Times of India: Pakistan must be destroyed!

[JackFell]

Are you human or you belong to some alien nation immune to nuclear fall out.

Wishing nuclear war means death wish for almost half of the world's population, loss of 75 percent of land mass, very large chunk of ozone layer vanishing, entering in nuclear summer day and winter night and ice age, food scarcity and many more.

You thinks by sitting in UK you will remain safe and sound, then you are highly mistaken. You and any living on this earth will face the harsh reality of nuclear fallout.

This is not WW2 era, it is 2020, more than 350 - 400 nuclear missiles and bombs and self propelled shells can cause unimaginable havoc and disaster, more than a billion population will be wiped out in first days of the nuclear war, but actual calamity will start in the form nuclear fall out due to 300 to 400 nuclear and thermonuclear explosions.

Do not brag about your high IQ and good physical appearance, these are all relative terms. Remember there was a time when whole Europe was in the dark age turmoil and at that time new Muslim nation was rising and finally become a force to reckon for the west. Muslim empires became the Centre of learning. In this world some rises and some falls. None can stay in one state or position.

At present Chinese nation is rising very rapidly and days are very near when western domination will become a part of history.

True about the rise and fall of civilisations.

Anyway, do India and Pakistan even really have nuclear capabilities? Both have only tested nuclear weapons a very small number of times, while states like China, the UK and France have tested dozens of times, and America/Russia hundreds of times. How do they know that the nuclear weapons will even work in combat?

 

[Marker]

Only Pakistanis, Afghans and Chechens will join that army. ALL OTHER Muslims will either hate this army or ridicule it.

No, only true believers and followers of Islam will remain the part of this army. This will be the army for which number of companions of holy Prophet salAllahu alayhi wasalam had wished to join, even few migrated and settled waiting for the Jehad call.

 

[CriticalThinker02]

A conflict between Pakistan and India literally means the end of civilisation. It will bring a Nuclear winter over the world that could last 3-5 years with crops falling to 10% where majority of mankind will die out of starvation. It would be the single greatest famine the world has ever seen.

rushing into this means 100% WW3 begins because the rest of the world would have to pick up arms and go to war with each other due to Nuclear winter and famine starvation while the supply chain will be disrupted completely no export and import anywhere. The whole world will go into flame.

Imo what China and the US is doing is preparing for this event silently until the time approaches and they know WW3 is unavoidable but once that door is opened it will not close until 70-80% of the current world population die and the world you know would change since post-WW3 would be vastly different with new countries and borders born alltogether with around 1-billion population max to 2-B starting life allover again.

There is a higher possibility Pakistan survives since they are more resilient then their Indian counter-parts cuz is gonna be a dog-fight. Some people will resort to eating a dog just to survive. The Indians are disjoined and not united people in tough critical times this will be there fall and undoing where a prophecy will come to be fullfilled

If we don't have the right to live on this earth, we will make sure no one does.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

No, only true believers and followers of Islam will remain the part of this army. This will be the army for which number of companions of holy Prophet salAllahu alayhi wasalam had wished to join, even few migrated and settled waiting for the Jehad call.

EXACTLY! But for all our faults, ONLY Pakistanis, Afghans and Chechens REALLY believe in Islam and have faith in Allah swt nowadays. All other Muslims have pretty much given up

Are you human or you belong to some alien nation immune to nuclear fall out.

Wishing nuclear war means death wish for almost half of the world's population, loss of 75 percent of land mass, very large chunk of ozone layer vanishing, entering in nuclear summer day and winter night and ice age, food scarcity and many more.

You thinks by sitting in UK you will remain safe and sound, then you are highly mistaken. You and any living on this earth will face the harsh reality of nuclear fallout.

This is not WW2 era, it is 2020, more than 350 - 400 nuclear missiles and bombs and self propelled shells can cause unimaginable havoc and disaster, more than a billion population will be wiped out in first days of the nuclear war, but actual calamity will start in the form nuclear fall out due to 300 to 400 nuclear and thermonuclear explosions.

Do not brag about your high IQ and good physical appearance, these are all relative terms. Remember there was a time when whole Europe was in the dark age turmoil and at that time new Muslim nation was rising and finally become a force to reckon for the west. Muslim empires became the Centre of learning. In this world some rises and some falls. None can stay in one state or position for ever.

At present Chinese nation is rising very rapidly and days are very near when western domination will become a part of history.

Just another deluded fantasist.

 

[CriticalThinker02]

I personally hope India and Pakistan engage in a full scale nuclear exchange soon. Could you imagine how much average world IQ would go up?

It would also help with the over population problem of South Asia, despite billions in IMF and World Bank loans and grants, both nations have failed to stop their population breeding like rabbits.

The biggest problem in the Third World right now is that of dsygenic fertility. As intelligence is likely to be be highly heritable, parents of a certain intelligence quotient give birth to children of similar intelligence. In the past before the Industrial Revolution, the weak would be sifted out of the population through natural selection, this explains why the populations who have evolved in cold climates like Europeans and North-East Asians are so smart and have so much accomplishment under their belts, while populations living in hotter environments where food and water is plentiful have less civilisational achievements.

Think about it, which environment would be tougher to survive and eventually transmit your genes in,nhot Africa or icy cold Northern Europe?

Since the Industrial Revolution however, this process has halted and even reversed. Due to Western aid and medical science, we know have much more weaklings surviving in Third World nations, this explains why Sikh soldiers of the past were so tall but now the Sikhs and other Indians/Pakistanis are short, to the extent that they are manlets and are on average the same height as Northern European females (this is why currycells are doomed to be virgins in the West and often turn to more sinister methods of scoring poontang.

View attachment 682341

An India-Pakistan nuclear exchange would be greatly beneficial to the world, as long as the nuclear exchange spares areas of great natural beauty like Kashmir and is mainly between major population centres only positive things would happen.

There is going to be great conflict on the subcontinent as well as in other high fertility areas like the MENA region and Sub-Saharan Africa, hence I am of the opinion that a nuclear war solve the problem in a more humane fashion.

Another big bonus of this would be that the Third World diaspora (who is on the whole more civilised and has a higher average IQ than the populace of its homeland due to elite immigration and better living conditions) could then make its way back to the Old Country and build it up using their higher IQs, this would also end racism in the West.

You know what is common between you and Lucifer, you were/are both racists, I don't think Lucifer would really count as a racist because he considered his own species to be superior to that of Humanity so I guess he would be considered a speciest or something anyways what I'm trying to say here is that you are a Satan in human garments.

 

[JackFell]

You know what is common between you and Lucifer, you were/are both racists, I don't think Lucifer would really count as a racist because he considered his own species to be superior to that of Humanity so I guess he would be considered a speciest or something anyways what I'm trying to say here is that you are a Satan in human garments.

Using the "r" word are we? South Asians are by far the most racist group on the planet, I pity the darker skinned South Asians who face colourism at the hands of the more Aryanised population.

I am not a racist, I am a race realist in that I recognise ethnic groups are more than just mere social constructs and instead also have a biological basis.

 

[CriticalThinker02]

Using the "r" word are we? South Asians are by far the most racist group on the planet, I pity the darker skinned South Asians who face colourism at the hands of the more Aryanised population.

I am not a racist, I am a race realist in that I recognise ethnic groups are more than just mere social constructs and instead also have a biological basis.

Regardless what anyone else beliefs, doesn't change the fact that you are a white supremacist racist and a scum on this earth.

 

[Marker]

True about the rise and fall of civilisations.

Anyway, do India and Pakistan even really have nuclear capabilities? Both have only tested nuclear weapons a very small number of times, while states like China, the UK and France have tested dozens of times, and America/Russia hundreds of times. How do they know that the nuclear weapons will even work in combat?

When the five super powers became nuclear states, nuclear technology was in its infancy. India performed its first nuclear test in 1974 (ironically code named: Smiling Buddah). After the Indian test, Pakistan was motivated to enter into the nuclear race and after Indian nuclear test in 1998 (interestingly this time code name was operation Shakti), Pakistan conducted five simultaneous nuclear test code named Chagai-I followed by another nuclear test Code name Chagai-II.

Chaghai-I nuclear tests max yield was 32 kilotons and Chagai-II nuclaer test yield was 15 kilotons.

Just by knowing the yield value, we can infer that Pakistan's know how in nuclear technology is highly advance. Our nuclear engineers are capable to make nuclear weapons below critical mass. That means that very small war heads can be made and placed in tactical battle missiles.

Apparently Pakistan nuclear doctrine is not to directly effect local population of adversary but focus on neutralizing nuclear and conventional war capabilities and crippling the support which include strategic infrastructures including power, transport, telecommunication, provision of water and sanitation and safe disposal of waste.

 

[JackFell]

Regardless what anyone else beliefs, doesn't change the fact that you are a white supremacist racist and a scum on this earth.

No point in living in denial

When the five super powers became nuclear states, nuclear technology was in its infancy. India performed its first nuclear test in 1974 (ironically code named: Smiling Buddah). After the Indian test, Pakistan was motivated to enter into the nuclear race and after Indian nuclear test in 1998 (interestingly this time code name was operation Shakti), Pakistan conducted five simultaneous nuclear test code named Chagai-I followed by another nuclear test Code name Chagai-II.

Chaghai-I nuclear tests max yield was 32 kilotons and Chagai-II nuclaer test yield was 15 kilotons.

Just by knowing the yield value, we can infer that Pakistan's know how in nuclear technology is highly advance. Our nuclear engineers are capable to make nuclear weapons below critical mass. That means that very small war heads can be made and placed in tactical battle missiles.

Apparently Pakistan nuclear doctrine is not to directly effect local population of adversary but focus on neutralizing nuclear and conventional war capabilities and crippling the support which include strategic infrastructures including power, transport, telecommunication, provision of water and sanitation and safe disposal of waste.

Tactical nukes are the way forward, nuclear artillery is particularly effective as it is devastating and has a very short travel time.

 

[CrazyZ]

Regardless what anyone else beliefs, doesn't change the fact that you are a white supremacist racist and a scum on this earth.

Greatest civilization achievement of the master race:

Blew themselves up in massive wars till nothing was left but rubble and 100's millions were killed. Were forced to abandon there empires and now lecture online about the dangers of overpopulation.

 

[Marker]

EXACTLY! But for all our faults, ONLY Pakistanis, Afghans and Chechens REALLY believe in Islam and have faith in Allah swt nowadays. All other Muslims have pretty much given up





Just another deluded fantasist.

Who knows. Time will tell. Past sinners and non-believers are converting into Islam. Allah is the best Planner.

 

[Dalit]

This Indian article is actually very reassuring. Everything we say and claim about India is justified in this article. This is not some article, but this is how RSS India thinks and wants to behave.

the Indian fear of a “two front war” needs to be tested

The question is, why isn't Hindustan testing this theory?

 

[Vikki]

Balls, that's why

Hindus are cowards

Hindus are not cowards...they are pragmatic,shrewd...we are not emotional like your bunch....just look into yourself and ask where your so called courage and veerta has landed your country.

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

Source: Times of India



Delenda Carthago Est, Cato the Elder used to urge the Roman Senate. “Carthage must be destroyed.” In 146BC, the Roman general Scipio Aemilianus razed Carthage to the ground and sold its entire population into slavery. Carthaginians were never again to trouble Rome again. The hour has come for India to echo Cato the Elder’s clarity. Pakistan must be destroyed.

India’s post-partition relations with Pakistan should have been as benign as they are with Iran, Afghanistan, and later Bangladesh, but they are not. Pakistan has waged war on India and driven devastating murderous religious wars in India continuously ever since it was born in 1947. Those who would have us believe that Pakistan has legitimate grievances against India say that Indian bullying and imperialism is the reason for the Indo-Pak conflict, and that a resolution of the Kashmir issue would bring peace. This is completely false.

Were Kashmir resolved to Pakistan’s satisfaction, the Islamic Republic would not lay down its arms. Its military would not leave the stage, the vast cadre of Jihad it has built would not disband. Instead, it would be taken as the triumph of the Mujahideen against the Hindu, and a validation of Pakistan’s ambitions, perseverance, and methods. Flushed with success, Pakistan would press the advantage with more separatist movements in India, more insurgencies, more narratives of the persecution of Muslims, to hammer wedges into the fault lines and fractures of the Indian Union till they widen beyond the capacity of the Indian state to heal them, leading ultimately to the break-up of the Republic of India.

Have no doubts about it. Pakistan is waging Jihad against India, it has been doing so since the moment of its creation, and it will never stop.

There are only two choices before us: One, pretend that it is not so, pretend that Pakistan has not created devastating socio-political crises for India, pretend that Pakistan is an ineffectual annoyance that can be endured for another 100 years and more.

Or two, face the reality that an enormously powerful organized machinery of Jihad sits astride the Sindhu River, in the heart of Ancient India, on this side of the Khyber Pass, constantly striving to shatter the Republic that the Hindus have built for themselves, unable to digest that the dominion of Islam over the Hindus has passed and determined to subdue the idolaters once more.

The reality is that we do not have the luxury to sit bunkered down and inactive, hoping to endure the next 70 years of Pakistan’s assault as we have endured it over the last 70. Pakistan is working overtime to revive the Khalistan movement and has made enormous strides in organizing Sikh communities in Canada and elsewhere, that are rooted in the villages of Punjab, towards a resurgence of Khalistani activism. Inactivity at this juncture will only leave Punjab aflame again in a few years, Hindu and Sikh conflict exploding. The youth of Kashmir can already be seen to have become radicalized and hateful of India beyond anything this author has seen hitherto, while the state administration has sat idle and inactive for over 15 years, letting Pakistani Islamist ideological cancer spread unchecked.

This cannot be allowed to continue. The security and continued existence of the Indian Republic depend on pushing the world of Mujahideen and Ghazis to the other side of the Khyber Pass and out of the Indian subcontinent, and exterminating the ideology and organizations of Jihad from the subcontinent. That requires the complete destruction of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Let’s have no illusions about this. There are no talks and treaties that can cleanse Pakistan of the obsession to wage Jihad upon the Hindus. If the Republic of India does not bring about the destruction of Pakistan, godfather of Jihad, then it cannot secure itself from the forces of Islamism that have been active in the subcontinent ever since Iqbal switched from “Sare Jahan se Accha Hindustan hamara” to “Muslim hain hum, Sara Jahan Hamara“.

The only question is whether India has the gumption, the cunning, and the will to do what is necessary. Our record is poor. In 1965, our forces reached Lahore and were called back. We could have solved the problem right then. There would have then been no Khalistan movement, no genocide in Bangladesh, no Kashmir problem, no KP refugees, no nuclear threat, and the hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens, soldiers and civilians, who have died because of Pakistan’s villainy would have been spared the horror.

In 1971, again Pakistan was saved because Indira Gandhi, her political position as an Iron Lady secured, preferred to throw away the victory won by our soldiers, rather than stand up to the Americans and finish the job once and for all.

The opinion of those in the know is that India’s military preparedness for a war with Pakistan is poor. Lt. General KJ Singh wrote in Times of India, “Pragmatically considering our current state of equipment and ammunition inventory, we seem to lack the decisive edge and requisite force asymmetry for a full scale conventional war”.

This ought not come as a surprise to anyone who understands the nature and mentality of politics and bureaucracy in India. Let’s be very clear on this: India has managed to hold off Pakistan for 70 years only because of our vast size advantage. Were Pakistan the same size as India in resources, population and economy, India would have ceased to exist decades ago. If we have held our ground, it is not because of any commitment, drive and competence on the part of our elected officials, bureaucrats, and diplomats.

Prime Minister Modi faces an overwhelming challenge in turning the ship of the Indian State to deal with the existential challenge of Pakistan. He is beset by an establishment that urges caution, talks, cool-headedness, limited action, constantly reminds him of the nuclear threat, the Chinese threat, while tying up India’s preparedness for war in committees, red tape and corruption.

Mr. Modi must understand that how India relates to Pakistan is a prisoner of an Indian establishment that would rather do nothing and has spent decades ensuring that nothing can be done. And he must figure out how this is to be changed so that India acquires and exercises military power advantage over Pakistan that is commensurate to India’s vastly greater resources.

More than anything, we need gumption. We need to switch from constantly fearing the consequences of any action we take, to boldly taking action that terrifies the enemy and drives him into anxiety and fear. “Surgical strikes” will not do. Pakistan’s strategy, from Mumbai to Pulwama, of filling our TV screens with the images of the blood and bodies of our people splattered across our streets, is a form of psychological terrorism straight out of the ISIS playbook. Killing a few Pakistani soldiers in the dark of night is not a meaningful response. Indian response to Pakistani military sponsored Jihadist terrorism should be scenes of corresponding carnage on Pakistani soil, scaled up from any act committed in India.

The attack on Pulwama should have been followed by a massive BrahMos missile barrage upon Hafiz Saeed’s compound in Muridke, near Lahore. If that would be an act of war, then let it be so. Or are we so afraid of war, and so deficient in cunning, that Pakistan can carry on brazenly without fear of Nuclear War but we can do nothing in return because we’re terrified of Nuclear War? Why is Pakistan not the slightest bit frightened of our nukes but we are paralyzed into inaction by theirs? It really all comes down to political and bureaucratic leadership that has never pushed itself to create and maintain India’s mastery in war and foreign relations. Let us remember that the US brought about the destruction of the USSR despite the threat of nuclear Armageddon. We have no choice but to achieve the same for Pakistan!

India’s international standing is weak. No one takes initiatives like the Quad seriously because no one has any expectation that India can be relied up to back up its allies with aggression and boldness when called upon. But if there was ever an American president who would back a bold and decisive play by India and provide political cover and resources, its Donald Trump. If there was ever a time that Britain can be pushed to support India internationally against state sponsors of terrorism, its now, as Britain looks to India for political, security and trade relationships in the post-Brexit scenario.

Let us also face the ghosts of 1962. China has never acted militarily against India in support of Pakistan. It provides economic, equipment and diplomatic advantages to Pakistan, but the Indian fear of a “two front war” needs to be tested. China has never come to Pakistan’s aid militarily, not in 1965, not in 1971, not in 1999. Realistically, it is virtually impossible that China would declare war on India, sink Indian ships, attack Indian bases were India to get tough with Pakistan. The Sino-Pakistan relationship is not so strong as to trip China into war when its own strategic calculus does not call for it. India must call Pakistan’s China bluff, or the fear of China will forever keep us afraid of dealing with Pakistan.

Let us be clear: If every such attack by Pakistan slips from the news after some minor and irrelevant response has been made, it will only be a matter of decades before Pakistan’s plans come to fruition, and the Indian Republic, paralyzed by inactivity, indifference and cowardice, does crack apart at the seams.

If that is not an outcome we want, Pakistan has to be destroyed and we have to gear up to make it happen. Starting now.





The article is old but still relevant , depicts the Indian mind sets. For those who think India wants peace.

These reports show that India is neither comparable to the traditional superpower, the US, nor to an emerging superpower, China. It is also not equal to a middle-power country like Japan or Germany. It is not even equivalent to its immediate neighbors Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Nepal in many development indicators.

 

[omegalamba7XL9]

Source: Times of India



Delenda Carthago Est, Cato the Elder used to urge the Roman Senate. “Carthage must be destroyed.” In 146BC, the Roman general Scipio Aemilianus razed Carthage to the ground and sold its entire population into slavery. Carthaginians were never again to trouble Rome again. The hour has come for India to echo Cato the Elder’s clarity. Pakistan must be destroyed.

India’s post-partition relations with Pakistan should have been as benign as they are with Iran, Afghanistan, and later Bangladesh, but they are not. Pakistan has waged war on India and driven devastating murderous religious wars in India continuously ever since it was born in 1947. Those who would have us believe that Pakistan has legitimate grievances against India say that Indian bullying and imperialism is the reason for the Indo-Pak conflict, and that a resolution of the Kashmir issue would bring peace. This is completely false.

Were Kashmir resolved to Pakistan’s satisfaction, the Islamic Republic would not lay down its arms. Its military would not leave the stage, the vast cadre of Jihad it has built would not disband. Instead, it would be taken as the triumph of the Mujahideen against the Hindu, and a validation of Pakistan’s ambitions, perseverance, and methods. Flushed with success, Pakistan would press the advantage with more separatist movements in India, more insurgencies, more narratives of the persecution of Muslims, to hammer wedges into the fault lines and fractures of the Indian Union till they widen beyond the capacity of the Indian state to heal them, leading ultimately to the break-up of the Republic of India.

Have no doubts about it. Pakistan is waging Jihad against India, it has been doing so since the moment of its creation, and it will never stop.

There are only two choices before us: One, pretend that it is not so, pretend that Pakistan has not created devastating socio-political crises for India, pretend that Pakistan is an ineffectual annoyance that can be endured for another 100 years and more.

Or two, face the reality that an enormously powerful organized machinery of Jihad sits astride the Sindhu River, in the heart of Ancient India, on this side of the Khyber Pass, constantly striving to shatter the Republic that the Hindus have built for themselves, unable to digest that the dominion of Islam over the Hindus has passed and determined to subdue the idolaters once more.

The reality is that we do not have the luxury to sit bunkered down and inactive, hoping to endure the next 70 years of Pakistan’s assault as we have endured it over the last 70. Pakistan is working overtime to revive the Khalistan movement and has made enormous strides in organizing Sikh communities in Canada and elsewhere, that are rooted in the villages of Punjab, towards a resurgence of Khalistani activism. Inactivity at this juncture will only leave Punjab aflame again in a few years, Hindu and Sikh conflict exploding. The youth of Kashmir can already be seen to have become radicalized and hateful of India beyond anything this author has seen hitherto, while the state administration has sat idle and inactive for over 15 years, letting Pakistani Islamist ideological cancer spread unchecked.

This cannot be allowed to continue. The security and continued existence of the Indian Republic depend on pushing the world of Mujahideen and Ghazis to the other side of the Khyber Pass and out of the Indian subcontinent, and exterminating the ideology and organizations of Jihad from the subcontinent. That requires the complete destruction of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Let’s have no illusions about this. There are no talks and treaties that can cleanse Pakistan of the obsession to wage Jihad upon the Hindus. If the Republic of India does not bring about the destruction of Pakistan, godfather of Jihad, then it cannot secure itself from the forces of Islamism that have been active in the subcontinent ever since Iqbal switched from “Sare Jahan se Accha Hindustan hamara” to “Muslim hain hum, Sara Jahan Hamara“.

The only question is whether India has the gumption, the cunning, and the will to do what is necessary. Our record is poor. In 1965, our forces reached Lahore and were called back. We could have solved the problem right then. There would have then been no Khalistan movement, no genocide in Bangladesh, no Kashmir problem, no KP refugees, no nuclear threat, and the hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens, soldiers and civilians, who have died because of Pakistan’s villainy would have been spared the horror.

In 1971, again Pakistan was saved because Indira Gandhi, her political position as an Iron Lady secured, preferred to throw away the victory won by our soldiers, rather than stand up to the Americans and finish the job once and for all.

The opinion of those in the know is that India’s military preparedness for a war with Pakistan is poor. Lt. General KJ Singh wrote in Times of India, “Pragmatically considering our current state of equipment and ammunition inventory, we seem to lack the decisive edge and requisite force asymmetry for a full scale conventional war”.

This ought not come as a surprise to anyone who understands the nature and mentality of politics and bureaucracy in India. Let’s be very clear on this: India has managed to hold off Pakistan for 70 years only because of our vast size advantage. Were Pakistan the same size as India in resources, population and economy, India would have ceased to exist decades ago. If we have held our ground, it is not because of any commitment, drive and competence on the part of our elected officials, bureaucrats, and diplomats.

Prime Minister Modi faces an overwhelming challenge in turning the ship of the Indian State to deal with the existential challenge of Pakistan. He is beset by an establishment that urges caution, talks, cool-headedness, limited action, constantly reminds him of the nuclear threat, the Chinese threat, while tying up India’s preparedness for war in committees, red tape and corruption.

Mr. Modi must understand that how India relates to Pakistan is a prisoner of an Indian establishment that would rather do nothing and has spent decades ensuring that nothing can be done. And he must figure out how this is to be changed so that India acquires and exercises military power advantage over Pakistan that is commensurate to India’s vastly greater resources.

More than anything, we need gumption. We need to switch from constantly fearing the consequences of any action we take, to boldly taking action that terrifies the enemy and drives him into anxiety and fear. “Surgical strikes” will not do. Pakistan’s strategy, from Mumbai to Pulwama, of filling our TV screens with the images of the blood and bodies of our people splattered across our streets, is a form of psychological terrorism straight out of the ISIS playbook. Killing a few Pakistani soldiers in the dark of night is not a meaningful response. Indian response to Pakistani military sponsored Jihadist terrorism should be scenes of corresponding carnage on Pakistani soil, scaled up from any act committed in India.

The attack on Pulwama should have been followed by a massive BrahMos missile barrage upon Hafiz Saeed’s compound in Muridke, near Lahore. If that would be an act of war, then let it be so. Or are we so afraid of war, and so deficient in cunning, that Pakistan can carry on brazenly without fear of Nuclear War but we can do nothing in return because we’re terrified of Nuclear War? Why is Pakistan not the slightest bit frightened of our nukes but we are paralyzed into inaction by theirs? It really all comes down to political and bureaucratic leadership that has never pushed itself to create and maintain India’s mastery in war and foreign relations. Let us remember that the US brought about the destruction of the USSR despite the threat of nuclear Armageddon. We have no choice but to achieve the same for Pakistan!

India’s international standing is weak. No one takes initiatives like the Quad seriously because no one has any expectation that India can be relied up to back up its allies with aggression and boldness when called upon. But if there was ever an American president who would back a bold and decisive play by India and provide political cover and resources, its Donald Trump. If there was ever a time that Britain can be pushed to support India internationally against state sponsors of terrorism, its now, as Britain looks to India for political, security and trade relationships in the post-Brexit scenario.

Let us also face the ghosts of 1962. China has never acted militarily against India in support of Pakistan. It provides economic, equipment and diplomatic advantages to Pakistan, but the Indian fear of a “two front war” needs to be tested. China has never come to Pakistan’s aid militarily, not in 1965, not in 1971, not in 1999. Realistically, it is virtually impossible that China would declare war on India, sink Indian ships, attack Indian bases were India to get tough with Pakistan. The Sino-Pakistan relationship is not so strong as to trip China into war when its own strategic calculus does not call for it. India must call Pakistan’s China bluff, or the fear of China will forever keep us afraid of dealing with Pakistan.

Let us be clear: If every such attack by Pakistan slips from the news after some minor and irrelevant response has been made, it will only be a matter of decades before Pakistan’s plans come to fruition, and the Indian Republic, paralyzed by inactivity, indifference and cowardice, does crack apart at the seams.

If that is not an outcome we want, Pakistan has to be destroyed and we have to gear up to make it happen. Starting now.





The article is old but still relevant , depicts the Indian mind sets. For those who think India wants peace.

Donald Trump Called India 'Filthy' in US Presidential Debate and Indians are Not Here For It - News18

'Look at India -- it's filthy. The air is filthy,' Trump said at the US Presidential debate in Nashville.

www.news18.com