Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
Karşımda ki insan inatla birşeyi anlamak istemediğinde cidden kötü birşey söylememek için kendimi zor tutuyorum, sayfalarca anlat adam hala aynı şeyi tekrar ediyor küfür eder gibi.
Bak diyorum, tekrar diyorum, meselenin politik kısmının benim söylediğim şeyle bir ilgisi YOK, bende biliyorum terörün sadece silahla çözülemeyeceğini ben sayfalardır burda "sadece" TSK nın askeri hatalarından bahsediyorum, PKK aynı yöntemlerle takır takır asker öldürüyor, bu ordu aynı şeylerle yüzlerce kez karşılaştı ama hala aynı terane, bu mesele tamamen askeri bi durum hiç bir bahanesi yok, ne olur ne olmaz tekrar ediyorum belki anlamassın, politik hataları yok saymıyorum, askeri hataları değerlendiyorum, anladın ?
Please continue the discussion in English friends.
I have a question to turar though. You keep repeating that the politicians haven't done their jobs correctly, which i partly agree upon. But can you illuminate us where and how they should have dealt with PKK in political terms? And what did they do wrong. Maybe if you eloborate that we can make an understanding here.
Also i have anohter criticism. You say the military does whatever they can do and we can't give them any repsonsibility. Really? How can't we hold them responsible for their actions where for example they killed about 30 Kurdish villagers just a couple month ago. Because when you do mistakes like that, PKK manipulates such events and finds new recruitment.
My perspective is this regarding the political arena:
1: AKP made a good initiative with the Kürt acilimi, because that was neccesary. I am sure they all had good intentions with this process. To win the Kurdish population's trust. If we are to go according to for example the MHP there should not be granted further Kurdish rights. But strangely that will benefit only the PKK. Why do you guys think BDP is against Kürt acilimi?
2: The government should initiate a new policy in the war against PKK. We should not hesitate making a big military incursion in Northern Iraq and Syria to clean this mess. If we are to get rid of these parasites, we need to go to the root of the problem aka North Iraq. Sending a couple of f16 into the area won't weaken them. But a real incursion with soldiers, tanks, mortars, planes etc. Could bring positive results.
You say the military does whatever they can do and we can't give them any repsonsibility.
Correct me if i'm wrong but above 30.000 terrorist have been killed since 1984. When you consider PKK's fix number of 5000 active militants on the mountains. Army finished them 6 times. But politicians couldn't put an end to the support from Kurds to PKK and couldn't prevent them to go mountains for become a terrorist.
Thousands of people sacrificed their lifes for their country. Right before the AKP, PKK was crippled...
So i'm asking again, whose fault is this mess? The army's or the politician's?
"Terörün zarar verme potansiyeli var, kazanma potansiyeli yoktur. Bu terör 30 yıldır devam ediyor. 30 yıldan bu yana etkisiz hale getirilen terörist sayısı 30 binin üstünde. Normalde şu anda terörist sayısı 5 bin civarında söyleniyor. Biz PKK terör örgütünü 6 defa bitirmiş durumdayız. 6 çarpı 5, 30 eder"
'PKK'yı bitirmiş durumdayız