What's new

Top 10 Human Origins Discoveries in 2015

Can we consider different races to be variants of Modern Humans ???
Don't really have any knowledge of what factors constitute a specie different than others or a race within a specie. But imo by looks a lion and tiger looks more distinct than different races of humans and they can breed into liger. The way male humans have facial hair and humans having arms, hand and foot very similar between different races gives an idea that human races arn't that different. Skin color is caused by very less percentage of DNA change but since its outside of body and mostly visible, it appears as if the change is vast. Combination of different chromosomes decide these things and it takes right combination of these chromosomes to make someone a miss world :p:. These things surely will be manipulated in later years. This is what i have read on internet.
 
The world we know and the the ancestry of humans we have so far discovered via the unearthed fossils represent a minute drop of actual human race and its evolution. Ultimately over time we may come to understand that the timeline we have assumed is actually much older.

What would really be interesting is the splicing of human genomes and identifying the necessary and unnecessary , unwanted and latent factors in it.

It is very interesting that earth provided the most conducive environment for evolution with which over millions of years finally humans came into existence (considering from cellular stage). Yet the nearest habitable planet is so far that we still dont know how we can reach it and during such a course of travel how we can preserve the human from the effects of time, travel and deep space issues.

This is a fascinating subject but honestly the interpretation of ancestry and evolution is very skewed. Sometimes due to negligible evidences and sometimes due to religious write ups defining the evolution. An example is the old story of adam and eve yet no one understand how adam and eve can exist in first place as evolution implies genetically they have to have a set of parents who may have been imperfect but their assimilation created the perfect homo sapiens...

Pls excuse me if i am offending anyone but my knowledge in this field is very very limited. Apologies in advance for any hurt feelings..
 
Human Differentiation: Evolution of Racial Characteristics
Comparison of Physical Characteristics
Race Skin Color Hair Eyes Blood Type (per cent)
Australian Aborigine and Papuan Chocolate-brown, black Black, wavy, curly, long Black, dark brown O (61), A (39)
American Indian Reddish-brown Black, dark brown, lank, long, circular section Black, dark brown O (91), A (9)
Pacific Islander Brown Black, lank, long Black, brown O (42), A (50), B (7), AB (1)
Black Black Black, wooly, short, flat elliptical section Black, dark brown O (54), A (28), B (16), AB (2)
White White, tan Black, brown, blond, red, straight, wavy or curly, oval section Black, brown, blue, green, hazel, grey O (40), A (44), B (11), AB (5)
Dravidian Brown to black Black or dark brown, straight or wavy, long Black, dark brown O (37), A (22), B (33), AB (7)
Asian Yellow, yellow-brown Black, lank, long, circular section Epicanthal fold, black O (38), A (24), B (30), AB (8)

humandifferentiationdiagramth.jpg

Human genetic variation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Those are races not subspecies..
 
Pertinent question which gets sidelined is why do humans have one sub-species ie the homosapiens whereas every other species has more than one variant like say Cats or Dogs or even Apes.

You would be called Racist if you did so.

Those are races not subspecies..

Just compare the Monkeys in Africa with People in Africa, Monkeys in India with Caucasians or Monkeys in China with Mongolians.

One can argue that Humans in each of these regions are closer to Monkeys in their respective regions than Humans in other regions.

A well known theory is that Humans are a product of scientific experiments by Aliens on Monkeys of different regions. The impact was obviously on the brian hence we think all Humans are same and not like animals.

Does a Gorilla mate with an Indian Monkey?

Does any Monkey mate with same sex?

upload_2015-12-30_17-44-27.png


upload_2015-12-30_17-40-58.png


upload_2015-12-30_17-43-15.png
 
It might be something to do with geography.


Lol what

Compare the evolution of Humans with that of the evolution of any other species in the same period and it would be very clear that Humans are evolving at an exponential pace when compared to any other species. Humans are GMOs.
 
Compare the evolution of Humans with that of the evolution of any other species in the same period and it would be very clear that Humans are evolving at an exponential pace when compared to any other species. Humans are GMOs.
And how does that have enough basis to form a theory? Sounds more like a hypothesis (a rather bad one if anything).
 
Pertinent question which gets sidelined is why do humans have one sub-species ie the homosapiens whereas every other species has more than one variant like say Cats or Dogs or even Apes.

Good question, but made a factual mistake. "Dogs" isn't a species, it's a subspecies - Canis lupus familiaris - of the species Canis lupus, which also includes the grey wolves.

The way male humans have facial hair and humans having arms, hand and foot very similar between different races gives an idea that human races arn't that different. Skin color is caused by very less percentage of DNA change but since its outside of body and mostly visible, it appears as if the change is vast. Combination of different chromosomes decide these things and it takes right combination of these chromosomes to make someone a miss world :p:. These things surely will be manipulated in later years. This is what i have read on internet.

"Aren't that different" or "very less" relative to what? ;p
 
And how does that have enough basis to form a theory? Sounds more like a hypothesis (a rather bad one if anything).

Humans know so little that everything is a theory. Even things that were once considered as facts have been revised with time which shows how little we know about ourselves and the universe that we live in.

It has been repeatedly proposed to expand the scope for SETI, and one of the suggested alterna-tives to radio is the biological media. Genomic DNA is already used on Earth to store non-biological information. Though smaller in capacity, but stronger in noise immunity is the genetic code. The code is a flexible mapping between codons and amino acids, and this flexibility allows modifying the code artificially. But once fixed, the code might stay unchanged over cosmological timescales; in fact, it is the most durable construct known. Therefore it represents an exceptional-ly reliable storage for an intelligent signature, if that conforms to biological and thermodynamic requirements. As the actual scenario for the origin of terrestrial life is far from being settled, the proposal that it might have been seeded intentionally cannot be ruled out. A statistically strong intelligent-like "signal" in the genetic code is then a testable consequence of such scenario. Here we show that the terrestrial code displays a thorough precision-type orderliness matching the criteria to be considered an informational signal. Simple arrangements of the code reveal an en-semble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of the same symbolic language. Accurate and systematic, these underlying patterns appear as a product of precision logic and nontrivial com-puting rather than of stochastic processes (the null hypothesis that they are due to chance coupled with presumable evolutionary pathways is rejected with P-value < 10–13). The patterns are pro-found to the extent that the code mapping itself is uniquely deduced from their algebraic repre-sentation. The signal displays readily recognizable hallmarks of artificiality, among which are the symbol of zero, the privileged decimal syntax and semantical symmetries. Besides, extraction of the signal involves logically straightforward but abstract operations, making the patterns essen-tially irreducible to any natural origin. Plausible way of embedding the signal into the code and possible interpretation of its content are discussed. Overall, while the code is nearly optimized biologically, its limited capacity is used extremely efficiently to store non-biological information.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1303/1303.6739.pdf
 
Last edited:
"Aren't that different" or "very less" relative to what? ;p
I don't know what you want to say. You are free to put your thoughts here :-)

Compare the evolution of Humans with that of the evolution of any other species in the same period and it would be very clear that Humans are evolving at an exponential pace when compared to any other species. Humans are GMOs.

You mean intelligence wise?
 
This is the magic of the shaitan to fool humans to believe non-sense and stuff like that.

7. 50,000-year-old Skull May Show Human-Neanderthal Hybrids Originated in Levant, not Europe
50%2C000-year-old-Skull.jpg


In a third study on Neanderthals, a 55,000-year-old skull found at Manot Cave in northern Israel may be the earliest evidence of modern man meeting and mating with Neanderthals found to date. The partial skull “provides evidence that both modern humans and Neanderthals inhabited the southern Levant during the late Pleistocene, close in time to the likely interbreeding event between modern humans and Neanderthals.” This challenges the theory that two species connected 10,000 years later in Europe.

.

Fun fact, must humans outside Africa carry 3% Neanderthals or it's Asia variant due to human-neanderthal breeding when humans exited Africa.
 
Back
Top Bottom