Keel
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 3,532
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
First of all, what you said has simply show you have no knowledge on how Chapter 11 works.
Wrong, in Common Law, a bankruptcy is not to avoid "Complete Bankruptcy" (Actually, what does that mean by "Complete Bankruptcy" anyway?). Bankruptcy (Or insolvency), by law, with its definition, is to taken the problematic factor away from a trouble company, thus confer to the guardianship of a company by either force, via court order, or by voluntary insolvency. If the matter cannot be solve by taking away the problem, the company will be wind down and liquidated. You are mixing individual bankruptcy law to corporate insolvency law. In common law, the term bankruptcy DOES NOT APPLIES TO COMPANY OR CORPORATE ENTITIES, either you enter into administration, or you goes liquidate.
Receivership in common law also was used in probate court when an administrator of an asset was deemed unsuitable to be in charge of that asset, and thus appointing an administrator for it.
In Chapter 11, there were AT NO POINT WOULD ANY RECEIVER OR ADMINISTRATOR WOULD BE APPOINTED. You, as a director, DOES NOT LOSE CONTROL OF YOUR COMPANY, Administrator will only appointed if you declare a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in the US. Filing Chapter 11 means you notice there are some unhealthy status with your company, it is a warning or precursor to the actual event of insolvency.
I don't ever think You get a warning before you file for insolvency in within Commonwealth country. IN country like UK and Australia where common law works, once you cannot repay your debt (either physical debt or cash flow balance), you will be either enter into voluntary administration or liquidate by court. There are no warning or anything you can do to shield the investor and creditor while you kept running your business.
Hence there are no similar factor between an insolvency declared under common law, and filing a chapter 11 in the US. That would make Chapter 11 unique outside any common law.
But then, this is not what I said in my original post...
In my original post, when I was replying to a member post which said "Elon Musk" will be in deep trouble if Tesla apply for Chapter 11 (Something regarding the stock market). My replied is that in the US, even a CEO file Chapter 11 is not the end of the road for him, he STILL HAS CONTROL over the company, however, in common law, YOU, THE DIRECTOR is done, once a company enter insolvency.
Dancing around Chapter 11 and receivership does not help but rather the more you dig into this topic, the more you show your lack of knowledge on US and Common Law Bankruptcy Law.
Did I brag? I don't think so, just that because you don't understand what I said, does not mean I am bragging, it just mean you have no knowledge on that subject matter to understand.
If I were you, get a taxation textbook and a dictionary, try to read it before you come out here and say stuff like "Complete Bankruptcy" that does not make any sense.
Talking to you is a total waste of time
Cant draw blood out of a stone
That's it