What's new

To protest Modi, these Indians are cooking beef in public

CAD

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 9, 2017
Messages
608
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
DSC_0492.jpg


A man named Brother Ummer serves a beef dish to a line of hungry people at Kozhikode’s beach. (Vidhi Doshi/The Washington Post)
By Vidhi Doshi June 6

KOZHIKODE, India — As soon as the evening call to prayer sounded over Kozhikode, a line formed along the esplanade. Volunteers started heaping food onto plates, cautious to keep the beef-to-rice ratio low, making sure there was enough to go around.

One man took out his smartphone to film the action; videos of beef-eating have been doing well on Facebook recently. News cameras from local stations zoomed in on the slogans plastered on a nearby screen that read: “Our food our choice.”

In this sleepy, palm-fringed city in southern India, eating beef has become a political act. On May 23, the Indian government introduced new anti-animal-cruelty rules, restricting the sale of cattle in markets. The move was widely interpreted as an attempt to close in on the country’s thriving beef industry, in line with right-wing Hindu ideology, according to which the cow is considered holy.

Some think the new rules are too draconian. For the past week here in the southern state of Kerala, people have gathered with pots and pans and firewood to cook beef and share it with strangers in the streets, a convivial form of protest. Many Hindus, who usually avoid cooking or eating beef, have joined the feasts.

At stake is the country’s $4.3 billion beef industry, which provides 23 percent of the world’s beef exports. Since the government’s new rules were introduced, global beef prices have shot up, and major brands such as Prada and Armani, which source leather from India, are concerned about the stability of their supply chains.


Small-time beef and leather traders will bear the brunt in India. Most of them are Muslims and lowest-caste Dalits — the people once called “untouchables” — since Hindus historically considered these jobs “unclean.” According to Jayakumari Devika, associate professor and historian at the Center for Development Studies in Kerala, the rules will allow large supermarket chains to control supply.

“Beef will become scarce,” she said, “at least for the time being.”

But for many in Kerala, the rules are more than an economic blunder. To them, they epitomize the arrogance of Hindu politicians in faraway New Delhi.

“For you in the north, beef may be food,” said Muhais Mohammed, one of those at a protest feast on Kozhikode’s beach. “For us, it is a deep-seated emotion.”

Since the election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, cow ambulances, cow hostels and even a system of ID cards for tracking cows have been introduced in veneration of the sacred animal. This bovine obsession hints at a bigger lurch toward the right in the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Protecting the “gau mata” — the cow mother — has long been on the agendas of Hindu supremacist groups such as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, which has close links to the BJP and its ruling elite. In Hindu tradition, eating beef is considered unscrupulous, to be left to the morally inferior.

Many say that the Modi government’s anti-beef rhetoric has gone too far. Some argue it is emboldening bands of cow protectors, known to maul and even kill people suspected of carrying beef. In 2015, a mob dragged a man named Mohammad Akhlaq out of bed and beat him to death because they suspected he had slaughtered a calf. In recent months, a man was harassed because he was suspected of carrying a bag made of cowhide. In another case, a dairy farmer transporting cattle from a market to his village was killed.

For Keralans, the Hinduism of the north is unrecognizable. Hindus here coexist peacefully with sizable Muslim and Christian minorities. They consider themselves ethnically and culturally different from those in the north. Beef is a staple of the local cuisine and culture. Even the state BJP here breaks with its northern allies on the issue; the state party promised better-quality beef in a recent election campaign.


“Public education in Kerala plays a big role in creating harmony,” said Biju Lal, a legal clerk and a Hindu who joined Muslims on the beach. Kerala’s ruling Communist Party has championed state education for decades, and government schools are attended by children from all social strata, encouraging communal mixing from an early age.

“There are historical reasons, too,” Lal added. “Partition probably left a bigger mark in the north,” referring to the separation of India and Pakistan in 1947 and the subsequent sectarian violence between Hindus and Muslims.

Since the ban, the hashtag #dravidanadu has trended on Twitter, calling for south India to break off from the north. In the neighboring state of Tamil Nadu, students at the elite Indian Institute of Technology Madras wore black and ate meat in front of news cameras.

At one beef party, an ox was slaughtered, and the video was shared online. Right-wing parties retaliated, throwing milk parties of their own and carrying out vigilante attacks against protesters.

On Kozhikode’s beach, the feast lasted less than an hour, long enough to scrape a large pot of curry bare.

Danish Subair was traveling with his cousin through the city when he came across the celebration. “We also brought beef with us in our bag,” he said. “Everyone in Kerala is eating beef now. I have a friend who is a big BJP supporter. Even he posted on Facebook yesterday about how much he loves beef.”

Taking cues from the south, states in eastern India are crying foul, too. In West Bengal, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, a fierce critic of Modi, said that the government’s passage of the rules using anti-animal-cruelty laws was underhanded and amounted to federal interference in state decisions. In Arunachal Pradesh, where the vast majority of people eat beef, Padi Richo, leader of the opposition Congress party, said the move was “dictatorial.” “Even China doesn’t do that,” he said.

Modi, a strict vegetarian, spoke often about cow protection during his election campaign in 2014. One of his slogans was “Vote Modi, give life to the cow.”

In office, Modi has attempted to distance himself from the party’s far right and position himself as a modern, business-friendly statesman who can open India up to the world. In 2016, he condemned overzealous cow protectors as “anti-social elements.”

But spurred by a recent electoral triumph in state elections, the BJP has become increasingly nationalistic.

World News Alerts

Breaking news from around the world.



In Uttar Pradesh, a hard-line Hindu cleric named Yogi Adityanath was appointed as chief minister and immediately launched a crackdown on illegal slaughterhouses, strangling the state’s booming beef industry.
He also initiated “anti-Romeo” squads to crack down on Western-style public displays of affection.

Arun Jaitley, the national minister of finance, suggested the beef protests were an overreaction to the government’s rules. He said state laws would remain in effect.

The BJP, already weak in the south, is showing signs that it is alarmed by Kerala’s reaction. Party President Amit Shah swooped in over the weekend to do damage control, meeting with church leaders and party loyalists.

But for some, the government’s efforts to restrict access to beef are a sign of darker things to come. Referring to the largest ethnic group in Kerala, Devika said, “Beef has been a part of Malayali culture for many centuries. If there was a move to deny something very normal to you, wouldn’t you protest?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...24ad94170ab_story.html?utm_term=.5d5b9189a6b2
 
. .
This cow issue is a pretty good way to control public opinion over a not-so-serious issue.

I shall dub thee "Bovine Diversion".
A term that identifies the diversion of public focus away from important issues towards issues that are of little material importance but high emotional importance while continuing to retain full control of the situation where normalcy can be achieved quickly and effectively using simple means.

Also read: Diversionary War
 
. .
DSC_0492.jpg


A man named Brother Ummer serves a beef dish to a line of hungry people at Kozhikode’s beach. (Vidhi Doshi/The Washington Post)
By Vidhi Doshi June 6

KOZHIKODE, India — As soon as the evening call to prayer sounded over Kozhikode, a line formed along the esplanade. Volunteers started heaping food onto plates, cautious to keep the beef-to-rice ratio low, making sure there was enough to go around.

One man took out his smartphone to film the action; videos of beef-eating have been doing well on Facebook recently. News cameras from local stations zoomed in on the slogans plastered on a nearby screen that read: “Our food our choice.”

In this sleepy, palm-fringed city in southern India, eating beef has become a political act. On May 23, the Indian government introduced new anti-animal-cruelty rules, restricting the sale of cattle in markets. The move was widely interpreted as an attempt to close in on the country’s thriving beef industry, in line with right-wing Hindu ideology, according to which the cow is considered holy.

Some think the new rules are too draconian. For the past week here in the southern state of Kerala, people have gathered with pots and pans and firewood to cook beef and share it with strangers in the streets, a convivial form of protest. Many Hindus, who usually avoid cooking or eating beef, have joined the feasts.

At stake is the country’s $4.3 billion beef industry, which provides 23 percent of the world’s beef exports. Since the government’s new rules were introduced, global beef prices have shot up, and major brands such as Prada and Armani, which source leather from India, are concerned about the stability of their supply chains.


Small-time beef and leather traders will bear the brunt in India. Most of them are Muslims and lowest-caste Dalits — the people once called “untouchables” — since Hindus historically considered these jobs “unclean.” According to Jayakumari Devika, associate professor and historian at the Center for Development Studies in Kerala, the rules will allow large supermarket chains to control supply.

“Beef will become scarce,” she said, “at least for the time being.”

But for many in Kerala, the rules are more than an economic blunder. To them, they epitomize the arrogance of Hindu politicians in faraway New Delhi.

“For you in the north, beef may be food,” said Muhais Mohammed, one of those at a protest feast on Kozhikode’s beach. “For us, it is a deep-seated emotion.”

Since the election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, cow ambulances, cow hostels and even a system of ID cards for tracking cows have been introduced in veneration of the sacred animal. This bovine obsession hints at a bigger lurch toward the right in the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Protecting the “gau mata” — the cow mother — has long been on the agendas of Hindu supremacist groups such as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, which has close links to the BJP and its ruling elite. In Hindu tradition, eating beef is considered unscrupulous, to be left to the morally inferior.

Many say that the Modi government’s anti-beef rhetoric has gone too far. Some argue it is emboldening bands of cow protectors, known to maul and even kill people suspected of carrying beef. In 2015, a mob dragged a man named Mohammad Akhlaq out of bed and beat him to death because they suspected he had slaughtered a calf. In recent months, a man was harassed because he was suspected of carrying a bag made of cowhide. In another case, a dairy farmer transporting cattle from a market to his village was killed.

For Keralans, the Hinduism of the north is unrecognizable. Hindus here coexist peacefully with sizable Muslim and Christian minorities. They consider themselves ethnically and culturally different from those in the north. Beef is a staple of the local cuisine and culture. Even the state BJP here breaks with its northern allies on the issue; the state party promised better-quality beef in a recent election campaign.


“Public education in Kerala plays a big role in creating harmony,” said Biju Lal, a legal clerk and a Hindu who joined Muslims on the beach. Kerala’s ruling Communist Party has championed state education for decades, and government schools are attended by children from all social strata, encouraging communal mixing from an early age.

“There are historical reasons, too,” Lal added. “Partition probably left a bigger mark in the north,” referring to the separation of India and Pakistan in 1947 and the subsequent sectarian violence between Hindus and Muslims.

Since the ban, the hashtag #dravidanadu has trended on Twitter, calling for south India to break off from the north. In the neighboring state of Tamil Nadu, students at the elite Indian Institute of Technology Madras wore black and ate meat in front of news cameras.

At one beef party, an ox was slaughtered, and the video was shared online. Right-wing parties retaliated, throwing milk parties of their own and carrying out vigilante attacks against protesters.

On Kozhikode’s beach, the feast lasted less than an hour, long enough to scrape a large pot of curry bare.

Danish Subair was traveling with his cousin through the city when he came across the celebration. “We also brought beef with us in our bag,” he said. “Everyone in Kerala is eating beef now. I have a friend who is a big BJP supporter. Even he posted on Facebook yesterday about how much he loves beef.”

Taking cues from the south, states in eastern India are crying foul, too. In West Bengal, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, a fierce critic of Modi, said that the government’s passage of the rules using anti-animal-cruelty laws was underhanded and amounted to federal interference in state decisions. In Arunachal Pradesh, where the vast majority of people eat beef, Padi Richo, leader of the opposition Congress party, said the move was “dictatorial.” “Even China doesn’t do that,” he said.

Modi, a strict vegetarian, spoke often about cow protection during his election campaign in 2014. One of his slogans was “Vote Modi, give life to the cow.”

In office, Modi has attempted to distance himself from the party’s far right and position himself as a modern, business-friendly statesman who can open India up to the world. In 2016, he condemned overzealous cow protectors as “anti-social elements.”

But spurred by a recent electoral triumph in state elections, the BJP has become increasingly nationalistic.

World News Alerts

Breaking news from around the world.



In Uttar Pradesh, a hard-line Hindu cleric named Yogi Adityanath was appointed as chief minister and immediately launched a crackdown on illegal slaughterhouses, strangling the state’s booming beef industry.
He also initiated “anti-Romeo” squads to crack down on Western-style public displays of affection.

Arun Jaitley, the national minister of finance, suggested the beef protests were an overreaction to the government’s rules. He said state laws would remain in effect.

The BJP, already weak in the south, is showing signs that it is alarmed by Kerala’s reaction. Party President Amit Shah swooped in over the weekend to do damage control, meeting with church leaders and party loyalists.

But for some, the government’s efforts to restrict access to beef are a sign of darker things to come. Referring to the largest ethnic group in Kerala, Devika said, “Beef has been a part of Malayali culture for many centuries. If there was a move to deny something very normal to you, wouldn’t you protest?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...24ad94170ab_story.html?utm_term=.5d5b9189a6b2

Oh really?
Next donot cry when a South Indian faces discrimnation in North.
Of Course Centre dont have any right to tell what to eat or drink.
But killing a cattle in front of public and thus hyper response of beef fest will only aggravate the anger of North Indians .
If Keralites want their own so called rights then they have to stop begging the Centre each and every time for monetory help .

The money they are giving us is also have the fair share of taxes of North Indians .
So in a democratic nation like India you have to respect others sentiments and beliefs also .
If you dont respect them they also wont respect you.
The killing of all this cattle in the name of beef fest was for nothing .They didnt ban the slaughter ,they are only regulating it .
 
.
Oh really?
Next donot cry when a South Indian faces discrimnation in North.
Of Course Centre dont have any right to tell what to eat or drink.
But killing a cattle in front of public and thus hyper response of beef fest will only aggravate the anger of North Indians .
If Keralites want their own so called rights then they have to stop begging the Centre each and every time for monetory help .

The money they are giving us is also have the fair share of taxes of North Indians .
So in a democratic nation like India you have to respect others sentiments and beliefs also .
If you dont respect them they also wont respect you.
The killing of all this cattle in the name of beef fest was for nothing .They didnt ban the slaughter ,they are only regulating it .

In a real democracy you are allowed to protest peacefully!
Eating beef in public is protest peacefully, even if you get butt hurt over it.
 
.
In a real democracy you are allowed to protest peacefully!
Eating beef in public is protest peacefully, even if you get butt hurt over it.

What protest?What was their complaint for this bogus protest?
Did they ban the beef?
In a democracy your rights dont have anytype of monopoly in Constitution.In democracy you have to consider the beliefs of others .
This is not a peaceful protest ,this is just arrogance .Thats all.
I know what I am talking since I am a Keralite
 
. .
Isn't mao already dead?
Unless there are clones of mao aka mini-mao's running around...;)
Lmao, RSSers' logics is hilarious... national average of 82?
Time to eat some holy beef to enlargen brain volume!
 
Last edited:
. .
IIT Madras scholar Keralite Sooraj R was brutally attacked by North Indian RSS goons in Tamilnadu just by admitting he eats beef

615035_thump.jpg




Again .Some people dont like when you question their religious beliefs and emotions .
Some will criticize ,some will attack and some will bomb them.
I wont support this act .
But you should also consider others emotion.
 
.
Again .Some people dont like when you question their religious beliefs and emotions .
Some will criticize ,some will attack and some will bomb them.
I wont support this act .
But you should also consider others emotion.

All he has is a shiner to the eye and everyone is pretending he got cancer from the hit.
Imagine if I got drip and wheel chair every time I got a shiner :D

But then drama is the forte of these liberal chaps.
 
.
What protest?What was their complaint for this bogus protest?
Did they ban the beef?
In a democracy your rights dont have anytype of monopoly in Constitution.In democracy you have to consider the beliefs of others .
This is not a peaceful protest ,this is just arrogance .Thats all.
I know what I am talking since I am a Keralite

You have NO IDEA what democracy is.
Like Holy crap, you think Democracy is fascism by the majority.
In a real democracy, people have the right to peacefully demonstrate. And you have the right to call it bogus, but you don't have the right to stop them.

You can be all the Keralite you want, but you have NO IDEA what you are talking about.
 
.
HATEFUL MESSAGE TO MUSLIMS
Beef ban to cause huge economic loss

Vijay Prashad
AlterNet


The Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, signed a new rule against the slaughter of cattle and the eating of beef (Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Regulation of Livestock Market, Rules 2017). It is highly unlikely that these rules were framed to protect animals. The original act—the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960—permits the humane slaughter of animals for food.
The new rule goes against the letter of the original act, and does so for religious and mischievous reasons rather than on ethical grounds for the sake of the animals.

‘The slaughter ban is anti-cow’
The order came just before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Muslim families who fast during the day often eat meat late in the evening. Given the predisposition of this government and its parent organization—the fascistic RSS—it is more than likely that the order came on the heels of Ramadan to send a message to India’s 120 million Muslims.

But of course the majority of Indians have no moral problem with the consumption of beef or any other kind of meat, says Indian journalist P. Sainath. A look at the most recent Census shows that more than 42 percent of the Indian population are Dalits, Muslims, Adivasis, Christians and Sikhs. None of these populations are particularly put off by the consumption of meat, with some of these populations reliant upon beef in their diet. If you add in the tens of millions of Hindus in states such as Kerala, Goa and Manipur who eat beef, then the numbers inch up to half the population. “How little we know about beef and the role of beef in our society,” Sainath tells me.

The order from Modi not only impacts those who eat beef, but also will have a detrimental impact on the leather industry and the meat producers (who not only provide for the domestic market, but also for overseas markets).The leather industry is valued at $17.8 billion and takes care of almost all of India’s footwear needs and provides raw materials for the pharmaceutical industry.

The beef ban, which has been in effect in several states already, has had an impact on livestock holdings. Farmers no longer want to own cattle, afraid that when the animals age there will be no resale value for them. The livestock census shows that those states with bans on cow slaughter have seen a decline in livestock. Those states with no decline on cow slaughter, on the other hand, have seen their numbers of cows either remain the same or rise. As P. Sainath told me, “The cow slaughter ban is anti-cow.”

Govt. supports vigilante groups
Sainath knows a great deal about cows. He has been studying the social impact of changes in rural India for over 30 years. In his first major book, Everybody Loves a Good Drought (1996), Sainath tells the story of how rural development specialists attempted to bring in foreign cows to replace Indian cows in the Kalahandi district of Odisha. In the attempt to provide relief to the rural areas, the well-meaning but deluded development specialists castrated the local Khariar bulls and left the locals worse off than before. “I have five cows and I buy milk daily from the market,” Bishwamber Joshi told Sainath.

Concern for the cow, the bull and the buffalo has rarely been central in India. Even those sections of the hard right that are eager to demonstrate their religious piety toward the cow do not often know what they are doing. Shelters for cows they capture are poorly run. News reports frequently appear of cows dying in large numbers in these shelters (gaushalas).

Over the course of this year, cow vigilante groups have lynched people who seem to be taking cows to the slaughterhouse. Brutality against these poor men and women, often Muslims or Dalits, has been captured on cell phone videos. It initially startled the public, but now, like so much of this kind of violence, has ceased to provoke revulsion. Meanwhile, the cows who were being led to market or to the slaughterhouse disappear from the story. What happens to them? It is not relevant. What is relevant is that the men who do the violence focus more on those vulnerable men and women than on the purported focus of their attention: the cow.

The government’s decision to push the beef ban in the context of these lynching only emboldens such vigilante violence. It means that the government gives immunity to such actions; in fact, encourages them in future. It also shows such vigilante groups that the government is on their side and does not see their actions as outside the bounds of democratic society.

Provinces oppose ban
From Kerala, where the Left Democratic Front government has just completed its first year, the Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan wrote a letter to the Indian Prime Minister. Vijayan, a leader of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), posted this letter on his Facebook page. Meat, wrote Vijayan, “is the primary source of protein for millions of poor and ordinary people in this country”— 780 million of whom live in deprivation. “People of all faiths consume meat in our country, not just the minorities. Once the prohibition comes into effect,” he continued, “it will not only deprive them of adequate nutrition, but also prevent the availability of raw material for the leather industry.” These orders, he wrote, “prove to be a challenge in upholding our plurality, the essence of our nation.”

Left activists, led by the Students Federation of India (SFI), held beef festivals, where they cooked beef and then shared their food in public. In Kerala, these festivals went by largely without any tension. In Bangalore, the hard right came to challenge the students, who were all arrested. In Chennai, one student, Sooraj, was badly beaten by supporters of the hard right at the Indian Institute of Technology (Madras). These activists, led by the students, are making a public declaration that they all resist the government’s orders.

The Kerala State Secretary of the SFI, M. Vijin, said that the government “should be concerned about whether people have enough nutritious food to eat. Are they bringing this rule to remove poverty in Indian villages?” He points his finger toward the depleted agricultural system in the country and to the grave problems of starvation. But Vijin is also concerned about the rights of people and the growing vigilante power in the country. “We will not allow this fascism to invade our kitchens,” Vijin says.

Vijay Prashad is professor of international studies at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut. He is the author of 18 books, including Arab Spring, Libyan Winter (AK Press, 2012), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South (Verso, 2013) and The Death of a Nation and the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016). His columns appear at AlterNet every Wednesday.

http://www.weeklyholiday.net/Homepage/Pages/UserHome.aspx?ID=5&date=0#Tid=14198
 
.
All he has is a shiner to the eye and everyone is pretending he got cancer from the hit.
Imagine if I got drip and wheel chair every time I got a shiner :D

But then drama is the forte of these liberal chaps.

Truth, justice, equality, empathy , diversity are not sanghis forte either

The PhD scholar in the Aerospace Engineering department lost partial vision in the eye and suffered multiple fractures

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nati...lars-eye-friend-says-event-not-beef-fest.html
 
.
Back
Top Bottom