What's new

To say RSS killed Gandhi is like saying Tamils killed your father: Sharp response to Rahul Gandhi Re

salimpheku

BANNED
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
1,355
Reaction score
-6
Country
India
Location
Sweden
http://www.oneindia.com/india/to-sa...r-sharp-response-to-rahul-gandhi-2510724.html

Rahul Gandhi never fails to bring up the RSS link to Mahatma Gandhi's killing. However this time he has got a sharp response from Mahatma Gandhi's great grandson, Shrikrishna Kulkarni.


In an open letter posted on his Facebook page, Kulkarni says, to say RSS killed Gandhi is like saying Tamils killed your father. Kulkarni's mother is Mahatma Gandhi's third son Ramdas Gandhi's daughter. She was married to G R Kulkarni. He says that the Congress should accept the verdict of the various commissions. "So please stop this charade, stop this opportunistic usage of the Gandhi name. You are not from the Gandhi family. You have fooled too many people for too long in India. Stop it now." Somebody from the Gandhi family has to call their bluff, he also said. To keep harping that the RSS killed Gandhi is akin to saying the Tamils killed your father, which would be such a petty falsehood, isn't it? A couple of guys don't make for a community..." he also wrote. Read the entire letter here:
 
.
To keep harping that the RSS killed Gandhi is akin to saying the Tamils killed your father

Keep Tamils out of your internal squabbles. We do not care what happens between RSS and Congress. Both of you are our enemies. Thank you.
 
. . . .
you will find that the letter has been released only in 1 India and similar websites. After sometime person who wrote the letter will disown.

Was it an ideology that killed Gandhi or a person? If that holds true for him it must hold true for Rajiv Gandhi as well.
 
.
Was it an ideology that killed Gandhi or a person? If that holds true for him it must hold true for Rajiv Gandhi as well.

The ideology of Tamil Togers killed Rajiv, ideology of the proto RSS orgs killed Gandhi.
 
. . . .
an ideology that emerges as a reaction to another one is by nature an inferior ideology.
you Logic nothing To do with reality and logic And law of nature
RSS Emerges as a Reaction of Muslims division of india for their promised land RSS Just reciprocating same for Hindus

Its good for Muslims that there is no provision of referendum in Constitution

If It was hindus Must have opted for Different land

This Is Why I like of Muhammad ali Jinnah he was Realist and logical Person Not like delusional Nehru And Gandhi

In Muhammad ali Jinnah All India Muslim League presidential address delivered in Lahore, on 22 March 1940, he explained:

It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. They are not religions in the strict sense of the word, but are, in fact, different and distinct social orders, and it is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality, and this misconception of one Indian nation has troubles and will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, litterateurs. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state.


It seems Jinnah already has vision for future to come I respect Him for Saying bitter truth Not like dubious Nehru
 
.
Ideology RSS is just reaction to Ideology of Jinnah irony is that 90 % of the Muslims favored this ideology

RSS came into existence in 1925
Jinnah demanded separate country in 1940

Don't blame sh!t of this terrorist organization on our founding fathers.
 
.
you Logic nothing To do with reality and logic And law of nature
RSS Emerges as a Reaction of Muslims division of india for their promised land RSS Just reciprocating same for Hindus

Its good for Muslims that there is no provision of referendum in Constitution

If It was hindus Must have opted for Different land

This Is Why I like of Muhammad ali Jinnah he was Realist and logical Person Not like delusional Nehru And Gandhi

In Muhammad ali Jinnah All India Muslim League presidential address delivered in Lahore, on 22 March 1940, he explained:

It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. They are not religions in the strict sense of the word, but are, in fact, different and distinct social orders, and it is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality, and this misconception of one Indian nation has troubles and will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, litterateurs. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state.

what happened to 'realistic and pragmatic' Jinnah's cuntry is open for all to see. A country that was born out of division found other ways to divide itself after independence- Bengali vs Pakistani, Mohajir vs others etc. India, born out of fruity idealism grew stronger and stronger- the entire population of millions who came to India absorbed without a trace in less than 10 years. I can quote several other ways in which pragmatic Jinnah ended up sabotaging the future of his country too.
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom