Axa-
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 18, 2012
- Messages
- 460
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes an ex airforce general said we can go into Sam(is that damaacus??) in 24 hours.
Yes it is Damascus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes an ex airforce general said we can go into Sam(is that damaacus??) in 24 hours.
USA killed people on your own soil what did you do? Think before you talk, the government was not bound to protect everyone and can't and also it wasn't a government or country official ship, it was volunteers, if an American goes to north Korea or some country and they kill them is America going to go to war? If Israel fired artillery INTO OUR OWN COUNTRY AND KILLED CIVILIAND I ASSURE YOU THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A RESPONSE.
Ok, those installations would be difficult to hit from sea, we still have SOM's naval variant under development. But;
1) Given the air superiority we have, It wouldn't be necessary to hit everything from surface.
2) We don't need to undertake amphibious landing operations while we have such a long border. Therefore we don't need to approach Syrian coastline.
3) I was talking about sinking Syrian ships by Type209 submarines we have. In retaliation to a mavi-marmara like attack which they have absolutely no way of defending themselves against.
Actualy he could had with the army they had before the revolution but as for now it's too weak.
Syrian Navy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Their illegal regime has very powerful coast defense systems.
LegionnairE you are making all these for nothing, an ex airforce general on Habertürk made a one hour interview, they even showed equipment etc, it's very long but in short he said we can go to Damascus in 24 hours. - - he also spoke about Cyprus a naval operation when we had very little resources very little national products, a sanction meant that we couldn't even replace them at the time etc and how successful it was and we easily went in 24+ hours
Poor coast defence. You cant defence 1000 km coast with 2 systems, and missile system thats 50 years old ahahahah. Maybe the old system missile dont work...
How tense is the current situation, is there any Turkish troop mobilization along Syrian border.
turkey is without a doubt more superior but so was iraq in iraq iran war but iran held it own you just never know it could be thta turkey may face both the army and the rebeliion united could stop the forces on ground after all even hezbullah stopped israel and israel was way above hezbullah thats why i am saying just dont take it into account bombardment aside i hope this wont become a full scale operation
Things would get messy and guerrilla warfare tactics could be used by many factions.
The only thing I don't understand is why the Turks want to get their hands dirty.
True, If Turkey wanted to annihilate Syria, then it is not a problem.
However, If we are talking about ousting it could be very difficult.
Things would get messy and guerrilla warfare tactics could be used by many factions.
There would be many parties that would want to maintain their interests.
USA
Israel
Iran
Turkey
These will be the major players.
The only thing I don't understand is why the Turks want to get their hands dirty.
i ahve no idea they bombed yes it was big but the parliament just said to start a whole one year war i dont get it you really have to be pushed bcz war is not a childs play it cost money and lives even if they were to just launch air strikes syria will respond too and this could lead to deaths of people not too mention the airstrikes will cost alot of money why does a good economically growing and militarily turkey want to go to a war soo easily its like world war 1
ANKARA- Turkish Yurt Newspaper said that the government of the Development and Justice Party has to take a neutral stance on the events in Syria instead of supporting the groups of the so-called the armed opposition.
"Turkey was inevitably affected by the events in Syria… so it was very necessary for it to adopt new polices and be aware that instigating others will bring nothing but more damages.. The Turkish government was wrong at seeing the whole region through a sectarian vision," Journalist Ali Sirmen wrote in an article published by the Newspaper.
He added that the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan was carrying out the policies of the US in Syria and the region, bearing the political and martial burden of this policy .
The Newspaper also revealed that the bomber which was used to launch the mortar on the Turkish Akcakale town is only used by NATO.
n an article by its Editor-in-Chief Merdan Yanardag, Yurt clarified that it had information from a reliable source saying that Turkey was the side which sent the mortars to the members of so-called ''the free army".
"Those information affirm that the Government of Erdogan's wrong policy was behind the falling of the mortar in the town that claimed the lives of 5 Turks." Yanaradag added.
Yurt Newspaper: Erdogan's government handed over the mortars to armed groups in Syria which shelled akcakale town
It's not war, it's a parliament act that states army can do operation in other countries.