority of West Pakistan.

No specific action for mainstream Hindus alone. It was an action to bring out independent Bangladesh regardless of religion or belief.

Saydee was innocent, dint commit any crime!


He was not politically active by then.

He is targeted just because He is the backbone of Jamat....

That's where the problem starts... not just for us but for your own people first. Let the case run, if he's innocent he will be released. I never targeted him.

If he was a killer and rapist, how come he survived after 1971 in Bangladesh??

after 1971 he used to preach , thousand of people used to attend his programs....

There are many ways one can live off in the subcontinent despite being guilty. How do you think Geela-ni managed to live in our country despite being the most anti-national vermin? Same way.

He joined Jamat after 1980.

jamat wasnt anti Awamileague then.

I don't care about personal rivalries of political matters in Bangladesh because that is your own internal problem.

Not BNP, Awamileague was the first to form Coalition with Jamat..... time for history check!

Whenever Hasina went to Chittagong , she used to meet Saydee....

Now Jamat Joined BNP around 2000.

Like I said, I don't have a problem with internal politics of your country as long as it doesn't hurt our people. Whether it was BNP, Jamaati or whatever, the point is, there was an assault against us Buddhists and Hindus conducting pogroms. That's what we're opposed to do.
 
.
It used to be 35% of them and 5% of our Buddhists. CHT was 98% Buddhist pre-1947. No one is saying Bangladesh as a whole is anti-Buddhist/anti-Hindu. It is just that those who are against them are not controlled
35% when?? 1947??
if yes then
they left in 1947
Again in 1971.
Many were killed in 1971 by Pak Army.
Still now and then they migrate to India....
I know many....
All of my hindu friends have relatives in India...
Through them they settle in India ........ For example my teacher's both son were married in India
Many after completing their school goes to bangalore or other places , later settles there
Again population increases geometrically... 2 to 4. 4 to 16. So percentage of Hindus will decrease normally.......
I dont know about any Buddhist massacre in Bangladesh....
May be they converted.....
Again many of them had to leave due to insurgency caused by them....
Bangladeshis are not extremists.
 
.
Wrong. Mukti Bahini was a pan-Bangla fighting force who were secular and not-religion themed to fight against Pakistani troops. During the Pakistani atrocities, all Bangaldeshis regardless of religion, were being massacred for not being Urdu speaking and protesting the authority of West Pakistan.

Pan Bangla means Both west and east. Muktis were from Muslim part of Bengal.
Muktis were not secular. It is a propaganda. Muktis were fighting for Justice...Just like the Libyans. few of them understood this "Secularism" Bangabandhu was killed by Muktis. according to them they were protecting Islam from Hindu India...
Muslims by PA were not massacred without cause. as my father's family and mother's family both were neutral, they roam freely in 1971. Only those who were active in politics, assisted muktis were killed. anyway according to an indian writer 80% victims were hindu.....
 
.
It was a mistake by Mukti and IA to have forgiven the Razakaars in 1971.

They had to show their colors and bite the hand that saved them. What was happening in the Dhaka parade ground should have been continued a bit longer.
 
.
It was a mistake by Mukti and IA to have forgiven the Razakaars in 1971.

They had to show their colors and bite the hand that saved them. What was happening in the Dhaka parade ground should have been continued a bit longer.

exactly.... Then Hasina could never play the card " Razakar" against Islamist groups........... I curse them for not killing Razakars then.......
Situation is so serious, you will understand from an example......
Goeyshwar chandra Roy A BNP leader was called a Hindu Razakar some days ago by a awamileague leader....
Anyone who talks against League gets the title........
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom