What's new

Top 10 Fighter Jets (Your 2 Cents)

Defenitely on better place than your tejas...



When you cant face danger, close your eyes...
I don't know what you mean by closing eyes..if I am to consider Chinese fighters then also they would not have made it to the top 5 nor are they better than mki or rafale, their advantage is in numbers .Yes their future fighters will be better.
 
.
Top Air Dominance a/c's
1. F22 Raptor
2.F15 E/F SE
3.Su 30 MKI/Su 35BM

Top Air Superiority
1. EFT
2. F15 Eagle
3. Mig 29UPG/SMT

Top MultiRole
1. Dassault Rafale
2. F16 BLK60 - 52/Sufa
3. F/A 18 Hornet
4. FC20

Top Maritime Strike Fighters
1. Rafale M
2. F/A 18 SH
3.Mig 29K
3. AV 8 Harrier

Top Point Defense Light Weight Fighters
1. FC1
2. Jas Gripen

Top Ground attack Specialist
1. Su34 Fullback
2. Panavia Tornado
3. A10 thunderbolt II

UCAV
1. MQ9 Reaper
2. MQ 1 Predator

Other aircrafts that deserve a mention
3rd gen aircrafts

Mig 21 Fishbed
Dassult Mirage 2000
F4 Phantom
F14 Tomcat
Mig 23F Flogger
F111 Aardvark
Mig 25 Foxbat
Mig 31 Foxhound
Panavia Tornado
Saab Viggen
Dassault Super Étendard
Mirage f1/V/III


Not Included, under development LCA Tejas, J20, J31, BAE Mantis, GA Avenger, Mig 35 OVT, Su 37, F35, PAKFA, AMCA, FXX,
 
.
Th ere is perhaps no better evidence of the Gripen’s combat virtues than its
aerodynamic performance. Although the aircraft’s top-end speed is limited in
comparison to the MiG-35, the Typhoon, and the F-16IN, it remains in the
same class as the Rafale and the F/A-18E/F. But more importantly, of all the
fi ghters competing in the MMRCA race, no aircraft has a better sustained turn
performance than the Gripen. Its aerodynamically clean design gives it a decisive
advantage over the Eurofi ghter, Rafale, and MiG-35 in any turning fi ght at
84 DOGFIGHT! | ASHLEY J. TELLIS
lower altitudes, but much smaller benefi ts over the F-16IN (without conformal
fuel tanks) and the F/A-18E/F. Th e Gripen’s advantages in sustained turning
performance diminish at higher altitudes, but it still remains superior to every
other aircraft in the MMRCA
competition. Its instantaneous
turn performance, in contrast,
generally falls below that of its
competitors (with the exception
of the F-16, when equipped with
conformal fuel tanks), but its
bleed rates are also dramatically
smaller, thus permitting it to
preserve its energy and get back
more rapidly into the fight.


http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/dogfight.pdf


Gripen is a hell of a fighter for a single engine jet also
 
.
My personal choice for Top 10 fighter aircrafts
1)F-22
2)Pak Fa/fgfa
3)F-35
4)J-20
5)Rafale
6)Eurofighter Typhoon
7)Su-35
8)Saab gripen/J-10
9)Su-30 mk
10)Mig 29
reason i placed f-22 is on top coz it's technically lot superior on
2nd spot i placed pak- fgfa coz after F-22 probably fgfa is the best in comparision to others 3rd spot for F-35 reason is simple its proven though it is difficult to maintain and lot of doubt about it brought it to 3rd spot
4th place chinese mighty j-20 as much i gathered details about it according to that i found it lil better than f-35 but still lot of speculation and secrecy brought it to 4th and
5th spot for Rafale though as it has everytime proved its worth compared to gripen and typhoon , typhoon is next best to rafale so it is on 6th spot
then goes su-35 gripen/j-10, su-mk, mig 29:smokin:
 
.
A-10 is a CAS air craft not a dedicated ground attack aircraft.

Rafale equivalent to f-16 block 52+ !!! :woot:

More or less.

How come it defeat F-16 block60 in MRCA deal? We are screwed :tsk:

Because, Americans refused transfer of technology of critical components to India, PAF has the same aircraft and is one of the top few F-16 users who actually have used F-16s in combat both in air and ground for around 30 years. F-16 Block-60/70 by far was the BEST air craft in MMRCA, even better than the current Typhoon.
 
.
More or less.

Because, Americans refused transfer of technology of critical components to India, PAF has the same aircraft and is one of the top few F-16 users who actually have used F-16s in combat both in air and ground for around 30 years. F-16 Block-60/70 by far was the BEST air craft in MMRCA, even better than the current Typhoon.

On what basis are you claiming that F16 a light fighter with single engine is on par with heavy weight Typhoon and Rafale with two engines and latest advanced technology??
 
.
A-10 is a CAS air craft not a dedicated ground attack aircraft.



More or less.



Because, Americans refused transfer of technology of critical components to India, PAF has the same aircraft and is one of the top few F-16 users who actually have used F-16s in combat both in air and ground for around 30 years. F-16 Block-60/70 by far was the BEST air craft in MMRCA, even better than the current Typhoon.
Mate I understand you are biased towards the F16 but claiming it (even the latest blk 70pwhich PAF don't have) is better than the EFT and especially the Rafale is simply NOT true. Please give EXACT reaoning behind this absurd logic.
 
.
Mate I understand you are biased towards the F16 but claiming it (even the latest blk 70pwhich PAF don't have) is better than the EFT and especially the Rafale is simply NOT true. Please give EXACT reaoning behind this absurd logic.

I, don't engage in debates with people who hold preconceived notions that cant be changed.
 
.
On what basis are you claiming that F16 a light fighter with single engine is on par with heavy weight Typhoon and Rafale with two engines and latest advanced technology??

1: Typhoon and Rafale are NOT heavy weight fighters, they and F-16s are all Medium weight category.
2: F-16s offered to India, were far more advanced in technology than both Rafale and Typhoons
3: F-16s are PROVEN - Typhoons and Rafale are still paper tigers.
4: F-16s offered to India were, coming with AESA on flyway costs.
5: F-16s can perform 3 sorties in 24 hours with LOWEST turn around time,maintenance and the LOWEST launch intervals = Reduced response time.
6: F-16s had low operating costs against Rafale and Typhoons.
7: Excellent TWR
8: Excellent and PROVEN Multirole - CAS -CAP - CAC- SEAD capabilities.
9: Excellent fuel to loiter ratio.
10: F-16s have more than one supplier of spare parts which is not the case with Rafale or Typhoons.

India bought Rafales because of political reasons, F-16 Block-70 specs was by far the most potent platform available on MMRCA competition, i am glad IAF won't have hands on it now.
 
.
1: Typhoon and Rafale are NOT heavy weight fighters, they and F-16s are all Medium weight category.
2: F-16s offered to India, were far more advanced in technology than both Rafale and Typhoons
3: F-16s are PROVEN - Typhoons and Rafale are still paper tigers.
4: F-16s offered to India were, coming with AESA on flyway costs.
5: F-16s can perform 3 sorties in 24 hours with LOWEST turn around time,maintenance and the LOWEST launch intervals = Reduced response time.
6: F-16s had low operating costs against Rafale and Typhoons.
7: Excellent TWR
8: Excellent and PROVEN Multirole - CAS -CAP - CAC- SEAD capabilities.
9: Excellent fuel to loiter ratio.
10: F-16s have more than one supplier of spare parts which is not the case with Rafale or Typhoons.

India bought Rafales because of political reasons, F-16 Block-70 specs was by far the most potent platform available on MMRCA competition, i am glad IAF won't have hands on it now.

You have listed F16 capabilities, but does not provide any proof that they are better than what the other two planes have to offer interms of avionics, aerodynmaic performance (TWR, MTOW etc).
 
.
You have listed F16 capabilities, but does not provide any proof that they are better than what the other two planes have to offer interms of avionics, aerodynmaic performance (TWR, MTOW etc).

Read and bring any specific questions that i may answer.
 
.
1. F22 .... that's it... beats the crap out of everything else :)
 
. . . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom